BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassSureExam Plat-Arch-204 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dQXpvHCIgp_amKc1nfFLl8Jm24dLWelQ
The Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice questions are designed by experienced and qualified Plat-Arch-204 exam trainers. They have the expertise, knowledge, and experience to design and maintain the top standard of Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 exam dumps. So rest assured that with the Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam real questions you can not only ace your Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam dumps preparation but also get deep insight knowledge about Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam topics. So download Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam questions now and start this journey.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Application Architect Salesforce Certified Technical Architect |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-select, Multiple-choice, Scenario-based |
| Available Languages: | English, Japanese |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 (initial), USD 200 (retake) |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Recommended Training: | Architect Journey: Integration Architecture Salesforce Integration Architecture Course |
| Exam Registration: | Kryterion Webassessor Pearson VUE |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite at authorized test centers |
| Pre Condition: | No mandatory prerequisites; recommended: 3โ4 years Salesforce platform experience, 1โ2 years integration experience, knowledge of APIs, web services and enterprise patterns |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailheadacademy.salesforce.com/certificate/exam-integration-arch---Plat-Arch-204 |
>> Plat-Arch-204 Exam Discount Voucher <<
Our staff is suffer-able to your any questions related to our Plat-Arch-204 test guide. If you get any suspicions, we offer help 24/7 with enthusiasm and patience. Apart from our stupendous Plat-Arch-204 latest dumps, our after-sales services are also unquestionable. Your decision of the practice materials may affects the results you concerning most right now. Good exam results are not accidents, but the results of careful preparation and high quality and accuracy materials like our Plat-Arch-204 practice materials.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 16
UC has an API-led architecture with three tiers. Requirement: return data to systems of engagement (mobile, web, Salesforce) in different formats and enforce different security protocols. What should the architect recommend?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a standard API-led connectivity model, the First Tier (Experience APIs) is responsible for tailoring data for specific systems of engagement.
The Experience APIs take the core data from the lower tiers and transform it into the specific return formats (e.g., JSON for mobile, XML for legacy web) and security protocols (e.g., OAuth for Salesforce, API Keys for web) required by each consumer. Option B correctly identifies that these transformations and security enforcements should happen at this outer layer. While an API Gateway (Option A) can provide generic security and rate limiting, it is the Experience API layer that provides the functional transformation and specific protocol requirements defined by the business needs of the engagement systems.
NEW QUESTION # 17
Northern Trail Outfitters wants to use Salesforce as a front end for creating accounts using the lead-to-opportunity process.
An order is created in Salesforce when the opportunity is Closed/Won, but the back-end Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is the data Master for order.
The customer wants to be able to see within Salesforce all the stages of order processing, like Order Created, Order Shipped, and Order Paid, that are within the retention window.
Which message durability consideration should an integration architect make when designing a solution to meet these business requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When designing an event-driven architecture to track order processing stages (Created, Shipped, Paid), the Integration Architect must ensure the solution provides "durability"-the ability to recover messages that were sent while a subscriber was offline or during a system failure. In Salesforce, this is managed through the Event Bus and the ReplayID mechanism.
For High-Volume Platform Events and Change Data Capture, Salesforce provides a standard retention window of 72 hours (3 days). This means that events are stored in the bus for this duration, allowing clients to "replay" events that occurred in the past. To leverage this durability, the subscribing client must specify where in the event stream they wish to begin receiving messages.
There are two special values for the ReplayID:
ReplayID = -1 (Tip of the Stream): The subscriber receives only new events that are published after the subscription is established. Any events published while the client was disconnected are missed. This does not meet the requirement of seeing processing stages that occurred within the retention window if the connection was interrupted.
ReplayID = -2 (All Available Events): The subscriber receives all events that are currently stored in the event bus (up to 72 hours old) as well as all new events.
By recommending the use of ReplayID = -2, the architect ensures that even if the Salesforce frontend or the integration middleware experiences downtime, the system can "catch up" by retrieving all order status updates (Shipped, Paid, etc.) that were published during that window. This provides a robust and resilient user experience, ensuring that the Opportunity and Order records in Salesforce accurately reflect the state of the ERP system without data gaps. This configuration is essential for maintaining data synchronization in a distributed landscape where Salesforce acts as the engagement layer for a back-1end ERP master.
NEW QUESTION # 18
An enterprise customer is planning to implement Salesforce to support case management.
Below is their current system landscape diagram. Considering Salesforce capabilities, what should the integration architect evaluate when integrating Salesforce with the current system landscape?
Answer: A
Explanation:
An Integration Architect's primary responsibility when evaluating a landscape for a new Salesforce implementation is to identify the system of record for each business process and determine which legacy systems will be replaced by Salesforce. In this scenario, the customer is implementing Salesforce specifically to support case management.
