2026年Jpshikenの最新ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor PDFダンプおよびISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NaI4L5y_8bGleRsUbWIzW_BHkai78Kzc
有効的なPECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor認定資格試験問題集を見つけられるのは資格試験にとって重要なのです。我々JpshikenのPECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験問題と試験解答の正確さは、あなたの試験準備をより簡単にし、あなたが試験に高いポイントを得ることを保証します。PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor資格試験に参加する意向があれば、当社のJpshikenから自分に相応しい受験対策解説集を選らんで、認定試験の学習教材として勉強します。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
>> ISO-9001-Lead-Auditorテスト模擬問題集 <<
あなたはISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験資料をよく勉強する限り、きっと短い時間で有難いISO-9001-Lead-Auditor認定試験資格証明書を取得できます。その後、あなたの生活もきっと大きく変わります。そして、いい友達ができ、いい生活を送ります。躊躇しないで、未来は本当に美しいです！ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験資料有効であるかどうか分からない場合、PECBウエブサイトで、ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験資料のデモを無料でダウンロードしてください。
質問 # 26
During a third-party audit of a pharmaceutical organisation (CD9000) site of seven COVID-19 testing laboratories in various terminals at a major international airport, you interview the CD 9000's General Manager (GM), who was accompanied by Jack, the legal compliance expert. Jack is acting as the guide in the absence of the Technical Manager due to him contracting COVID-19.
You: "What external and internal issues have been identified that could affect CD9000 and its quality management system?" GM: "Jack guided us on this. We identified issues like probable competition of another laboratory organisation in the airport, legal requirements on COVID-19 continuously changing, the shortage of competent laboratory analysists, the epidemic declining soon, shortage of chemicals for the analysis. It was quite a good experience." You: "Did you document these issues?" GM: "No. Jack said that ISO 9001 does not require us to document these issues." You: "How did you determine the risks associated with the issues and did you plan actions to address them?" GM: "I am not sure. The Technical Manager is responsible for this process. Jack may be able to answer this question in his absence." Select two options for how you would respond to the General Manager's suggestion:
正解：A、B
解説：
According to clause 4.1 of ISO 9001:2015, the organization should determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic direction and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its quality management system. The organization should monitor and review these issues and update them as necessary. Although the standard does not explicitly require documented information of these issues, it does require documented information as evidence of the implementation of the actions taken to address risks and opportunities, as per clause 6.1. The organization should also retain documented information as evidence of the results of the monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of its QMS, as per clause 9.1. Therefore, the auditor should not accept the legal compliance expert answering the question, as he is not the person responsible for the process and may not have the necessary competence or knowledge of the QMS. The auditor should also look for evidence that the actions resulting from the risk assessment had been taken, as this is a requirement of the standard and a way to verify the effectiveness of the QMS. The other options are not appropriate courses of action for the auditor, because they do not address the audit objective or criteria, or they may compromise the audit integrity or impartiality. For example, option B may not be feasible or reliable, as the Technical Manager may not be available or able to provide the necessary evidence by phone. Option C may cause unnecessary delay and inconvenience for the audit process and the auditee. Option E may not solve the problem, as the guide is not the main source of evidence or information for the audit. Option F may be disrespectful or unprofessional, as the consultant may have a legitimate role or interest in the audit.
References: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Context of the Organization, ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group Guidance on Audit Evidence
質問 # 27
Scenario 5: Mechanical-Electro (ME) Audit Stages
Mechanical-Electro, better known as ME, is an American company that provides mechanical and electrical services in China. Their services range from air-conditioning systems, ventilation systems, plumbing, to installation of electrical equipment in automobile plants, electronic manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants.
Due to the fierce competition from local Chinese companies and failing to meet customer requirements, ME's revenue dropped significantly. In addition, customers' trust and confidence in the company decreased, and the reputation of the company was damaged.
In light of these developments, the top management of ME decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After having an effective QMS in place for over a year, they applied for a certification audit.
