BONUS!!! Download part of EduDump NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KXOpTS6WwXgtMypVEPuxxbgc2QPsGNPY
Do you want to pass NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 exam and get the related certification within the minimum time and effort? If you would like to give me a positive answer, you really should keep a close eye on our website since you can find the best NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 study material in here--our NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 Training Materials. We have helped millions of thousands of candidates to prepare for the NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 exam and all of them have got a fruitful outcome, we believe you will be the next winner as long as you join in us!
| Certification Vendor: | Fortinet |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiSwitch 7.6 Administrator |
| Exam Number: | NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-Based Items, Multiple Choice, Configuration Reasoning |
| Exam Price: | $200 USD |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Related Certifications: | Fortinet Certified Professional (FCP) - Secure Networking |
| Passing Score: | Pass / Fail |
| Real Exam Qty: | 35-40 |
| Exam Duration: | 70 minutes |
| Sample Questions: | Fortinet NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Pearson VUE |
| Pre Condition: | None specified |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://training.fortinet.com/local/staticpage/view.php?page=library_fortiswitch |
>> NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 Unlimited Exam Practice <<
Don't worry because "EduDump" is here to save you from these losses with its updated and real Fortinet NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 exam questions. We provide you with the latest prep material which is according to the content of Fortinet NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 Certification Exam and enhances your knowledge to crack the test. EduDump practice material is made by keeping in focus all the sections of the current syllabus.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 95
Which two statements about the FortiLink authorization process are true? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The FortiLink authorization process is an integral part of setting up FortiSwitch to be managed by FortiGate.
The correct statements regarding the FortiLink authorization process are:
C).A FortiLink frame is sent by FortiGate to FortiSwitch to complete the authorization.This is a part of the FortiLink protocol, where FortiGate communicates with the connected FortiSwitch to establish management and control. This frame initiates the configuration and management process, allowing FortiGate to effectively control the switch.
D).FortiLink authorization sets the FortiSwitch management mode to FortiLink.Once authorized, the management mode of FortiSwitch is set to FortiLink, indicating that it is being managed via a FortiLink connection from a FortiGate appliance. This changes the operational mode of the switch to be under the control of the FortiGate for centralized management and policy application.
References:
Further details on the FortiLink setup and authorization process can be accessed through the FortiGate configuration guides available on theFortinet Documentation site.
NEW QUESTION # 96
Which statement about the IGMP snooping querier when enabled on a VLAN is true?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Active multicast receiver entries are aging on each IGMP query sent on the VLAN (A): When IGMP snooping querier is enabled on a VLAN, it functions to manage multicast traffic within the VLAN by keeping track of multicast group memberships. The IGMP querier sends queries to determine which ports require the multicast traffic. The multicast receiver entries, which are entries that indicate which devices have requested the multicast data, age or time out based on these IGMP queries. Each query refreshes active connections but ages out entries that no longer respond, helping to ensure that multicast traffic is only sent to ports with active receivers.
NEW QUESTION # 97
Refer to the exhibits.
An administrator has deployed two FortiSwitch devices, Core-1 and Core-2, as multichassis link aggregation group (MCLAG) peers. These switches are connected to FortiGate for FortiLink and to an access switch (Access-1) using an inter-switch link (ISL). After configuration, the administrator notices that both Core-1 and Core-2 are claiming to be the root bridge in the Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) topology. What explains this behavior? (Choose one answer)
Answer: D
Explanation:
According to theFortiSwitchOS 7.6 Administration Guideand theFortiSwitch 7.6 Study Guide, Multichassis Link Aggregation (MCLAG) provides node-level redundancy by grouping two physical switches together so that theyappear as a single logical switchto the rest of the network. This logical representation is critical for preventing Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) from blocking redundant uplinks from downstream client switches.
To achieve this " single switch " appearance, the MCLAG peer switches synchronize their STP state andshare the same Bridge ID, which consists of a synchronized bridge MAC address and the same bridge priority. As shown in the exhibits for Core-1 and Core-2, both switches are configured with aBridge MAC of
02090f000701and aPriority of 20480. Because they possess identical identification parameters, each physical switch in the peer group locally recognizes itself as part of the root bridge entity for the MSTP region.
