さらに、Fast2test CCDS-Oダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KaR3G8UAopiUUBpYv1iExCZseQMB98y-
CCDS-O試験に参加する人が多くなっていますから、提供される問題集は多くなります。受験生としてのあなたは資料の選択に悩んでいますか？弊社のCCDS-O問題集は安くて全面的なのですから、あなたは我々の問題集を利用したら、順調に試験に合格できます。だから、多くの人は我々のCCDS-O問題集を推薦します。
| Certification Vendor: | ACDIS |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist-Outpatient (CCDS-O) Exam |
| Exam Number: | CCDS-O |
| Exam Price: | $280 (ACDIS members), $380 (non-members), +$100 international fee |
| Related Certifications: | Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist (CCDS) |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 2 years |
| Exam Format: | Computer-based, Multiple-choice questions, Remotely proctored or test center delivery |
| Real Exam Qty: | 140 (120 scored, 20 unscored) |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Passing Score: | 85 out of 120 scored questions |
| Exam Duration: | 150 minutes |
| Recommended Training: | CCDS-O Exam Candidate Handbook CCDS-O Official Study Guide |
| Exam Registration: | ACDIS Certification Application Prometric Scheduling |
| Sample Questions: | ACDIS CCDS-O Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Computer-based testing at Prometric centers or remote proctoring via ProProctor |
| Pre Condition: | RN, MD, DO, or HIM/coding certification (RHIA, RHIT, CCS, CPC, CRC, COC) + 2 years outpatient CDI experience; OR 1 year outpatient + 1 year inpatient CDI experience; minimum 2,000 hours per year |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://acdis.org/certification/ccds-o |
ACDIS CCDS-Oソフト版問題集のようなバーチャルは購入前に、どうすれば適用性を感じられますか。この問題に心配する必要がありませんし、我々社の無料に提供するACDIS CCDS-OPDF版を直接にダウンロードし、事前に体験できます。何か問題があると、ライブチャットとメールで問い合わせます。我々Fast2testを選択するとき、ACDIS CCDS-O試験にうまく合格できるチャンスを捉えるといえます。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
質問 # 55
Progress note states: "Recent EGD identified severe hyperplasia, without obstruction. Follow-up today for Barrett's. Complains of chest pain, difficulty swallowing, 15-pound weight loss in last 12 weeks. Diagnoses-significant weight loss, cachexia, anorexia, Barrett's esophagus, and chest pain. Plan short term tube feeding-consult home health and dietitian for management." Which of the following diagnoses will trigger an HCC assignment?
正解：D
解説：
Within the CMS-HCC model, only certain diagnoses map to HCC categories that contribute to the RAF score. Among the listed options, cachexia is the diagnosis most likely to map to an HCC because it represents a serious systemic wasting condition associated with significant morbidity, higher expected resource use, and frequently coexists with advanced chronic disease. In contrast, Barrett's esophagus generally does not map to an HCC in CMS risk adjustment, and symptom-based diagnoses such as significant weight loss typically do not trigger HCC capture. Anorexia in general clinical usage often represents a symptom (loss of appetite) and, unless it is clearly documented as a qualifying malnutrition-related condition with appropriate specificity, it usually does not map to an HCC. The plan for tube feeding and dietitian involvement strengthens clinical relevance, but for risk adjustment the diagnosis must be one that maps to an HCC category-here, cachexia is the one that meets that criterion and would be the HCC-triggering diagnosis.
質問 # 56
A female patient presents for her yearly wellness check-up. Her vital signs are within normal limits with the exception of dyspnea. Her weight is 165 lbs, up 10 lbs from her previous clinic visit 2 weeks prior. Problem list includes diagnoses of obesity, COPD, heart failure, and diabetes without complications. The patient's A1c noted 9.2 up from 7.2 from previous year wellness exam. Based on the clinical indicators, which of the following medications should be evaluated and addressed during this clinic visit?
