Reliable 312-97 training materials bring you the best 312-97 guide exam: EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE)

P.S. Kostenlose 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von Zertpruefung verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1J48PU54_4LCQykL4zkrsyq8EkRB1HGQU

Melden Sie sich an ECCouncil 312-97 Zertifizierungsprüfung an? Haben Sie vor zu vielen Prüfungsunterlagen Kopfschmerzen? Wir Zertpruefung können diese Probleme auflösen und wir sind die Website, an der Sie glauben können. Wenn Sie unsere Unterlagen zur ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfung benutzen, können Sie sehr leicht die ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfung bestehen. Sie sollen keine Zeit an den Unterlagen verschwenden, die vielleicht keinen Sinn haben. Probieren Sie bitte den Service von Zertpruefung.

ECCouncil 312-97 Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:EC-Council
Exam Name:EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE)
Exam Number:312-97
Certificate Validity Period:3 years
Real Exam Qty:100
Available Languages:English
Exam Price:$250 (USD)
Related Certifications:CSA (Certified Secure Application Developer)
CND (Certified Network Defender)
CEH (Certified Ethical Hacker)
Exam Format:Multiple Choice, Scenario-based Questions
Exam Duration:180 minutes
Passing Score:70%
Sample Questions:ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions
Exam Way:Online proctored or at authorized testing centers
Pre Condition:Minimum 2 years of experience in cybersecurity or software development is recommended; CEH certification is a recommended prerequisite
Official Syllabus URL:https://www.eccouncil.org/Certification/item/exam-312-97-ec-certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde

>> 312-97 Prüfungsunterlagen <<

312-97 Musterprüfungsfragen & 312-97 Online Test

Unsere Webseite Zertpruefung ist eine Webseite mit langer Geschichte, die Zertifizierungsantworten zur ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfung bietet. Nach langjährigen Bemühungen beträgt die Bestehensrate der ECCouncil 312-97 Zertifizierungsprüfung bereits 100%. Der Inhalt unserer Lehrbücher aktualisieren sich ständig, damit die Schulungsunterlagen zur ECCouncil 312-97 Zertifizierungsprüfung immer korekkt sind. Darüber hinaus können Sie einjährige Aktualisierung genießen, wenn Sie unsere Dumps gekauft haben.

ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfungsplan:

ThemaEinzelheiten
Thema 1
  • DevSecOps Pipeline - Build and Test Stage: This module explores integrating automated security testing into build and testing processes through CI pipelines. It covers SAST and DAST approaches to identify and address vulnerabilities early in development.
Thema 2
  • DevSecOps Pipeline - Plan Stage: This module covers the planning phase, emphasizing security requirement identification and threat modeling. It highlights cross-functional collaboration between development, security, and operations teams to ensure alignment with security goals.
Thema 3
  • Introduction to DevSecOps: This module covers foundational DevSecOps concepts, focusing on integrating security into the DevOps lifecycle through automated, collaborative approaches. It introduces key components, tools, and practices while discussing adoption benefits, implementation challenges, and strategies for establishing a security-first culture.

ECCouncil EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) 312-97 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q43-Q48):

43. Frage
Kenji Watanabe, a DevSecOps engineer at a Tokyo gaming studio, needs a testing tool that combines code instrumentation with live traffic analysis, so it can pinpoint the exact line of vulnerable code triggered when a QA tester clicks through the application during functional testing. Which approach should Kenji choose?

Antwort: B

Begründung:
IAST works by instrumenting the application with agents that monitor code execution from within while the application is exercised through normal functional or QA testing, allowing it to correlate detected vulnerabilities directly back to specific lines of source code in real time -- precisely what Kenji needs. Penetration testing is typically a manual or semi-manual black-box/gray-box assessment performed by security testers simulating real-world attacks, and does not inherently tie findings to exact source lines through instrumentation during routine QA clicks. Threat modeling is a design-time planning activity performed before code execution. Chaos engineering intentionally injects failures into production or production-like systems to test resilience, not to detect code-level vulnerabilities during functional testing. Because Kenji wants instrumented, line- level detection during live QA interaction, IAST is correct.


44. Frage
David Paymer has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer in an IT company over the past 5 years. His organization is using Azure DevOps service to produce software products securely and quickly. David's team leader asked him to publish a NuGet package utilizing a command line. Imagine you are in David's place; which command would you use to publish NuGet package into the feed?

