あなたはPSM-III問題集を利用したら、いろいろ勉強できます。そうすれば、大会社に入って、高い給料を獲得できます。PSM-III問題集の合格率が高いので、PSM-III試験に落ちることを心配する必要がないです。数えられない程の受験者はPSM-III試験をパスしました。あなたはPSM-III問題集に興味を持たれば、Scrum会社のウエブサイトを訪問してください。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Scrum in the Organization | - Organizational Design and Culture - Scaling Scrum |
| Done and Undone Work | - Definition of Done |
| Facilitation and Coaching | - Facilitation - Coaching - Teaching |
| Product Backlog Management | - Backlog Refinement - Stakeholder Management |
| Scrum Theory and Empiricism | - Scrum Values - Complex adaptive systems - Empirical process control |
| The Scrum Framework | - Scrum Artifacts - Scrum Events - Scrum Roles |
PSM-III試験シミュレーションのコンテンツシステムは、専門家によって構築されています。 PSM-III学習教材のアフターサービスも専門家によって提供されます。製品の使用中に問題が発生した場合は、いつでも入手できます。 PSM-III準備の質問を選択すると、プロフェッショナルサービスにより、最適な方法でそれを使用し、それを最大限に活用し、最高の学習結果をもたらすことができます。弊社のPSM-III学習教材は、作成の最初の段階で、認定資格を取得するための専門的な態度を持っています。
質問 # 13
A Development Team, arguing it is self-organising, indicates it no longer needs the Daily Scrum; they collaborate throughout the day and they feel it has become a needless ritual.
正解：
解説：
A Development Team claiming self-organization as a reason to stop theDaily Scrumreflects a misunderstanding of bothself-managementand the purpose of Scrum events. As a Scrum Master, I would address this through teaching, coaching, and empiricism rather than enforcement.
Daily Scrum Is Mandatory in Scrum
First, it must be made clear that theDaily Scrum is a required Scrum event. The Scrum Guide defines it as a
15-minute event held every working day of the Sprint for the Developers. Choosing to eliminate it means the team isno longer practicing Scrum, regardless of how well they collaborate informally.
Self-Organization Does Not Mean Skipping Empiricism
Self-organizing (self-managing) teams decidehowto do the work, notwhetherto inspect and adapt. Scrum events exist to upholdempirical process control. The Daily Scrum specifically enables:
* Transparencyabout progress toward the Sprint Goal,
* Inspectionof the Sprint Backlog and current plan,
* Adaptationof work for the next 24 hours.
Informal collaboration throughout the day does not replace theshared, intentional inspection momentthat the Daily Scrum provides.
The Daily Scrum Is Not a Ritual or Status Meeting
If the Daily Scrum feels like a needless ritual, this is asignal that it is not being used correctly. It should not be a status report or a meeting for the Scrum Master or Product Owner. Instead, it is aplanning event for the Developers, focused on how to best achieve the Sprint Goal.
As a Scrum Master, I would coach the team toimprove the Daily Scrum, for example by:
* Centering the discussion on progress toward the Sprint Goal,
* Making impediments and risks explicit,
* Using different formats that suit the team's context.
Risks of Removing the Daily Scrum
Removing the Daily Scrum reducestransparencyand delays inspection and adaptation. Problems such as integration issues, misalignment, or threats to the Sprint Goal may surface too late, increasing risk and waste.
Over time, this undermines predictability and value delivery.
質問 # 14
During a retrospective, one of the more junior developers confesses he has a hard time getting his opinion heard. Whendiscussing the work to be done, the more experienced developers often don't let him finish his sentences or disregard what hehas to say. What Scrum Values are touched upon here?
正解：
解説：
The situation described directly touches on several coreScrum Values, which guide behavior and collaboration within Scrum Teams. In particular, the values ofCourage, Respect, and Opennessare most prominently involved.
First, the value ofCourageis demonstrated by the junior developer. Speaking up about feeling unheard, especially in front of more experienced colleagues, requires personal courage. Scrum encourages team members to be brave in raising difficult or uncomfortable issues so that problems can be addressed rather than ignored. Without courage, important impediments to collaboration and effectiveness would remain hidden.
Second, the situation highlights a lack ofRespectin team interactions. Scrum emphasizes that Scrum Team members respect each other as capable, independent individuals. Interrupting a colleague or disregarding their input-regardless of seniority-undermines this value. Respect is essential for effective collaboration and for creating an environment where all team members can contribute fully.
Third, the value ofOpennessis central to this scenario. Scrum Teams are expected to be open about challenges, feedback, and differing perspectives. Openness also means being receptive to ideas from all team members, independent of role, experience level, or background. Disregarding input from a junior developer contradicts Scrum's emphasis on openness and reduces the quality of decision-making.
質問 # 15
One of the Scrum events is the Sprint Review. How does the Sprint Review enable empiricism? What would the impact be if some members of the development team were not present?
正解：
解説：
TheSprint Reviewis a key Scrum Event that directly enablesempiricism, which is the foundation of Scrum.
Empiricism is based on making decisions using what is known, observed, and learned, supported by the pillars oftransparency, inspection, and adaptation. The Sprint Review operationalizes these pillars at the product level.
How the Sprint Review Enables Empiricism
First, the Sprint Review createstransparencyby making the current state of the product visible. During the event, the Scrum Team presents a"Done" Product Incrementthat meets the Definition of Done. Stakeholders can see and often use the actual product rather than relying on reports or assumptions. This shared visibility ensures that discussions are grounded in reality.
