Salesforce JS-Dev-101 Valid Exam Vce Free, JS-Dev-101 New Dumps Questions

P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce JS-Dev-101 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by DumpsReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fR2NTWhEGwFv72aFZtpKZCwDDlBH4LvK

It's not easy for most people to get the JS-Dev-101 guide torrent, but I believe that you can easily and efficiently obtain qualification certificates as long as you choose our products. After you choose our study materials, you can master the examination point from the JS-Dev-101 Guide question. Then, you will have enough confidence to pass your exam. As for the safe environment and effective product, why don’t you have a try for our JS-Dev-101 question torrent, never let you down!

Salesforce JS-Dev-101 Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Asynchronous Programming: Covers asynchronous programming concepts and understanding how the event loop controls execution flow and determines outcomes.
Topic 2
  • Browser and Events: Covers DOM manipulation, event handling and propagation, browser-specific APIs, and using Browser Developer Tools to inspect code behavior.
Topic 3
  • Testing: Covers evaluating unit test effectiveness against a block of code and modifying tests to improve their coverage and reliability.

>> Salesforce JS-Dev-101 Valid Exam Vce Free <<

Salesforce JS-Dev-101 New Dumps Questions, JS-Dev-101 Free Exam Questions

A certification is not only an affirmation to your ability but also can help you enter a better company and improve your salary. JS-Dev-101 exam cram can help you get your certification successfully. We have a professional team to collect and research the latest information for the exam, and we offer you free update for 365 days after payment, so that you can obtain the latest information. In order to build up your confidence for JS-Dev-101 Exam Braindumps, we are pass guarantee and money back guarantee if you fail to pass the exam.

Salesforce Certified JavaScript Developer - Multiple Choice Sample Questions (Q44-Q49):

NEW QUESTION # 44
Refer to the code below:
const searchText = 'Yay! Salesforce is amazing!';
let result1 = searchText.search(/sales/i);
let result2 = searchText.search(/sales/);
console.log(result1);
console.log(result2);
After running this code, which result is displayed on the console?

Answer: B

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract JavaScript Knowledge:
String: "Yay! Salesforce is amazing!"
Index positions:
'Y' at 0, 'a' at 1, 'y' at 2, '!' at 3, space at 4, 'S' at 5, 'a' at 6, 'l' at 7, 'e' at 8, 's' at 9, etc.
Substring "Sales" starts at index 5.
String.prototype.search with a regex returns the index of the first match or -1 if there is no match.
searchText.search(/sales/i);
/sales/i is case-insensitive because of the i flag.
It matches "Sales" beginning at index 5.
So result1 is 5.
searchText.search(/sales/);
/sales/ is case-sensitive.
It requires lowercase "sales".
The text has "Sales" with uppercase S, so this does not match.
search returns -1 when there is no match.
So result2 is -1.
Console output:
First log: 5
Second log: -1
Option D matches this.
Concepts: regex search, case sensitivity vs i flag, String.prototype.search return values.
________________________________________


NEW QUESTION # 45
Function to test:
01 const sum3 = (arr) => {
02 if (!arr.length) return 0;
03 if (arr.length === 1) return arr[0];
04 if (arr.length === 2) return arr[0] + arr[1];
05 return arr[0] + arr[1] + arr[2];
06 };
Which two assert statements are valid tests for this function?

Answer: A,D

Explanation:
Length 1 → returns arr[0] → 0.
Assertion: 0 === 0 → true.
Also a correct and meaningful test.
Therefore, the valid and logically correct tests here are C and D.
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract JavaScript Knowledge:
Evaluate each test:
A). sum3([1, '2'])
Array length is 2 → line 4: arr[0] + arr[1] → 1 + '2' → '12' (string).
Assertion: '12' == 12 is true (type coercion).
However, this "test" is not logically correct: a numeric sum function should not be expected to return '12' as a string. It passes only because of weak equality coercion, so it is not a good/valid test of correct behavior.
B). sum3(['hello', 2, 3, 4])
Length ≥ 3 → line 5: 'hello' + 2 + 3 → 'hello2' + 3 → 'hello23'.
'hello23' === NaN is always false because NaN is never equal to anything, not even itself.
This assertion fails and also misunderstands how NaN comparisons work.
C). sum3([-3, 2])
Length 2 → -3 + 2 = -1.
Assertion: -1 === -1 → true.
This is a correct and meaningful test.


