P.S. NewDumps在Google Drive上分享了免費的2026 Salesforce Plat-Arch-204考試題庫：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_V5jprLhinDbrnBRfSIXXOGH71c_DZvu
NewDumps為你提供了一個明確而優秀的選擇，為你減少煩惱。想早點成功嗎？早點拿到Salesforce Plat-Arch-204認證考試的證書嗎？快點將NewDumps加入購物車吧。NewDumps會給你很好的指導，能確保你通過考試。使用NewDumps你可以很快獲得你想要的證書。
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-select, Multiple-choice |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce System Architect Salesforce B2C Solution Architect |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online (proctored) or Onsite at a testing center |
| Pre Condition: | One year of Integration Architecture experience and three to four years of experience on Salesforce platform |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/integrationarchitect |
多考一些證照對於年輕人來說不是件壞事，是加薪升遷的法寶。對於參加 Plat-Arch-204 考試的年輕人而言，不需要擔心 Salesforce 證照沒有辦法過關，只要找到最新的Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 考題，就是 Plat-Arch-204 考試順利過關的最佳方式。Plat-Arch-204題庫涵蓋了考試中心的正式考試的所有的題目。確保了考生能順利通過考試，獲得 Salesforce 認證證照。
| 主題 | 簡介 |
|---|---|
| 主題 1 |
|
| 主題 2 |
|
| 主題 3 |
|
問題 #106
Universal Containers (UC) works with third-party agents on banner initial design concepts. The design files (2.5 GB) are stored in an on-premise file store. UC wants to allow agencies to view these files in the community. Which solution should an integration architect recommend?
答案：A
解題說明：
When dealing with extremely large files, such as the 2.5 GB design files mentioned, an architect must consider the platform's file size limits and storage costs. Salesforce Files have a maximum upload size of 2 GB through most interfaces, making Option B technically unfeasible for a 2.5 GB file. Furthermore, storing numerous large files natively in Salesforce would lead to excessive storage consumption and costs.
The most efficient and cost-effective approach is Data Virtualization or Redirection. By creating a custom object to store the file location URL (Option C), the actual file remains in the performant on-premise file store. When the community user needs to access the design, they are redirected to the source system, which handles the massive data transfer. This fulfills the requirement to "view" the files without the overhead of moving gigabytes of data through the Salesforce infrastructure. Option A is less ideal because a 2.5 GB download over a standard Request-Reply pattern would likely lead to timeouts and a poor user experience.
問題 #107
Northern Trail Outfitters has recently implemented middleware for orchestration of services across platforms. The Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system being used requires transactions be captured near real-time at a REST endpoint initiated in Salesforce when creating an Order object. Additionally, the Salesforce team has limited development resources and requires a low-code solution. Which option should fulfill the use case requirements?12
答案：A
解題說明：
To satisfy a requirement for near real-time updates to an ERP system while adher9ing to a low-code constraint, the architect must leverage Salesforce's modern declara10tive automation tools. The goal is to initiate an outbound signal that the existing middleware can then orchestrate and deliver to the ERP's REST endpoint.
The Remote Process Invocation-Fire and Forget pattern is perfectly suited for this scenario. In this pattern, Salesforce sends a message to an external system and does not wait for a functional response. This is ideal for "capturing" transactions in an ERP where the primary goal is record synchronization rather than a real-time calculation return. By using Flow Builder, the team can implement a record-triggered flow on the Order object. This flow can be configured to execute "Actions" that send data to the middleware via External Services or standard HTTP Callouts (Beta/GA features in modern Flow), which requires zero Apex coding.
Option B, Outbound Messaging, is a legacy declarative tool that is highly reliable but has a significant limitation: it natively sends messages in SOAP format. Since the requirement specifically specifies a REST endpoint, using Outbound Messaging would require additional transformation logic in the middleware, making it a less direct architectural fit than a modern Flow-based REST call. Option C, Change Data Capture (CDC), is a highly scalable, event-driven mechanism, but it is typically considered more complex to implement and maintain. It requires the middleware to manage "Replay IDs" and subscribe to a streaming channel, which often requires more specialized development effort on the middleware side compared to a simple HTTP POST from a Flow. For a team with limited development resources, Flow Builder provides the most accessible and maintainable path to achieving near real-time integration.
問題 #108
When a user clicks "Check Preferences" as part of a Lightning flow, preferences from an externally hosted RESTful service are to be checked in real time. The service has OpenAPI 2.0 definitions. Which integration pattern and mechanism should be selected?