A team of four auditors was appointed for the audit, including Li Na as the audit team leader. Initially, the audit team conducted a general review of ME's documents, including the quality policy, operational procedures, inventory lists, QMS scope, process documentation, training records, and previous audit reports.
Li Na stated that this would allow the team to maintain a systematic and structured approach to gathering documents for all audit stages. While reviewing the documented information, the team observed some minor issues but did not identify any major nonconformities. Therefore, Li Na claimed that it was not necessary to prepare a report or conduct a meeting with ME's representatives at that stage of the audit. She stated that all areas of concern would be discussed in the next phase of the audit.
Following the on-site activities and the opening meeting with ME's top management, the audit team structured an audit test plan to verify whether ME's QMS conformed to Clause 8.2.1 (Customer Communication) of ISO 9001.
To do so, they gathered information through group interviews and sampling. Li Na conducted interviews with departmental managers in the first group and then with top management. In addition, she chose a sampling method that sufficiently represented customer complaints from both areas of ME' s operations.
The team members were responsible for the sampling procedure. They selected a sample size of 4 out of
45 customer complaints received weekly for electrical services and 2 out of 10 complaints for mechanical services.
Afterward, the audit team evaluated the evidence against the audit criteria and generated the audit findings.
According to general principles of sampling procedure, did the audit team select a valid sample for electrical services?
正解：C
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
The audit team selected 4 out of 45 customer complaints for electrical services, which is too low based on standard statistical sampling methods. According to ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems), for a population size between 13 and 52, a minimum sample size should be 5 to achieve a reasonable level of confidence.
This means the selected sample (4 complaints) was insufficient and did not align with standard sampling procedures. Therefore, the correct answer is A.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.5 (Sampling Methods in Auditing)
質問 # 28
XYZ Corporation employs 100 people, and during a Stage 1 certification audit, certain issues are identified with the Quality Management System (QMS). Which two options describe the circumstances in which you could raise a nonconformity against Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015?
正解：D、F
解説：
Understanding Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015:Clause 6.2 (Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them) specifies that organizations must:
Establish measurable and relevant quality objectives consistent with the quality policy (Clause 6.2.1).
Include objectives applicable to product/service conformity and customer satisfaction.
Document these objectives and their planning as documented information (Clause 6.2.1 & 6.2.2).
Plan how to achieve the objectives, including defining actions, resources, responsibilities, timelines, and methods for evaluation.
Analysis of Options:
A). Quality objectives are not being implemented by the organisation ' s personnel:Incorrect. While implementation is critical, this relates more to operational aspects rather than the direct requirements of Clause 6.2. Implementation issues would typically raise concerns under Clause 9.1 (Performance Evaluation).
B). The consultant has not interpreted ISO 9001 correctly:Incorrect. The consultant ' s interpretation of ISO
9001 is irrelevant in terms of Clause 6.2 compliance. The focus is on whether the organization aligns with the requirements, not the consultant ' s role.
C). Establishing quality objectives did not include top management:Incorrect. While top management involvement is vital for QMS effectiveness (Clause 5.1), this is not a direct requirement of Clause 6.2. Top management alignment is implied but not explicitly mandated for establishing quality objectives.
D). Quality objectives were not established in alignment with the organisation ' s quality policy:Correct.
Clause 6.2.1 requires that quality objectives be consistent with the organization's quality policy, ensuring they reflect its purpose, strategic direction, and commitment to continual improvement. Misalignment would constitute a nonconformity.
E). The organisation cannot afford to undertake quality objectives all at once:Incorrect. Financial constraints are not directly addressed in Clause 6.2. The clause focuses on planning to achieve objectives, which includes defining the necessary resources but does not demand achieving all objectives simultaneously.
F). Quality objectives are not maintained as documented information:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 specifically requires that quality objectives be maintained as documented information. Failure to document the objectives is a direct violation of this clause.
Why Options D and F Are Correct:
D: Misalignment between the quality objectives and the quality policy directly violates Clause 6.2.1, which mandates that objectives support the strategic direction of the organization.
