Almost every Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) test candidate nowadays is confused about the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) study material. They don't know where to download updated JN0-352 questions that can help them prepare quickly for the Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) test. Some rely on outdated Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) (JN0-352) questions and suffer from the loss of money and time.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Routing Protocols | - BGP fundamentals and policy control - IS-IS overview - OSPF configuration and troubleshooting |
| Operations and Troubleshooting | - Junos CLI monitoring tools - Troubleshooting routing and switching issues |
| Routing Policy and Filtering | - Policy statements - Route filtering and preference control |
| High Availability | - Redundancy concepts in enterprise networks - VRRP configuration and behavior |
| Layer 2 Switching Technologies | - VLANs and trunking - Spanning Tree Protocol (STP/RSTP/MSTP) - Ethernet switching concepts |
| Network Services | - NAT concepts in Junos - Basic multicast concepts |
>> JN0-352 Reliable Braindumps <<
As we all know, HR form many companies hold the view that candidates who own a JN0-352 professional certification are preferred, because they are more likely to solve potential problems during work. And the JN0-352 certification vividly demonstrates the fact that they are better learners. As for candidates who possessed with a JN0-352 professional certification are more competitive. The current word is a stage of science and technology, social media and social networking has already become a popular means of JN0-352 Exam Materials. As a result, more and more people study or prepare for exam through social networking. By this way, our JN0-352 learning guide can be your best learn partner.
NEW QUESTION # 106
You have traffic for a video streaming application traversing a GRE tunnel in your network and users are reporting poor performance. Both ends of the tunnel are using the default settings for a gigabit Ethernet interface, but you observe excessive packet drops due to exceeding the MTU.
Which two steps would you take to improve connectivity for this application? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,D
Explanation:
The described symptom -- excessive packet drops specifically attributed to exceeding the MTU on a GRE tunnel carrying full-size video streaming traffic across default-MTU gigabit Ethernet interfaces -- is a direct consequence of the 24 bytes of GRE encapsulation overhead pushing packets that were already at or near the standard 1500-byte Ethernet MTU past the physical interface's transmission limit once the outer GRE and IP headers are added. The most durable fix is to proactively increase the physical member interfaces' MTU beyond the 1500-byte default -- to
1524 bytes or higher -- which provides sufficient headroom to absorb the full GRE encapsulation overhead without ever causing the fully encapsulated packet to exceed the interface's transmission capability, allowing full-size 1500-byte payloads to pass through the tunnel intact and without fragmentation or drops. As a complementary measure, configuring the clear-dont- fragment-bit option on the tunnel or member interfaces instructs Junos to clear the DF (don't fragment) bit on oversized packets rather than dropping them outright when they do exceed the available MTU, allowing the Packet Forwarding Engine to fragment and later reassemble the traffic instead of silently discarding it, which directly addresses the reported packet loss even under transient conditions. Simply raising the MTU only to 1500 bytes fails to account for the 24- byte GRE overhead and would not resolve the underlying oversize condition. Routing the tunnel over a higher-bandwidth link addresses potential congestion but does nothing to correct an MTU- based packet-size violation, which is the root cause explicitly identified in this scenario.
NEW QUESTION # 107
You want to use filter-based forwarding (FBF) on your Internet peering router to load-balance traffic to two directly connected ISPs based on the source address. Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Option B is correct. Filter-based forwarding (FBF), also known as Policy Based Routing (PBR), uses the forwarding routing instance type.
Option C is correct. Routing Information Base (RIB) groups are used to copy routes from one routing table to another. In the context of FBF, RIB groups can be used to copy routes from the inet.0 routing table.
Option A is incorrect. FBF does not use the no-forwarding routing instance type. Option D is incorrect. RIB groups are not used to hide routes in the inet.0 routing table. They are used to share or copy routes between different routing tables.
NEW QUESTION # 108
Which statement describes how Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RSTP) identifies an alternate port?
Answer: D
Explanation:
RSTP, as defined in IEEE 802.1w, introduces explicit, well-defined port roles that go beyond legacy 802.1D STP's simpler root/designated/blocking model, and the alternate port role is one of RSTP's key refinements. An alternate port is a port that receives BPDUs from a bridge other than the one through which the local switch's actual root port reaches the root bridge -- in other words, it represents a second, redundant path toward the root bridge learned from a different upstream bridge than the one currently providing the best (root port) path. Because the existing root port already provides the lowest-cost, actively used path to the root, the alternate port is deliberately held in the discarding (non-forwarding) state during normal, stable operation, functioning purely as a pre-computed, ready-to-use backup; critically, RSTP's major performance advantage over legacy STP is that if the current root port fails, the switch can transition its alternate port directly and almost instantly into the forwarding root port role without needing to pass through the lengthy listening and learning timer-based states that classic STP required, since the alternate port's suitability as a backup was already continuously verified through ongoing BPDU reception. It is not simply 'not receiving BPDUs' (an alternate port receives BPDUs continuously, just inferior ones relative to the current root port), it is not itself the least-cost path (that describes the root port), and it does not forward based on designated-port overload, which is not a concept that exists in RSTP's port-role logic at all.
NEW QUESTION # 109
You are deploying an EX Series switch with a Wi-Fi access point. The access point needs all untagged traffic to use a specific VLAN. In this scenario, which feature should you enable on the switch port?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 110
What is the purpose of the native VLAN feature on the Juniper Networks EX Series Switches?
Answer: D
Explanation:
A native VLAN is a trunk-port concept, not an access-port concept. On an 802.1Q trunk, every frame is normally expected to carry a VLAN tag identifying its membership; the native VLAN is the single exception that Junos permits an administrator to define using the native-vlan-id statement under the trunk interface's family ethernet-switching hierarchy. Any untagged frame arriving on that trunk port is automatically classified into the configured native VLAN, and conversely, outbound frames belonging to the native VLAN are transmitted untagged rather than with an 802.1Q header. This behavior exists chiefly for interoperability with legacy or third-party devices that either cannot generate 802.1Q tags or intentionally send management or default traffic untagged across an otherwise tagged trunk. Access ports, by definition, only ever carry a single VLAN's traffic and never receive tagged frames in normal operation, so the native VLAN mechanism has no relevance there -- which eliminates the access-port-oriented answer choices.
The native VLAN also does not restrict a trunk to a single VLAN; the trunk continues to carry all configured tagged VLANs simultaneously, with the native VLAN simply being the designated untagged exception. Misconfiguring or mismatching native VLAN IDs between two trunk peers is a classic Layer 2 troubleshooting scenario on the exam.
NEW QUESTION # 111
......
The JN0-352 software supports the MS operating system and can simulate the real test environment. In addition, the JN0-352 software has a variety of self-learning and self-assessment functions to test learning outcome, which will help you increase confidence to pass exam. The contents of the three versions are the same. Each of them neither limits the number of devices used or the number of users at the same time. You can choose according to your needs. JN0-352 Study Materials provide 365 days of free updates, you do not have to worry about what you missed.
New JN0-352 Test Review: https://www.torrentvce.com/JN0-352-valid-vce-collection.html