참고: Pass4Test에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2026 Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VVefK09Llj7xg1nVMSQGWBXWZxdRtldY
Pass4Test는 아주 믿을만하고 서비스 또한 만족스러운 사이트입니다. 만약 Plat-Arch-204시험실패 시 우리는 100% 덤프비용 전액환불 해드립니다.그리고 시험을 패스하여도 우리는 일 년 동안 무료업뎃을 제공합니다.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Available Languages: | Japanese, English |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 (initial), USD 200 (retake) |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Technical Architect Salesforce Certified Application Architect |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice, Scenario-based, Multiple-select |
| Recommended Training: | Architect Journey: Integration Architecture Salesforce Integration Architecture Course |
| Exam Registration: | Kryterion Webassessor Pearson VUE |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite at authorized test centers |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites; recommended: 3–4 years Salesforce platform experience, 1–2 years integration experience, knowledge of APIs, web services and enterprise patterns |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailheadacademy.salesforce.com/certificate/exam-integration-arch---Plat-Arch-204 |
IT업계 종사자라면 누구나 Salesforce 인증Plat-Arch-204시험을 패스하고 싶어하리라고 믿습니다. 많은 분들이 이렇게 좋은 인증시험은 아주 어렵다고 생각합니다. 네 맞습니다. 패스할 확율은 아주 낮습니다. 노력하지 않고야 당연히 불가능한 일이 아니겠습니까? Salesforce 인증Plat-Arch-204 시험은 기초 지식 그리고 능숙한 전업지식이 필요 합니다. Pass4Test는 여러분들한테Salesforce 인증Plat-Arch-204시험을 쉽게 빨리 패스할 수 있도록 도와주는 사이트입니다. Pass4Test의Salesforce 인증Plat-Arch-204시험관련 자료로 여러분은 짧은 시간내에 간단하게 시험을 패스할수 있습니다. 시간도 절약하고 돈도 적게 들이는 이런 제안은 여러분들한테 딱 좋은 해결책이라고 봅니다.
| 주제 | 소개 |
|---|---|
| 주제 1 |
|
| 주제 2 |
|
| 주제 3 |
|
| 주제 4 |
|
질문 # 72
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to improve the quality of callouts from Salesforce to its REST APIs. For this purpose, NTO will require all API Clients/consumers to adhere to REST API Markup Language (RAML) specifications that include the field-level definition of every API request and response Payload. The RAML specs serve as interface contracts that Apex REST API Clients can rely on. Which design specification should the integration architect include in the integration architecture to ensure that Apex REST API Clients' unit tests confirm Adherence to the RAML specs?
정답：A
설명：
In a contract-first integration strategy using RAML (RESTful API Modeling Language), the specification defines the exact structure of requests and responses. Because Salesforce unit tests cannot perform actual network callouts, the platform requires d1evelopers to use the HttpCalloutMock interface to simulate responses.
To ensure that the integration code strictly adheres to the established RAML contract, the integration architect must mandate that the HttpCalloutMock implementation returns responses that mirror the RAML specification. This means the mock must include all required fields, correct data types, and the expected HTTP status codes (e.g., 200 OK, 201 Created) as defined in the contract. By doing this, the unit tests verify that the Apex client code can successfully parse and process the specific JSON or XML payloads defined in the RAML spec.
Option A and B are technically imprecise. The Apex client does not "implement" the mock; rather, the test class provides a separate mock implementation to the runtime via Test.setMock(). The value of the integration architecture lies in the content of that mock. If the mock is designed to return contract-compliant data, then any change to the RAML that breaks the Apex code's ability to process it will be caught immediately during the testing phase. This "Mock-as-a-Contract" approach provides a safety net, ensuring that Salesforce remains compatible with external services even as those services evolve, provided the RAML is kept up to date.
질문 # 73
A large enterprise customer is implementing Salesforce. Current systems include ERP for invoicing/fulfillment and a Marketing solution for email. Associates need to view and log interactions in Salesforce. Which system should be the system of record for customers and prospects?
정답：C
설명：
To achieve a "Customer 360" view where sales and service associates have the context needed for daily interactions, Salesforce is the logical System of Record (SoR) for customer and prospect engagement.