F: Lack of documentation for quality objectives breaches the requirement to maintain them as documented information under Clause 6.2.1.
Relevant References:
Clause 6.2.1: Establishing quality objectives aligned with the quality policy.
Clause 6.2.2: Maintaining documented information for quality objectives and planning to achieve them.
Clause 5.1.1: Top management ' s responsibility to ensure alignment between the QMS and strategic direction.
質問 # 29
Scenario 2:
Bell is a Canadian food manufacturing company that operates globally. Their main products include nuts, dried fruits, and confections. Bell has always prioritized product quality and has maintained a good reputation for many years. However, the company's production error rate increased significantly, leading to more customer complaints.
To increase efficiency and customer satisfaction, Bell implemented a Quality Management System (QMS) based on ISO 9001. The top management established a QMS implementation team comprising five middle managers from various departments, including Leslie, the quality manager.
Leslie was responsible for assigning responsibilities and authorities for QMS-related roles. He also suggested including a top management representative in the QMS team, but top management declined due to other priorities.
The team defined the QMS scope as:
"The scope of the QMS includes all activities related to food processing." Leslie established a quality policy and presented it to the team for review before top management approval
. Top management also proposed a new strategy for handling customer complaints, requiring biweekly customer surveys to monitor customer perceptions.
In scenario 2, the team determined the QMS scope by taking into account only the requirements of top management. Is this compliant with ISO 9001?
正解：D
解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
ISO 9001:2015, Clause 4.3 (Determining the Scope of the Quality Management System) states that when determining the QMS scope, an organization must consider:
* External and internal issues (Clause 4.1)
* The needs and expectations of interested parties (Clause 4.2)
* The products and services provided by the organization
In the scenario, Bell only considered top management's input, which fails to address Clause 4.2 (interested parties' expectations)-such as customers, suppliers, and regulatory authorities.
Reference:
ISO 9001:2015, Clause 4.3 - Determining the Scope of the QMS
ISO 9001:2015, Clause 4.2 - Understanding the Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
質問 # 30
In the context of a third-party audit, match the event with the responsibility for conducting it.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
The correct answer is:
Event
Selecting audit team = Individual(s) managing the audit programme
Conducting the audit = Audit team
Preparing the audit plan = Audit team leader
Requesting the audit = Audit client
To complete the table, click on the blank section you want to complete so that it is highlighted in red, and then click on the applicable text from the options below. Alternatively, drag and drop each option to the appropriate blank section. Responsibility:- Individual(s) managing the audit programme Audit team Audit team leader Audit client According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 5.3, the individual(s) managing the audit programme are responsible for selecting the audit team, taking into account the competence and availability of the auditors and any experts needed. 1 According to clause 6.2, the audit team is responsible for conducting the audit, which includes collecting and verifying audit evidence, evaluating audit findings, and preparing the audit report. 1 According to clause 6.1, the audit team leader is responsible for preparing the audit plan, which includes defining the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and duration, as well as assigning roles and responsibilities to the audit team members. 1 According to clause 5.2, the audit client is the person or organization that requests the audit, which can be the auditee (the person or organization being audited) or any other person or organization that has an interest in the audit results. 1 References:
1: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems
質問 # 31
......
自分の幸せは自分で作るものだと思われます。ただ、社会に入るIT卒業生たちは自分能力の不足で、ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験向けの仕事を探すのを悩んでいますか？それでは、弊社のPECBのISO-9001-Lead-Auditor練習問題を選んで実用能力を速く高め、自分を充実させます。その結果、自信になる自己は面接のときに、面接官のいろいろな質問を気軽に回答できて、順調にISO-9001-Lead-Auditor向けの会社に入ります。
ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験参考書: https://www.jpshiken.com/ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor_shiken.html
2026年Jpshikenの最新ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor PDFダンプおよびISO-9001-Lead-Auditor試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NaI4L5y_8bGleRsUbWIzW_BHkai78Kzc