NEW QUESTION # 46
Whichthree actions can be using the JavaScript browser console?
Choose 3 answers:

Answer: C,D,E


NEW QUESTION # 47
A developer has a fizzbuzz function that, when passed in a number, returns the following:
'fizz' if the number is divisible by 3.
'buzz' if the number is divisible by 5.
'fizzbuzz' if the number is divisible by both 3 and 5.
Empty string '' if the number is divisible by neither 3 nor 5.
Which two test cases properly test scenarios for the fizzbuzz function?

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
:
First, recall the fizzbuzz rules:
If n divisible by 3 and not by 5 → return 'fizz'.
If n divisible by 5 and not by 3 → return 'buzz'.
If n divisible by both 3 and 5 → return 'fizzbuzz'.
Otherwise → return '' (empty string).
Evaluate each test:
Option A:
let res = fizzbuzz(true);
console.assert(res === '');
In JavaScript, when using arithmetic operations with true, it is coerced to the number 1. A typical implementation of fizzbuzz would treat the argument as a number and compute:
true % 3 → 1 % 3 → 1
true % 5 → 1 % 5 → 1
So true is effectively treated as 1, which is divisible by neither 3 nor 5. The function should return ''. The assertion res === '' will pass.
This test covers the scenario "neither divisible by 3 nor 5".
Option B:
let res = fizzbuzz(3);
console.assert(res === '');
3 is divisible by 3 but not by 5.
According to fizzbuzz rules, fizzbuzz(3) should return 'fizz'.
This test expects '', so it is incorrect; the assertion would fail in a correct implementation.
Option C:
let res = fizzbuzz(5);
console.assert(res === 'fizz');
5 is divisible by 5 but not by 3.
According to fizzbuzz rules, fizzbuzz(5) should return 'buzz'.
This test expects 'fizz', so it is incorrect.
Option D:
let res = fizzbuzz(15);
console.assert(res === 'fizzbuzz');
15 is divisible by both 3 and 5.
According to fizzbuzz rules, fizzbuzz(15) should return 'fizzbuzz'.
This assertion correctly matches the expected result, so it is a proper test case.
Thus, the two test cases that correctly test valid fizzbuzz behavior are:
Answe r: A, D
Study Guide / Concept Reference (no links):
Modulo operator (%) for divisibility checks
Truthy/number coercion of boolean true in arithmetic (Number(true) === 1) Designing unit tests with console.assert Typical fizzbuzz logic structure and expected outputs


NEW QUESTION # 48
Refer to the code below:
01 function changeValue(param) {
02 param = 5;
03 }
04 let a = 10;
05 let b = a;
06
07 changeValue(b);
08 const result = a + ' - ' + b;
What is the value of result when the code executes?

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract JavaScript Knowledge:
We must understand pass-by-value for primitives in JavaScript.
Initial values:
let a = 10;
let b = a; // b gets a copy of the value 10
So:
a is 10
b is 10 (independent copy)
Function call:
changeValue(b);
Function definition:
function changeValue(param) {
param = 5;
}
param receives the value of b, which is 10.
Inside the function, param is a local variable.
param = 5; changes only this local copy.
It does not affect b outside the function.
After the function call:
a is still 10.
b is still 10.
Result:
const result = a + ' - ' + b;
a is 10.
b is 10.
String concatenation: '10 - 10'.
So result is:
"10 - 10"
Therefore, the correct option is:
Study Guide Concepts:
Primitive values (numbers, strings, booleans) are passed by value
Function parameters as local variables
String concatenation with +
Difference between mutating references vs primitives
________________________________________


NEW QUESTION # 49
......

You can trust DumpsReview and download JS-Dev-101 exam questions to start preparation with complete peace of mind and satisfaction. The JS-Dev-101 exam questions have already helped countless Salesforce JS-Dev-101 exam candidates. They got success in their dream JS-Dev-101 Certification Exam with flying colors. They did this with the help of real, valid, and updated JS-Dev-101 exam questions. You can also get success in the Salesforce Certified JavaScript Developer - Multiple Choice certification exam with JS-Dev-101 exam questions.

JS-Dev-101 New Dumps Questions: https://www.dumpsreview.com/JS-Dev-101-exam-dumps-review.html

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of DumpsReview JS-Dev-101 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1fR2NTWhEGwFv72aFZtpKZCwDDlBH4LvK