BONUS!!! 免費下載VCESoft L4M5考試題庫的完整版：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1v5iJsriopcC1pwjvq5LcGiCyQ6Lq5tkR
作為IT認證考試學習資料的專業團隊，VCESoft是您獲得高品質學習資料的來源。無論您需要尋找什么樣子的CIPS L4M5考古題我們都可以提供，借助我們的L4M5學習資料，您不必浪費時間去閱讀更多的參考書，只需花費20 – 30小時掌握我們的CIPS L4M5題庫問題和答案，就可以順利通過考試。我們為您提供PDF版本的和軟件版，還有在線測試引擎題庫，其中L4M5軟件版本的題庫，可以模擬真實的考試環境，以滿足大家的需求，這是最優秀的L4M5學習資料。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Know how to prepare for negotiations with external organisations | 35% | - Planning and resources
|
| Topic 2: Understand how commercial negotiations should be undertaken | 30% | - Communication skills
|
| Topic 3: Understand key approaches in the negotiation of commercial agreements with external organisations | 35% | - Types of negotiation approaches
|
我們都很清楚 CIPS L4M5 認證考試在IT行業中的地位是駐足輕重的地位，但關鍵的問題是能夠拿到CIPS L4M5的認證證書不是那麼簡單的。我們很清楚地知道網上缺乏有高品質的準確性高的相關考試資料。VCESoft的考試練習題和答案可以為一切參加IT行業相關認證考試的人提供一切所急需的資料。它能時時刻刻地提供你們想要的資料，購買我們所有的資料能保證你通過你的第一次CIPS L4M5認證考試。
問題 #15
The only procurement risk inherent in a distributive negotiation approach is the potential loss in the outcome.
Is this statement TRUE?
答案：B
解題說明：
Distributive negotiation carries several risks beyond justlosing out on value. These includedamaging supplier relationships,eroding trust, andreaching an impasse, where neither party can agree. This could result in delayed projects, increased costs, or supplier withdrawal.
"Distributive negotiation can lead to a breakdown in communication, impasses, and long-term relationship damage. The win-lose mindset can prevent collaborative problem-solving." (L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.5 - Risks of Distributive Approaches)
問題 #16
Sally is negotiating with an oversea supplier on the price and payment period. Her company and the supplying organisation are equal in bargaining power.The supplier says that they are investing in new facilities and machinery so the payment period should not be longer than 30 days. Sally knows that her company often pays the suppliers after 45 days from the delivery, but at the moment the company has positive cash flow and it is able to pay immediately. Which of the following should be Sally's concession plan?
答案：B
解題說明：
Explanation
In the scenario, the length of payment period is particularly important to the supplier as they are investing new facilities. Otherwise, the buyer's company has apositive cash flow position and budget is available for a shorter payment terms. So this tradeable (payment period) is important to supplier but it is not a significant problem with the buyer. This tradeable will fall within 'Easy concession to trade' quadrant in the following matrix:
Table Description automatically generated
If the tradeable fall within this quadrant, Sally should shorten the payment period in supplier's favour and try to win as many concessions as possible in return. Asking for a discount may be a reasonable trade-off.
LO 2,AC 2.3
問題 #17
Katie is preparing a negotiation with a strategic supplier. Through deep market analysis, she realises that her company and the supplier have equal bargaining power. Via regular communication, Katie knows that both parties are arguing on amount of liquidated damages and neither party shall concede all of their requirements but some are negotiable. Katie and her counterpart from supplying company still desire a long-term relationship and hope that the meeting between them will be a solution for current situation. Which of the following is the most appropriate approach that Katie should adopt to achieve the above outcome?
答案：C
解題說明：
Competing is assertive and uncooperative, a power-oriented mode. When competing, an individual pursues his or her own concerns at the other person's expense, using whatever power seems appropriate to win his or her position. Competing might mean standing up for your rights, defending a position you believe is correct, or simply trying to win. Competing will not allow long-term relationship to flourish.
Compromising is intermediate in both assertiveness and cooperativeness. When compromising, the objective is to find an expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfies both parties. Compromising falls on a middle ground between competing and accommodating, giving up more than competing but less than accommodating. Likewise, it addresses an issue more directly than avoiding but doesn't explore it in as much depth as collaborating. Compromising might mean splitting the difference, exchanging concessions, or seeking a quick middle-ground position. It is a valid approach when long-term relationships are at stake and it is important to find some common ground on which to base an agreement. Both sides get something but not everything. Therefore, this is the most appropriate for this scenario.
Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation. In the scenario, both parties want to take the opportunity, then avoiding is not an appropriate solution.
Accommodating is unassertive and cooperative-the opposite of competing. When accommodating, an individual neglects his or her own concerns to satisfy the concerns of the other person; there is an element of self-sacrifice in this mode. Accommodating might take the form of selfless generosity or charity, obeying another person's order when you would prefer not to, or yielding to another's point of view. In the scenario, neither party shall concede all of their requirements, it is unnecessary to adopt this approach.
LO 1, AC 1.1
問題 #18
Which of the following are elements of price negotiations? Select the TWO that apply.
答案：B,C
解題說明：
Price negotiations extend beyond headline unit price and include elements that influence total commercial value. Pricing arrangements (such as fixed, variable, indexed, or cost-plus pricing) directly affect financial risk and cost certainty. Terms of payment influence cash flow, working capital, and overall cost of ownership, making them core price-related negotiation variables. Sales tax is typically regulated and not negotiable, while cash flow management and administration costs are internal organisational concerns rather than negotiated price elements. CIPS emphasises a holistic approach to price negotiations that considers structure and payment terms, not just price level.
Reference: CIPS L4M5 Commercial Negotiation (CORE), 2nd edition - LO 2.2: Elements and structure of price negotiations.
問題 #19
If the price of a good is above the equilibrium price, which of the following will happen?
答案：D
解題說明：
In microeconomics, equilibrium price is determined when the quantity demanded is equal to thequantity supplied at equilibrium price in a market, there will be no shortages and no surpluses. If we combine our supply and demand curves on one graph, the point at which they converge determines the equilibrium price. If the price is set above this price and you read across the graph you will see the supply excess demand and there will be a surplus. In order to reduce this surplus, the price will need to fall. The scenario is illustrated in the graph below:
Chart, line chart Description automatically generated
問題 #20
......
VCESoft為您提供的針對性培訓和高品質的練習題，是你第一次參加CIPS L4M5 認證考試最好的準備。VCESoft提供的練習題是與真實的考試試題很相似的，能確保你一次成功通過CIPS L4M5 認證考試。如果你考試失敗，我們將全額退款。
L4M5試題: https://www.vcesoft.com/L4M5-pdf.html
P.S. VCESoft在Google Drive上分享了免費的、最新的L4M5考試題庫：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1v5iJsriopcC1pwjvq5LcGiCyQ6Lq5tkR