그 외, ITDumpsKR ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제집 일부가 지금은 무료입니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1daFQYmnZpq4qLq8RLd-jw67yxNjE0QlS
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험이 정말 어렵다는 말을 많이 들으신 만큼 저희 ITDumpsKR는PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프만 있으면PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험이 정말 쉬워진다고 전해드리고 싶습니다. PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor덤프로 시험패스하고 자격증 한방에 따보세요. 자격증 많이 취득하면 더욱 여유롭게 직장생활을 즐길수 있습니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Certification and Accreditation Framework | 15% | - ISO/IEC 17021-1 requirements for certification bodies - Audit report preparation and documentation - Principles of certification bodies - Certification decision process - Surveillance and re-certification audits |
| Topic 2: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) and the ISO/IEC 27001 Standard | 15% | - Regulatory and legal considerations in information security - Overview of ISO/IEC 27001 and its relationship with ISO/IEC 27002 - Fundamental principles and concepts of information security |
| Topic 3: ISMS Audit Based on ISO 19011 and ISO/IEC 17021-1 | 25% | - Measuring, monitoring, and reporting ISMS performance - Continual improvement processes - Auditing organizational structure and roles - Auditing control selection and implementation (Annex A) - Auditing the context of the organization - Auditing risk assessment and treatment processes - Auditing leadership commitment |
| Topic 4: Audit Lifecycle and Competencies of the Lead Auditor | 25% | - Audit communication strategies - Audit follow-up and corrective action verification - Conflict resolution during audits - Managing audit relationships with audited parties - Leading an audit team |
| Topic 5: Audit Principles and Audit Process | 20% | - Audit scope and objectives - Audit sampling methodology - Audit types and stages ( initiation, planning, execution, reporting) - Risk-based audit approach - Audit evidence collection techniques |
>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인기덤프자료 <<
ITDumpsKR는 고품질의 IT PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험공부자료를 제공하는 차별화 된 사이트입니다. ITDumpsKR는PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor응시자들이 처음 시도하는PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험에서의 합격을 도와드립니다. 가장 적은 시간은 투자하여 어려운PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험을 통과하여 자격증을 많이 취득하셔서 IT업계에서 자신만의 가치를 찾으세요.
질문 # 186
You are performing an ISO 27001 ISMS surveillance audit at a residential nursing home, ABC Healthcare Services. ABC uses a healthcare mobile app designed and maintained by a supplier, WeCare, to monitor residents' well-being. During the audit, you learn that 90% of the residents' family members regularly receive medical device advertisements from WeCare, by email and SMS once a week. The service agreement between ABC and WeCare prohibits the supplier from using residents' personal dat a. ABC has received many complaints from residents and their family members.
The Service Manager says that the complaints were investigated as an information security incident which found that they were justified.
Corrective actions have been planned and implemented according to the nonconformity and corrective action management procedure.
You write a nonconformity "ABC failed to comply with information security control A.5.34 (Privacy and protection of PII) relating to the personal data of residents' and their family members. A supplier, WeCare, used residents' personal information to send advertisements to family members." Select three options of the corrections and corrective actions listed that you would expect ABC to make in response to the nonconformity.
정답：A,C,F
설명：
The three options of the corrections and corrective actions listed that you would expect ABC to make in response to the nonconformity are:
B . ABC cancels the service agreement with WeCare.
E . ABC introduces background checks on information security performance for all suppliers.
F . ABC periodically monitors compliance with all applicable legislation and contractual requirements involving third parties.
B . This option is a possible correction and corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. A correction is the action taken to eliminate a detected nonconformity, while a corrective action is the action taken to eliminate the cause of a nonconformity and to prevent its recurrence1. By cancelling the service agreement with WeCare, ABC could stop the unauthorized use of residents' personal data and protect their privacy and rights. This could also prevent further complaints and legal issues from the residents and their family members. However, this option may also have some drawbacks, such as the loss of a service provider, the need to find an alternative solution, and the potential impact on the residents' well-being.
E . This option is a possible corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. By introducing background checks on information security performance for all suppliers, ABC could ensure that they select and work with reliable and trustworthy partners who respect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information they handle. This could also help ABC to comply with information security control A.15.1.1 (Information security policy for supplier relationships), which requires the organisation to agree and document information security requirements for mitigating the risks associated with supplier access to the organisation's assets2.
