今の競争の激しいIT業界では、多くの認定試験の合格証明書が君にをとんとん拍子に出世するのを助けることができます。多くの会社は君の実力と昇進がその証明書によって判断します。FortinetのNSE6_EDR_AD-7.0認証試験はIT業界の中で含金度高い試験で、Fast2testがFortinetのNSE6_EDR_AD-7.0認証試験について対応性の訓練 を提供しておって、ネットで弊社が提供した部分の問題集をダウンロードしてください。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: FortiEDR Installation and Configuration | 25% | - Pre-installation requirements and planning - Initial configuration and licensing - Communication Manager setup - Collector Agent installation methods - Management Platform deployment |
| Topic 2: FortiEDR Architecture and Components | 20% | - Collector Agent components and functionality - Management Platform architecture - Communication Manager and Cloud Console - FortiEDR core architecture overview |
| Topic 3: Threat Detection and Response | 20% | - Real-time threat blocking - Event analysis and investigation - Incident response workflows - Forensic data collection - Automated threat remediation |
| Topic 4: Administration and Maintenance | 10% | - Upgrade and patch management - User management and role-based access - Log management and export - Backup and recovery procedures - System monitoring and diagnostics |
| Topic 5: Policy Management and Security Profiles | 25% | - Application control rules - Custom policy creation and modification - Exclusion configuration - Default security policies overview - Policy assignment and targeting |
当社Fast2testは、製品の品質が非常に重要であることを深く知っているため、NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0テストトレントの高品質の開発に注力しています。当社の製品を購入したすべてのお客様は、NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0ガイド急流に深い印象を残しています。もちろん、顧客は製品の高品質だけでなく、製品の効率性にも深い印象を残しています。 NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験の質問は多くの時間を節約するのに役立ちます。NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験準備を使用する場合、学習に20〜30時間を費やすだけで、NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験に合格できます。
質問 # 18
Refer to the exhibit.
Based on the threat hunting event details shown in the exhibit, which two statements about the event are true?
(Choose two answers)
正解：C、D
解説：
The correct answers are B and D .
The exhibit shows a Process Creation activity event where cmd.exe is the source process and PING.EXE is the target process. The displayed Executing user is R2D2-KVM63\fortinet, and the command line shows fortinet.com, which means the user fortinet executed a ping command targeting fortinet.com.
The FortiEDR guide explains that Threat Hunting activity events consist of a source , an action , and a target
. It also states that Process Actions have another process as the target and include process-related actions such as Process Creation .
The exhibit also shows file-related details for the executable, including the executable path, product, SHA1 hash, and command line. In FortiEDR Threat Hunting, process execution events are tied to executable-file metadata, so the event is associated with the executable file involved in the process action. This supports B in the exam's intended wording.
Option A is not reliable because the screenshot does not prove MITRE details are unavailable; it only shows that no MITRE detail is visible in the current portion of the details pane. The guide states that MITRE indications appear when an activity event has related MITRE information.
Option C is wrong because the screenshot shows the process status as Running and does not show a block indicator. A green check does not mean blocked; it indicates a trusted/signed/allowed status context. There is no evidence that PING.EXE was blocked.
質問 # 19
Refer to the Exhibit:
A FortiEDR analyst is prioritizing response efforts. One application has a vulnerability score of Critical but an Unknown ACI rating, while another has a Medium vulnerability score with active ACI evidence of adversary targeting. Which application must be addressed first? (Choose one answer)
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is D .
The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide explains that FortiEDR displays two severity ratings for applications: NIST Severity and ACI Severity . NIST Severity is based on FortiEDR's vulnerability scoring system using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. ACI Severity, however, is Adversary Centric Intelligence provided by FortiRecon and FortiGuard Threat Analysts, covering dark web, open-source, and technical threat intelligence, including threat actor insights . This helps administrators proactively assess risk, respond faster to incidents, understand attackers, and protect assets.
The guide also states that FortiEDR helps analysts prioritize alerts and incidents using risk factors such as severity of vulnerabilities , relevance of threat intelligence feeds , and severity of affected endpoints , so effort is focused on the most significant organizational risks.
Therefore, the application with Medium NIST severity but active ACI evidence of adversary targeting should be prioritized over an application with Critical NIST severity but Unknown ACI rating , because active adversary-centric intelligence indicates current attacker interest or exploitation relevance. In plain terms: a theoretical critical vulnerability matters, but an actively targeted vulnerability is the fire you put out first.
