BONUS!!! Laden Sie die vollständige Version der Zertpruefung 156-590 Prüfungsfragen kostenlos herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15iQNmSE7qRl0yGRzg-yrCgmF8hk3eNCD
Wir wissen, wie bedeutend die CheckPoint 156-590 Prüfung für die in der IT-Branche angestellte Leute ist. Deshalb entwickeln wir die Prüfungssoftware für CheckPoint 156-590, die Ihnen große Hilfe leisten können. Die Prüfungsunterlagen, die Sie brauchen, haben unser Team schon gesammelt. Außerdem haben wir die Unterlagen wissenschaftlich analysiert und geordnet. Wir tun dies alles, um Ihr Stress und Belastung der Vorbereitung auf CheckPoint 156-590 zu erleichtern.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Threat Prevention Policy | 20% | - Creating and configuring Threat Prevention profiles - Threat Prevention action settings - Applying Threat Prevention policy layers - Profile-based vs. rule-based configurations |
| Topic 2: Threat Extraction | 10% | - Threat Extraction (Sanboxing) concepts - PDF, Office document, and archive sanitization - Threat Extraction policy configuration |
| Topic 3: Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus | 15% | - Bot and malware signature updates - Anti-Virus scanning methods (streamed vs. traditional) - Configuring Anti-Bot and Anti-Virus policies - Bot detection mechanisms |
| Topic 4: Threat Prevention Overview and Architecture | 10% | - Security Gateway integration with Threat Prevention - Check Point Threat Prevention solution overview - Threat Prevention architecture and components |
| Topic 5: Threat Prevention Dashboard and Monitoring | 10% | - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues - Using SmartConsole for monitoring - Threat Prevention logs and reporting - Threat Prevention statistics and trends |
| Topic 6: IPS (Intrusion Prevention System) | 20% | - IPS architecture and deployment modes - IPS signatures and protections - IPS policy configuration and tuning - IPS exceptions and whitelisting - IPS logging and alerts |
| Topic 7: Threat Emulation (SandBlast) | 15% | - Threat Emulation architecture and deployment - File emulation process and verdicts - Threat Emulation policy configuration - Zero-day threat protection |
Haben Sie Zertpruefung, haben Sie den Schlüssel zum Erfolg, denn Sie können damit die CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung zügig bestehen. Unsere Berufsgruppe aus gut ausgebildeten und erfahrenen IT-Eliten haben die Entwicklungen der ständig veränderten IT-Branche untersucht und erforscht, dann erstellen Sie die Schulungsunterlagen zur CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung für Zertpruefung. Ihre Autorität ist zweifellos. Bevor Sie unsere Prüfungsmaterialien kaufen, können Sie die Demo durch unsere Webseite Zertpruefung herunterladen.
65. Frage
What action is taken by Threat Prevention for traffic that does not match any Threat Prevention rules?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The correct answer is C. Accept . Threat Prevention is applied only to traffic that has already been accepted by the Access Control policy, and then the Threat Prevention rulebase determines which protection profile, blade behavior, and tracking settings apply. When traffic does not match a Threat Prevention rule, no Threat Prevention profile is selected for that connection, so the traffic is not blocked by Threat Prevention simply because of a non-match. Check Point documentation explains that Threat Prevention policy layers calculate their actions according to rule matching, and in a single-layer policy the enforced rule is the first matched rule.
This distinction is critical for certification and real operations. Threat Prevention is not a replacement for the Access Control decision; it is a follow-up inspection layer for already accepted traffic. A non-match in Threat Prevention means the traffic is outside the configured protected scope or rule conditions, so the Threat Prevention engine does not apply a prevent/drop/reject action to it. Reject and Drop are enforcement outcomes for matched malicious or blocked traffic, not for unmatched Threat Prevention traffic. Detect is a logging/enforcement mode for matched protections, not the default result of no rule match. Reference topics:
Threat Prevention Policy, ordered layer behavior, protected scope, first-match rule logic, unmatched traffic handling.
