当社JPNTestは、常にNSEI_OTS_AR-7.6認定の傾向を追ってきました。当社の研究開発チームは、NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6試験で出題される質問を調査するだけではありません。 NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6練習資料の内容は、試験のすべての質問が含まれるように慎重に選択されています。そして、私たちの教材には、いつでも、どこでも、読む、Fortinet NSE I - OT Security 7.6 Architectテストする、勉強するのに役立つ3つの形式があります。つまり、当社の製品を使用すると、試験の準備を効率的に行うことができます。 NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6認定を希望される場合、当社Fortinetの製品が最適です。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Monitoring and Risk Assessment | 25% | - Event handling and logging with FortiAnalyzer 7.6 - Threat detection using FortiSIEM 7.4 - OT-focused risk assessment and management |
| Topic 2: Network Security | 25% | - Virtual patching for legacy OT systems - Deep inspection for industrial protocols (Modbus, DNP3, OPC) - Security automation and threat response |
| Topic 3: Network Access Control | 25% | - Authentication and access policies for OT devices - Purdue Model and secure network segmentation - OT Ethernet and industrial communication models |
| Topic 4: Asset Management | 25% | - Device detection and inventory using FortiGate & FortiNAC - Fortinet Security Fabric for OT environments - OT security standards and compliance (IEC 62443, NIST) |
我々は弊社のNSEI_OTS_AR-7.6問題集を利用するあなたは一発で試験に合格できると信じています。我々はIT業界の権威で専門家たちは数年以来の努力を通して、NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6問題集の開発に就職しています。我々のNSEI_OTS_AR-7.6問題集を利用してから、あなたは短い時間でリラクスで試験に合格することができるだけでなく、試験に必要な技能を身につけることもできます。
質問 # 18
You want to improve the security of your OT network and therefore deploy a FortiGate device with the OT signatures database. Which two statements about this database are true? (Choose two answers)
正解：B、C
解説：
The correct answers are A and D .
Option A is correct because the study guide states that for OT protocol coverage, "a valid OT security service license is required to receive updates on both intrusion prevention and application control signatures." It also shows "Valid license required" in the FortiGuard subscriptions section for OT protocol coverage. This confirms that a valid OT security service license is required to use and maintain the OT signatures database correctly.
Option D is also correct because the guide explicitly shows the CLI configuration used "To enable OT signatures" :
config ips global
set exclude-signatures none
end
It then states that "By default, OT signatures are excluded from the signatures lists on the GUI until you enable them on the CLI." This directly confirms that you must set exclude-signatures to none in the CLI to enable OT signatures.
Option B is incorrect because the study guide does not say you manually import the OT signatures database.
Instead, it explains that FortiGuard maintains updated OT signatures and that a valid license is required to receive updates. Option C is incorrect because the guide clearly says OT signatures are excluded by default until enabled from the CLI.
質問 # 19
Refer to the exhibit.
Which statement about this partial Asset Identity List page is correct? (Choose one answer)
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is B. A firewall policy has a Virtual Patching security profile applied to it .
The decisive clue in the exhibit is the Vulnerabilities column showing KEVs and device-specific vulnerability counts. The study guide explains the virtual patching workflow in this exact way: "FortiGate performs a lookup for device-specific vulnerabilities and mitigation rules in FortiGuard," then
"FortiGuard returns specific OT virtual patching signatures," and "FortiGate caches the signatures and mitigation rules that apply to each device." That is the same behavior reflected by the Asset Identity List showing vulnerability information per detected device.
The guide then states that "When traffic related to the vulnerable device reaches FortiGate, the firewall policy with the virtual patching profile applies." It also says "A virtual patching profile can be applied to firewall policies in any direction, protecting traffic from or to the vulnerable OT device." This directly links the per-device vulnerability visibility to a Virtual Patching profile enforced through firewall policy.
The other options do not match the exhibit. Antivirus is not described in the study guide as building a device- by-device vulnerability list, Application Control is used for OT protocol and message visibility, and IPS focuses on exploit detection and prevention. The Vulnerabilities/KEVs display is the indicator that FortiGate is using Virtual Patching logic for those OT devices.
