神様は私を実力を持っている人間にして、美しい人形ではないです。IT業種を選んだ私は自分の実力を証明したのです。しかし、神様はずっと私を向上させることを要求します。Versa NetworksのVNX301試験を受けることは私の人生の挑戦の一つです。でも大丈夫です。TopexamのVersa NetworksのVNX301試験トレーニング資料を購入しましたから。すると、Versa NetworksのVNX301試験に合格する実力を持つようになりました。 TopexamのVersa NetworksのVNX301試験トレーニング資料を持つことは明るい未来を持つことと同じです。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
TopexamのVersa NetworksのVNX301試験トレーニング資料を利用すれば、認定試験に合格するのは簡単になります。うちのVersa NetworksのVNX301試験トレーニング資料は豊富な経験を持っている専門家が長年の研究を通じて開発されたものです。Topexamの学習教材は君の初めての試しでVersa NetworksのVNX301認定試験に合格するのに助けます。
質問 # 31
A tenant has two internet circuits and one LTE backup circuit. The forwarding profile lists the internet circuits with priority 1 and LTE with priority 2. The next-hop selection method is Load Balance. What is the expected behavior while both internet circuits are healthy?
正解：A
解説：
The correct answer is A . In Versa SD-WAN forwarding profiles, next-hop priorities define which circuits are preferred. When the Load Balance next-hop selection method is used and two circuits share the same priority, sessions can be distributed across those equal-priority paths as long as they are usable and SLA- compliant. A lower priority number represents a more preferred group than a higher priority number.
Therefore, two circuits with priority 1 are preferred over LTE with priority 2 .
In this scenario, both internet circuits are healthy and both have priority 1. The VOS device should load- balance sessions across those two circuits. LTE remains available as a lower-priority backup path and would normally be considered only when the preferred internet circuits are unavailable, fail path checks, or no longer meet the applicable policy conditions.
Traffic is not replicated because replication is a separate feature and not implied by Load Balance. The branch does not drop traffic while valid paths exist. LTE is not preferred merely because its priority number is higher; in path selection, priority 1 is preferred over priority 2.
質問 # 32
Examine the exhibit below.
You are configuring an IPsec tunnel towards a non-SD-WAN site over the INETTransport-VR. The site IP address is 10.1.1.1. This tunnel is for traffic between the 192.168.100.0/24 and the 192.168.200.0/24 LAN networks. The tunnel does not establish.
Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct?
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is A . The exhibit shows that the IPsec VPN is being configured with Tunnel Routing Instance: XIAN-Control-VR . However, the question states that the tunnel is toward a non-SD-WAN site over the INET-Transport-VR . For a site-to-site IPsec tunnel, the tunnel routing instance must match the routing instance used to reach the peer public IP address. In this case, the remote non-SD-WAN peer is
10.1.1.1 , and the intended underlay transport is INET-Transport-VR , not the Control VR.
Versa troubleshooting documentation explains that routing instances are used to define where traffic is sourced and forwarded. For example, configuration examples select routing instances when enabling services or initiating tests, and traffic must use the correct WAN or transport routing instance to reach the remote endpoint. Versa branch troubleshooting also emphasizes that after transport connectivity is available, the branch establishes IKE-based IPsec connectivity; if that connectivity fails, the IPsec-related interface remains down.
Changing the routing instance to global would not be correct because the intended path is specifically INET-Transport-VR. A higher precedence value is not required to establish the tunnel. The policy selector shown already defines local-to-remote interesting traffic, and the key failure is the incorrect tunnel routing instance.
質問 # 33
Examine the exhibit below.
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct? (Choose two.)
正解：B、C
解説：
The correct answers are A and B . In the exhibit, the LAN interface shows a fixed VLAN ID value of 100 .
Because this value is directly configured in the template rather than represented as a per-device variable, every branch that uses this template will receive the same LAN VLAN ID. This supports option A. Versa configuration examples show that VLAN-tagged interfaces are created by defining logical units with a vlan- id, and organizations then use those tagged interfaces for traffic identification and routing services.
For the MPLS WAN network , the VLAN ID field is shown as a variable or bind-data style value rather than a fixed number. This allows each branch device to receive a different MPLS VLAN ID during onboarding, depending on the branch-specific values supplied in the workflow or device bind data. Therefore, branches can have separate VLAN IDs on the MPLS WAN transport, which supports option B. Versa SD-WAN troubleshooting output also shows WAN interfaces as logical VNI subinterfaces, such as vni-0/1.0 and vni-0/2.
0, mapped to SD-WAN transport networks like INET and MPLS.
Option C is incorrect because an INET interface can be untagged, commonly represented with VLAN ID 0. Option D is incorrect because the MPLS VLAN field is intentionally parameterized, not incorrectly configured.
質問 # 34
You are configuring a CGNAT rule for branch internet access and want to verify which access-list entry will match traffic before translation. Which information is shown by the CGNAT ACL command?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is A . Versa CGNAT troubleshooting documentation shows the command show cgnat acl info < tenant-id > for viewing CGNAT access lists used for traffic matching. The example output includes columns such as ACL handle , RuleId , Category , Precedence , VRF , Source IP , and Destination IP . It also shows tenant ID and total filters.
This command is useful when a CGNAT rule exists in configuration but sessions are not being translated. By checking the ACL output, the administrator can confirm whether the correct source prefix, destination prefix, VRF, and rule precedence are actually programmed in the dataplane. If the wrong VRF or subnet is shown, the rule may never match the intended traffic.
System uptime and CPU usage are operational health indicators. SLA metrics are SD-WAN path- quality values. BGP AS path and local preference are routing attributes. None of these directly show CGNAT access-list match programming.
質問 # 35
A branch device is powered on with factory-default staging configuration. The device establishes an IKE session to the staging server and receives an IP address, but it does not proceed to establish an IKE session with the Versa Controller. Which staging phase is failing?
正解：B
解説：
The correct answer is B . In Versa SD-WAN onboarding, the branch progresses through three staging phases.
In Stage 1 , the branch uses its factory-default configuration to start an IKE session with the staging server.
After the IKE session comes up, the staging server assigns an IP address to the branch and notifies the branch of the Versa Director IP address. Versa Director is also notified that the branch has come up.
In Stage 2 , Versa Director pushes the stage-two configuration to the branch through the staging server. This stage changes the IPsec profile so that the Controller IP address becomes the remote IP. The branch reboots and then attempts to establish the IKE session with the Controller. If the device successfully completed Stage
1 but never forms the Controller IKE session, the failure point is Stage 2.
Stage 3 is later, when the device receives stage-three configuration, becomes operational, and creates Controller IPsec plus branch-to-branch VXLAN/ESP sessions. Therefore, the described issue is a Stage
2 staging failure.
質問 # 36
......
ユーザーエクスペリエンスとクライアントのフィードバックを優先します。VNX301実践ガイドは、常にサービスを改善し、バージョンを更新してクライアントの利便性を高め、満足させるようにします。 VNX301トレーニング資料に関するクライアントの満足度は、前進を続ける原動力の源です。 VNX301ガイド資料を理解できるようになりました。 VNX301認定に関する知識の主流の微妙な変更はすべてキャッチされ、利用可能なVNX301学習資料リソースの検索に最善を尽くします。
VNX301資格参考書: https://www.topexam.jp/VNX301_shiken.html