Option B is tempting but incomplete because it relies only on NIST/CVSS severity. FortiEDR's ACI rating exists specifically to add adversary context to prioritization. Option A is wrong because FortiEDR does not treat all vulnerable applications equally. Option C is wrong because asset criticality can matter, but the guide does not say prioritization depends only on asset criticality.
=========
質問 # 20
Refer to the exhibit.
Based on the exhibit, which two observations are true? (Choose two answers)
正解：B、D
解説：
The correct answers are C and D .
The exhibit shows the incident classification as Malicious . In the Activity Audit, the entry from FortinetCloudServices states: "Classification change: Malicious" and also says the file is classified as malicious. This directly proves that FCS classified the event as malicious . The FortiEDR guide explains that the audit history shows the chronology for classifying the security event and displays details when FortiEDR Cloud Service (FCS) reclassifies a security event after its initial classification by the Core.
The exhibit also states that the file was "Detected as Unknown malware." This supports option D in the exam wording: FortiEDR/FCS has classified the file as malicious, but it is being identified as unknown malware , meaning it was not recognized as a known malware family/signature at the time of classification.
The guide explains that FCS enhances classification using data enrichment, automated and manual analysis, file analysis, sandboxing, machine learning flow analysis, commonality analysis, crowdsourced data deduction, and other methods, so "unknown malware" can still be classified malicious by FCS.
Option A is wrong because the exhibit shows Malicious , not Suspicious. Option B is wrong because the incident status is Unhandled , not resolved or handled.
=========
質問 # 21
Refer to the exhibit.
Based on the exhibit, which statement about this threat hunting query is true? (Choose one answer)
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is A .
The exhibit shows a FortiEDR Threat Hunting saved query using RemotePort:3389, scoped to a specific device, with Scheduled Query enabled, classification set to Suspicious , and a repeat interval of 15 minutes .
TCP port 3389 is the standard RDP port, so the query is designed to detect RDP-related network activity for the selected endpoint.
The FortiEDR guide states that saving a Threat Hunting query can define it as a scheduled query to automate threat detection. It further states that when a scheduled query runs and detects matches, a security event is automatically created in the Incidents tab , and notifications are sent according to the security event configuration.
Option B is too absolute and therefore wrong. The specific query shown uses a network field, but Threat Hunting itself can search activity events across files, registry, network, processes, and event logs. Option C is wrong because the Community Query checkbox is not selected, so it is not configured as a shared community
/global query. The guide states that Community Query must be selected to share the query with the FortiEDR community, including other organizations.
Option D is wrong because a scheduled Threat Hunting query generates an incident; it does not automatically block RDP unless additional playbook actions are configured. The guide says scheduled queries generate security events and may trigger configured playbook actions, but the query itself is not a blocking control.
=========
質問 # 22
You are asked to create a playbook to isolate a device with a collector. Which action category does isolating a device with a collector fall under? (Choose one answer)
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is A. Investigation .
The FortiEDR 7.0.0 Administration Guide states that Investigation actions enable administrators to isolate a device or assign it to a high-security Collector Group for further investigation of the device's activity. Under the Investigation section, the guide lists the available investigation action types, including "Isolate device with Collector," "Isolate device with NAC," and "Move device to High Security Group." For Isolate device with Collector , the guide explains that the action blocks communication to and from the affected Collector, and it applies only to endpoint Collectors. If the Playbook policy is configured to isolate a device for a malicious event, then when a malicious security event is triggered, the device is isolated from communicating with the outside world for both sending and receiving.
So, this is not a Remediation , Custom , or Notification action. In FortiEDR Playbook policy terminology, Isolate device with Collector belongs under Investigation .
=========
質問 # 23
......
NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験に参加する前に、試験を知りたい場合、弊社の公式サイトを訪問できます。そして、弊社のNSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験ガイドのデモをダウンロードすることは簡単で、便利です。クリックするだけ必要からです。後、弊社のNSE6_EDR_AD-7.0資料はすべてNSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験に関わることがわかります。NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0資料の全てのページはNSE6_EDR_AD-7.0試験に関連しています。NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0資料は素晴らしいものです。
NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0学習範囲: https://jp.fast2test.com/NSE6_EDR_AD-7.0-premium-file.html