質問 # 20
You want FortiAnalyzer to trigger an automation stitch on a FortiGate device automatically. What must you configure on FortiAnalyzer to enable direct communication with FortiGate? (Choose one answer)
正解：A
解説：
The verified answer is C. The Fabric settings . The study guide ties FortiAnalyzer-triggered actions to the Security Fabric relationship with FortiGate, not to playbook tasks or standalone event handlers alone. It explains that "within the Security Fabric environment, FortiAnalyzer is a key element in the creation of automation stitches" and shows the flow where a downstream FortiGate sends logs to FortiAnalyzer, then FortiAnalyzer parses the logs and notifies the root FortiGate , after which the root FortiGate triggers the action . This shows that FortiAnalyzer must be configured so it can communicate with FortiGate through the Security Fabric.
The guide also states that FortiAnalyzer is the foundation of the Security Fabric , providing logging, reporting, analytics, and automation for Fabric devices and endpoints. It further explains that the FortiAnalyzer Fabric connector consolidates the traffic logs within the Security Fabric. This confirms that the automation workflow depends on proper Security Fabric integration. A playbook task is used for automated SOC actions, and an event handler is used to generate events from logs, but neither one alone establishes the direct communication path needed between FortiAnalyzer and FortiGate. Therefore, the required configuration on FortiAnalyzer is the Fabric settings .
質問 # 21
Refer to the exhibits.
A partial Basic Event Handler page on FortiAnalyzer and the creation of a trigger in a FortiGate device are shown. To improve the protection of your OT network, you want to automate the handling of compromised devices notified through FortiAnalyzer. You have configured an event handler named Alert_trigger as shown in the exhibit. When you create the trigger on the FortiGate device, the Event handler name field does not provide the Alert_trigger option. What two actions must you perform to make the Alert_trigger option available? (Choose two answers)
正解：B、C
解説：
The correct answers are C and D .
Option C is correct because the study guide explains that when "a handler generates an event with the automation stitch option enabled, FortiAnalyzer sends a notification" and, in the Security Fabric workflow, "FortiAnalyzer parses the logs and notifies the root FortiGate." This means FortiGate must first have the FortiAnalyzer connection configured so it can consume FortiAnalyzer event handlers and use them in automation. The wizard message in the exhibit also points to this requirement by indicating that a FortiAnalyzer connection must be configured.
Option D is also correct because the study guide explicitly says that in this automation flow "the root FortiGate triggers the action" and shows "Stitches configured on root FortiGate." Therefore, if you want the FortiAnalyzer event handler to appear and be usable for automation, the trigger must be configured on the root FortiGate , not on an arbitrary downstream FortiGate.
Option A is incorrect because + Create is only a GUI control and does not solve the missing-event-handler visibility problem. Option B is not identified in the study guide as the requirement for making a FortiAnalyzer event handler available in the FortiGate automation trigger list.
質問 # 22
Refer to the exhibit.
A partial OT network is shown. You must improve the security of this OT network and implement internal segmentation between network 1 and network 2. How can you achieve the segmentation? (Choose one answer)
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is D. You can configure forward domain IDs for each network .
The study guide explains that in FortiGate transparent mode, all interfaces belong to the same broadcast domain, even interfaces with different VLAN IDs , and then states that you can "subdivide into multiple broadcast domains" by configuring set forward-domain < domain_ID > . It also states that "interfaces with the same domain ID belong to the same broadcast domain" and, with multiple forward domains,
"traffic arriving on one interface is broadcast only to interfaces in the same forward domain ID." That is the mechanism used to separate internal networks and confine traffic between network segments.
The other options do not fit this requirement. Universal ZTNA is for application access control, not segmentation between two OT networks. One traffic VDOM does not create segmentation by itself; multiple VDOMs would be needed for that type of isolation. An explicit software switch controls intraswitch traffic inside the same software-switch domain, not segmentation between separate networks like network 1 and network 2. Therefore, the correct way to implement the internal segmentation asked in the question is to assign different forward domain IDs to each network.
質問 # 23
......
Fortinet認定を取得したい場合は、NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6学習教材で時間と労力を大幅に節約できます。他にもやることがたくさんあることを知っており、当社の製品は何らかの形であなたの懸念を和らげます。まず、NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6試験の資料は、断片化された時間を組み合わせて効果を高め、次に、最短時間で試験に合格して希望の認定を取得できます。 NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6学習教材を使用すると、競争力を向上させることができます。 NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6学習ガイドの助けを借りて、あなたは他の人よりも最高の星になります
NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6日本語: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/NSEI_OTS_AR-7.6-mondaishu