P.S. Free 2026 Juniper JN0-336 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Actual4test: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o9WyO2lLpZucABiCE_mfmA2ORuy7wJiU
If you buy and use the JN0-336 study materials from our company, we believe that our study materials will make study more interesting and colorful, and it will be very easy for a lot of people to pass their exam and get the related certification if they choose our JN0-336 study materials and take it into consideration seriously. Now we are willing to introduce the JN0-336 Study Materials from our company to you in order to let you have a deep understanding of our study materials. We believe that you will benefit a lot from our JN0-336 study materials.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Identity-Aware Security | - Integration with directory services - Juniper Identity Management Service (JIMS) - Identity-based policies |
| SSL Proxy | - SSL reverse proxy - Certificate management - SSL forward proxy - Configuration and troubleshooting |
| Application Security | - Application firewall - Configuration, monitoring and troubleshooting - Application Quality of Service (QoS) - Application identification - Advanced Policy-Based Routing (APBR) |
| Juniper Secure Analytics (JSA) | - Integration with SRX devices - Event correlation and reporting - Log collection and analysis |
| High Availability (HA) Clustering | - Chassis cluster configuration - Cluster architecture and concepts - Failover and synchronization - Monitoring and troubleshooting |
| Virtual SRX / cSRX | - Configuration and management - Resource allocation and scaling - Deployment and architecture |
| Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) | - Juniper ATP Cloud - Configuration, monitoring and troubleshooting - Juniper ATP On-Premises - File analysis and threat intelligence |
| IPsec VPNs | - Remote access VPN - Site-to-site IPsec VPN - VPN monitoring and troubleshooting |
| Advanced Security Policies | - Scheduling - Configuration, monitoring and troubleshooting - Logging - Application Layer Gateways (ALGs) - Session management - Unified security policies |
| Security Director | - Policy management - Deployment and configuration - Management and monitoring |
| Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDP/IPS) | - IPS database management - Configuration, monitoring and troubleshooting - IPS policies |
>> New Juniper JN0-336 Dumps Ebook <<
A lot of professional experts concentrate to making our JN0-336 practice materials by compiling the content so they have gained reputation in the market for their proficiency and dedication. About some esoteric points, they illustrate with examples for you. Our JN0-336 practice materials are the accumulation of professional knowledge worthy practicing and remembering, so you will not regret choosing us. The best way to gain success is not cramming, but to master the discipline and regular exam points of question behind the tens of millions of questions. Our JN0-336 practice materials can remove all your doubts about the exam. If you believe in our products this time, you will enjoy the happiness of success all your life.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Regarding static attack object groups, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The correct answers are C and D. Static attack object groups are manually defined groups. Juniper states that custom attack groups are static in nature because the attacks are explicitly specified in the group; therefore, those attack groups do not change when the security database is updated. This is the key difference between static groups and dynamic groups. Dynamic groups use matching criteria and can automatically update membership when the signature database changes, but static groups do not behave that way.
Option C is correct because updating the IPS/IDP signature database does not automatically add or remove members from a static attack group. Option D is correct because the administrator must explicitly add the desired attack objects to the custom static group. Option A describes dynamic matching behavior, not static group behavior. Option B is also dynamic-group behavior; Juniper Security Director documentation says dynamic group membership is automatically updated during signature updates based on the group's matching criteria. Static groups are intentionally deterministic: they include only the attacks manually selected by the administrator. Reference topics: IDP attack objects, static attack groups, custom attack groups, dynamic attack groups, IPS signature database updates.
NEW QUESTION # 26
What is a function of the Juniper Identity Management Service?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. maintaining a centralized authentication table. Juniper Identity Management Service, or JIMS, is used with SRX Series Firewalls to collect user-identity information from identity sources such as Microsoft Active Directory, domain controllers, and Exchange servers, then provide that identity data to SRX enforcement points. Juniper describes JIMS as storing IP address, username, and group-relationship information in its cache and generating authentication entries used for user-based or group-based access control on SRX firewalls. Juniper's Identity-Aware Firewall documentation also states that the authentication table contains the IP address, username, and group mapping information used as the authentication source.