F . This option is a possible corrective action that ABC could take to address the nonconformity. By periodically monitoring compliance with all applicable legislation and contractual requirements involving third parties, ABC could verify that the suppliers are fulfilling their obligations and responsibilities regarding information security. This could also help ABC to comply with information security control A.18.1.1 (Identification of applicable legislation and contractual requirements), which requires the organisation to identify, document, and keep up to date the relevant legislative, regulatory, contractual, and other requirements to which the organisation is subject3.
Reference:
1: ISO 27000:2018 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Overview and vocabulary, clause 3.9 and 3.10 2: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A, control A.15.1.1 3: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 - Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, Annex A, control A.18.1.1
질문 # 187
You are an experienced audit team leader guiding an auditor in training.
Your team is currently conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients. The auditor in training has been tasked with reviewing the PEOPLE controls listed in the Statement of Applicability (SoA) and implemented at the site.
Select four controls from the following that would you expect the auditor in training to review.
정답：B,C,D,H
설명：
The four controls from the list that the auditor in training should review are:
*A. Confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements: This control requires the organisation to ensure that all employees, contractors, and third parties who have access to sensitive information sign appropriate agreements that oblige them to protect the confidentiality and integrity of such information. This is especially important for an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients, as it demonstrates its commitment to safeguarding their information assets and complying with their contractual obligations.
*C. Information security awareness, education and training: This control requires the organisation to provide regular and relevant information security awareness, education and training to all employees, contractors, and third parties who have access to the organisation's information systems and information assets. This is essential for ensuring that they are aware of their roles and responsibilities, the information security policies and procedures, the potential threats and risks, and the best practices for preventing and responding to information security incidents.
*D. Remote working arrangements: This control requires the organisation to establish and implement policies and procedures for managing the information security risks associated with remote working arrangements, such as teleworking, mobile working, or working from home. This includes defining the conditions and requirements for remote working, such as the authorised devices, applications, and networks, the encryption and authentication methods, the backup and recovery procedures, and the reporting and monitoring mechanisms. This is important for an organisation that stores data on behalf of external clients, as it ensures that the information security level is maintained regardless of the location of the workers and the devices they use.
*E. The conducting of verification checks on personnel: This control requires the organisation to conduct appropriate verification checks on the background, qualifications, and references of all employees, contractors, and third parties who have access to the organisation's information systems and information assets. This is necessary for verifying their identity, suitability, and trustworthiness, and for preventing the hiring of unauthorised or malicious individuals who could compromise the information security of the organisation and its clients.
References: = ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A, clauses A.5.7, A.7.2, A.7.3, and A.7.4; ISO 27001 People Controls: How personnel ensures information security; What are the 11 new security controls in ISO 27001:
2022? - Advisera.
질문 # 188
Scenario 8: Tess
a. Malik, and Michael are an audit team of independent and qualified experts in the field of security, compliance, and business planning and strategies. They are assigned to conduct a certification audit in Clastus, a large web design company. They have previously shown excellent work ethics, including impartiality and objectiveness, while conducting audits. This time, Clastus is positive that they will be one step ahead if they get certified against ISO/IEC 27001.
Tessa, the audit team leader, has expertise in auditing and a very successful background in IT-related issues, compliance, and governance. Malik has an organizational planning and risk management background. His expertise relies on the level of synthesis and analysis of an organization's security controls and its risk tolerance in accurately characterizing the risk level within an organization On the other hand, Michael is an expert in the practical security of controls assessment by following rigorous standardized programs.
After performing the required auditing activities, Tessa initiated an audit team meeting They analyzed one of Michael s findings to decide on the issue objectively and accurately. The issue Michael had encountered was a minor nonconformity in the organization's daily operations, which he believed was caused by one of the organization's IT technicians As such, Tessa met with the top management and told them who was responsible for the nonconformity after they inquired about the names of the persons responsible To facilitate clarity and understanding, Tessa conducted the closing meeting on the last day of the audit. During this meeting, she presented the identified nonconformities to the Clastus management. However, Tessa received advice to avoid providing unnecessary evidence in the audit report for the Clastus certification audit, ensuring that the report remains concise and focused on the critical findings.
