ちなみに、ShikenPASS CFE-Lawの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ljh5TbzglALyI6i87Yx1tc-pqNhS2Lm5
ユーザーのプライバシー保護は、インターネット時代の永遠の問題です。多くの違法ウェブサイトはユーザーのプライバシーを第三者に販売するため、多くの購入者は奇妙なウェブサイトを信じることを嫌います。ただし、CFE-Law学習エンジンCFE-Lawを購入する際に心配する必要はまったくありません。ユーザーの情報が私たちの評判を傷つけているため、ユーザーの情報を決して販売しないことを保証します。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence and Legal Procedure | 20% | - Principles of evidence - Admissibility and exceptions (e.g., business records) - Collection and preservation of evidence |
| Rights of Individuals During Investigation | 15% | - Constitutional protections - Rights of employees and suspects - Attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine |
| Legal Systems and Framework | 20% | - Overview of legal systems - Administrative and regulatory law - Civil vs. criminal law |
| Fraud-Related Laws and Offenses | 25% | - Money laundering and related offenses - Elements of fraud - Bankruptcy, securities, and tax fraud - Anti-corruption laws (e.g., FCPA) |
| Litigation, Testimony and Enforcement | 20% | - Civil actions and remedies - Testimony and expert witness standards - Criminal prosecution process |
この人材が多い社会で、人々はずっと自分の能力を高めていますが、世界で最先端のIT専門家に対する需要が継続的に拡大しています。ですから、ACFEのCFE-Law認定試験に受かりたい人が多くなります。しかし、試験に受かるのは容易なことではないです。実は良いトレーニング資料を選んだら試験に合格することは不可能ではないです。ShikenPASSが提供したACFEのCFE-Law「Certified Fraud Examiner」試験トレーニング資料はあなたが試験に合格することを助けられます。ShikenPASSのトレーニング資料は大勢な受験生に証明されたもので、国際的に他のサイトをずっと先んじています。ACFEのCFE-Law認定試験に合格したいのなら、ShikenPASSが提供したACFEのCFE-Lawトレーニング資料をショッピングカートに入れましょう。
質問 # 13
Consents to searches by government agents that are obtained by force, duress, or bribery are NOT effective under the law and do NOT eliminate the need for a search warrant.
正解：A
解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 2.
In the context of The Law Related to Fraud, specifically relating to bribery, the question asks about NOT.
The correct answer is A: True.
This question addresses fraud-related laws. The correct answer identifies the proper legal concept or violation that applies in the described scenario. Fraud examiners must understand these legal principles to properly identify and address fraudulent activities.
質問 # 14
Ellis works for a business that filed for bankruptcy. The administrator presiding over the bankruptcy contacts Ellis and requests information regarding his employer's financial affairs Assuming the administrator has all of the powers recommended in the World Bank Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor/Debtor Regimes (World Bank Principles) which of the following is TRUE?
正解：A
解説：
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 3.
In the context of Bankruptcy Fraud, specifically relating to bankruptcy, administrator, the question asks about TRUE, his employer's financial affairs Assuming the administrator has all of the powers recommended in the World Bank Principles for Effective Insolvency and Creditor/Debtor Regimes (World Bank Principles) which of the following is TRUE.
The correct answer is C: The administrator may compel Ellis to provide the information despite Ellis's relationship to the business.
This question focuses on bankruptcy fraud concepts. The correct answer correctly identifies the relevant bankruptcy process, filing type, or fraud scheme. Understanding bankruptcy proceedings and the roles of various parties is essential for fraud examiners investigating these cases.
質問 # 15
Before Monique's criminal trial for embezzlement, she contacts witnesses against her and offers to pay them if they change their stories regarding the embezzlement. Monique's actions would MOST LIKELY cause the government to bring additional charges against her for:
正解：B
解説：
According to the ACFE Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section, under The Criminal Justice System and The Law Related to Fraud , obstruction of justice occurs when a person corruptly interferes with the administration of law or the proper functioning of the judicial process. This includes attempting to improperly influence, intimidate, or tamper with witnesses in a pending proceeding.
Offering money to witnesses in exchange for changing their testimony constitutes witness tampering, which is a classic form of obstruction of justice. The essence of obstruction is not merely the success of the interference but the corrupt attempt to impede the due administration of justice. The legal system depends on truthful testimony, and any effort to alter or influence witness statements through bribery undermines the integrity of judicial proceedings.
"Conspiracy to influence the court" is not a standard standalone criminal charge in this context, and fraudulent misrepresentation typically relates to deception for financial or property gain, not interference with judicial proceedings. Judicial extortion involves coercion under color of official authority, which does not apply here.
Therefore, Monique's conduct-offering payment to alter testimony-would most likely result in additional charges for obstruction of justice because she is attempting to corruptly interfere with the criminal trial process.
質問 # 16
Which of the following is NOT an element that must be proven to establish a penury offense?
正解：C
質問 # 17
Which of the following scenarios is an example of the criminal sanction known as criminal forfeiture?
正解：B
質問 # 18
......
弊社のCFE-Law問題集は三種類の版を提供いたします。PDF版、ソフト版とオンライン版があります。PDF版のCFE-Law日本語問題集は印刷されることができ、ソフト版のCFE-Law日本語問題集はいくつかのパソコンでも使われることもでき、オンライン版の問題集はパソコンでもスマホでも直接に使われることができます。お客様は自分の愛用する版が選べます。
CFE-Law試験勉強攻略: https://www.shikenpass.com/CFE-Law-shiken.html
BONUS！！！ ShikenPASS CFE-Lawダンプの一部を無料でダウンロード：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Ljh5TbzglALyI6i87Yx1tc-pqNhS2Lm5