JN0-352 test dump, JN0-352 pass exam

It is time for you to plan your life carefully. After all, you have to make money by yourself. If you want to find a desirable job, you must rely on your ability to get the job. Now, our JN0-352 training materials will help you master the popular skills in the office. With our JN0-352 Exam Braindumps, you can not only learn the specialized knowledge of this subject to solve the problems on the work, but also you can get the JN0-352 certification to compete for a higher position.

Juniper JN0-352 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionObjectives
Routing Protocols- OSPF configuration and troubleshooting
- BGP fundamentals and policy control
- IS-IS overview
Routing Policy and Filtering- Route filtering and preference control
- Policy statements
High Availability- VRRP configuration and behavior
- Redundancy concepts in enterprise networks
Network Services- Basic multicast concepts
- NAT concepts in Junos
Operations and Troubleshooting- Junos CLI monitoring tools
- Troubleshooting routing and switching issues
Layer 2 Switching Technologies- Ethernet switching concepts
- VLANs and trunking
- Spanning Tree Protocol (STP/RSTP/MSTP)

>> JN0-352 Actual Questions <<

2026 Excellent 100% Free JN0-352 โ€“ 100% Free Actual Questions | Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) Exam Details

Many exam candidates feel hampered by the shortage of effective JN0-352 practice materials, and the thick books and similar materials causing burden for you. Serving as indispensable choices on your way of achieving success especially during this exam, more than 98 percent of candidates pass the exam with our JN0-352 practice materials and all of former candidates made measurable advance and improvement. All JN0-352 practice materials fall within the scope of this exam for your information.

Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) Sample Questions (Q37-Q42):

NEW QUESTION # 37
You need to apply a Layer 2 firewall filter on a Juniper Networks EX Series Switch to block traffic from the source MAC address 00:12:34:56:00:07 entering the switch on ge-0/0/3. After committing the configuration, traffic from the MAC address still passes through. Referring to the exhibit, which statement is correct in this scenario?

Answer: B

Explanation:
The intent of this filter is to match and discard traffic from one single, specific host MAC address, which requires the source-mac-address match condition to reference the complete, exact 48-bit address using an explicit /48 mask (or no mask at all, which Junos treats as an implicit full match) so that only that one precise address is matched. As configured, the term instead specifies a /40 mask on 00:12:34:56:00:07, meaning only the first 40 bits (the first five octets, 00:12:34:56:00) are actually significant to the match, while the sixth octet is effectively wildcarded across its full range; this produces an imprecise, overly broad match criterion rather than the single-host match the administrator intended, and is a common configuration mistake that undermines the predictability and correctness of MAC-based filtering. The lesson tested here is that source and destination MAC address match conditions in Junos firewall filters must be specified with the correct, deliberate, and explicit prefix length appropriate to the intended scope -- typically /48 for a single exact host -- rather than an arbitrary or miscalculated mask value. Firewall filters under family ethernet-switching are fully capable of matching on both source-mac-address and destination-mac-address, which rules out that option entirely. Layer 2 MAC-based filters function correctly on both access and trunk interface modes, so interface type is not a limiting factor here.
There is no indication in the exhibit that the filter's application direction (input versus output) is reversed.


NEW QUESTION # 38
How does BGP prevent routing loops between internal peers?

Answer: D

Explanation:
BGP employs two distinct loop-prevention mechanisms depending on whether peers are external or internal to the same autonomous system. Between external peers (EBGP), loop prevention relies on the AS path attribute: every time a route crosses an AS boundary, the local AS number is prepended to the path, and a router rejects any incoming route whose AS path already contains its own AS number, since that would indicate the route has looped back around.
Between internal peers (IBGP) within the same AS, however, the AS path attribute never changes, because IBGP does not add AS numbers as routes are readvertised internally -- meaning AS path alone cannot detect an internal loop. Instead, IBGP enforces a strict split- horizon-style rule: a router that learns a route via IBGP must never readvertise that route to another IBGP peer. This rule guarantees that every IBGP speaker within the AS must be directly peered with every other IBGP speaker (a logical full mesh) in order for all routers to receive all routes, since no IBGP router will relay IBGP-learned routes onward on another router's behalf.
This full-mesh requirement is precisely why techniques such as route reflection and confederations were later developed -- they preserve the same loop-prevention guarantee while relaxing the physical full-mesh peering burden. VRRP and BFD serve entirely unrelated purposes (gateway redundancy and fast failure detection, respectively) and play no role in BGP loop prevention.


