多くの候補者がCT-GenAIのソフトウェアテストエンジンに興味を持っています。 このバージョンはソフトウェアです。 オンラインでパソコンにダウンロードしてインストールした場合、他の電子製品にコピーしてオフラインで使用できます。 CT-GenAIのソフトウェアテストエンジンは非常に実用的です。 電話、iPadなどで使用できます。 いつでもどこでも勉強できます。 PDFバージョンと比較して、ISQI CT-GenAIのソフトウェアテストエンジンは、実際の試験シーンをシミュレートすることもできるため、実際の試験に対する気分を克服し、気軽に試験に参加できます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| LLM-Powered Test Infrastructure | 10% | - RAG, fine-tuning, and model adaptation - AI agents and integration with test tools - Architecture and deployment considerations |
| Introduction to Generative AI for Software Testing | 15% | - Capabilities and limitations relevant to testing - Core concepts: Generative AI, LLMs, foundation models - Use cases across the testing lifecycle |
| Deploying and Integrating GenAI in Test Organisations | 15% | - Measuring value and continuous improvement - Roles, skills, and team readiness - Strategy, governance, and adoption roadmap |
| Prompt Engineering for Effective Software Testing | 35% | - Prompt patterns for test design, data generation, automation - Iterative refinement and evaluation of prompts - Principles and structure of effective prompts |
| Managing Risks of Generative AI in Software Testing | 25% | - Validation, verification, and mitigation strategies - Data privacy, security, and compliance concerns - Hallucinations, bias, inaccuracy, and consistency risks |
当社の製品で使用されているテストソフトウェアは、WindowsのCT-GenAI学習教材に最適です。これにより、コンピューターで最高の学習スタイルを楽しむことができます。また、CT-GenAI認定ガイドでは、最新の科学技術を使用して、権威ある研究材料ネットワーク学習の新しい要件を満たしています。従来の学習方法とは異なり、CT-GenAI学習教材の大きな利点は、ユーザーが学習計画を柔軟に調整できることです。 CT-GenAIテスト問題の新しいデザインが、ユーザーの学習をより面白く、カラフルにすることを願っています。
質問 # 10
An LLM prioritizes tests using likelihood X impact but ranks a trivial tooltip change above a payment failure.
What defect does this MOST LIKELY show?
正解：C
解説：
This scenario describes a failure in the model's ability to apply logical weight to specific domain concepts, specifically in the context of Risk-Based Testing (RBT). When an LLM ranks a low-impact UI element (a tooltip) higher than a critical functional failure (payment processing), it demonstrates a "Reasoning error in risk calculation logic." While LLMs can follow formulas like $Risk = Likelihood \times Impact$, they may lack the deep semantic understanding of "Impact" within a specific business domain unless explicitly guided.
This is not necessarily a hallucination (Option C), as the model isn't necessarily inventing facts, but rather misapplying the logic of prioritization. It is also distinct from dataset bias (Option D), which would involve a systematic skewing across all outputs. In professional testing, this type of error highlights the necessity of
"human-in-the-loop" verification. Testers must review AI-generated prioritizations to ensure that the logical deductions align with the actual business risk and technical criticality of the features being tested.
質問 # 11
Which statement BEST describes vision-language models (VLMs)?
正解：B
解説：
Vision-Language Models (VLMs)represent a specialized subset of multimodal Large Language Models.
Their defining characteristic is the ability to process, understand, and reason across both textual and visual modalities simultaneously. In the field of software testing, VLMs are revolutionary because they allow the AI to "see" a User Interface (UI). A tester can provide a screenshot of a web page alongside a natural language prompt, and the VLM can identify UI elements, detect visual regressions, or even validate that the visual layout matches a design specification. They are not a "superset" (Option C) of multimodal AI, but rather a specific implementation of it focused on the intersection of sight and language. Unlike traditional OCR or pixel-comparison tools used in legacy UI automation (Option B), VLMs understand thecontextof what they see-for instance, identifying a "broken" button icon that a human would recognize but a rule-based script might miss. This integration of visual and textual data is what makes them a vital component of modern, AI- augmented Quality Assurance strategies.
