JPNTestは、お客様に学習のためのさまざまな種類のRelativityのRCA練習トレントを提供し、知識を蓄積し、試験に合格し、期待されるスコアを取得する能力を高めるための信頼できる学習プラットフォームです。 RCAスタディガイドには、オンラインでPDF、ソフトウェア、APPの3つの異なるバージョンがあります。 顧客の信頼を確立するために、購入前にダウンロードできる関連するRelativity Certified Administrator無料デモを提供しています。 RCA試験の質問で、RCA試験で勝つ自信があります。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Setup and Management | 30-35% | - Applications and Workflows
|
| Topic 2: Search and Analytics | 20-25% | - Structured Analytics and AI
|
| Topic 3: Data In and Out | 10-15% | - Data Export
|
| Topic 4: Data Manipulation and Interaction | 25-30% | - Mass Operations and Tools
|
調査、研究を経って、IT職員の月給の増加とジョブのプロモーションはRelativity RCA資格認定と密接な関係があります。給料の増加とジョブのプロモーションを真になるために、JPNTestのRelativity RCA問題集を勉強しましょう。いつまでもRCA試験に準備する皆様に便宜を与えるJPNTestは、高品質の試験資料と行き届いたサービスを提供します。
質問 # 63
What workflow is not supported by Import/Export?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is D. Saved Search import. Relativity's official Import/Export workflow overview states that Import/Export supports unprocessed raw native files , document load files , image load files , production load files , and Relativity Dynamic Objects for import. On the export side, it supports folders , production sets , saved searches , and RDO files . In other words, saved searches are export workflows, not import workflows .
That distinction is important for RCA-level administration because Import/Export is organized around specific import and export pathways. A Saved Search import is not listed as a supported workflow because a saved search is a Relativity object used to define document criteria inside a workspace, not a standard external load-file-based content import. By contrast, document load file import and image load file import are explicitly supported workflows, and Relativity also supports unstructured data import for processing.
Therefore, among the options given, the unsupported Import/Export workflow is Saved Search import . This is consistent with Relativity's current documentation, which shows Saved Search only under export workflows.
質問 # 64
What operation does the document re-production feature support?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is D. Replace produced images with a placeholder. Relativity's official Re-production documentation lists supported and unsupported re-production types. Among the supported types, Relativity explicitly includes Replace produced images with placeholder (I-P) .
The same documentation also explicitly lists several unsupported types that correspond to the incorrect options in this question. Relativity states that replacing a document that was produced as native only with produced images or a placeholder is unsupported, which rules out option B. It also states that replacing a document that was produced as a placeholder with another placeholder is unsupported, which rules out option C. Option A is likewise unsupported because "replace produced images with a native" is not identified as a supported re-production type. Instead, Relativity supports image-to-placeholder, placeholder-to-images, and re-producing documents with the same number of pages.
This distinction matters because re-production is tightly controlled to preserve numbering integrity and production consistency. For example, when replacing produced images with placeholders, Relativity preserves the original Bates numbering while substituting placeholder pages. From an RCA production- administration perspective, the supported operation among the listed choices is clearly Replace produced images with a placeholder . Therefore, the correct answer is D .
質問 # 65
Why would Review Center charts show "Unknown User 1" for some coded documents?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is B. A reviewer was originally part of the workspace and coded documents, but has since been removed from the workspace. Relativity's official Review Center documentation explains that when documents were coded by reviewers who are not part of the current Relativity instance , those reviewers can appear in charts and tables as "Unknown User 1," "Unknown User 2," and so on. The documentation specifically notes that this can happen if a reviewer was removed from the workspace or if the workspace was archived and restored into a different instance. That directly supports option B.
The other options do not match Relativity's documented explanation. Losing permission to code is not the stated reason for the "Unknown User" label. Likewise, an unprepared project is a separate project-state issue and does not explain why specific prior coding activity would be attributed to an anonymous placeholder. An error requiring queue re-preparation is also not the documented cause of this naming behavior. From a case administration perspective, this is an important concept because administrators often manage workspace users, permissions, and lifecycle changes over time. If prior reviewers are removed, their historical coding may still appear in analytics or project monitoring views, but the user identity may no longer resolve normally. In that circumstance, Review Center surfaces those coding records under a label such as
"Unknown User 1."
質問 # 66
You need to create a saved search of all documents containing the term apple that do not contain the term magazine. What dtSearch string would successfully return these documents?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is A. NOT magazine AND apple . Relativity's dtSearch syntax documentation confirms that dtSearch supports the Boolean operators AND, OR, and NOT and uses them to connect multiple terms in a single search expression. To return only documents that contain apple while excluding those that contain magazine , the query must require the presence of apple and exclude magazine in the same Boolean expression. Option A does exactly that.
Option B is not correct because Apple NOT magazine is missing the required Boolean connector before NOT
. Relativity's dtSearch guidance and related syntax behavior show that NOT is used as part of a Boolean expression, not as a standalone middle operator without AND or OR. Option C is incorrect because Apple OR NOT magazine would broaden the result set too much, potentially returning documents that do not contain apple at all. Option D is also incorrect because it excludes apple instead of requiring it. Therefore, the valid dtSearch string that successfully returns documents containing apple but not magazine is NOT magazine AND apple .
質問 # 67
How can you modify a dtSearch index?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is A. Configure the index to be accent sensitive. Relativity's official dtSearch index documentation lists Create accent sensitive as a configurable Yes/No setting on a dtSearch index. When enabled, the index becomes sensitive to accents and other language-specific characters. This is an example of a valid dtSearch index modification that an administrator can configure.
The other options are incorrect. Relativity does not document a dtSearch feature that translates search terms into multiple languages, so option B is not a valid dtSearch index modification. A repeated content filter is associated with Analytics workflows, not dtSearch index configuration, so option C is also wrong. Option D is clearly incorrect because dtSearch indexes are not simply automatic and fixed upon import; Relativity provides a dedicated dtSearch object with editable settings such as searchable set, sub-index sizing behavior, skip malicious files, and accent sensitivity.
From an RCA perspective, this matters because dtSearch is a configurable search technology in Relativity, and administrators are responsible for tuning it for the needs of a workspace. Accent sensitivity can materially affect search precision in multilingual or language-specific datasets. Therefore, the correct answer is A .
質問 # 68
......
あなたはRCA試験を準備していて精確の資料がありませんなら、我々JPNTestの資料を参考しましょう。我々はあなたが一発で試験に合格するのを保証します。我々は試験に対応する弊社のRCA問題集を継続してアップグレードしています。あなたの持っているすべての商品は一年の無料更新を得られています。あなたは十分の時間でRCA試験を準備することができます。
RCA対応受験: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/RCA-mondaishu