NEW QUESTION # 39
Click the Exhibit button. Which two statements about the IS-IS output shown in the exhibit are correct? (Choose two.)

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
This detailed adjacency output shows R3 maintaining four separate, fully Up adjacencies, evenly split between the two IS-IS levels. R1 and R2 are both formed at Level 1, confirming that R3 is directly adjacent to exactly two Level 1 neighbors within its local area, which validates that statement. R4 and R5 are both formed at Level 2, and Level 2 adjacencies are, by definition, part of the IS-IS backbone that interconnects areas; a router maintaining any Level 2 adjacency is by that fact participating in and connected to the Level 2 backbone, confirming R3's backbone connectivity as well. Every one of the four listed adjacencies explicitly shows 'Speaks: IP, IPv6' in its detail output, which is Junos's way of indicating that both the IPv4 and IPv6 address families have been successfully negotiated and are active over that circuit; this directly contradicts, rather than supports, the claim that IPv6 is disabled on these neighbors -- if IPv6 were disabled, the Speaks field would list only IP. Regarding authentication, the output contains no field, flag, or indication whatsoever referencing authentication configuration or state for the R5 adjacency (or any adjacency); Junos would typically surface authentication-related information separately if it were configured and relevant, and its complete absence here means no basis exists in the exhibit to conclude authentication is required for that specific adjacency.


NEW QUESTION # 40
Referring to the exhibit, which two configuration changes must you apply for packets to reach from R1 to R3 using IS-IS? (Choose two.)

Answer: A,B

Explanation:
A) On R1, enable Level 1 on the ge-0/0/1 interface. In IS-IS, both levels (Level 1 and Level 2) are enabled by default when you enable IS-IS on an interface1. Level 1 systems route within an area.
If the destination is outside an area, Level 1 systems route toward a Level 2 system. Therefore, enabling Level 1 on the ge-0/0/1 interface on R1 would allow packets to reach from R1 to R3.
D) On R3 enable Level 1 on the ge-0/0/4 interface Similarly, enabling Level 1 on the ge-0/0/4 interface on R3 would allow packets to reach from R1 to R3. These explanations are based on the IS-IS configuration documents and learning resources available at Juniper Networks1 and Cisco.


NEW QUESTION # 41
You are troubleshooting a BGP routing issue between your network and a customer router and are reviewing the BGP routing policies. Which two statements are correct in this scenario?
(Choose two.)

Answer: B,D

Explanation:
In BGP, routing policies are used to control the flow of routing information between BGP peers.
Option C suggests that import policies are applied after the RIB-In table. This is correct because import policies in BGP are applied to routes that are received from a BGP peer, before they are installed in the local BGP Routing Information Base (RIB-In). The RIB-In is a database that stores all the routes that are received from all peers.
Option D suggests that export policies are applied after the RIB-Local table. This is correct because export policies in BGP are applied to routes that are being advertised to a BGP peer, after they have been selected from the local BGP Routing Information Base (RIB-Local). The RIB-Local is a database that stores all the routes that the local router is using.


NEW QUESTION # 42
......

The study material to get Juniper Enterprise Routing and Switching, Specialist (JNCIS-ENT) certified should be according to individual's learning style and experience. Real Juniper JN0-352 Exam Questions certification makes you more dedicated and professional as it will provide you complete information required to work within a professional working environment.

JN0-352 Exam Details: https://www.testvalid.com/JN0-352-exam-collection.html