P.S. Free & New 312-39 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ITexamReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CyEWtOCqw8E7yi0JJ_tIJW30RgP24pTU
In order to help customers study with the paper style, our 312-39 test torrent support the printing of page. We will provide you with three different versions, the PDF version allow you to switch our 312-39 study torrent on paper. You just need to download the PDF version of our 312-39 Exam Prep, and then you will have the right to switch study materials on paper. We believe it will be more convenient for you to make notes. And you can be assured to download the version of our 312-39 study torrent.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Incident Response and Forensics | 20% | - Digital Forensics Basics
|
| SOC Process and Workflow | 20% | - Incident Detection and Analysis
|
| Enhanced Incident Detection with Threat Intelligence | 20% | - Threat Hunting
|
| Data Analysis and SIEM | 25% | - SIEM Deployment
|
| SOC Infrastructure and Threat Intelligence | 15% | - Threat Intelligence
|
>> Question 312-39 Explanations <<
Three versions of 312-39 exam guide are available on our test platform, including PDF version, PC version and APP online version. As a consequence, you are able to study the online test engine of312-39 study materials by your cellphone or computer, and you can even study 312-39 Actual Exam at your home, company or on the subway whether you are a rookie or a veteran, you can make full use of your fragmentation time in a highly-efficient way to study with our 312-39 exam questions and pass the 312-39 exam.
NEW QUESTION # 102
A threat hunter analyzing an infected endpoint finds that malicious processes keep reappearing even after termination, making traditional remediation ineffective. The user reports slowdowns, abnormal pop-ups, and unauthorized application launches. Deeper inspection reveals multiple scheduled tasks executing unknown scripts at intervals, along with suspicious registry modifications enabling automatic execution on startup. The endpoint makes intermittent encrypted outbound connections to an unclassified external server. The organization also observed multiple failed privileged logins from the same subnet. Which signs should the threat hunter look for to confirm and mitigate the threat?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Host-based artifacts are the most direct evidence to confirm persistence and recurring execution on an endpoint. The scenario already describes classic host persistence mechanisms: scheduled tasks and registry autorun modifications. To confirm and mitigate, a threat hunter should focus on endpoint-resident artifacts such as: persistence entries (scheduled tasks, Run/RunOnce keys, services, WMI subscriptions), process ancestry (which parent launches the malicious script), file system changes (dropped scripts, DLLs, staged payloads), and security control tampering. These artifacts enable containment and eradication because they point to what must be removed and what must be prevented from re-creating itself after reboot. Network- based artifacts are important for identifying C2 destinations and potential lateral movement, but they won't fully explain how the malware survives termination. Threat intelligence context can help attribute and match TTPs, but it's not required to confirm persistence locally. Indicators of Attack are behavior patterns (like scheduled task creation, registry autoruns, process injection) and are valuable conceptually, but the option that best represents the concrete evidence you need to examine and remediate on the endpoint is "host-based artifacts." In SOC response, you'd combine host artifact removal with credential resets and scoping for similar persistence across endpoints.
NEW QUESTION # 103
A SOC analyst is responsible for designing a security dashboard that provides real-time monitoring of security threats. The organization wants to avoid overwhelming analysts with excessive information and focus on the most critical security alerts to ensure timely responses to potential threats. Which principle should guide the design of the dashboard?
Answer: C
Explanation:
SOC dashboards are operational tools, not data lakes. The guiding principle is to maximize analyst decision speed and accuracy under time pressure. Prioritizing critical information and removing unnecessary details reduces cognitive overload and alert fatigue, which are major contributors to missed high-severity incidents.
A well-designed SOC dashboard highlights high-signal items first: active high/critical incidents, alerts with confirmed impact, identity compromise indicators, lateral movement signals, and key environmental health metrics (ingestion gaps, sensor failures). It also supports triage by surfacing minimal but essential context:
affected user/host, severity, time window, tactic/technique mapping, and recommended first action. "Include as much data as possible" often results in clutter that slows response and hides important signals. Restricting access to only network admins is not a design principle and can hinder collaboration. Using only historical data undermines real-time detection and containment, which is central to SOC operations. Effective dashboards follow "need-to-know for action": show what enables a fast, correct response first, and provide drill-down for deeper analysis when needed.
NEW QUESTION # 104
Jane, a security analyst, while analyzing IDS logs, detected an event matching Regex /((\%3C)|<)((\%69)|i|(\%
49))((\%6D)|m|(\%4D))((\%67)|g|(\%47))[
BONUS!!! Download part of ITexamReview 312-39 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1CyEWtOCqw8E7yi0JJ_tIJW30RgP24pTU