While the ERP remains the master for financial transactions (invoices) and the Marketing tool masters campaign analytics, Salesforce should house the core "Golden Record" of the customer. This is achieved by integrating relevant data from the ERP (order status, invoice history) and Marketing (lead source, email engagement) into Salesforce. This strategy (Option A) empowers associates to log interactions and view history in one place, fulfilling the primary goal of the CRM implementation while avoiding the complexity of a new custom database (Option B) or trying to force prospect-level engagement data into a rigid ERP (Option C).
질문 # 74
What should an integration architect recommend to ensure all integrations to the Northern Trail Outfitters' company portal use SSL mutual authentication?
정답：C
설명：
To ensure that all integrations calling into a Salesforce portal are secured with Mutual Authentication, the architect must enable and configure specific platform-level security settings. The primary recommendation is to Enforce SSL/TLS Mutual Authentication for the relevant integration users.
Mutual Authentication (Two-way SSL) adds a layer of trust beyond the standard session-based authentication. When enforced, the Salesforce server requires the calling client to present a valid CA-signed certificate that matches a certificate stored in the org. This ensures that only authorized systems with the correct private key can establish a connection.
To implement this, the architect must first work with Salesforce support to enable the feature. Once enabled, a Mutual Authentication Certificate must be uploaded to the org, and a specific user profile-cloned for integration purposes-must have the "Enforce SSL/TLS Mutual Authentication" permission enabled. This configuration forces the client to use port 8443 (the dedicated port for mutual TLS) for API calls, providing a highly secure, server-to-server connection that protects against impersonation and unauthorized data access.
질문 # 75
What is the first thing an integration architect should validate if a callout from a Lightning web component (LWC) to an external endpoint is failing?
정답：C
설명：
When an integration initiated from the client-side (the browser) fails, the architect must first look at the browser's security policies. In Salesforce, Lightning Web Components are subject to the Lightning Component framework's Content Security Policy (CSP).
CSP is a security layer that prevents cross-site scripting (XSS) and other code injection attacks by restricting which domains the browser is allowed to communicate with. If an LWC attempts to make a fetch() call to an external REST endpoint, the browser will block the request unless that specific domain is whitelisted in CSP Trusted Sites.
Option B (Remote Site Settings) is a common distractor; these settings are strictly for server-side Apex callouts and have no effect on client-side JavaScript requests. Option A (CORS) is also a browser security mechanism, but it must be configured on the external server to allow Salesforce to access its resources. While CORS is necessary, the first thing to validate within the Salesforce environment for a failing LWC callout is the CSP Trusted Site entry. Without this whitelisting, the request will be terminated by the browser before it even leaves the client, regardless of how the external server is configured.
질문 # 76
Universal Containers (UC) is planning to implement Salesforce as its CRM system. Currently, UC has a marketing system for leads, Microsoft Outlook for contacts and emails, and an ERP for billing and payments. The proposed CRM should provide a single customer view. What should an integration architect consider to support this strategy?
정답：A
설명：
The foundational step in a CRM transformation project is to understand the business context and data landscape before selecting technical tools or middleware.
Before proposing a technical solution, an architect must evaluate current and future data and system usage to identify specific integration requirements. This includes documenting business processes, mapping data flows between the Marketing system, Outlook, and the ERP, and identifying which system will serve as the "System of Record" for each data entity. For example, the architect needs to determine if lead data from the Marketing system should flow unidirectionally to Salesforce or if activities from Outlook need bidirectional synchronization to maintain a "360-degree view".
While out-of-the-box connectors (Option B) and middleware (Option C) are valuable, they are implementation tactics that follow the discovery phase. Jumping directly to connectors may overlook unique business processes that require custom integration logic, while proposing middleware prematurely can lead to unnecessary costs if native tools or point-to-point connections are sufficient. A thorough evaluation ensures that the integration architecture is scalable, avoids data corruption, and aligns with UC's strategic goal of breaking down information silos to provide sales and support staff with meaningful, unified customer insights.
질문 # 77
......
Plat-Arch-204최고품질 덤프문제보기: https://www.pass4test.net/Plat-Arch-204.html
2026 Pass4Test 최신 Plat-Arch-204 PDF 버전 시험 문제집과 Plat-Arch-204 시험 문제 및 답변 무료 공유: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1VVefK09Llj7xg1nVMSQGWBXWZxdRtldY