많은 사이트에서ACDIS 인증CCDS-O 인증시험대비자료를 제공하고 있습니다. 그중에서 PassTIP를 선택한 분들은ACDIS 인증CCDS-O시험통과의 지름길에 오른것과 같습니다. PassTIP는 시험에서 불합격성적표를 받으시면 덤프비용을 환불하는 서비스를 제공해드려 아무런 걱정없이 시험에 도전하도록 힘이 되어드립니다. PassTIP덤프를 사용하여 시험에서 통과하신 분이 전해주신 희소식이 PassTIP 덤프품질을 증명해드립니다.
| Certification Vendor: | ACDIS |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist-Outpatient (CCDS-O) Exam |
| Exam Number: | CCDS-O |
| Related Certifications: | Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist (CCDS) |
| Passing Score: | 85 out of 120 scored questions |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Exam Format: | Remotely proctored or test center delivery, Computer-based, Multiple-choice questions |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Price: | $280 (ACDIS members), $380 (non-members), +$100 international fee |
| Real Exam Qty: | 140 (120 scored, 20 unscored) |
| Recommended Training: | CCDS-O Exam Candidate Handbook CCDS-O Official Study Guide |
| Exam Registration: | ACDIS Certification Application Prometric Scheduling |
| Sample Questions: | ACDIS CCDS-O Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Computer-based testing at Prometric centers or remote proctoring via ProProctor |
| Pre Condition: | RN, MD, DO, or HIM/coding certification (RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CPC, CRC, COC) + 2 years outpatient CDI experience; OR 1 year outpatient + 1 year inpatient CDI experience; minimum 2,000 hours per year |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://acdis.org/certification/ccds-o |
ACDIS CCDS-O인증시험패스에는 많은 방법이 있습니다. 먼저 많은 시간을 투자하고 신경을 써서 전문적으로 과련 지식을 터득한다거나; 아니면 적은 시간투자와 적은 돈을 들여 PassTIP의 인증시험덤프를 구매하는 방법 등이 있습니다.
| 주제 | 소개 |
|---|---|
| 주제 1 |
|
| 주제 2 |
|
| 주제 3 |
|
| 주제 4 |
|
| 주제 5 |
|
질문 # 59
A 67-year-old male patient has been seen by a PCP multiple times this year. Diagnoses reported are diabetes with nephropathy with an HCC weight of 0.166; diabetes with retinopathy with an HCC weight of 0.166; atrial fibrillation with an HCC weight of 0.299, and a demographic risk factor weight of 0.332. Which of the following is this patient's final RAF score for these diagnoses?
정답：A
설명：
The patient's RAF is calculated by adding the applicable HCC weights plus the demographic factor, but only after applying the HCC model's hierarchy rules. In outpatient risk adjustment education (as emphasized in ACDIS-based training), certain condition groups are hierarchical-meaning multiple related diagnoses in the same hierarchy do not "stack." Instead, only the highest-ranked HCC in that disease group contributes to the RAF. Here, "diabetes with nephropathy" and "diabetes with retinopathy" both carry the same HCC weight (0.166) and fall within the diabetes complication hierarchy, so they do not add together; only one 0.166 value is counted. Atrial fibrillation contributes separately (0.299), and the demographic risk factor contributes (0.332). Therefore, the final RAF is 0.166 + 0.299 + 0.332 = 0.797. This illustrates why outpatient CDI focuses on documenting all clinically supported conditions for care accuracy, while understanding that some related diagnoses won't increase RAF beyond the highest applicable HCC in that hierarchy.
질문 # 60
A CDI specialist is following up on a query while the provider is seeing patients in the clinic. The BEST action that will support a quick and compliant response to the query is to
정답：A
설명：
Outpatient CDI follow-up must balance responsiveness with confidentiality and professional standards. The most compliant approach is to communicate query-related information in a setting that protects protected health information and minimizes the risk of incidental disclosure. Discussing the query in a private room with the door closed supports timely clarification while maintaining privacy, avoiding conversations that could be overheard by patients, visitors, or staff who are not involved in the patient's care. Catching the provider in the hallway is faster but increases privacy risk because clinical details can be overheard, and it may also distract the provider in a high-traffic environment. Leaving a sticky note on the next patient's chart is inappropriate because it can be seen by others, may be misplaced, and can create compliance and medico-legal concerns (including mixing patients or leaving PHI unsecured). Waiting for the next scheduled meeting may be compliant but does not support a quick response, potentially delaying coding completion and data integrity. Therefore, a private discussion is both the quickest and most compliant option.