Based on the evidence examined, the audit team drafted the audit conclusions and decided that two areas of the organization must be audited before the certification can be granted. These decisions were later presented to the auditee, who did not accept the findings and proposed to provide additional information. Despite the auditee's comments, the auditors, having already decided on the certification recommendation, did not accept the additional information. The auditee's top management insisted that the audit conclusions did not represent reality, but the audit team remained firm in their decision.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
The audit team did not accept Clastus's additional information because they had already made the certification recommendation. Is this acceptable?
정답：A
설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
B . Correct answer:
ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing) requires auditors to consider all relevant evidence before making a final recommendation.
Clastus has the right to present additional evidence if they disagree with findings.
A . Incorrect:
Certification recommendations should remain open to valid new evidence until officially finalized.
C . Incorrect:
Auditors must consider revisions if they provide relevant clarification or evidence.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.6.3 (Handling Disputes and Additional Evidence in Audits)
질문 # 189
Scenario 6
Sinvestment is an insurance provider that offers a wide range of coverage options, including home, commercial, and life insurance. Originally established in North California, the company has expanded its operations to other locations, including Europe and Africa. In addition to its growth, Sinvestment is committed to complying with laws and regulations applicable to its industry and preventing any information security incident. They have implemented an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO
/IEC 27001 and have applied for certification.
A team of auditors was assigned by the certification body to conduct the audit. After signing a confidentiality agreement with Sinvestment, they started the audit activities. For the activities of the stage 1 audit, it was decided that they would be performed on site, except the review of documented information, which took place remotely, as requested by Sinvestment.
The audit team started the stage 1 audit by reviewing the documentation required, including the declaration of the ISMS scope, information security policies, and internal audit reports. The evaluation of the documented information was based on the content and procedure for managing the documented information.
In addition, the auditors found out that the documentation related to information security training and awareness programs was incomplete and lacked essential details. When asked, Sinvestment's top management stated that the company has provided information security training sessions to all employees.
The stage 2 audit was conducted three weeks after the stage 1 audit. The audit team observed that the marketing department (not included in the audit scope) had no procedures to control employees' access rights.
Since controlling employees' access rights is one of the ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and was included in the company's information security policy, the issue was included in the audit report.
Question
Was Sinvestment's request for reviewing documented information remotely acceptable?
정답：C
설명：
Sinvestment's request to review documented information remotely during the stage 1 audit is acceptable and aligns with established auditing practices, making option A the correct answer. ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO
19011:2018 both permit flexibility in how audit activities are conducted, including the use of remote techniques, provided confidentiality, integrity, and effectiveness of the audit are maintained.
Stage 1 audits are primarily focused on reviewing documented information, understanding the organization's context, confirming the ISMS scope, and assessing readiness for stage 2. Reviewing documents remotely is a widely accepted practice, especially when supported by appropriate confidentiality agreements, as was the case in this scenario. The auditors had already signed confidentiality agreements, mitigating the risk of information disclosure.
Option B is incorrect because remote document review does not inherently lead to a breach of confidentiality.
Risks must be managed, not assumed. Secure document-sharing platforms and confidentiality agreements are sufficient safeguards when properly implemented. Option C is incorrect because the use of different locations or remote methods does not automatically reduce audit efficiency; in many cases, it enhances efficiency by reducing travel time and allowing better preparation.
Therefore, allowing remote review of documented information during stage 1 is fully consistent with ISO auditing standards and recognized certification body practices.
질문 # 190
Your organisation is currently seeking ISO/IEC27001:2022 certification. You have just qualified as an Internal ISMS auditor and the ICT Manager wants to use your newly acquired knowledge to assist him with the design of an information security incident management process.
He identifies the following stages in his planned process and asks you to confirm which order they should appear in.
