P.S.TopexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 Amazon SAP-C02ダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bi_CSlL5oxNEMwhkg48w1Bsq7aWhurGd
当社Amazonでは、多くの分野の専門家を雇用してSAP-C02学習ガイドを作成しているため、学習教材の品質を安心してご利用いただけます。 さらに、SAP-C02試験問題のガイダンスに基づいて試験の準備をすることで、Topexam近い将来昇進する機会を増やし、給与を引き上げることができます。 したがって、AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional (SAP-C02)試験を受ける準備ができたら、SAP-C02学習教材を利用できます。 次の受益者になりたい場合、何を待っていますか？ SAP-C02学習教材を購入してください。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous improvement for existing solutions | 25% | |
| Accelerate workload migration and modernization | 20% | |
| Design for new solutions | 29% | |
| Design solutions for organizational complexity | 26% |
SAP-C02試験の参考資料では、無料の試用版をダウンロードできます。試用版を使用して、知りたい情報を入手できます。 SAP-C02学習教材の試用版をダウンロードした後、目的の選択を行うことができるお気に入りのSAP-C02試験準備だけでなく、お好きなバージョンも簡単に選択できます。 SAP-C02学習資料では、すべてのユーザーが製品を理解し、本当に必要なものを入手できるようにしています。 SAP-C02学習教材は非常に理解しやすいので、あなたが誰であっても、ここで欲しいものを見つけることができます。
質問 # 768
A data analytics company has an Amazon Redshift cluster that consists of several reserved nodes. The cluster is experiencing unexpected bursts of usage because a team of employees is compiling a deep audit analysis report. The queries to generate the report are complex read queries and are CPU intensive.
Business requirements dictate that the cluster must be able to service read and write queries at all times. A solutions architect must devise a solution that accommodates the bursts of usage.
Which solution meets these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
正解：D
解説：
The best solution is to deploy an AWS Lambda function to add capacity to the Amazon Redshift cluster by using an elastic resize operation when the cluster's CPU metrics in Amazon CloudWatch reach 80%. This solution will enable the cluster to scale up or down quickly by adding or removing nodes within minutes. This will improve the performance of the complex read queries and also reduce the cost by scaling down when the demand decreases. This solution is more cost-effective than using a classic resize operation, which takes longer and requires more downtime. It is also more suitable than using Amazon EMR, which is designed for big data processing rather than data warehousing. References: Amazon Redshift Documentation, Resizing clusters in Amazon Redshift, [Amazon EMR Documentation]
質問 # 769
A company needs to build a disaster recovery (DR) solution for its ecommerce website. The web application is hosted on a fleet of t3.Iarge Amazon EC2 instances and uses an Amazon RDS for MySQL DB instance.
The EC2 instances are in an Auto Scaling group that extends across multiple Availability Zones.
In the event of a disaster, the web application must fail over to the secondary environment with an RPO of 30 seconds and an R TO of 10 minutes.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
正解：C
解説：
The company should use infrastructure as code (IaC) to provision the new infrastructure in the DR Region.
The company should create a cross-Region read replica for the DB instance. The company should set up AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery to continuously replicate the EC2 instances to the DR Region. The company should run the EC2 instances at the minimum capacity in the DR Region. The company should use an Amazon Route
53 failover routing policy to automatically fail over to the DR Region in the event of a disaster. The company should increase the desired capacity of the Auto Scaling group. This solution will meet the requirements most cost-effectively because AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (AWS DRS) is a service that minimizes downtime and data loss with fast, reliable recovery of on-premises and cloud-based applications using affordable storage, minimal compute, and point-in-time recovery. AWS DRS enables RPOs of seconds and RTOs of minutes1. AWS DRS continuously replicates data from the source servers to a staging area subnet in the DR Region, where it uses low-cost storage and minimal compute resources to maintain ongoing replication. In the event of a disaster, AWS DRS automatically converts the servers to boot and run natively on AWS and launches recovery instances on AWS within minutes2. By using AWS DRS, the company can save costs by removing idle recovery site resources and paying for the full disaster recovery site only when needed. By creating a cross-Region read replica for the DB instance, the company can have a standby copy of its primary database in a different AWS Region3. By using infrastructure as code (IaC), the company can provision the new infrastructure in the DR Region in an automated and consistent way4. By using an Amazon Route 53 failover routing policy, the companycan route traffic to a resource that is healthy or to another resource when the first resource becomes unavailable.
The other options are not correct because:
* Using AWS Backup to create cross-Region backups for the EC2 instances and the DB instance would not meet the RPO and RTO requirements. AWS Backup is a service that enables you to centralize and automate data protection across AWS services. You can use AWS Backup to back up your application data across AWS services in your account and across accounts. However, AWS Backup does not provide continuous replication or fast recovery; it creates backups at scheduled intervals and requires manual restoration. Creating backups every 30 seconds would also incur high costs and network bandwidth.
* Creating an Amazon API Gateway Data API service integration with Amazon Redshift would not help with disaster recovery. The Data API is a feature that enables you to query your Amazon Redshift cluster using HTTP requests, without needing a persistent connection or a SQL client. It is useful for building applications that interact with Amazon Redshift, but not for replicating or recovering data.
* Creating an AWS Data Exchange datashare by connecting AWS Data Exchange to the Redshift cluster would not help with disaster recovery. AWS Data Exchange is a service that makes it easy for AWS customers to exchange data in the cloud. You can use AWS Data Exchange to subscribe to a diverse selection of third-party data products or offer your own data products to other AWS customers. A datashare is a feature that enables you to share live and secure access to your Amazon Redshift data across your accounts or with third parties without copying or moving the underlying data. It is useful for sharing query results and views with other users, but not for replicating or recovering data.
