BONUS!!! Download part of PrepAwayPDF F5CAB3 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jcPXU9MsVRalg3BxB_NW7NnvmE1vzGKd
Whereas the F5 F5CAB3 web-based version of our practice test is compatible with iOS, Android, Windows, Linux, and Mac. Additionally, you can take the F5 F5CAB3 web-based practice test online using Chrome, Firefox, Safari, MS Edge, Internet Explorer or any other popular browser.
| Certification Vendor: | F5 Networks |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | F5 Certified BIG-IP Administrator: Data Plane Configuration |
| Exam Number: | F5CAB3 |
| Exam Duration: | 120 minutes |
| Related Certifications: | F5 Certified BIG-IP Administrator (F5-CA) F5 Certified Specialist, Data Plane Configuration |
| Exam Price: | $160 USD |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Select, Build List, Multiple Choice |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-80 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Passing Score: | 247 out of 350 (approximately 70%) |
| Sample Questions: | F5 F5CAB3 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or test center |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended: F5 Certified Administrator certification or equivalent experience with BIG-IP LTM |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.f5.com/go/certification |
>> F5CAB3 Testking Exam Questions <<
The advent of our F5 F5CAB3 study guide with three versions has helped more than 98 percent of exam candidates get the certificate successfully. Rather than insulating from the requirements of the BIG-IP Administration Data Plane Configuration F5CAB3 Real Exam, our F5CAB3 practice materials closely co-related with it.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 59
A BIG-IP Administrator configures a node with a standard icmp Health Monitor. The Node shows as DOWN although the Backend Server is configured to answer ICMP requests. Which step should the administrator take next to find the root cause of this issue?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In the F5 BIG-IP ecosystem, a standard ICMP health monitor functions by sending an ICMP echo request to a target node and expecting an ICMP echo reply within a specified timeout period. When a node is marked " DOWN " despite the backend server being configured to respond to ICMP, the issue typically lies in the network path or the specific packet exchange between the BIG-IP ' s self IP and the node ' s IP. Running a tcpdump is the most effective next step because it provides a real-time packet capture of the actual monitor traffic leaving the BIG-IP and any return traffic coming back from the server. This allows the administrator to verify if the BIG-IP is actually sending the echo request, if the request is reaching the server, and if the server is indeed replying or if the reply is being dropped by an intermediate firewall or a security policy.
While other tools have their place, they are inappropriate for this specific layer 3/4 connectivity issue. A qkview is a comprehensive diagnostic file used primarily for F5 Support to analyze the entire system ' s state but is overkill for initial connectivity troubleshooting. An ssldump is used for inspecting SSL/TLS handshakes and encrypted payloads, which is irrelevant for a non-encrypted ICMP monitor. A curl command is a tool for testing HTTP/HTTPS application-level responses; it cannot be used to troubleshoot ICMP (ping) connectivity directly. By using tcpdump -ni < vlan_name > host < node_ip > , the administrator can see the ICMP " type 8 " (request) and " type 0 " (reply) packets, immediately identifying if the monitor failure is due to a " Destination Unreachable " message or a simple lack of response, thereby pinpointing the root cause in the data plane.
NEW QUESTION # 60
A virtual server is configured to offload SSL from a pool of backend servers. When users connect to the virtual server, they successfully establish an SSL connection but no content is displayed. A packet trace performed on the server shows that the server receives and responds to the request. What should a BIG-IP Administrator do to resolve the problem? (Choose one answer)
Answer: B
Explanation:
This scenario describes a classic case of asymmetric routing in a "one-arm" or non-gateway deployment.
When a BIG-IP system is configured for SSL offloading, the following traffic flow occurs:
* Client-Side: The client establishes a successful SSL/TLS handshake with the Virtual Server. This explains why the user can "successfully establish an SSL connection."
* Server-Side: The BIG-IP decrypts the traffic and forwards it as plain HTTP to the backend server. The packet trace confirms the server receives the HTTP GET request and responds with the content.
* The Routing Failure: By default, the BIG-IP system preserves the client's original source IP address. If the backend server's default gateway is not the BIG-IP system (or if the server is on the same subnet as the client), the server will attempt to send the response directly back to the client's IP address, bypassing the BIG-IP.
