그리고 DumpTOP ACD-301 시험 문제집의 전체 버전을 클라우드 저장소에서 다운로드할 수 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N4CDX6Q_2qqMtlpncbnAEXURzf-Ra3Fd
다년간 IT업계에 종사하신 전문가들이 자신의 노하우와 경험으로 제작한 Appian ACD-301덤프는 ACD-301 실제 기출문제를 기반으로 한 자료로서 ACD-301시험문제의 모든 범위와 유형을 포함하고 있어 높을 적중율을 자랑하고 있습니다.덤프구매후 불합격 받으시면 구매일로부터 60일내 주문은 덤프비용을 환불해드립니다.IT 자격증 취득은 DumpTOP덤프가 정답입니다.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Extending Appian | - Program advanced APIs that allow Appian to communicate with external systems - Evaluate existing plug-ins and recognize when to develop custom plug-ins - Evaluate advanced document generation options - Design and troubleshoot advanced integrations - Evaluate and implement authentication using connected systems |
| Topic 2: Project and Resource Management | - Interpret client requirements and recommend technical design options - Manage and lead essential activities across an Agile team - Recommend the protocols and procedures involved in Appian governance |
| Topic 3: Data Management | - Analyze, evaluate, and troubleshoot high-volume database structures - Determine the best way to leverage data fabric, data types, and data migration - Plan, execute, and troubleshoot data migrations - Diagnose and troubleshoot data fabric complexities - Implement advanced database features - Analyze and design secure data models |
| Topic 4: Platform Management | - Schedule, execute, and troubleshoot application deployments across environments - Troubleshoot and resolve issues at the environment level, involving Appian Support when necessary - Implement administration console settings - Describe basic platform enterprise architecture and how it's used |
| Topic 5: Proactively Design for Scalability and Performance | - Build and maintain scalable applications - Plan and evaluate load testing - Monitor and troubleshoot issues at the application level - Design and implement performant Appian components |
| Topic 6: Application Design and Development | - Evaluate how Appian can meet user requirements - Evaluate and design applications for consistency and reusability - Implement best practices for multiple application development - Design applications leveraging Appian functionality |
지금 같은 상황에서 몇년간Appian ACD-301시험자격증만 소지한다면 일상생활에서많은 도움이 될것입니다. 하지만 문제는 어떻게Appian ACD-301시험을 간단하게 많은 공을 들이지 않고 시험을 패스할것인가이다? 우리DumpTOP는 여러분의 이러한 문제들을 언제드지 해결해드리겠습니다. 우리의ACD-301시험마스터방법은 바로IT전문가들이제공한 시험관련 최신연구자료들입니다. 우리DumpTOP 여러분은ACD-301시험관련 최신버전자료들을 얻을 수 있습니다. DumpTOP을 선택함으로써 여러분은 성공도 선택한것이라고 볼수 있습니다.
질문 # 33
Your client's customer management application is finally released to Production. After a few weeks of small enhancements and patches, the client is ready to build their next application. The new application will leverage customer information from the first application to allow the client to launch targeted campaigns for select customers in order to increase sales. As part of the first application, your team had built a section to display key customer information such as their name, address, phone number, how long they have been a customer, etc. A similar section will be needed on the campaign record you are building. One of your developers shows you the new object they are working on for the new application and asks you to review it as they are running into a few issues. What feedback should you give?
정답：A
설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
The scenario involves reusing a customer information section from an existing application in a new application for campaign management, with the developer encountering issues. Appian's best practices emphasize reusability, efficiency, and maintainability, especially when leveraging existing components across applications.
Option B (Ask the developer to convert the original customer section into a shared object so it can be used by the new application):
This is the recommended approach. Converting the original section into a shared object (e.g., a reusable interface component) allows it to be accessed across applications without duplication. Appian's Design Guide highlights the use of shared components to promote consistency, reduce redundancy, and simplify maintenance. Since the new application requires similar customer data (name, address, etc.), reusing the existing section-after ensuring it is modular and adaptable-addresses the developer's issues while aligning with the client's goal of leveraging prior work. The developer can then adjust the shared object (e.g., via parameters) to fit the campaign context, resolving their issues collaboratively.