Option A is wrong because JIMS is not an email-encryption service. Option B is wrong because malicious- code logging belongs to security inspection features such as antivirus, IDP, or ATP workflows, not JIMS.
Option C is wrong because network data encryption is handled by technologies such as IPsec VPN or SSL
/TLS, not identity management. JIMS exists to centralize identity-to-IP mapping so identity-aware security policies can match users and groups instead of relying only on source IP addresses. Reference topics: Identity- Aware Security Policies, JIMS, authentication table, user-to-IP mapping, group-based policy enforcement.
NEW QUESTION # 27
Which three different objects would be created, modified, cloned, and deleted in the Shared Objects workspace of Junos Space Security Director? (Choose three.)
Answer: A,B,E
Explanation:
The correct answers are A, B, and D. In Security Director, the Shared Objects workspace is used for reusable objects that can be referenced by policies across managed devices. Juniper documentation shows that address objects are created from Configure > Shared Objects > Addresses, and those address objects can be used across devices in firewall, NAT, IPS, and VPN services. This supports option B, because IP address/address objects are classic shared objects.
Option A is correct because Geo IP policies are created from Configure > Shared Objects > Geo IP. Juniper's procedure explicitly places Geo IP under the Shared Objects path. Option D is also correct because policy enforcement groups are created from Configure > Shared Objects > Policy Enforcement Groups and are used to group endpoints such as IP addresses, subnets, or locations for policy-enforcement workflows.
Option C is wrong because audit logs are monitoring records, not reusable shared objects; Juniper places them under Monitor > Audit Logs, where they track login history and user-initiated tasks. Option E is wrong because policy rules are created and managed inside firewall, NAT, IPS, or threat policies, not as independent Shared Objects. Reference topics: Security Director, Shared Objects, address objects, Geo IP, policy enforcement groups.
NEW QUESTION # 28
Which rule base in an IDP policy is used to eliminate false positives?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. exempt. In Junos IDP, the exempt rulebase is specifically used to prevent selected traffic from triggering known false-positive detections. Juniper's IDP documentation explains that exempt rules can be configured when an IDP policy generates false positives for a particular attack object, source, destination, or traffic pattern. The exempt rulebase lets the administrator exclude matching traffic from attack detection while still allowing the rest of the IDP policy to inspect other traffic normally.
Option A, IPS, is wrong because the IPS rulebase is the main inspection rulebase used to detect and act on attacks. It is where attack objects and actions are commonly applied, but it is not the rulebase designed to eliminate false positives. Option B, monitor, is not the correct false-positive elimination mechanism.
Monitoring can help observe behavior, but it does not exempt traffic from matching an attack object. Option C, signature, is wrong because signatures are attack-detection patterns, not a rulebase type used to suppress false positives. The operational correction for noisy or irrelevant matches is to create an exempt rule for the specific trusted source, destination, or attack object. Reference topics: IDP rulebases, exempt rulebase, false- positive tuning, attack objects, IPS inspection.
NEW QUESTION # 29
Exhibit
Referring to the SRX Series flow module diagram shown in the exhibit, where is application security processed?
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 30
......
Our JN0-336 study materials are compiled and tested by our expert. JN0-336 try hard to makes JN0-336 exam preparation easy with its several quality features. We send learning information in the form of questions and answers, and our JN0-336 study materials are highly relevant to what you need to pass JN0-336 certification exam. Our free demo will show you the actual JN0-336 Certification Exam. You can learn about real exams in advance by studying our JN0-336 study materials and improve your confidence in the exam so that you can pass JN0-336 exams with ease. This is also the reason that has been popular by the majority of candidates.
JN0-336 Learning Mode: https://www.actual4test.com/JN0-336_examcollection.html
P.S. Free & New JN0-336 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Actual4test: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o9WyO2lLpZucABiCE_mfmA2ORuy7wJiU