질문 # 61
In which of the following situations would a yes/no query format be considered compliant?
정답：C
설명：
A yes/no query format is considered compliant when it is used to resolve a clear documentation conflict and the provider is being asked to confirm which statement accurately reflects the patient's condition for that encounter. In these situations, the intent is not to introduce a new diagnosis or steer the provider toward a particular coded outcome, but to reconcile inconsistent information already present in the record (e.g., one clinician documents a condition and another documents the opposite, or different notes describe different statuses). A focused yes/no confirmation can be appropriate because the clinical question is essentially binary: which interpretation is correct. By contrast, obtaining a new diagnosis generally requires an open-ended or multiple-choice format with balanced options (including "unable to determine") and strong encounter-specific indicators to avoid leading. Likewise, organism specification and acuity clarification often involve more than two clinically valid possibilities (different organisms, acute vs chronic vs acute-on-chronic, etc.), making yes/no overly restrictive and potentially leading. Therefore, resolving conflicting documentation is the best fit for a compliant yes/no query.
질문 # 62
Which component of the OPPS assigns payment rates based on procedure grouping?
정답：A
설명：
Under the Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS), hospital outpatient services are paid based on Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APCs). APCs are the mechanism that groups clinically similar services and procedures-typically identified through CPT/HCPCS reporting-into payment categories with established relative resource costs. CPT codes identify what service was performed, but CPT itself is not the OPPS payment grouping methodology; OPPS takes the coded line items and maps many of them into APC groupings (with packaging rules, status indicators, and modifier impacts) to determine the payment rate. DRGs are used for inpatient prospective payment and do not apply to OPPS outpatient claims in the same way. The Physician Fee Schedule applies to professional services (physician/clinician billing) rather than the hospital facility component paid under OPPS. From an outpatient CDI lens, accurate, specific documentation supports correct CPT/HCPCS selection, modifier use, units, and medical necessity linkages-ensuring services map to the correct APC and are not inappropriately bundled, denied, or downcoded during review. This protects payment accuracy and compliance by aligning the clinical story with the reported outpatient services.
질문 # 63
A CDI specialist reviews the record of a patient with a history of CHF and DM Type 2 who was seen in the clinic earlier that day for possible bronchitis, fever, congestion, dyspnea, and cough. A chest x-ray indicated LLL infiltrate, and a nebulizer treatment was administered while in the office. Levofloxacin and albuterol were prescribed. Which of the following is MOST appropriate to query?
정답：D
설명：
The documented clinical picture and treatment plan better align with pneumonia than uncomplicated bronchitis, creating a clear documentation/coding consistency opportunity. A LLL infiltrate on chest x-ray is a classic clinical indicator for pneumonia, and prescribing levofloxacin supports treatment of a likely bacterial lower respiratory infection rather than routine viral bronchitis. The patient also has fever, dyspnea, cough, and required an in-office nebulizer treatment, all of which can accompany pneumonia and increase clinical significance. In outpatient CDI practice, the most appropriate query is the one that clarifies the provider's definitive diagnosis when objective findings and management suggest a more specific condition than what is stated (e.g., "possible bronchitis"). Querying for diabetic complications or heart failure specificity is not as directly supported by the encounter's indicators and treatment actions provided, and "acuity of bronchitis" is secondary if the true condition is pneumonia. Clarifying whether pneumonia is present ensures accurate reporting, medical necessity support, and appropriate risk/quality capture.
질문 # 64
......
CCDS-O시험대비 최신 덤프공부: https://www.passtip.net/CCDS-O-pass-exam.html