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Publishing a NuGet package to a feed is done using the nuget.exe push command. The -Source parameter specifies the target feed name or URL, and the -ApiKey parameter is required even if the feed ignores its value. The publish verb is not used for NuGet package uploads, and - Destination is not a valid parameter for pushing packages. Therefore, nuget.exe push -Source
"<YOUR_FEED_NAME>" -ApiKey <ANY_STRING> <PACKAGE_PATH> is the correct
command. Using command-line publishing supports automation and consistency in DevSecOps workflows, enabling secure and repeatable artifact distribution as part of continuous delivery pipelines.


45. Frage
(Sofia Coppola has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer in an MNC company located in Denver, Colorado. In January of 2020, her organization migrated all the workloads from on-prem to AWS cloud environment due to the robust security feature and cost-effective services offered by AWS. Which of the following is an Amazon Web Services-hosted version control tool that Sofia can use to manage and store assets in the AWS cloud?.)

Antwort: B

Begründung:
AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed, AWS-hosted source control service that allows teams to store and manage source code, binaries, and other digital assets securely in the cloud. It supports Git-based repositories and integrates seamlessly with other AWS DevOps services such as CodeBuild, CodePipeline, and CodeDeploy. CodePipeline orchestrates CI/CD workflows, CodeBuild performs build and test operations, and CodeDeploy automates application deployment-but none of these are version control systems. For organizations migrating from on-prem to AWS, CodeCommit provides fine-grained access control using IAM, encryption at rest and in transit, and high availability without the need to manage infrastructure. Using CodeCommit during the Code stage supports secure collaboration, version tracking, and centralized source control aligned with DevSecOps best practices.
========


46. Frage
(Rachel Maddow has been working at RuizSoft Solution Pvt. Ltd. for the past 7 years as a senior DevSecOps engineer. To develop software products quickly and securely, her organization has been using AWS DevOps services. On January 1, 2022, the software development team of her organization developed a spring boot application with microservices and deployed it in AWS EC2 instance. Which of the following AWS services should Rachel use to scan the AWS workloads in EC2 instance for security issues and unintended network exposures?.)

Antwort: D

Begründung:
AWS Inspector is a managed vulnerability assessment service designed specifically to scan workloads running on Amazon EC2 instances and container images for security vulnerabilities and unintended network exposures. It automatically evaluates instances against known vulnerabilities and security best practices, providing detailed findings and risk severity levels. AWS WAF protects web applications from common web exploits but does not perform host-based vulnerability scanning. AWS Config tracks configuration changes and compliance but does not actively scan workloads for vulnerabilities. Amazon CloudWatch focuses on monitoring logs, metrics, and alarms rather than security scanning. For a Spring Boot microservices application deployed on EC2, AWS Inspector is the correct choice to continuously assess security posture during the Build, Deploy, and Operate phases of the DevSecOps pipeline.
========


47. Frage
Paul McCartney has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer in an IT company over the past 5 years. He would like to integrate Conjur secret management tool into the CI/CD pipeline to secure the secret credentials in various phases of development. To integrate Conjur with Jenkins, Paul downloaded Conjur.hpi file and uploaded it to the Upload Plugin section of Jenkins. Paul declared a policy branch using a code and saved it as a .yml file. Which of the following commands should Paul use to load this policy in Conjur root?

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Conjur policies define access controls, authentication rules, and secret variables, and they must be loaded into the correct policy branch. The conjur policy load command uses the -b flag to specify the policy branch and the -f flag to specify the policy file. To load a policy into the root branch, the correct command is conjur policy load -b root -f <file-name>. Options that reverse or misuse these flags are invalid and would either fail or load the policy incorrectly. Loading policies correctly during the Build and Test stage ensures that Jenkins pipelines can securely access secrets at runtime, enforcing centralized secret management, least-privilege access, and compliance with security requirements.


48. Frage
......

312-97 Musterprüfungsfragen: https://www.zertpruefung.de/312-97_exam.html

P.S. Kostenlose 2026 ECCouncil 312-97 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von Zertpruefung verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1J48PU54_4LCQykL4zkrsyq8EkRB1HGQU