質問 # 12
Your team needs to generate 500 API test cases for a REST API with 50 endpoints. You have documented 10 exemplar test cases that follow your organization's standard format. You want the LLM to generate test cases following the pattern demonstrated in your examples. Which of the following prompting techniques is BEST suited to achieve your goal in this scenario?
正解：D
解説：
Few-shot promptingis the technique of providing a few examples (exemplars) within the prompt to demonstrate the desired task and output format to the LLM. In this scenario, providing 10 existing, high- quality test cases acts as a "pattern" for the model to follow. This is significantly more effective than "Zero- shot prompting" (Option D), where the model is given a task without examples and may deviate from the specific organizational format required (e.g., specific JSON structures or assertion styles). While "Prompt chaining" (Option A) is useful for breaking down complex tasks into sub-tasks, the primary need here is pattern recognition and replication, which is the core strength of Few-shot learning. "Meta prompting" (Option C) involves having the AI write the prompt itself, which is unnecessary when the team already has clear examples. By using Few-shot prompting, the tester "conditions" the model's latent space to prioritize the provided format, ensuring that all 500 generated test cases maintain consistency with the HTTP methods, headers, and assertion logic defined in the exemplars.
質問 # 13
In the context of software testing, which statements (i-v) about foundation, instruction-tuned, and reasoning LLMs are CORRECT?
i. Foundation LLMs are best suited for broad exploratory ideation when test requirements are underspecified.
ii. Instruction-tuned LLMs are strongest at adhering to fixed test case formats (e.g., Gherkin) from clear prompts.
iii. Reasoning LLMs are strongest at multi-step root-cause analysis across logs, defects, and requirements.
iv. Foundation LLMs are optimal for strict policy compliance and template conformance.
v. Instruction-tuned LLMs can follow stepwise reasoning without any additional training or prompting.
正解：A
解説：
Understanding the hierarchy of LLM types is vital for selecting the right tool for specific testing tasks.
Foundation LLMsare trained on massive datasets to predict the next token; they excel at broad, creative
"ideation" (Statement i) but often struggle with following specific instructions or constraints (making Statement iv incorrect).Instruction-tuned LLMshave undergone additional training (Fine-tuning) to follow explicit commands and templates. They are highly effective at structured tasks like converting requirements into Gherkin feature files (Statement ii).Reasoning LLMs(or those utilizing specialized prompting like Chain- of-Thought) are designed to handle complex, multi-stage logic. This makes them the superior choice for diagnostic tasks like root-cause analysis, where the model must synthesize information across logs and requirements to find a defect's origin (Statement iii). Statement v is incorrect because while instruction-tuned models are capable, complex "stepwise reasoning" usually requires specific prompting techniques or the inherent logic of specialized reasoning models. Therefore, the combination of i, ii, and iii represents the correct alignment of model capability to testing functionality.
質問 # 14
Which AI approach requires feature engineering and structured data preparation?
正解：B
解説：
Classical Machine Learning(which includes algorithms like Random Forests, Support Vector Machines, and Linear Regression) is characterized by its reliance onFeature Engineering. This is the process where human experts manually select, extract, and transform raw data into a set of "features" or variables that the algorithm can process. For instance, in a classical ML model predicting software defects, a tester might have to manually define features like "lines of code changed" or "number of previous bugs." In contrast,Deep Learningand its subset,Generative AI(Options B and D), utilize "Representation Learning." This means the multi-layered neural networks automatically identify and extract the relevant features from raw, often unstructured data (like text or images) without explicit human instruction.Symbolic AI(Option A) is based on hard-coded logical rules rather than data-driven learning. Understanding this distinction is fundamental for testers, as it determines the level of data preparation required: Classical ML requires high human effort in data structuring, while GenAI requires high effort in prompt engineering and grounding.
質問 # 15
......
ISQI CT-GenAI認定試験の難しさで近年にほとんどの受験生は資格認定試験に合格しなっかたと良く知られます。だから、我々社の有効な試験問題集は長年にわたりISQI CT-GenAI認定資格試験問題集作成に取り組んだIT専門家によって書いてます。実際の試験に表示される質問と正確な解答はあなたのISQI CT-GenAI認定資格試験合格を手伝ってあげます。
CT-GenAI日本語版と英語版: https://www.certjuken.com/CT-GenAI-exam.html