Now you can pass EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) exam without going through any hassle. You can only focus on 312-97 exam dumps provided by the TestSimulate, and you will be able to pass the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) test in the first attempt. We provide high quality and easy to understand 312-97 pdf dumps with verified ECCouncil 312-97 for all the professionals who are looking to pass the 312-97 exam in the first attempt. The 312-97 training material package includes latest 312-97 PDF questions and practice test software that will help you to pass the 312-97 exam.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) Exam |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Passing Score: | 70% (may vary 60โ85% depending on exam version) |
| Related Certifications: | EC-Council DevSecOps Essentials (DSE) |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQ) |
| Exam Duration: | 240 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Recommended Training: | EC-Council DevSecOps Engineer Training (E|CDE) EC-Council DevSecOps Essentials (DSE) |
| Exam Registration: | EC-Council ECDE Official Page Pearson VUE EC-Council Exams |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored exam via EC-Council Exam Portal / Pearson VUE |
| Pre Condition: | Basic understanding of application security concepts; enrollment in EC-Council DevSecOps training recommended |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/train-certify/certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde/ |
Our company is famous for its high-quality in this field especially for 312-97 certification exams. It has been accepted by thousands of candidates who practice our study materials for their 312-97 exam. In this major environment, people are facing more job pressure. So they want to get a certification rise above the common herd. How to choose valid and efficient 312-97 Guide Torrent should be the key topic most candidates may concern.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 67
(Charles Drew has been working as a DevSecOps team leader in an IT company located in Nashville, Tennessee. He would like to look at the applications from an attacker's perspective and make security a part of the organizations' culture. Imagine, you are working under Charles as a DevSecOps engineer. Charles has asked you to install ThreatPlaybook, which is a unified DevSecOps Framework that allows you to go from iterative, collaborative threat modeling to application security testing orchestration. After installation, you must configure ThreatPlaybook CLI; therefore, you have created a directory for the project and then you go to the current directory where you would like to configure ThreatPlaybook. Which of the following commands will you use to configure ThreatPlaybook? (Here, < your-email > represents your email id; < host info > represents IP address; and < port > represents the nginx port.))
Answer: A
Explanation:
ThreatPlaybook CLI is configured using the ThreatPlaybook configure command, which initializes the CLI with the required connection and user details. The -e option is used to specify the user's email address, the -h option defines the host information such as IP address or hostname, and the -p option specifies the port number. This configuration enables the CLI to securely communicate with the ThreatPlaybook service for orchestrating threat modeling and application security testing workflows. Options that use playbook configure are incorrect because the executable name is explicitly ThreatPlaybook. Options using -u instead of -h do not correctly specify host information. Configuring ThreatPlaybook during the Plan stage helps teams adopt an attacker's mindset early, embedding security into the organization's culture and ensuring threats are identified and addressed before development and deployment activities begin.
========
NEW QUESTION # 68
(Jeremy Renner has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer at an IT company that develops customized software to various customers stretched across the globe. His organization is using Microsoft Azure DevOps Services. Using an IaC tool, Jeremey deployed the infrastructure in Azure. He would like to integrate Chef InSpec with Azure to ensure that the deployed infrastructure is in accordance with the architecture and industrial standards and the security policies are appropriately implemented. Therefore, he downloaded and installed Chef InSpec. He used Azure CLI command for creating an Azure Service Principal with reader permission to the Azure resources, then he exported the generated credentials. After installation and configuration of Chef InSpec, he would like to create the structure and profile. Which of the following commands should Jeremy use to create a new folder jyren-azureTests with all the required artifacts for InSpec tests?)
Answer: C
Explanation:
Chef InSpec provides a command-line interface for creating and executing compliance profiles. To initialize a new profile with the required directory structure, metadata file, and example controls, the correct command is inspec init profile <profile-name>. In Jeremy's case, running inspec init profile jyren-azureTests creates a new folder with all required artifacts needed to write and run Azure compliance tests. Options using prof are invalid abbreviations, and prefixing the command with chef is incorrect when using the InSpec CLI directly.
Creating a structured InSpec profile during the Build and Test stage enables automated validation of infrastructure against architectural standards and security policies, supporting Infrastructure as Code security and continuous compliance practices.
========
NEW QUESTION # 69
A multinational e-commerce company has been following the Waterfall methodology for years to develop its internal applications. However, the company has been facing challenges in keeping up with frequent market changes, leading to delays in product releases. The development team struggles with late-stage problem identification, as issues cannot be addressed until the repair phase. Additionally, customers often report that the final product does not fully meet their expectations due to misalignment in project requirements. To overcome these challenges, the company's leadership has decided to transition to a more iterative and flexible software development approach that allows continuous testing, faster releases, and incremental enhancements based on feedback. Which software development methodology should the company adopt to resolve these issues?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Agile methodology is the iterative, flexible approach: development proceeds in short increments with continuous testing, frequent releases, and feedback-driven enhancements-resolving late-stage defect discovery and requirement misalignment caused by Waterfall. The V-Model is still sequential, and DevOps is a culture/practice set rather than the requested development methodology.
NEW QUESTION # 70
David Paymer has been working as a senior DevSecOps engineer in an IT company over the past 5 years. His organization is using Azure DevOps service to produce software products securely and quickly. David's team leader asked him to publish a NuGet package utilizing a command line. Imagine you are in David's place; which command would you use to publish NuGet package into the feed?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Publishing a NuGet package to a feed is done using the nuget.exe push command. The -Source parameter specifies the target feed name or URL, and the -ApiKey parameter is required even if the feed ignores its value. The publish verb is not used for NuGet package uploads, and - Destination is not a valid parameter for pushing packages. Therefore, nuget.exe push -Source
"<YOUR_FEED_NAME>" -ApiKey <ANY_STRING> <PACKAGE_PATH> is the correct
command. Using command-line publishing supports automation and consistency in DevSecOps workflows, enabling secure and repeatable artifact distribution as part of continuous delivery pipelines.
NEW QUESTION # 71
Nadia Correia works as a DevSecOps architect for a fintech startup in Lisbon. During the Plan stage of her pipeline, she wants to create a visual model that identifies potential threats, attack vectors, and trust boundaries in a new payments microservice before any code is written. Which activity should Nadia perform?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Threat modeling is a proactive planning-stage activity used to identify assets, entry points, trust boundaries, and potential threats to an application before development begins. Techniques such as STRIDE or DREAD help teams systematically enumerate risks like spoofing, tampering, and information disclosure, and map them to mitigating controls early in the SDLC. Software Composition Analysis (SCA) identifies vulnerabilities in third-party/open-source dependencies, DAST tests running applications for vulnerabilities, and fuzz testing feeds malformed input to a running program to find crashes - all of these occur after code exists, unlike threat modeling, which is inherently a design-time (Plan stage) activity. Since Nadia needs to model attack vectors and trust boundaries before writing code, threat modeling is the correct choice.
NEW QUESTION # 72
......
312-97 Latest Test Preparation: https://www.testsimulate.com/312-97-study-materials.html