2026 Latest Real4exams Integration-Architect PDF Dumps and Integration-Architect Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RSsZtVLKNAPZc_X_0uc9IfWMdi79Xgiv
Salesforce guarantees that if you use the product, you will pass the Integration-Architect exam on your first try. Its primary goal is to save students time and money, not just conduct a business transaction. Candidates can take advantage of the free trials to evaluate the quality and standard of the Integration-Architect Dumps before making a purchase. With the right Salesforce Integration-Architect study material and support team passing the examination at first attempt is an achievable goal.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Integration-Architect |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-select, Multiple-choice, Scenario-based |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Technical Architect Salesforce Certified System Architect |
| Available Languages: | Simplified Chinese, Korean, English, Japanese |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Recommended Training: | Salesforce Architect Courses Trailhead - Integration Architecture |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Certification Registration |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Integration-Architect Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite at authorized testing centers |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites; recommended 1–2 years of Salesforce integration experience, 2–3 years of Salesforce platform experience |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=005298980&language=en_US |
>> Pdf Demo Integration-Architect Download <<
The procedures of buying our Integration-Architect study materials are simple and save the clients’ time. We will send our Integration-Architect exam question in 5-10 minutes after their payment. Because the most clients may be busy in their jobs or other significant things, the time they can spare to learn our Integration-Architect learning guide is limited and little. But if the clients buy our Integration-Architect training quiz they can immediately use our product and save their time. And the quality of our exam dumps are very high!
The Salesforce Integration-Architect Exam covers a range of topics related to integration architecture, including data integration, application integration, and system integration. It also includes a section on security, which is critical for ensuring that data is protected and secure during the integration process. Passing Integration-Architect exam demonstrates that the individual has the knowledge and skills required to design and implement complex integration solutions that meet the needs of their organization. Salesforce Certified Integration Architect certification is highly valued in the industry and can significantly enhance an individual's career prospects.
NEW QUESTION # 66
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to make synchronous callouts "available to promise" services to query product availability and reserve inventory during customer checkout process.
Which two considerations should an integration architect make when building a scalable integration solution?
Choose 2 answers
Answer: A,B
NEW QUESTION # 67
A company wants to standardize exception tracking, handling, and analytics. Given the following actions:
1. Build a company wide logging service hosted on a middleware platform
2. Create case object records for exceptions based thresholds
3. Change all their Apex Loggers to publish Application Exceptions as custom Platform Events.
Which two specifications should the integration architect include in the logging service architecture?
Choose 2 answers
Answer: C,D
NEW QUESTION # 68
A business requires automating the check and updating of the phone number type classification for all incoming calls. Up to 100,000 calls per day are received, and the business is flexible with timing (every 6-12 hours is sufficient). A Remote-Call-In and/or Batch Synchronization pattern via middleware is planned.
Which component should an integration architect recommend to implement these patterns?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In a Remote-Call-In or Batch Synchronization pattern where an external middleware initiates the connection to Salesforce, the external system must be authenticated. The standard Salesforce framework for this is the Connected App.
A Connected App provides a framework for external applications to integrate with Salesforce using APIs and standard protocols like OAuth 2.0. For a high-volume (100,000 records) batch process initiated by middleware every 6-12 hours, the architect would recommend a Connected App using a secure flow, such as the OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Flow. This allows the middleware to authenticate as a specific "Integration User" without storing clear-text passwords.
Option A (API Gateway) is used to manage and secure outbound calls from Salesforce or between external services; it does not handle inbound authentication to the Salesforce org itself. Option B (Remote Site Settings) is a whitelist configuration used purely to allow Salesforce to make outbound callouts to a specific URL; it provides no authentication mechanism for systems calling into Salesforce. By recommending a Connected App, the architect ensures that the middleware has the necessary permissions (scopes) to use the Bulk API-which is the appropriate mechanism for the 100,000 record volume-while maintaining a secure, auditable, and standard integration boundary.
NEW QUESTION # 69
An enterprise customer is planning to implement Salesforce to support case management.
Below is their current system landscape diagram. Considering Salesforce capabilities, what should the integration architect evaluate when integrating Salesforce with the current system landscape?
Answer: B
Explanation:
An Integration Architect's primary responsibility when evaluating a landscape for a new Salesforce implementation is to identify the system of record for each business process and determine which legacy systems will be replaced by Salesforce. In this scenario, the customer is implementing Salesforce specifically to support case management.
According to the provided landscape diagram, the Case Management System currently exists as a standalone entity. Since Salesforce Service Cloud provides native, best-in-class case management capabilities, this legacy system is the primary candidate for retirement. Retiring the legacy Case Management system avoids data fragmentation and ensures that Salesforce serves as the single source of truth for support interactions.
However, for Salesforce to function effectively as a new case management hub, it must integrate with the remaining surrounding systems:
* Email Management System: This system likely handles inbound customer communications. An architect must evaluate integrating this with Salesforce (via Email-to-Case or a specialized connector) so that incoming emails automatically generate or update cases.
* Order Management System (OMS): Support agents often need to view order history or status to resolve customer inquiries. Integrating Salesforce with the OMS allows for a 360-degree view, enabling agents to see relevant order data directly within the Salesforce case console.
* Data Warehouse: For long-term reporting, trend analysis, and a unified customer profile, case data from Salesforce needs to be pushed to the Data Warehouse. This ensures that the Analytics and Business Intelligence Tool downstream can report on support metrics alongside other enterprise data.
Therefore, the architect should evaluate integrations with the Data Warehouse, Order Management, and Email Management System. Option B and C are incorrect because they suggest integrating with the "Case Management System," which is the very system being superseded by Salesforce's native capabilities. By focusing on the integration of these three supporting systems, the architect ensures a seamless transition where Salesforce is fully enriched with the necessary external data to drive support excellence.
NEW QUESTION # 70
Customer is evaluating Platform Events solution and would like help in comparing/contrasting it with Outbound Message for a real-time / near-real time needs. They expect 3,000 consumers of messages from Salesforce.
Which three considerations should be evaluated and highlighted when deciding between the solutions?
Choose 3 answers
Answer: A,C,E
Explanation:
Both Platform Events and Outbound Message offer declarative means for asynchronous near-real time needs.
They aren't best suited for real-time integrations (A). In both Platform Events and Outbound Messages, the event messages are retried by and delivered in sequence, and only once. Salesforce ensures there is no duplicate message delivery (B). Message sequence is possible in Outbound Message but not guaranteed with PlatformEvents. Both offer very high reliability. Fault handling and recovery are fully handled by Salesforce
. Number of concurrent subscribers to Platform Events is capped at 2,000. An Outbound Message configuration can pass only 100 notifications in a single message to a SOAP end point (D). Both Platform Events and Outbound Message are highly scalable. However, unlike Outbound Message, only Platform Events have Event Delivery and Event Publishing limits to be considered (E). Reference: Salesforce Integration Architecture Designer Resource Guide, page 23
NEW QUESTION # 71
......
Integration-Architect Test Valid: https://www.real4exams.com/Integration-Architect_braindumps.html
P.S. Free & New Integration-Architect dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Real4exams: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RSsZtVLKNAPZc_X_0uc9IfWMdi79Xgiv