私たちの努力は自分の人生に更なる可能性を増加するためのことであるとよく思われます。あなたは弊社JpexamのSAVE International CVS試験問題集を利用し、試験に一回合格しました。SAVE International CVS試験認証証明書を持つ皆様は面接のとき、他の面接人員よりもっと多くのチャンスがあります。その他、CVS試験認証証明書も仕事昇進にたくさんのメリットを与えられます。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Standards, Ethics and Application | 10% | - Application in different industries and sectors - SAVE International standards and guidelines - Professional ethics and responsibilities |
| Leadership and Facilitation | 15% | - Leading value study teams - Stakeholder management and communication - Workshop facilitation skills |
| Value Methodology Job Plan | 30% | - Function analysis phase - Preparation phase - Creative phase - Information phase - Presentation and implementation phase - Evaluation phase - Development phase |
| Tools and Techniques | 20% | - Creative thinking and idea generation methods - Decision-making and evaluation tools - Cost analysis and worth assessment - Function analysis system technique (FAST) |
| Value Methodology Principles and Concepts | 25% | - Origins, development and application scope of Value Methodology - Value index, function and cost relationship - Definition and core concepts of Value |
CVS試験問題は正式に認定されています。 私たちSAVE Internationalの目標は、効率的な学習スタイルで、Certified Value Specialist関連するCVS試験に合格できるようにすることです。 CVSトレーニング資料の品質と手頃な価格により、当社の競争力は常に世界のリーダーです。 CVS学習教材は、他のトレーニング教材よりも高い合格率を持っているため、完全な結果を得ることができると確信しています。 CVS試験問題を使用すると、Jpexam成功が保証されます。
質問 # 43
Which of the following actions should be taken to develop a comprehensive and effective VM study report?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、D
解説：
The correct answers are A. List VM proposals developed and C. Focus the report on the major VM proposals .
In the Presentation Phase, the VM study report must document the results of the study in a clear, decision- oriented format. The report should identify the VM proposals developed during the Development Phase, including the recommended change, basis of comparison, cost effect, value improvement, advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations. Listing the developed proposals gives decision makers a complete record of the team's actionable outputs.
However, an effective report should not become a raw archive of every discussion, idea, or technical detail. It should focus attention on the major VM proposals that offer meaningful value improvement and require management review or approval. This aligns with the Presentation Phase purpose: to communicate developed alternatives clearly and obtain concurrence for implementation.
Option B is less appropriate because the methodology may be summarized, but an overly detailed methodology section can distract from the proposals and decisions required. Option D is incorrect because technical terminology should be controlled and audience-appropriate; excessive jargon weakens communication.
References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Study Report; Development Phase; VM Proposals; Decision- Maker Communication.
質問 # 44
Which of the following are outcomes of function framing?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：B、D
解説：
Function framing is an essential Value Methodology discipline because it changes the team's viewpoint from things and solutions to functions and purposes . The correct outcomes are that it defines reality in terms of what things do and why they do them and allows maximum potential for divergent thinking . In VM, a function is expressed in an active verb and measurable noun format, which forces the team to describe the required performance rather than defend the current design. This helps the team understand the real need behind a product, process, project, or service.
Option B is incorrect because function framing does not focus on existing solutions; it deliberately moves the team away from solution fixation. Option C is close, but it is more directly associated with the Creativity Phase, where ideas are generated to satisfy required functions. Function framing prepares the ground for that later solution generation, but its direct outcome is clearer functional understanding and broader thinking freedom. By defining the problem functionally, the team avoids premature judgment and opens a wider solution space.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Framing; Function Definition; Divergent Thinking; Creativity Phase Linkage.
質問 # 45
What are typical examples of evaluation criteria used for a business process study during the Evaluation Phase?
Choose 2 answers.
正解：A、C
解説：
The correct answers are A. Efficiency and D. Scalability . In the Evaluation Phase, the VM team uses structured criteria to screen and rank creative ideas based on their ability to improve value while still delivering the required functions. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard defines VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team to improve value through function analysis, and it confirms that VM applies not only to products and construction projects but also to business procedures, services, manufacturing processes, and business plans . ( ) For a business process study , typical evaluation criteria focus on how well an alternative improves process performance. Efficiency is a primary criterion because business-process alternatives are commonly judged by cycle time, resource use, duplication reduction, workflow simplification, and productivity. Scalability is also typical because the improved process should remain effective as transaction volume, users, locations, or organizational complexity increase.
Environmental impact may be valid in sustainability-driven studies, construction, or product/process engineering, but it is not a typical core criterion for a general business-process VM study. Maintenance is more typical for physical assets, facilities, equipment, or technical systems. The Evaluation Phase specifically selects ideas that offer value improvement while considering performance requirements and resource limits. ( ) References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Business Process Study; Evaluation Criteria; ; Scalability; Value Improvement.
質問 # 46
During the Presentation Phase, the team leader should primarily do which of the following?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is A . SAVE's VM Standard defines the Presentation Phase as the phase where the team leader develops a report and/or presentation that documents and conveys the adequacy of the developed alternatives and the associated value improvement opportunity. The purpose is to communicate recommendations clearly so decision makers can assess whether to accept, modify, defer, or reject them.
Option B belongs to Function Analysis. Option C belongs to Creativity. Option D is wrong because the VM team recommends; it does not take over governance or ownership authority. A strong CVS-level presentation must be technically credible and management-focused. It should explain what is recommended, why the alternative satisfies required functions, how it affects performance and risk, what costs change, what life-cycle benefits are expected, and what implementation actions are required. The Presentation Phase is not a sales pitch based on vague savings claims. It is a disciplined transfer of decision-ready information from the VM team to accountable decision makers.
References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Report; Decision-Maker Communication.
質問 # 47
There is resistance to a new VM program in an organization. What should a VM program coordinator focus on to increase acceptance of VM?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is D. Identify a few subjects that would benefit from change and recommend a VM study through dialogue with staff . When an organization resists a new VM program, the coordinator should build acceptance through participation, relevance, and early demonstrated value-not by forcing compliance or emphasizing deficiencies.
SAVE's Study Guide describes VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team to improve value through function analysis, with value improvement achieved by identifying alternate ways to accomplish required functions. ( ) This means VM acceptance is strongest when people see how the method applies to real organizational problems. The Study Guide also emphasizes that management should support resources and implementation, while affected parties should be involved early to gain maximum benefit from a Value Study. ( ) Option A may help education, but it does not directly overcome resistance. Option B can sound accusatory and may increase defensiveness. Option C creates top-down compliance, not genuine acceptance. Option D is best because it uses dialogue, selects practical pilot opportunities, and allows staff to experience VM as useful rather than imposed.
References/topics: VM Programs; Program Acceptance; Value Manager Role; Stakeholder Engagement; Organizational Change; Value Study Selection.
質問 # 48
......
ご存知のように、CVS証明書は、グローバル市場で非常に高い評価を得ており、大きな影響力を持っています。 しかし、SAVE International証明書を取得する方法は多くの人々にとって頭痛の種になりました。 CVS学習教材はあなたに機会を提供します。 CVS試験の実施を選択すると、あらゆる思いやりのあるサービスを提供できるように最善を尽くします。 当社の製品はお客様の観点から設計されており、採用した専門家が変化する傾向に応じてCVSのCertified Value Specialist学習教材を更新し、CVS学習教材の高品質を確保します。
CVS過去問題: https://www.jpexam.com/CVS_exam.html