정답：
설명：
Explanation:
Step 1 = Incident logging Step 2 = Incident categorisation Step 3 = Incident prioritisation Step 4 = Incident assignment Step 5 = Task creation and management Step 6 = SLA management and escalation Step 7 = Incident resolution Step 8 = Incident closure The order of the stages in the information security incident management process should follow a logical sequence that ensures a quick, effective, and orderly response to the incidents, events, and weaknesses. The order should also be consistent with the best practices and guidance provided by ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO
/IEC 27035:2022. Therefore, the following order is suggested:
* Step 1 = Incident logging: This step involves recording the details of the potential incident, event, or weakness, such as the date, time, source, description, impact, and reporter. This step is important to provide a traceable record of the incident and to facilitate the subsequent analysis and response. This step is related to control A.16.1.1 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to establish responsibilities and procedures for the management of information security incidents, events, and weaknesses. This step is also related to clause 6.2 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to log the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 2 = Incident categorisation: This step involves determining the type and nature of the incident, event, or weakness, such as whether it is a hardware issue, network issue, or software issue. This step is important to classify the incident and to assign it to the appropriate resolver or team. This step is related to control A.16.1.2 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to report information security events and weaknesses as quickly as possible through appropriate management channels. This step is also related to clause 6.3 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to categorize the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 3 = Incident prioritisation: This step involves assessing the severity and urgency of the incident, event, or weakness, and classifying it as critical, high, medium, or low. This step is important to prioritize the incident and to allocate the necessary resources and time for the response. This step is related to control A.16.1.3 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to assess and prioritize information security events and weaknesses in accordance with the defined criteria. This step is also related to clause 6.4 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to prioritize the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 4 = Incident assignment: This step involves passing the incident, event, or weakness to the individual or team who is best suited to resolve it, based on their skills, knowledge, and availability.
This step is important to ensure that the incident is handled by the right person or team and to avoid delays or confusion. This step is related to control A.16.1.4 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to respond to information security events and weaknesses in a timely manner, according to the agreed procedures. This step is also related to clause 6.5 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to assign the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 5 = Task creation and management: This step involves identifying and coordinating the work needed to resolve the incident, event, or weakness, such as performing root cause analysis, testing solutions, implementing changes, and documenting actions. This step is important to ensure that the incident is resolved effectively and efficiently, and that the actions are tracked and controlled. This step is related to control A.16.1.5 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to apply lessons learned from information security events and weaknesses to take corrective and preventive actions. This step is also related to clause 6.6 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to create and manage the tasks for the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 6 = SLA management and escalation: This step involves ensuring that any service level agreements (SLAs) are adhered to while the resolution is being implemented, and that the incident is escalated to a higher level of authority or support if a breach looks likely or occurs. This step is important to ensure that the incident is resolved within the agreed time frame and quality, and that any deviations or issues are communicated and addressed. This step is related to control A.16.1.6 of ISO
/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to communicate information security events and weaknesses to the relevant internal and external parties, as appropriate. This step is also related to clause 6.7 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to manage the SLAs and escalations for the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 7 = Incident resolution: This step involves applying a temporary workaround or a permanent solution to resolve the incident, event, or weakness, and restoring the normal operation of the information and information processing facilities. This step is important to ensure that the incident is resolved completely and satisfactorily, and that the information security is restored to the desired level.
This step is related to control A.16.1.7 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to identify the cause of information security events and weaknesses, and to take actions to prevent their recurrence or occurrence. This step is also related to clause 6.8 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to resolve the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
* Step 8 = Incident closure: This step involves closing the incident, event, or weakness, after verifying that it has been resolved satisfactorily, and that all the actions have been completed and documented.
This step is important to ensure that the incident is formally closed and that no further actions are required. This step is related to control A.16.1.8 of ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which requires the organization to collect evidence and document the information security events and weaknesses, and the actions taken. This step is also related to clause 6.9 of ISO/IEC 27035:2022, which provides guidance on how to close the incidents, events, and weaknesses.
References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements1
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor2
* ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor - PECB3
* ISO 27001:2022 certified ISMS lead auditor - Jisc4
* ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Transition Training Course5
* ISO 27001 - Information Security Lead Auditor Course - PwC Training Academy6
* ISO/IEC 27035:2022, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security incident management
질문 # 191
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor는PECB의 인증시험입니다.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증시험을 패스하면PECB인증과 한 발작 더 내디딘 것입니다. 때문에ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험의 인기는 날마다 더해갑니다.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험에 응시하는 분들도 날마다 더 많아지고 있습니다. 하지만ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor시험의 통과 율은 아주 낮습니다.ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor인증시험준비중인 여러분은 어떤 자료를 준비하였나요?
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor완벽한 공부문제: https://www.itdumpskr.com/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam.html
참고: ITDumpsKR에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2026 PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1daFQYmnZpq4qLq8RLd-jw67yxNjE0QlS