This behavior is intentional and is a fundamental characteristic of MCLAG design in FortiSwitchOS. It ensures that any downstream device, such as Access-1, receives BPDUs with the same bridge ID from both Core-1 and Core-2, thereby treating them as a single high-availability neighbor rather than two separate devices. Option A is incorrect as FortiGate typically does not participate in STP calculations. Option B is incorrect because this " duplicate " root behavior is the expected sign of acorrectlyfunctioning MCLAG control plane. Option D is incorrect as STP remains active to prevent loops elsewhere in the fabric; it is merely logically simplified for the MCLAG domain.
NEW QUESTION # 98
Refer to the exhibit.
PC1 and PC2 are connected to port1 on FortiSwitch. Which VLAN tags will FortiSwitch apply when forwarding PC1 and PC2 traffic out of port2? (Choose one answer)
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to theFortiSwitchOS 7.6 Administration Guideand theFortiSwitch 7.6 Study Guide, the classification of untagged traffic entering a switch port is determined by the port's hierarchy of VLAN assignment rules.
For the traffic arriving atport1:
* PC1 (MAC 58:ef:68:b4:33:32):The exhibit shows an explicitMAC-based VLAN assignmentrule for this specific MAC address, placing it intoVLAN 10. In FortiSwitchOS, dynamic assignments like MAC-based or protocol-based rules take precedence over the port's static native VLAN. Therefore, PC1's traffic is internally associated with VLAN 10.
* PC2 (MAC 58:ef:68:b4:33:c3):There is no MAC-based rule for this device. As a result, the switch falls back to the default behavior and assigns the traffic to the port'sNative VLAN, which isVLAN 20.
For the traffic exiting port2:
The egress behavior depends on the VLAN tagging configuration of the outgoing interface. On port2, the Native VLAN is 4094, and VLANs 10 and 20 are listed as Allowed VLANs. According to Fortinet documentation, any traffic belonging to an allowed VLAN that does not match the native VLAN ID of the egress port must be sent as tagged 802.1Q frames. Since neither VLAN 10 nor VLAN 20 matches the native ID of 4094, the FortiSwitch will apply a VLAN 10 tag to PC1's traffic and a VLAN 20 tag to PC2's traffic as they are forwarded to the FortiGate.
NEW QUESTION # 99
Refer to the exhibit.
You just connected three FortiSwitch devices:Core-1,Core-2, andAccess-1. Core-1 and Core-2 both connect to Access-1 for redundancy. All switches are managed by FortiGate, which uses port4 as the FortiLink interface. After you enable the uplink ports on Core-2, you notice that port3 on Access-1 enters the Discarding STP state. What is the most likely cause of this behavior? (Choose one answer)
Answer: C
Explanation:
According to theFortiSwitchOS 7.6 Administration Guideand theFortiLink 7.6 Study Guide, the Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is automatically enabled on managed FortiSwitches to ensure a loop-free Layer 2 topology within the FortiLink fabric. When multiple physical paths exist between switches (as shown in the redundant connections between the Core and Access tiers), STP must block one of the paths to prevent a broadcast storm.
The behavior described in the exhibit-whereport3 on Access-1enters aDiscarding state-is a result of the STP election process. In a standard STP environment, switches elect aRoot Bridgebased on the lowestBridge Priority(or lowest MAC address as a tie-breaker). Once a root is established, other switches identify the " best
" path to that root (the Root Port) and block all other redundant paths.
The provided exhibit shows that Access-1 has two paths to the core: one to Core-1 and one to Core-2. The fact that the path to Core-2 is discarded suggests that the STP topology was recalculated when Core-2 was enabled. In the context of Fortinet technical exams for this specific scenario,Option C (Core-2 has the lowest bridge priority)is the standard answer identifying that Core-2 ' s priority settings influenced the STP tree such that Access-1 ' s link to it was determined to be the redundant (alternate) path.
If the switches were configured withMCLAG (Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation), both physical links would be treated as a single logical trunk, and neither would be in a discarding state. However, without MCLAG, the system relies on bridge priorities to prune the loop.BPDU Guard (Option A)is incorrect because it would administratively shut down the port rather than placing it in an STP " Discarding " state.Option Bis incorrect as the switch would not appear in the managed topology if unauthorized.
NEW QUESTION # 100
......
Flexible NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 Learning Mode: https://www.edudump.com/exams/Fortinet/NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6/
What's more, part of that EduDump NSE5_FSW_AD-7.6 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KXOpTS6WwXgtMypVEPuxxbgc2QPsGNPY