BONUS!!! Download part of PracticeDump Data-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YtyFZ4PF91Dq-RgVXzQr7UPj-Jw_-Q0J
The Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate pdf questions learning material provided to the customers from PracticeDump is in three different formats. The first format is PDF format which is printable and portable. It means it can be accessed from tablets, laptops, and smartphones to prepare for the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam. The Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate PDF format can be used offline, and candidates can even prepare for it in the classroom or library by printing questions or on their smart devices.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Automate data pipelines
|
| Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Apply programming concepts
|
| Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Implement data quality checks
|
| Data Store Management | 26% | - Design data models
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate New Learning Materials <<
We are confident that our Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate training online materials and services are competitive. We are trying to offer the best high passing-rate Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Training Online materials with low price. Our Data-Engineer-Associate exam materials will help you pass exam one shot without any doubt.
NEW QUESTION # 75
A company has as JSON file that contains personally identifiable information (PIT) data and non-PII data.
The company needs to make the data available for querying and analysis. The non-PII data must be available to everyone in the company. The PII data must be available only to a limited group of employees. Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 76
A company stores datasets in JSON format and .csv format in an Amazon S3 bucket. The company has Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server databases, Amazon DynamoDB tables that are in provisioned capacity mode, and an Amazon Redshift cluster. A data engineering team must develop a solution that will give data scientists the ability to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The best solution to meet the requirements of giving data scientists the ability to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL with the least operational overhead is to use AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, use Amazon Athena to query the data, use SQL for structured data sources, and use PartiQL for data that is stored in JSON format.
AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores1. AWS Glue crawlers are processes that connect to a data store, progress through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then create metadata tables in the Data Catalog2. The Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components3. You can use AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server, and Amazon DynamoDB, and store the metadata in the Data Catalog.
Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python4. Amazon Athena also supports PartiQL, a SQL-compatible query language that lets you query, insert, update, and delete data from semi-structured and nested data, such as JSON. You can use Amazon Athena to query the data from the Data Catalog using SQL for structured data sources, such as .csv files and relational databases, and PartiQL for data that is stored in JSON format. You can also use Athena to query data from other data sources, such as Amazon Redshift, using federated queries.
Using AWS Glue and Amazon Athena to query all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL is the least operational overhead solution, as you do not need to provision, manage, or scale any infrastructure, and you pay only for the resources you use. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your crawlers and ETL jobs1. Amazon Athena charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries. You can also reduce the cost and improve the performance of your queries by using compression, partitioning, and columnar formats for your data in Amazon S3.
Option B is not the best solution, as using AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, and use Redshift Spectrum to query the data, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena. Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL. While Redshift Spectrum is powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, it is not necessary or cost-effective for querying all data sources by using syntax similar to SQL. Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries, which is similar to Amazon Athena, but it also requires you to have an Amazon Redshift cluster, which charges you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster5. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of data and complex queries. Moreover, using Redshift Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision and manage the cluster, and create an external schema and database for the data in the Data Catalog, instead of querying it directly from Amazon Athena.
Option C is not the best solution, as using AWS Glue to crawl the data sources, store metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, use AWS Glue jobs to transform data that is in JSON format to Apache Parquet or .csv format, store the transformed data in an S3 bucket, and use Amazon Athena to query the original and transformed data from the S3 bucket, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena with PartiQL. AWS Glue jobs are ETL scripts that you can write in Python or Scala to transform your data and load it to your target data store. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance of analytical queries by reducing the amount of data that needs to be scanned and providing efficient compression and encoding schemes6. While using AWS Glue jobs and Parquet can improve the performance and reduce the cost of your queries, they would also increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, as you would have to write, run, and monitor the ETL jobs, and store the transformed data in a separate location in Amazon S3. Moreover, using AWS Glue jobs and Parquet would introduce additional latency, as you would have to wait for the ETL jobs to finish before querying the transformed data.
Option D is not the best solution, as using AWS Lake Formation to create a data lake, use Lake Formation jobs to transform the data from all data sources to Apache Parquet format, store the transformed data in an S3 bucket, and use Amazon Athena or Redshift Spectrum to query the data, would incur more costs and complexity than using Amazon Athena with PartiQL. AWS Lake Formation is a service that helps you centrally govern, secure, and globally share data for analytics and machine learning7. Lake Formation jobs are ETL jobs that you can create and run using the Lake Formation console or API. While using Lake Formation and Parquet can improve the performance and reduce the cost of your queries, they would also increase the complexity and the operational overhead of the data pipeline, as you would have to create, run, and monitor the Lake Formation jobs, and store the transformed data in a separate location in Amazon S3. Moreover, using Lake Formation and Parquet would introduce additional latency, as you would have to wait for the Lake Formation jobs to finish before querying the transformed data.