* Stateful Drop: Because the BIG-IP is a Full Proxy, it expects the response to return through its own internal state table to be encrypted and sent back to the client. Since the response bypasses the BIG-IP, the BIG-IP connection eventually times out, and the client receives no data despite the server having sent it.
Solution (SNAT): Enabling Secure Network Address Translation (SNAT), specifically SNAT Auto Map, ensures that the BIG-IP replaces the client's source IP with its own internal self-IP before sending the request to the server. This forces the server to send the response back to the BIG-IP, allowing the BIG-IP to complete the transaction and deliver the content to the user.
NEW QUESTION # 61
During a high-demand event, the BIG-IP Administrator needs to limit the number of new connections per second to a Virtual Server.
What should be applied?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Connection rate limits restrict how many new connections are accepted per second, protecting application resources.
NEW QUESTION # 62
A BIG-IP Administrator creates a new VLAN on BIG-IP Cluster Member A and attaches an interface to it.
Although the Auto Config Sync is in place, the new VLAN does NOT show up on Cluster Member B. What should the BIG-IP Administrator do to ensure the new VLAN is configured on each Cluster Member?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a BIG-IP High Availability (HA) environment, most configuration objects (Virtual Servers, Pools, iRules) are considered "shared" and are synchronized automatically between devices. However, network-level objects-specifically VLANs and Self IPs-are unique to the hardware and are generally not synchronized by the ConfigSync process.
This is intentional because two devices in a cluster may have different physical cabling or interface assignments. For example, Cluster Member A might use interface 1.1 for a specific VLAN, while Cluster Member B might use interface 1.2. Because the BIG-IP system cannot assume that the physical network topology is identical for both appliances, the administrator must Configure the new VLAN manually on Cluster Member B.
Once the VLAN is created manually on both devices with the exact same name, it can then be used to host
"shared" floating Self IP addresses or traffic groups that will synchronize. Failing to create the VLAN on the peer device will prevent the traffic group from failing over correctly, as the peer will not have the necessary Layer 2 broadcast domain defined to take over the traffic. Resetting Device Trust (Option D) is a drastic step for fix sync communication issues but will not change the fact that VLANs are non-syncable objects.
Enabling the interface (Option B) only affects the link status of Member A and has no impact on the configuration of Member B.
NEW QUESTION # 63
Exhibit:
Due to a change in application requirements, a BIG-IP Administrator needs to modify the configuration of a Virtual Server to include a Fallback Persistence Profile. Which persistence profile type should the BIG-IP Administrator use for this purpose?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In a BIG-IP environment, a Fallback Persistence Profile is utilized as a secondary "stickiness" mechanism when the primary (Default) persistence method fails to provide a valid persistence record. For example, if a Virtual Server uses HTTP Cookie Persistence as its primary method, but a client's browser has cookies disabled, the BIG-IP will be unable to find a persistence cookie in the request. Without a fallback method, the system would treat every request from that client as a new, independent connection, potentially breaking the application session.
Source Address Affinity (also known as Source Address Persistence) is the most common and standard choice for a fallback profile. It operates at the network layer (Layer 3) by tracking the client's source IP address.
Because every IP packet contains a source address, this method is virtually guaranteed to work even when application-layer data (like Cookies or SSL Session IDs) is missing or encrypted beyond the BIG-IP's visibility. While Universal (Option A) and Hash (Option D) profiles are highly flexible and can use iRules to persist on almost any data, they require specific configuration and logic that may not always be present or valid. SSL persistence (Option C) relies on the SSL Session ID, which frequently changes due to modern browser security practices (session renegotiation), making it less reliable than Source Address Affinity. By configuring Source Address Affinity as the fallback, the administrator ensures that the BIG-IP has a "safety net" to maintain session integrity based on the client's IP address when the more granular cookie-based persistence is unavailable.
NEW QUESTION # 64
......
F5CAB3 Instant Download: https://www.prepawaypdf.com/F5/F5CAB3-practice-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New F5CAB3 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PrepAwayPDF: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jcPXU9MsVRalg3BxB_NW7NnvmE1vzGKd