Option A (Provide guidance to the developer on how to address the issues so that they can proceed with their work):
While providing guidance is valuable, it doesn't address the root opportunity to reuse existing code. This option focuses on fixing the new object in isolation, potentially leading to duplicated effort if the original section could be reused instead.
Option C (Point the developer to the relevant areas in the documentation or Appian Community where they can find more information on the issues they are running into):
This is a passive approach and delays resolution. As a Lead Developer, offering direct support or a strategic solution (like reusing components) is more effective than redirecting the developer to external resources without context.
Option D (Create a duplicate version of that section designed for the campaign record):
Duplication violates Appian's principle of DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and increases maintenance overhead. Any future updates to customer data display logic would need to be applied to multiple objects, risking inconsistencies.
Given the need to leverage existing customer information and the developer's issues, converting the section to a shared object is the most efficient and scalable solution.
질문 # 34
You are the lead developer for an Appian project, in a backlog refinement meeting. You are presented with the following user story:
"As a restaurant customer, I need to be able to place my food order online to avoid waiting in line for takeout." Which two functional acceptance criteria would you consider 'good'?
정답：A,C
설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
As an Appian Lead Developer, defining "good" functional acceptance criteria for a user story requires ensuring they are specific, testable, and directly tied to the user's need (placing an online food order to avoid waiting in line). Good criteria focus on functionality, usability, and reliability, aligning with Appian's Agile and design best practices. Let's evaluate each option:
A . The user will click Save, and the order information will be saved in the ORDER table and have audit history:
This is a "good" criterion. It directly validates the core functionality of the user story-placing an order online. Saving order data in the ORDER table (likely via a process model or Data Store Entity) ensures persistence, and audit history (e.g., using Appian's audit logs or database triggers) tracks changes, supporting traceability and compliance. This is specific, testable (e.g., verify data in the table and logs), and essential for the user's goal, aligning with Appian's data management and user experience guidelines.
B . The user will receive an email notification when their order is completed:
While useful, this is a "nice-to-have" enhancement, not a core requirement of the user story. The story focuses on placing an order online to avoid waiting, not on completion notifications. Email notifications add value but aren't essential for validating the primary functionality. Appian's user story best practices prioritize criteria tied to the main user need, making this secondary and not "good" in this context.
C . The system must handle up to 500 unique orders per day:
This is a non-functional requirement (performance/scalability), not a functional acceptance criterion. It describes system capacity, not specific user behavior or functionality. While important for design, it's not directly testable for the user story's outcome (placing an order) and isn't tied to the user's experience. Appian's Agile methodologies separate functional and non-functional requirements, making this less relevant as a "good" criterion here.
D . The user cannot submit the form without filling out all required fields:
This is a "good" criterion. It ensures data integrity and usability by preventing incomplete orders, directly supporting the user's ability to place a valid online order. In Appian, this can be implemented using form validation (e.g., required attributes in SAIL interfaces or process model validations), making it specific, testable (e.g., verify form submission fails with missing fields), and critical for a reliable user experience. This aligns with Appian's UI design and user story validation standards.
Conclusion: The two "good" functional acceptance criteria are A (order saved with audit history) and D (required fields enforced). These directly validate the user story's functionality (placing a valid order online), are testable, and ensure a reliable, user-friendly experience-aligning with Appian's Agile and design best practices for user stories.
Appian Documentation: "Writing Effective User Stories and Acceptance Criteria" (Functional Requirements).
Appian Lead Developer Certification: Agile Development Module (Acceptance Criteria Best Practices).
Appian Best Practices: "Designing User Interfaces in Appian" (Form Validation and Data Persistence).
질문 # 35
You are required to configure a connection so that Jira can inform Appian when specific tickets change (using a webhook). Which three required steps will allow you to connect both systems?
정답：A,B,C
설명：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Configuring a webhook connection from Jira to Appian requires setting up a mechanism for Jira to push ticket change notifications to Appian in real-time. This involves creating an endpoint in Appian to receive the webhook and configuring Jira to send the data. Appian's Integration Best Practices and Web API documentation provide the framework for this process.