Furthermore, using Redshift Spectrum to query the data would also incur the same costs and complexity as mentioned in option B.
References:
What is Amazon Athena?
Data Catalog and crawlers in AWS Glue
AWS Glue Data Catalog
Columnar Storage Formats
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
AWS Glue Schema Registry
What is AWS Glue?
Amazon Redshift Serverless
Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters
[Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum]
[Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift]
[What is AWS Lambda?]
[PartiQL for Amazon Athena]
[Federated queries in Amazon Athena]
[Amazon Athena pricing]
[Top 10 performance tuning tips for Amazon Athena]
[AWS Glue ETL jobs]
[AWS Lake Formation jobs]
NEW QUESTION # 77
A manufacturing company collects sensor data from its factory floor to monitor and enhance operational efficiency. The company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to publish the data that the sensors collect to a data stream. Then Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose writes the data to an Amazon S3 bucket.
The company needs to display a real-time view of operational efficiency on a large screen in the manufacturing facility.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LOWEST latency?
Answer: D
Explanation:
This solution will meet the requirements with the lowest latency because it uses Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink to process the sensor data in real time and write it to Amazon Timestream, a fast, scalable, and serverless time series database. Amazon Timestream is optimized for storing and analyzing time series data, such as sensor data, and can handle trillions of events per day with millisecond latency. By using Amazon Timestream as a source, you can create an Amazon QuickSight dashboard that displays a real-time view of operational efficiency on a large screen in the manufacturing facility. Amazon QuickSight is a fully managed business intelligence service that can connect to various data sources, including Amazon Timestream, and provide interactive visualizations and insights123.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
A. Use Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (previously known as Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) to process the sensor data. Use a connector for Apache Flink to write data to an Amazon Timestream database.
Use the Timestream database as a source to create a Grafana dashboard. This option is similar to option C, but it uses Grafana instead of Amazon QuickSight to create the dashboard. Grafana is an open source visualization tool that can also connect to Amazon Timestream, but it requires additional steps to set up and configure, such as deploying a Grafana server on Amazon EC2, installing the Amazon Timestream plugin, and creating an IAM role for Grafana to access Timestream. These steps can increase the latency and complexity of the solution.
B. Configure the S3 bucket to send a notification to an AWS Lambda function when any new object is created. Use the Lambda function to publish the data to Amazon Aurora. Use Aurora as a source to create an Amazon QuickSight dashboard. This option is not suitable for displaying a real-time view of operational efficiency, as it introduces unnecessary delays and costs in the data pipeline. First, the sensor data is written to an S3 bucket by Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, which can have a buffering interval of up to 900 seconds.
Then, the S3 bucket sends a notification to a Lambda function, which can incur additional invocation and execution time. Finally, the Lambda function publishes the data to Amazon Aurora, a relational database that is not optimized for time series data and can have higher storage and performance costs than Amazon Timestream .
D. Use AWS Glue bookmarks to read sensor data from the S3 bucket in real time. Publish the data to an Amazon Timestream database. Use the Timestream database as a source to create a Grafana dashboard. This option is also not suitable for displaying a real-time view of operational efficiency, as it uses AWS Glue bookmarks to read sensor data from the S3 bucket. AWS Glue bookmarks are a feature that helps AWS Glue jobs and crawlers keep track of the data that has already been processed, so that they can resume from where they left off. However, AWS Glue jobs and crawlers are not designed for real-time data processing, as they can have a minimum frequency of 5 minutes and a variable start-up time. Moreover, this option also uses Grafana instead of Amazon QuickSight to create the dashboard, which can increase the latency and complexity of the solution .
1: Amazon Managed Streaming for Apache Flink
2: Amazon Timestream
3: Amazon QuickSight
Analyze data in Amazon Timestream using Grafana
Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose
Amazon Aurora
AWS Glue Bookmarks
AWS Glue Job and Crawler Scheduling
NEW QUESTION # 78
A company uses an on-premises Microsoft SQL Server database to store financial transaction data. The company migrates the transaction data from the on-premises database to AWS at the end of each month. The company has noticed that the cost to migrate data from the on-premises database to an Amazon RDS for SQL Server database has increased recently.