Second, the Sprint Review enablesinspection. The Scrum Team and stakeholders jointly inspect the Increment and assess progress toward product goals. The Developers provide context about what was delivered, what was not, and what challenges were encountered. This inspection is focused on outcomes and value, not individual performance.
Third, the Sprint Review supportsadaptation. Based on the inspection and feedback, new insights emerge about customer needs, market conditions, risks, and opportunities. The Product Owner uses this information to adapt the Product Backlog, reordering items, adding new work, or refining existing items. This completes the empirical feedback loop by ensuring future decisions are based on the latest evidence.
Impact of Development Team Members Not Attending the Sprint Review
If some Developers are not present at the Sprint Review, empiricism is weakened.
First,transparency decreases. Developers possess critical, first-hand knowledge about implementation details, technical trade-offs, constraints, and risks. Without their presence, stakeholders receive an incomplete picture of the Increment and its implications.
Second,inspection becomes less effective. Stakeholders may ask questions about behavior, limitations, or quality that only Developers can accurately answer. The absence of Developers limits meaningful dialogue and reduces the quality of inspection.
Third,adaptation suffers. Decisions about what to do next-such as changes to scope, priorities, or technical direction-depend on accurate understanding. Without Developers participating, adaptations to the Product Backlog may be based on assumptions rather than evidence, increasing the risk of poor decisions.
Finally, excluding Developers underminesScrum Values, particularlyRespect and Openness, by treating the Sprint Review as a reporting event rather than a collaborative working session. This can lead to disengagement and reduced shared ownership of product outcomes.
質問 # 16
You are a Scrum Master working with a Scrum Team. The Development Team constantly complain that requirements are not clear enough. The Product Owner claims she is too busy to provide extra clarity. What should you do?
正解：
解説：
This situation represents a breakdown inProduct Backlog transparency and collaboration, which directly threatens empiricism and value delivery. As a Scrum Master, my responsibility is not to solve the problem myself, but toenable the Scrum Team and the organization to resolve it.
1. Reframe the Problem: Requirements vs. Product Backlog
First, I would help both parties reframe the issue. In Scrum, we do not work with "requirements" in a traditional, fixed sense. Instead, we work with aProduct Backlog that is emergent, ordered, and continuously refined. Lack of clarity in Product Backlog Items means that the backlog is not in a usable state, which is an impediment to the Developers.
2. Make the Impact Transparent
Next, I would facilitate a conversation to make the impact of unclear backlog itemstransparent:
* Developers cannot reliably forecast work,
* Sprint Goals are put at risk,
* Rework and waste increase,
* Delivery of value slows down.
This conversation should involve the Product Owner and be grounded inevidence, not blame. The goal is shared understanding of the consequences, not assigning fault.
3. Reinforce Product Owner Accountability
The Scrum Guide is clear that theProduct Owner is accountable for maximizing value and for Product Backlog management, which includes ensuring that Product Backlog Items are clear, understood, and ordered. Being "too busy" does not remove this accountability. As a Scrum Master, I wouldcoach the Product Ownerto recognize that insufficient availability is itself an organizational impediment.
4. Enable Collaboration, Not Handoffs
At the same time, I would coach the Developers that clarity is oftenco-created, not simply provided. Scrum encourages close collaboration between Developers and the Product Owner. Techniques such as:
* Regular Product Backlog refinement,
* Joint discussions during Sprint Planning,
* Asking focused questions around the Sprint Goal,can significantly improve shared understanding without relying on detailed upfront specifications.
5. Address Organizational Constraints
If the Product Owner's lack of availability is due to organizational overload or competing responsibilities, this becomes asystemic impediment. In that case, the Scrum Master must raise this issue to the organization and help leadership understand that a Product Owner who is not sufficiently available puts product outcomes at risk.
質問 # 17
A Scrum Team has been working on a product for nine Sprints. A new Product Owner comes in, understanding he is accountable for the Product Backlog. However, he is unsure about his responsibilities.
Which two activities are part of the Product Owner role according to Scrum?
正解：
解説：
According to Scrum, theProduct Owneris accountable formaximizing the value of the productand for effectiveProduct Backlog management. Two key activities that are explicitly part of this role are:
1. Ordering the Product Backlog to Maximize Value
The Product Owner is responsible forordering the Product Backlogso that the most valuable work is done first. This ordering reflects:
* Business and customer value,
* Risk and uncertainty,
* Strategic goals and learning from previous Sprints.
Through this activity, the Product Owner ensures that the Scrum Team is always working on what matters most.
2. Ensuring Product Backlog Items Are Transparent, Clear, and Understood The Product Owner ensures that Product Backlog Items are:
* Clearly expressed,
* Transparent to the Scrum Team and stakeholders,
* Understood well enough for Developers to select them during Sprint Planning.
This does not mean writing detailed requirements alone, butcollaboratingso that shared understanding exists.
質問 # 18
......
PSM-III学習教材の練習試験や模擬試験はみんなにとって重要です。今のリビジョン条件はPSM-III試験に参加する良い機会です。したがって、レビュープランを調整するために、PSM-IIIの各練習問題を要約することが不可欠です。今、私たちはPSM-III実際試験を模擬するためにオンラインテストエンジンとWindowsソフトウェアを追加しました。
PSM-III参考書: https://www.it-passports.com/PSM-III.html