答案：B
解題說明：
This scenario describes a classic Request and Reply pattern where a user action in the UI requires an immediate, synchronous response from an external system to determine the next step in a business process (the Flow).
The requirement specifies that an OpenAPI 2.0 (Swagger) definition is available. For an Integration Architect, this is a prime use case for External Services. External Services allow you to import an OpenAPI schema and automatically generate "Invocable Actions" that can be used directly in Flow Builder without writing a single line of Apex code.
Why this is the best fit:
Low Code: It fulfills the requirement purely through declarative configuration, which reduces maintenance and development costs.
Real-Time: It performs a synchronous HTTP callout and waits for the Boolean/String values to be returned to the Flow variables.
Type Safety: Because it uses the OpenAPI definition, Salesforce understands the data types (Boolean/String) natively.
Option A (Data Virtualization) is more suitable for viewing and searching large external datasets as if they were records; it is over-engineered for a simple "check status" function. Option C (Remote Call-In) is the inverse of the requirement; it refers to an external system calling into Salesforce. By using Enhanced External Services, the architect provides a scalable, declarative solution that perfectly aligns with modern Salesforce development best practices for real-time external system interaction.
問題 #109
A customer is migrating from an old legacy system to Salesforce and wants to integrate all existing systems currently working with the legacy application. Which constraint/pain-point should an integration architect consider when choosing the integration pattern/mechanism?
答案：B
解題說明：
When designing an integration architecture for a legacy migration, Data volume and processing volume are the primary technical constraints that dictate the choice of integration pattern.
Salesforce is a multi-tenant environment with strict governor limits. High data volumes can quickly exhaust synchronous request limits, API quotas, and storage allocations. An architect must evaluate:
Synchronous vs. Asynchronous: High-volume processing often requires asynchronous patterns (like Batch or Fire-and-Forget) to avoid blocking user actions and hitting concurrent request limits.
Bulk vs. REST: If millions of records need to be migrated or synchronized daily, the Bulk API is the only scalable mechanism, as standard REST or SOAP APIs are not optimized for massive datasets.
Data Persistence: Large volumes of read-only data might be better served through Data Virtualization (Salesforce Connect) to avoid consuming expensive Salesforce storage.
While reporting (Option C) and multi-currency (Option B) are important business requirements, they are functional configurations within Salesforce and do not drive the technical "plumbing" of the integration as heavily as volume does. By prioritizing the evaluation of volume and processing needs, the architect ensures that the integration is stable, performant, and capable of scaling as the business grows.
問題 #110
Northern Trail Outfitters is creating a distributable Salesforce package. The package needs to call into a Custom Apex REST endpoint in the central org. The security team wants to ensure a specific integration account is used in the central org that they will authorize after installation. Which item should an architect recommend?
答案：A
解題說明：
When building a distributable package (likely a Managed Package) that must securely communicate back to a central "Hub" org, the architect must use a framework that supports OAuth 2.0 flows. Storing plain-text or even encrypted passwords (Option B) is a security violation and is brittle across different environments.
The architecturally sound solution is to leverage the Authentication Provider and Named Credentials framework. In the central org, a Connected App is created to act as the OAuth endpoint. In the package, an Authentication Provider is configured using the Consumer Key and Consumer Secret from that Connected App. This setup allows the administrator in the "Subscriber" org (the org where the package is installed) to initiate an OAuth flow.
When the security team "authorizes" the integration after installation, they are essentially completing the OAuth handshake. This grants the subscriber org an Access Token and a Refresh Token associated with the specific integration user in the central org. This mechanism ensures:
Credential Security: No passwords are ever stored in the code or metadata.
Centralized Control: The security team in the central org can revoke the Refresh Token at any time to kill the integration.
Scalability: The same package can be distributed to hundreds of orgs, each with its own unique, secure connection to the central Hub.
By using an Authentication Provider combined with a Named Credential, the Apex code in the package can simply call the endpoint by its developer name, and Salesforce handles the entire authentication header injection automatically, ensuring a robust and secure cross-org integration.
問題 #111
......
Plat-Arch-204 PDF題庫: https://www.newdumpspdf.com/Plat-Arch-204-exam-new-dumps.html
此外，這些NewDumps Plat-Arch-204考試題庫的部分內容現在是免費的：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_V5jprLhinDbrnBRfSIXXOGH71c_DZvu