試験PSM-IIテスト参考書 &一生懸命にPSM-II過去問題 | 100％合格率のPSM-II基礎問題集

P.S.MogiExamがGoogle Driveで共有している無料の2026 Scrum PSM-IIダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_gzqN79z7AWAuXz6khQfJfGTOYVeLSJs

MogiExamのPSM-II問題集を買ったら1年間の無料オンラインのアップデートを提供する一方で、試験に失敗したら、お客様に全額で返金いたします。

スクラムマスターは、スクラムフレームワークにおける重要な役割であり、チームがスクラムプロセスに従うことを保証し、チームが目標を達成するのを妨げる可能性のある障害を削除することを担当します。プロのスクラムマスターレベルII（PSM II）試験は、スクラムの知識と専門知識を実証したいスクラムマスターの高度な認定です。

スクラムPSM-II認定試験は、スクラムフレームワークを習得し、スキルを次のレベルに引き上げる準備ができているスクラムマスターの専門的な認定です。この試験は、すでにPSM-I認定を取得しており、高度な知識と専門知識を実証しようとしている個人向けに設計されています。

>> PSM-IIテスト参考書 <<

PSM-II過去問題 & PSM-II基礎問題集

PSM-IIの科学技術の改善は、社会の将来の建設と進歩に計り知れない力を生み出します。 PSM-II模擬試験は、緊急の課題に対処するための最適な選択および有用なツールとなります。 10年以上の努力により、当社のPSM-IIトレーニング資料は、業界で最も広く称賛され、待望の製品になりました。 PSM-II模擬試験の計画と設計において、プロのエリートから完全な技術サポートを受けています。もうheしないでください。 PSM-II学習エンジンの購入を後悔することはありません！

PSM-II試験を受験するためには、すでにPSM-Iの認定を取得し、スクラムマスターとして1年以上の経験がある必要があります。この要件により、スクラムの原則や実践に熟知した経験豊富なスクラムマスターだけがPSM-II試験を受験できるようになっています。

Scrum Professional Scrum Master level II (PSM II) 認定 PSM-II 試験問題 (Q231-Q236):

質問 # 231
A cross-functional Development Team is defined as:

A. A team of skilled developers that can effectively multi-task on multiple Product Backlog items at the same time.
B. Cross-skilled individuals who are able to do all the work necessary to deliver a shippable Increment at the end of the Sprint.
C. A group of full-stack developers shared across multiple teams.
D. A team of engineers, testers, business analysts, technical architects and functional managers.

正解：B

解説：
The objective of the Sprint is to produce a shippable Increment at the end of each Sprint so that the team can effectively inspect and adapt accordingly.

質問 # 232
What is the recommended size for a Development Team (within the Scrum Team)?

A. Minimal 5
B. 7 plus or minus 2
C. 0
D. 3 to 9

正解：D

質問 # 233
Steven is a Scrum Master of a Scrum Team that is new to Scrum. At the halfway point of the Sprint, the Product Owner comes to Steven telling him that he is concerned the Development Team will not be able to complete the entire Sprint Backlog by the end of the Sprint.
What should Steven do in this situation?

A. Coach the Product Owner that with complex software development, you cannot promise the entire scope that was forecast during Sprint Planning. As more is learned during the Sprint, work may emerge that affects the Sprint Backlog.
B. Motivate the Development Team to meet their commitment to the Product Owner.
C. Add more people to the Development Team to meet the Product Owner's expectations.
D. Advise the Product Owner that the Development Team owns the Sprint Backlog and it is up to them to meet their commitments. No one tells the Development Team how to turn Product Backlog into Increments of potentially releasable functionality.

正解：A

解説：
Scrum is founded on empirical process control theory, or empiricism. Empiricism asserts that knowledge comes from experience and making decisions based on what is known. The Sprint Backlog is a forecast by the Development Team about what functionality will be in the next Increment and the work needed to deliver that functionality into a 'Done' Increment. The Development Team modifies the Sprint Backlog throughout the Sprint, and the Sprint Backlog emerges during the Sprint. This emergence occurs as the Development Team works through the plan and learns more about the work needed to achieve the Sprint Goal.
Why C is incorrect:
a) The Dev Team does not commit to finishing all items in the Sprint Backlog. Committing to completing all items would be fixed scope and fixed time leaving no room to adapt. They commit to the Sprint Goal and doing the right thing.
b) It's also incorrect for the PO to focus on completing the entire Sprint Backlog. Finishing everything should not be his main focus. Having a shippable increment that meets the Sprint Goal is more important than trying to finish everything. The advice in option C is equivalent to "Don't worry, they'll get everything done." but because of the complex domain, you cannot guarantee everything will get done.