According to the provided landscape diagram, the Case Management System currently exists as a standalone entity. Since Salesforce Service Cloud provides native, best-in-class case management capabilities, this legacy system is the primary candidate for retirement. Retiring the legacy Case Management system avoids data fragmentation and ensures that Salesforce serves as the single source of truth for support interactions.
However, for Salesforce to function effectively as a new case management hub, it must integrate with the remaining surrounding systems:
Email Management System: This system likely handles inbound customer communications. An architect must evaluate integrating this with Salesforce (via Email-to-Case or a specialized connector) so that incoming emails automatically generate or update cases.
Order Management System (OMS): Support agents often need to view order history or status to resolve customer inquiries. Integrating Salesforce with the OMS allows for a 360-degree view, enabling agents to see relevant order data directly within the Salesforce case console.
Data Warehouse: For long-term reporting, trend analysis, and a unified customer profile, case data from Salesforce needs to be pushed to the Data Warehouse. This ensures that the Analytics and Business Intelligence Tool downstream can report on support metrics alongside other enterprise data.
Therefore, the architect should evaluate integrations with the Data Warehouse, Order Management, and Email Management System. Option B and C are incorrect because they suggest integrating with the "Case Management System," which is the very system being superseded by Salesforce's native capabilities. By focusing on the integration of these three supporting systems, the architect ensures a seamless transition where Salesforce is fully enriched with the necessary external data to drive support excellence.
NEW QUESTION # 19
Considering Salesforce capabilities, what should the integration architect evaluate when integrating Salesforce with the current system landscape?
Answer: A
Explanation:
When evaluating a current system landscape for a Salesforce implementation, an Integration Architect's primary goal is to align the platform's native capabilities with the existing architecture to determine which systems will be replaced, retired, or integrated. Based on the provided diagram (image_69c0fd.png), the landscape consists of an Email Management System, an Order Management System, a Case Management System, and a Data Warehouse used for Business Intelligence.
In a scenario where an enterprise is implementing Salesforce to support Case Management (Service Cloud), Salesforce natively provides the robust capabilities required to serve as the new "System of Record" for customer support interactions. Consequently, the legacy Case Management System is typically targeted for retirement. The architect's evaluation therefore focuses on the necessary integration points with the systems that will coexist with the new Salesforce instance to ensure a unified agent experience.
As outlined in standard Salesforce Integration Architecture frameworks, the following evaluations are critical:
Order Management System (OMS): Salesforce must integrate with the OMS so that service agents can view real-time order history, shipping status, and line items directly within the Case record, often using patterns like Request-Reply or Data Virtualization.
Email Management System (EMS): To support Omni-Channel service, Salesforce needs to integrate with the EMS (via Email-to-Case or a Marketing Cloud connector) to ensure that all customer communications are captured and tracked against the appropriate Case records.
Data Warehouse: For long-term historical reporting and cross-functional analytics, Salesforce must push its transactional data to the enterprise Data Warehouse. This ensures the Analytics and Business Intelligence Tool can continue to provide a holistic view of company performance.
By selecting Option C, the architect recognizes that Salesforce replaces the legacy case management function while requiring strategic integration with the Data Warehouse, Order Management, and Email Management systems to achieve a true 360-degree view of the customer.
NEW QUESTION # 20
Northern Trail Outfitters uses a custom Java application to display code coverage and test results for all of its enterprise applications and plans to include Salesforce as well. Which Salesforce API should an integration architect use to meet the requirement?
Answer: B
Explanation:
For developer-centric tools that need to access fine-grained technical data like code coverage and test results, the Tooling API is the correct architectural choice.
While the Metadata API (Option B) is used to deploy or retrieve code, it does not provide real-time query access to the underlying metrics of a test run. The Tooling API, however, exposes specialized objects such as ApexCodeCoverage, ApexCodeCoverageAggregate, and ApexTestResult. These objects allow the Java application to query exactly which lines of code were executed during a test and the overall percentage of coverage for the organization.
The Analytics REST API (Option A) is designed for querying and interacting with Einstein Analytics (CRM Analytics) datasets and dashboards, which is irrelevant to software development lifecycle (SDLC) metrics. By using the Tooling API, the Java application can perform RESTful queries to gather comprehensive data on test successes, failures, and coverage gaps. This allows NTO to integrate Salesforce into its existing enterprise-wide quality dashboard, ensuring a unified view of code health across all platforms.
NEW QUESTION # 21
......
Plat-Arch-204 Test Questions Vce: https://www.passsureexam.com/Plat-Arch-204-pass4sure-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassSureExam: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dQXpvHCIgp_amKc1nfFLl8Jm24dLWelQ