Option A (Create a Web API object and set up the correct security):
This is a required step. In Appian, a Web API object serves as the endpoint to receive incoming webhook requests from Jira. You must define the API structure (e.g., HTTP method, input parameters) and configure security (e.g., basic authentication, API key, or OAuth) to validate incoming requests. Appian recommends using a service account with appropriate permissions to ensure secure access, aligning with the need for a controlled webhook receiver.
Option B (Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials):
This is essential. In Jira, you need to set up a webhook by providing the Appian Web API's URL (e.g., https://<appian-site>/suite/webapi/<web-api-name>) and the credentials or authentication method (e.g., API key or basic auth) that match the security setup in Appian. This ensures Jira can successfully send ticket change events to Appian.
Option C (Create a new API Key and associate a service account):
This is necessary for secure authentication. Appian recommends using an API key tied to a service account for webhook integrations. The service account should have permissions to process the incoming data (e.g., write to a process or data store) but not excessive privileges. This step complements the Web API security setup and Jira configuration.
Option D (Give the service account system administrator privileges):
This is unnecessary and insecure. System administrator privileges grant broad access, which is overkill for a webhook integration. Appian's security best practices advocate for least-privilege principles, limiting the service account to the specific objects or actions needed (e.g., executing the Web API).
Option E (Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status):
This is incorrect for a webhook scenario. Webhooks are push-based, where Jira notifies Appian of changes. Creating an integration object for periodic polling (pull-based) is a different approach and not required for the stated requirement of Jira informing Appian via webhook.
These three steps (A, B, C) establish a secure, functional webhook connection without introducing unnecessary complexity or security risks.
The three required steps that will allow you to connect both systems are:
A . Create a Web API object and set up the correct security. This will allow you to define an endpoint in Appian that can receive requests from Jira via webhook. You will also need to configure the security settings for the Web API object, such as authentication method, allowed origins, and access control.
B . Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials. This will allow you to set up a webhook in Jira that can send requests to Appian when specific tickets change. You will need to specify the URL of the Web API object in Appian, as well as any credentials required for authentication.
C . Create a new API Key and associate a service account. This will allow you to generate a unique token that can be used for authentication between Jira and Appian. You will also need to create a service account in Appian that has permissions to access or update data related to Jira tickets.
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
D . Give the service account system administrator privileges. This is not required and could pose a security risk, as giving system administrator privileges to a service account could allow it to perform actions that are not related to Jira tickets, such as modifying system settings or accessing sensitive data.
E . Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status. This is not required and could cause unnecessary overhead, as creating an integration object from Appian to Jira would involve polling Jira for ticket status changes, which could consume more resources than using webhook notifications. Verified Appian Documentation, section "Web API" and "API Keys".
질문 # 36
You are reviewing the Engine Performance Logs in Production for a single application that has been live for six months. This application experiences concurrent user activity and has a fairly sustained load during business hours. The client has reported performance issues with the application during business hours.During your investigation, you notice a high Work Queue - Java Work Queue Size value in the logs. You also notice unattended process activities, including timer events and sending notification emails, are taking far longer to execute than normal.The client increased the number of CPU cores prior to the application going live.What is the next recommendation?
정답：B
질문 # 37
For each requirement, match the most appropriate approach to creating or utilizing plug-ins Each approach will be used once.
Note: To change your responses, you may deselect your response by clicking the blank space at the top of the selection list.
정답：
설명：
질문 # 38
......
Appian ACD-301인증시험패스에는 많은 방법이 있습니다. 먼저 많은 시간을 투자하고 신경을 써서 전문적으로 과련 지식을 터득한다거나; 아니면 적은 시간투자와 적은 돈을 들여 DumpTOP의 인증시험덤프를 구매하는 방법 등이 있습니다.
ACD-301인증시험 덤프문제: https://www.dumptop.com/Appian/ACD-301-dump.html
DumpTOP ACD-301 최신 PDF 버전 시험 문제집을 무료로 Google Drive에서 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N4CDX6Q_2qqMtlpncbnAEXURzf-Ra3Fd