It-PassportsはServSafeのServSafe-Manager認定試験に対して問題集を提供しておるサイトで、現場のServSafeのServSafe-Manager試験問題と模擬試験問題集を含みます。ほかのホームページに弊社みたいな問題集を見れば、あとでみ続けて、弊社の商品を盗作することとよくわかります。It-Passportsが提供した資料は最も全面的で、しかも更新の最も速いです。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: The Microworld | - Contaminants and pathogens
|
| Topic 2: Integrated Pest Management | - Pest prevention
|
| Topic 3: Safe Facilities and Equipment | - Facility requirements
|
| Topic 4: Providing Safe Food | - Foodborne illnesses
|
| Topic 5: Contamination, Food Allergens, and Foodborne Illness | - Preventing contamination
|
| Topic 6: Food Safety Management Systems | - Active managerial control
|
| Topic 7: The Safe Food Handler | - Employee food safety responsibilities
|
| Topic 8: Cleaning and Sanitizing | - Facility sanitation
|
| Topic 9: The Flow of Food | - Food handling procedures
|
| Topic 10: Cleaning Up After Emergencies | - Emergency response procedures
|
当社のソフトウェアバージョンには、実際のServSafe-Manager試験環境をシミュレートするという利点があります。多くの受験者は、練習をするときにパフォーマンスを発揮するには神経質すぎるため、実際のServSafe-Manager試験に合格できません。 ServSafe-Manager練習資料のこのソフトウェアバージョンは、心理的な恐怖を克服するのに役立ちます。その上、練習を終えると得点が表示されるので、数回後には間違いなくどんどん良くなります。 ServSafe-Manager試験の受験を完了したため、ServSafe-Manager試験に合格する必要があります。
質問 # 89
For a foodborne illness to be considered a confirmed outbreak, at least how many people must become sick?
正解：D
解説：
According to the National Restaurant Association and the CDC standards used by ServSafe, a foodborne- illness outbreak is defined by three specific criteria. First,two or more peoplemust experience the same symptoms after eating the same food. Second, an investigation must be conducted by state or local regulatory authorities (such as the health department). Third, the outbreak must be confirmed by laboratory analysis, which identifies the specific pathogen (likeSalmonellaorNorovirus) in both the affected individuals and the food source.
Understanding this definition is vital for a Food Protection Manager because the reporting and investigation process only "confirms" an outbreak when that second person is linked to the event. A single case (Option A) is considered an "illness" but not an "outbreak," though it should still be taken seriously. There are rare exceptions-such as cases of Botulism or Scombroid poisoning-where even a single case may trigger an immediate emergency investigation, but for the general purposes of the ServSafe exam and standard regulatory definitions, the number is two. When a suspected outbreak occurs, the Manager's role is to cooperate with the authorities, isolate any remaining suspected food (labeling it "Do Not Use/Do Not Discard"), and provide records like temperature logs and staff schedules. This helps investigators trace the source of the contamination, whether it was a failure in the "Flow of Food" (like improper cooling) or a sick employee. Proactive management and adherence to the FDA Food Code are designed to prevent these outbreaks from occurring by breaking the chain of contamination before it can affect multiple guests.
質問 # 90
There has been a recall of chicken tenders due to intentional tampering. The Person in Charge (PIC) has determined that the operation serves the type of chicken tenders recalled. What should the PIC do?
正解：C
解説：
Intentional tampering is a "food defense" issue and represents a critical threat to public safety. Unlike accidental biological contamination, intentional tampering may involve chemical, physical, or biological agents that are not necessarily destroyed by heat. Therefore, telling staff to cook the food longer (Option A) is an ineffective and dangerous response. According to ServSafe guidelines for managing recalls, especially those involving a security threat, the PIC must immediately take t1he product out of service by locating and isolating it.
The isolated food must be clearly labeled with "Do Not Use" and "Do Not Discard" signs to prevent any accidental preparation. It should be stored in a separate area from all other food and equipment. Furthermore, because this recall involves "intentional tampering," the PIC must notify the local regulatory authority (health department) and potentially law enforcement. This ensures that the incident is tracked and that the source of the tampering can be investigated. Continuing to serve the food (Option B) is gross negligence. Donating the food (Option D) is unethical and illegal, as it passes a known hazard to another population. This procedure is a key part of theA.L.E.R.T.food defense program, specifically the "Report" and "Threat" components, which emphasize transparency and cooperation with health officials during a crisis.
質問 # 91
A cook checks the temperature of soup being held for service, and it is $130