The company requires a cost-effective solution to migrate the data to AWS. The solution must cause minimal downtown for the applications that access the database.
Which AWS service should the company use to meet these requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) is a cloud service that makes it possible to migrate relational databases, data warehouses, NoSQL databases, and other types of data stores to AWS quickly, securely, and with minimal downtime and zero data loss1. AWS DMS supports migration between 20-plus database and analytics engines, such as Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon RDS for SQL Server2. AWS DMS takes overmany of the difficult or tedious tasks involved in a migration project, such as capacity analysis, hardware and software procurement, installation and administration, testing and debugging, and ongoing replication and monitoring1. AWS DMS is a cost-effective solution, as you only pay for the compute resources and additional log storage used during the migration process2. AWS DMS is the best solution for the company to migrate the financial transaction data from the on-premises Microsoft SQL Server database to AWS, as it meets the requirements of minimal downtime, zero data loss, and low cost.
Option A is not the best solution, as AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers, but it does not provide any built-in features for database migration.
You would have to write your own code to extract, transform, and load the data from the source to the target, which would increase the operational overhead and complexity.
Option C is not the best solution, as AWS Direct Connect is a service that establishes a dedicated network connection from your premises to AWS, but it does not provide any built-in features for database migration.
You would still need to use another service or tool to perform the actual data transfer, which would increase the cost and complexity.
Option D is not the best solution, as AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to transfer data between on-premises storage systems and AWS storage services, such as Amazon S3, Amazon EFS, and Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, but it does not support Amazon RDS for SQL Server as a target. You would have to use another service or tool to migrate the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS for SQL Server, which would increase the latency and complexity. References:
Database Migration - AWS Database Migration Service - AWS
What is AWS Database Migration Service?
AWS Database Migration Service Documentation
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
NEW QUESTION # 79
A company has a data lake in Amazon 53. The company uses AWS Glue to catalog data and AWS Glue Studio to implement data extract, transform, and load (ETL) pipelines.
The company needs to ensure that data quality issues are checked every time the pipelines run. A data engineer must enhance the existing pipelines to evaluate data quality rules based on predefined thresholds.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST implementation effort?
Answer: C
Explanation:
* Problem Analysis:
* The company uses AWS Glue for ETL pipelines and must enforcedata quality checksduring pipeline execution.
* The goal is to implement quality checks withminimal implementation effort.
* Key Considerations:
* AWS Glue provides anEvaluate Data Quality transformthat allows for defining quality checks directly in the pipeline.
* DQDL (Data Quality Definition Language)simplifies the process by allowing declarative rule definitions.
* Solution Analysis:
* Option A: SQL Transform
* SQL queries can implement rules but require manual effort for each rule and do not integrate natively with Glue.
* Option B: Evaluate Data Quality Transform + DQDL
* AWS Glue's built-inEvaluate Data Quality transformis designed for this use case.
* Allows defining thresholds and rules in DQDL with minimal coding effort.
* Option C: Custom Transform with PyDeequ
* PyDeequ is a powerful library but adds unnecessary complexity compared to Glue's native features.
* Option D: Custom Transform with Great Expectations
* Similar to PyDeequ, Great Expectations adds operational complexity and external dependencies.
* Final Recommendation:
* Use theEvaluate Data Quality transformwithDQDLto implement data quality rules in AWS Glue pipelines.
:
AWS Glue Data Quality
DQDL Syntax and Examples
AWS Glue Studio Documentation
NEW QUESTION # 80
......
Our Data-Engineer-Associate study materials provide free trial service for consumers. If you are interested in our Data-Engineer-Associate study materials, and you can immediately download and experience our trial question bank for free. Through the trial you will have different learning experience on Data-Engineer-Associate exam guide , you will find that what we say is not a lie, and you will immediately fall in love with our products. As a key to the success of your life, the benefits that our Data-Engineer-Associate Study Materials can bring you are not measured by money. Data-Engineer-Associate test torrent can help you pass the exam in the shortest time.
Pdf Data-Engineer-Associate Format: https://www.practicedump.com/Data-Engineer-Associate_actualtests.html
P.S. Free 2026 Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PracticeDump: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YtyFZ4PF91Dq-RgVXzQr7UPj-Jw_-Q0J