質問 # 234
You are the Scrum Master for three Scrum Teams working on the same product. There is a single Product Backlog that all three Scrum Teams select from. Management is eager to improve the productivity of the teams and wants to standardize velocity across all three teams so that they can see how each team is delivering value. When responding to management, which two statements are appropriate?
(choose the best two answers)

A. Velocity is the amount of business functionality that a Scrum Team creates in a Sprint. It is unique to that team and used as an input to Sprint Planning.
B. Standardizing velocity across teams can help with understanding which teams are creating more value.
C. Velocity has no direct relationship with value.
D. Incentivizing teams based on velocity can boost the Scrum Team's motivation to create more value.

正解：A、C

解説：
Explanation
C: Velocity has no direct relationship with value. This is a true statement, as velocity is a measure of the amount of work done by a Scrum Team in a Sprint, not the value or quality of that work. Velocity can vary depending on many factors, such as the size, complexity, and priority of the Product Backlog items, the skills and experience of the Developers, the Definition of Done, and the Sprint length. Therefore, velocity is not a reliable indicator of value creation or team performance.
D: Velocity is the amount of business functionality that a Scrum Team creates in a Sprint. It is unique to that team and used as an input to Sprint Planning. This is a true statement, as velocity is a team-specific metric that reflects how much business functionality the Scrum Team can deliver in a Sprint. Velocity can help the Scrum Team to forecast how many Product Backlog items they can select for the next Sprint, based on their past performance and current capacity. However, velocity is not a goal or a target for the Scrum Team, and it should not be compared across teams.
References:
Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 15: "Velocity is a measure of how much work a team can complete in a given time period. It is usually expressed in terms of story points or function points per Sprint." Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 16: "Velocity is not a measure of value or quality. It does not tell us anything about the usefulness, usability, or desirability of the product increment." Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 17: "Velocity is unique to each team and depends on many factors, such as the size and complexity of the work items, the skills and experience of the team members, the definition of done, and the length of the Sprint." Professional Scrum Master II Course, page 18: "Velocity can be used as an input for Sprint Planning, to help the team forecast how much work they can realistically accomplish in the next Sprint. However, velocity is not a goal or a target for the team, and it should not be used to compare or evaluate teams."

質問 # 235
A Scrum Master colleague of yours wants some guidance on what to do in the following situation.
During the Daily Scrum, one Scrum Team member, who is a key central figure in the organization, drags on and on about things which actually are interesting but not relevant for the Daily Scrum, day after day. What are two suggestions you would offer to your colleague?
(Choose the best two answers)

A. You contact the team member's Line Manager and raise this as an impediment to the Manager, and ask that they resolve this matter.
B. You suggest using a timer, to limit the time each person can speak at the Daily Scrum.
C. You suggest taking the person aside and asking them what they believe the key outcomes are for the Daily Scrum. Effectively coaching them to help create focus during the Daily Scrum.
D. You suggest passing a token around. The person holding the token has the floor to speak for an allotted amount of time.
E. You suggest coaching the Developers to help them find a way to solve the problem, and own the solution.

正解：C、E

解説：
Effectively coaching them to help create focus during the Daily Scrum. This is a good suggestion because it shows respect and empathy for the person, while also helping them understand the purpose and value of the Daily Scrum. Coaching is one of the core competencies of a Scrum Master, and it can help the person self-reflect and improve their behavior.
This is another good suggestion because it empowers the Developers to take ownership of their own process and communication. The Scrum Master's role is not to impose rules or solutions, but to facilitate and enable the team's self-organization and collaboration. By coaching the Developers, the Scrum Master can help them address the issue in a constructive and respectful way.

質問 # 236
......

PSM-II過去問題: https://www.mogiexam.com/PSM-II-exam.html

さらに、MogiExam PSM-IIダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_gzqN79z7AWAuXz6khQfJfGTOYVeLSJs