正解：C
解説：
In ambulatory CDI chart review, clinical indicators should align with assessment and management captured in the note (problem relevance and MEAT-style support: monitor, evaluate, assess/address, treat). This visit has two strong indicators that warrant medication evaluation. First, dyspnea plus a rapid 10-lb weight increase over two weeks is a classic signal of possible fluid overload in a patient with heart failure, making a loop diuretic such as Lasix clinically relevant to assess (effectiveness, adherence, dose changes, exacerbation risk, and whether HF is stable vs decompensated). Second, the A1c has worsened significantly (9.2 from 7.2), indicating inadequate glycemic control that should prompt review and adjustment of diabetes therapy; insulin such as NovoLog is directly tied to diabetes treatment escalation or optimization. The other medication pairs do not logically match the documented problems and indicators (e.g., appetite stimulant/anemia therapy, immunosuppressant, antidepressant/antihistamine). Therefore, NovoLog and Lasix best reflect what should be evaluated and addressed
質問 # 57
The principal diagnosis is defined as:
正解：B
解説：
The definition in option B is the official Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) definition used for inpatient coding: the principal diagnosis is the condition determined-after evaluation-to be chiefly responsible for the admission. It is not simply the first condition written, nor necessarily the "worst" or most severe condition; it is the reason for admission once the workup clarifies the clinical picture. CDI practice reinforces this because principal diagnosis selection drives DRG assignment, quality metrics, and reporting, and errors often stem from confusing presenting symptoms with the final established diagnosis. Although outpatient settings use different concepts (e.g., first-listed diagnosis for the encounter), ACDIS education frequently contrasts inpatient "principal diagnosis" with outpatient "first-listed" to prevent documentation and coding misalignment. Clinicians should document the definitive condition when known (and link symptoms to that condition), and clearly describe diagnostic uncertainty when not yet established. This clarity supports compliant coding, accurate benchmarking, and defensible medical necessity across settings.
質問 # 58
For outpatient/provider services, the primary sources of coding authority include the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting, AHA's Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, as well as which of the following?
正解：B
解説：
Outpatient/provider coding relies on two major code sets: ICD-10-CM for diagnoses and CPT/HCPCS for professional services, procedures, and supplies. Because of that, outpatient coding authority is anchored not only in the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines and AHA Coding Clinic guidance for diagnosis reporting, but also in the authoritative guidance that clarifies CPT/HCPCS reporting. ACDIS outpatient CDI education stresses that CDI specialists must understand both sides: the diagnosis coding rules (ICD-10-CM) and the procedural/service reporting rules (CPT/HCPCS) that drive much of outpatient reimbursement. AMA's CPT Assistant is a key interpretive authority for CPT coding guidance, while AHA's Coding Clinic for HCPCS provides clarification on HCPCS Level II reporting. The other options focus on ICD-10-PCS guidelines and DRG tools, which are primarily inpatient facility concepts (PCS is inpatient procedure coding; DRGs are inpatient payment groupers). Therefore, the correct supplemental outpatient authority pair is AHA's Coding Clinic for HCPCS and AMA's CPT Assistant.
質問 # 59
Which performance metric is MOST appropriate for an outpatient program to share with providers?
正解：B
解説：
Outpatient CDI programs should share provider-facing metrics that are clinically meaningful, aligned with ambulatory documentation goals, and unlikely to be perceived as payment-driven prompting. RAF scores are an appropriate metric because they reflect how well the documented and coded condition burden represents the patient panel's complexity in risk adjustment models. Discussing RAF supports education around accurate diagnosis capture, specificity, and annual recapture of active chronic conditions that are monitored, evaluated, assessed/addressed, or treated. In contrast, APC payment rates are facility OPPS payment constructs and typically are not actionable for individual ambulatory provider documentation improvement. HCC per member per month payments is explicitly financial and can create compliance risk by tying documentation discussions directly to payment, which outpatient CDI guidance warns against in provider messaging. MCC rates are primarily an inpatient DRG severity concept and are not the most relevant outpatient performance measure. Therefore, RAF scores best balance provider relevance, program goals, and compliant education focus.
質問 # 60
......
CCDS-O無料試験: https://jp.fast2test.com/CCDS-O-premium-file.html
ちなみに、Fast2test CCDS-Oの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KaR3G8UAopiUUBpYv1iExCZseQMB98y-