66. Frage
Task: Test core protections by triggering ICMP flood attack.
Antwort:
Begründung:
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- From test machine: ping -f .
2- SmartConsole > Logs > Filter blade:IPS AND type:DOS.
3- Confirm logs with action "Prevent."
4- Verify protection was from Core Protections list.
5- Adjust rate limit in protections if needed.
67. Frage
What kind of blade is the IPS considered?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
The correct answer is B. Pre-infection . IPS is categorized as a pre-infection Threat Prevention blade because its primary role is to stop exploitation attempts before the protected host becomes compromised. Check Point' s Threat Prevention guide describes IPS as protection against malicious and unwanted network traffic, focusing on application and server vulnerabilities, in-the-wild attacks, exploit kits, and malicious attackers.
The same guide distinguishes Anti-Bot & Advanced DNS as post-infection detection of bots on hosts, while Anti-Virus is described as pre-infection detection and blocking of malware at the gateway.
IPS belongs in the pre-infection stage because it prevents the exploit chain from succeeding. It inspects network traffic for vulnerability exploitation, protocol abuse, malformed payloads, known CVE exploitation attempts, server attacks, client attacks, and suspicious patterns that could lead to compromise. "Preventative" is broadly true as an English description, but it is not the specific Check Point lifecycle classification tested here. "Inline" describes where a security function may sit in traffic flow, not the infection-stage category.
"Post-infection" is associated with Anti-Bot, which detects and blocks command-and-control communications after a host shows signs of compromise. Reference topics: IPS Software Blade, pre-infection prevention, exploit protection, Threat Prevention architecture, Anti-Bot post-infection contrast.
68. Frage
That Tracking option can be used to capture additional data for analysis by Check Point TAC?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
The correct answer is B. Forensics . In Threat Prevention policy tracking, Forensics is the tracking option intended to enrich Threat Prevention logs with additional investigation data. Check Point documentation states that the Forensics option adds fields to the Threat Prevention logs , and that this extra information provides a deeper understanding of an attack. The Monitoring Threat Prevention section further explains that Advanced Forensics Details can appear in logs for supported protocols such as DNS, FTP, SMTP, HTTP, and HTTPS, and that this additional information is used by Check Point researchers to analyze attacks.
This is why Forensics is the correct TAC-oriented tracking choice. Alert is a notification-style tracking action, not a deep forensic enrichment mechanism. SNMP sends a management notification, and User Defined invokes administrator-defined alert handling rather than supplying advanced attack-analysis fields. In operational troubleshooting, Forensics is valuable because it preserves richer evidence around the inspected connection, affected blade, protocol behavior, and detection context. Reference topics: Threat Prevention Policy Track Options, Advanced Forensics Details, Logs & Monitor, TAC escalation analysis.
69. Frage
Task: Configure specific protections for SMB protocol attacks.
Antwort:
Begründung:
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- In IPS Protections, filter by "Protocol: SMB."
2- Enable all protections related to SMB and set to "Prevent."
3- Add a tag: "Windows Server Protections."
4- Attach them to a custom profile.
5- Save and assign the profile in Threat Prevention policy.
70. Frage
......
Damit die Kandidaten bessere Noten bei der CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung bekommen können, versuchen wir Zertpruefung immer, unser Bestes zu tun. Nach mehrjährigen Bemühungen beträgt die Hit-Rate der CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung von Zertpruefung schon 100%. Wenn die Fragenkataloge zur CheckPoint 156-590 Zertifizierungsprüfung irgend ein Qualitätsproblem haben oder Sie die Zertifizierungsprüfung nicht bestehen, erstatten wir alle Ihren bezahlten Summe zurück.
156-590 Deutsch Prüfung: https://www.zertpruefung.de/156-590_exam.html
BONUS!!! Laden Sie die vollständige Version der Zertpruefung 156-590 Prüfungsfragen kostenlos herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=15iQNmSE7qRl0yGRzg-yrCgmF8hk3eNCD