P.S. Free & New VNX301 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Exam-Killer: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QMV3h1zurbDfeYCvRE6C8PK6xQ1EMHh_
Getting certified is a surefire way to advance your career in the IT industry. Nowadays, Versa Networks VNX301 certification has been one of the hottest exams which many IT candidates chased after. While how to pass the VNX301 exam test in an efficient way is another question for all of you. I think our Exam-Killer VNX301 will do some help. The high hit rate can ensure you 100% pass. The regular updates of the VNX301 study material can keep you one step ahead in the real exam. The comprehensive questions with the accurate answers will help you have a good knowledge of the actual test and assist you pass with ease.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
>> VNX301 Answers Real Questions <<
We guarantee you that our top-rated Versa Networks VNX301 practice exam (PDF, desktop practice test software, and web-based practice exam) will enable you to pass the Versa Certified SD-WAN Specialist (VNX300) (VNX301) certification exam on the very first go. The authority of Exam-Killer in VNX301 Exam Questions rests on its being high-quality and prepared according to the latest pattern.
NEW QUESTION # 21
While troubleshooting the SD-WAN data path, you run show vsf tunnel access-circuits ... detail and see the following encapsulation chain: VMLH, MPLS-over-GRE, IPsec-ESP, and VXLAN. What does this output primarily confirm?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B . Versa's SD-WAN data-path troubleshooting documentation shows that show vsf tunnel access-circuits ... detail can display the access-circuit state and encapsulation chain used for tunnel forwarding. In the example, the output lists multiple encapsulations, including VMLH , MPLS-over-GRE , IPsec-ESP , and VXLAN . It also shows transport details such as source IP, destination IP, UDP transport, tunnel MTU, SPI values, and SLA state.
This confirms that the VOS data plane has built the SD-WAN tunnel encapsulation stack required to forward overlay traffic across the underlay. IPsec-ESP in the chain indicates encrypted tunnel handling, while VXLAN and other encapsulation components are part of the SD-WAN overlay forwarding structure.
The output does not indicate simple bridging, plain-text-only GRE, or bypass of the VOS data plane.
Instead, it proves that the packet path is being processed through the VOS tunnel forwarding framework and that the administrator is looking at the SD-WAN access-circuit tunnel state.
NEW QUESTION # 22
Examine the CLI output in the exhibit.
You are reviewing the OSPF adjacency on a VOS CPE, and the output is shown in the exhibit. In this scenario, what is the probable cause of the OSPF adjacency issue?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start . Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as "exchange start," followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.
Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart.
Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.
NEW QUESTION # 23
A CGNAT rule is configured, but traffic is not being translated. You want to confirm whether the expected source and destination prefixes are programmed in the CGNAT access list for the tenant. Which command is most appropriate?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . Versa CGNAT troubleshooting documentation states that, after connecting to the vsmd daemon, administrators can view CGNAT access lists used for traffic matching with the command show cgnat acl info < tenant-id > . The sample output shows ACL handle, rule ID, category, precedence, VRF, source IP, destination IP, tenant ID, and total filters.
This is the correct command when NAT configuration appears present but translations do not occur, because it verifies whether the runtime dataplane has the correct traffic-match rules. If the source prefix, destination prefix, VRF, or precedence is wrong, the session may never match the NAT rule, and no translation will be applied.
show system status checks system services. show device clients shows active and failed sessions, CPU usage per session, and memory load for processes. show system storage shows disk usage. These commands are useful in other troubleshooting workflows, but they do not validate CGNAT ACL matching criteria for tenant traffic.
NEW QUESTION # 24
A branch has correct underlay speed and no asymmetric SD-WAN paths, but users still report packet loss during large transfers. You suspect QoS shaping is dropping traffic. Which command is most appropriate to verify interface-level CoS drops?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . Versa throughput troubleshooting documentation includes a specific section titled Check that Packets Are not Dropped by CoS . It states that if a CoS shaper or rate limiter is configured on the VOS device, it may drop packets when traffic exceeds the configured shaping rate. To check whether CoS is dropping packets, Versa recommends commands including show class-of-services interfaces brief and show class-of-services interfaces detail interface-name.
The detailed interface output displays traffic statistics such as TX packets, TX packets dropped, TX bytes, TX bytes dropped, and per-traffic-class drops. This is exactly the evidence needed to confirm whether shaping or QoS enforcement is causing the observed loss.
show alarms last-n 10 may reveal major events but will not provide per-interface CoS drop counters.
show system uptime only indicates how long the system has been running. show cgnat tenants is relevant for NAT state and tenant CGNAT resources, not QoS drops.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Examine the exhibit below.
You are configuring an IPsec tunnel towards a non-SD-WAN site over the INETTransport-VR. The site IP address is 10.1.1.1. This tunnel is for traffic between the 192.168.100.0/24 and the 192.168.200.0/24 LAN networks. The tunnel does not establish.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . The exhibit shows that the IPsec VPN is being configured with Tunnel Routing Instance: XIAN-Control-VR . However, the question states that the tunnel is toward a non-SD-WAN site over the INET-Transport-VR . For a site-to-site IPsec tunnel, the tunnel routing instance must match the routing instance used to reach the peer public IP address. In this case, the remote non-SD-WAN peer is
10.1.1.1 , and the intended underlay transport is INET-Transport-VR , not the Control VR.
Versa troubleshooting documentation explains that routing instances are used to define where traffic is sourced and forwarded. For example, configuration examples select routing instances when enabling services or initiating tests, and traffic must use the correct WAN or transport routing instance to reach the remote endpoint. Versa branch troubleshooting also emphasizes that after transport connectivity is available, the branch establishes IKE-based IPsec connectivity; if that connectivity fails, the IPsec-related interface remains down.
Changing the routing instance to global would not be correct because the intended path is specifically INET-Transport-VR. A higher precedence value is not required to establish the tunnel. The policy selector shown already defines local-to-remote interesting traffic, and the key failure is the incorrect tunnel routing instance.
NEW QUESTION # 26
......
The excellent Versa Networks VNX301 practice exam from Exam-Killer can help you realize your goal of passing the Versa Networks VNX301 certification exam on your very first attempt. Most people find it difficult to find excellent Versa Networks VNX301 Exam Dumps that can help them prepare for the actual Versa Certified SD-WAN Specialist (VNX300) VNX301 exam.
New VNX301 Exam Book: https://www.exam-killer.com/VNX301-valid-questions.html
What's more, part of that Exam-Killer VNX301 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1QMV3h1zurbDfeYCvRE6C8PK6xQ1EMHh_