References:
https://aws.amazon.com/disaster-recovery/
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/drs/latest/userguide/what-is-drs.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_ReadRepl.html#USER_ReadRepl.XRgn
https://aws.amazon.com/cloudformation/
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/dns-failover.html
https://aws.amazon.com/backup/
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/mgmt/data-api.html
https://aws.amazon.com/data-exchange/
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/datashare-overview.html
質問 # 770
A company hosts an intranet web application on Amazon EC2 instances behind an Application Load Balancer (ALB). Currently, users authenticate to the application against an internal user database.
The company needs to authenticate users to the application by using an existing AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory directory. All users with accounts in the directory must have access to the application.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
正解：B
解説：
The correct solution is to use the authenticate-oidc action for the ALB listener rule and configure it with the details of the AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory directory. This way, the ALB can use OpenID Connect (OIDC) to authenticate users against the directory and grant them access to the intranet web application. The app client in the directory is used to register the ALB as an OIDC client and provide the necessary credentials and endpoints. The callback URL is the URL that the ALB redirects the user to after a successful authentication. This solution does not require any additional services or roles, and it leverages the existing directory accounts for all users.
The other solutions are incorrect because they either use the wrong action for the ALB listener rule, or they involve unnecessary or incompatible services or roles. For example:
Solution B is incorrect because it uses Amazon Cognito user pool, which is a separate user directory service that does not integrate with AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory. To use this solution, the company would have to migrate or synchronize their users from the directory to the user pool, which is not required by the question. Moreover, the authenticate-cognito action for the ALB listener rule only works with Amazon Cognito user pools, not with federated identity providers (IdPs) that have metadata from the directory.
Solution C is incorrect because it uses IAM as an identity provider (IdP), which is not compatible with AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory. IAM can only be used as an IdP for web identity federation, which allows users to sign in with social media or other third-party IdPs, not with Active Directory. Moreover, the authenticate-oidc action for the ALB listener rule requires an OIDC IdP, not a SAML 2.0 federation IdP, which is what IAM provides.
Solution D is incorrect because it uses AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS Single Sign-On), which is a service that simplifies the management of SSO access to multiple AWS accounts and business applications. This service is not needed for the scenario in the question, which only involves a single intranet web application. Moreover, the authenticate-cognito action for the ALB listener rule does not work with external IdPs that use SAML, such as AWS IAM Identity Center.
Reference:
Authenticate users using an Application Load Balancer
What is AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory?
Using OpenID Connect for user authentication
質問 # 771
A company has a web application that allows users to upload short videos. The videos are stored on Amazon EBS volumes and analyzed by custom recognition software for categorization.
The website contains stat c content that has variable traffic with peaks in certain months. The architecture consists of Amazon EC2 instances running in an Auto Scaling group for the web application and EC2 instances running in an Auto Scaling group to process an Amazon SQS queue The company wants to re-architect the application to reduce operational overhead using AWS managed services where possible and remove dependencies on third-party software.
Which solution meets these requirements?
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
Option C is correct because hosting the web application in Amazon S3, storing the uploaded videos in Amazon S3, and using S3 event notifications to publish events to the SQS queue reduces the operational overhead of managing EC2 instances and EBS volumes. Amazon S3 can serve static content such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and media files directly from S3 buckets. Amazon S3 can also trigger AWS Lambda functions through S3 event notifications when new objects are created or existing objects are updated or deleted. AWS Lambda can process the SQS queue with an AWS Lambda function that calls the Amazon Rekognition API to categorize the videos. This solution eliminates the need for custom recognition software and third-party dependencies345 References: 1: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/using-spot-instances.html 2:
https://aws.amazon.com/efs/pricing/ 3:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/WebsiteHosting.html 4:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/NotificationHowTo.html 5:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rekognition/latest/dg/what-is.html 6:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/latest/dg/Welcome.html
質問 # 772
A global manufacturing company plans to migrate the majority of its applications to AWS. However, the company is concerned about applications that need to remain within a specific country or in the company's central on-premises data center because of data regulatory requirements or requirements for latency of single-digit milliseconds. The company also is concerned about the applications that it hosts in some of its factory sites, where limited network infrastructure exists.
The company wants a consistent developer experience so that its developers can build applications once and deploy on premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid architecture.
The developers must be able to use the same tools, APIs, and services that are familiar to them.
Which solution will provide a consistent hybrid experience to meet these requirements?
正解：D
解説：
Installing AWS Outposts for the applications that have data regulatory requirements or requirements for latency of single-digit milliseconds will provide a fully managed service that extends AWS infrastructure, services, APIs, and tools to customer premises1. AWS Outposts allows customers to run some AWS services locally and connect to a broad range of services available in the local AWS Region1. Using AWS Snowball Edge Compute Optimized devices to host the workloads in the factory sites will provide local compute and storage resources for locations with limited network infrastructure2. AWS Snowball Edge devices can run Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Lambda functions locally and sync data with AWS when network connectivity is available2.
質問 # 773
......
Topexamは、AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional (SAP-C02)試験に必要な人向けの安定した信頼できる試験問題プロバイダーです。 私たちは長い間市場に滞在し、成長してきました。SAP-C02試験問題の優れた品質と高い合格率のため、私たちは常にここにいます。 安全な環境と効果的な製品については、数千人の候補者が私たちの研究の質問を選んでいます。なぜあなたは私たちTopexamの研究の質問に挑戦してみてください。
SAP-C02テスト資料: https://www.topexam.jp/SAP-C02_shiken.html
P.S. TopexamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいSAP-C02ダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bi_CSlL5oxNEMwhkg48w1Bsq7aWhurGd