P.S. Free 2026 CIPS L4M2 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ITExamSimulator: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pGNvOMYJiPcyMyQG3fCtWlkgrMb8Tl2i
In the increasingly competitive IT industry, L4M2 certification exam seems to be the basic condition of the development of the industry. If you want to pass the L4M2 exam certification easier and quicker, it's a very feasible way for you to take advantage of ITExamSimulator's CIPS L4M2 Exam Training materials. We promise that after you purchase L4M2 exam dumps, if you fail the L4M2 exam certification, we will give a full refund.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Understand the use of specifications in procurement and supply | |
| Understand how to develop a business case for requirements to be sourced from external suppliers | - Analyse how market factors affect procurement |
| Understand market management in procurement and supply | - Compare the competitive forces that influence markets
|
CIPS PDF Questionsย format, web-based practice test, and desktop-based L4M2 practice test formats. All these three L4M2 exam dumps formats features surely will help you in preparation and boost your confidence to pass the challenging CIPS L4M2 Exam with good scores.
NEW QUESTION # 39
Which of the following is the core of value analysis process?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Value Analysis (VA) is concerned with existing products. It involves a current product being ana-lysed and evaluated by a team, to reduce costs, improve product function or both. Value Analysis exercises use a plan which step-by-step, methodically evaluates the product in a range of areas. These include costs, function, alternative components and design aspects such as ease of manufac-ture and assembly.
According to the Value Methodology standard, there are 6 phases to a Value Analysis:
- Information
- Function Analysis
- Creative
- Evaluation
- Development
- Presentation
1. Information
In this first phase, the team attempts to understand why the project exists and who or what it is to produce.
They obtain project data, present the original design or product concepts, and understand the project scope.
Schedule, costs, budget, risk, and other non-monetary issues are studied until the team is comfortable with the concept of the project, what it is to produce, and who its end users are.
This step also includes things like site visits and meetings with the project team, if required. Project documents like plans, drawings, specifications, and reports are obtained and the value engineering team becomes familiar with them.
2. Function Analysis
This step represents the meat and potatoes (core) of the value analysis. The team attempts to determine the functions the project serves. Functions come in two forms:
- Primary functions are those that represent the reason for the project's existence, for example, a building project might have adequate plumbing as a primary function.
- Secondary functions are those that the project serves without being core to the project. For example, a building project might have as a secondary function maintaining the view of the neighboring building.
The functions are described in verb/noun pairs, such as "supply water to all suites," or "Maintain view of adjacent park." For a project like this, the team should come up with 10 - 15 functions. You might be surprised how many secondary functions exist for most projects. Subject matter experts would be a great resource, but in their absence an appropriate level of brainstorming and analysis are necessary.
The team should also identify value-mismatched functions to focus the improvements on. For ex-ample, maybe a large obstruction is preventing the view of the adjacent park from too many suites resulting in a potential mismatch of the cost vs. functional benefit. This is investigated in the next step.
3. Creative
This phase represents the generation of improvement ideas. The team develops alternative ways that the project can perform the functions that have been identified. At this step, the functions are looked at individually and each one gets a list of alternative ways to perform the function. There is no judging between the importance of the various functions.
4. Evaluation
At this stage, a priority is given to each project improvement idea. The ideas are discussed and potential costs are determined. Once the risk-reward profile of each idea is itemized, the team has determined which ideas are worth implementing into the project or feature.
A few years ago, there was a pedestrian bridge built near my home which was originally designed for emergency vehicles. Although this type of design is standard practice for the bridges of this type, the value engineering team identified that emergency vehicle passage was not needed (verb/noun pair = 'maintain passage for emergency vehicles'). Also, a second major outcome of this value analysis was to change the design to an aesthetic, curved bridge because it was in a prominent location. The redesign of the bridge cost some money but this was more than made up by the cost of the bridge construction. Thus, the value analysis paid for itself about 10 times over in the reduced construction cost, and the bridge was significantly more aesthetic.
5. Development
Once the value improvement options have been whittled down to the ones that make sense, the value engineering team develop the options to the point of passing them back to the original project team. They must be clearly written and explained so that the project owner and stakeholders can understand how it benefits the project and act on it. Any potential negative factors are identified. Potential costs and cost savings are itemized.
6. Presentation
This last phase represents the presentation of the alternatives to the stakeholders. Often value engineering represents a change in the normal practices that people are used to, an "out of the box thinking." Thus the best salesperson on the team is often the best one to do the presentation.
Some typical products of a value engineering analysis are a briefing document, risk analy-sis, present worth analysis, advantages vs. disadvantages, etc.
NEW QUESTION # 40
Which of the following is the core of value analysis process?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Value Analysis (VA) is concerned with existing products. It involves a current product being ana-lysed and evaluated by a team, to reduce costs, improve product function or both. Value Analysis exercises use a plan which step-by-step, methodically evaluates the product in a range of areas. These include costs, function, alternative components and design aspects such as ease of manufac-ture and assembly.
According to the Value Methodology standard, there are 6 phases to a Value Analysis:
- Information
- Function Analysis
- Creative
- Evaluation
- Development
- Presentation
1. Information
In this first phase, the team attempts to understand why the project exists and who or what it is to produce. They obtain project data, present the original design or product concepts, and understand the project scope. Schedule, costs, budget, risk, and other non-monetary issues are studied until the team is comfortable with the concept of the project, what it is to produce, and who its end users are.
This step also includes things like site visits and meetings with the project team, if required. Project documents like plans, drawings, specifications, and reports are obtained and the value engineering team becomes familiar with them.
2. Function Analysis
This step represents the meat and potatoes (core) of the value analysis. The team attempts to determine the functions the project serves. Functions come in two forms:
- Primary functions are those that represent the reason for the project's existence, for example, a building project might have adequate plumbing as a primary function.
- Secondary functions are those that the project serves without being core to the project. For example, a building project might have as a secondary function maintaining the view of the neighboring building.
The functions are described in verb/noun pairs, such as "supply water to all suites," or "Maintain view of adjacent park." For a project like this, the team should come up with 10 - 15 functions. You might be surprised how many secondary functions exist for most projects. Subject matter experts would be a great resource, but in their absence an appropriate level of brainstorming and analysis are necessary.
The team should also identify value-mismatched functions to focus the improvements on. For ex-ample, maybe a large obstruction is preventing the view of the adjacent park from too many suites resulting in a potential mismatch of the cost vs. functional benefit. This is investigated in the next step.
3. Creative
This phase represents the generation of improvement ideas. The team develops alternative ways that the project can perform the functions that have been identified. At this step, the functions are looked at individually and each one gets a list of alternative ways to perform the function. There is no judging between the importance of the various functions.
4. Evaluation
At this stage, a priority is given to each project improvement idea. The ideas are discussed and potential costs are determined. Once the risk-reward profile of each idea is itemized, the team has determined which ideas are worth implementing into the project or feature.
A few years ago, there was a pedestrian bridge built near my home which was originally designed for emergency vehicles. Although this type of design is standard practice for the bridges of this type, the value engineering team identified that emergency vehicle passage was not needed (verb/noun pair = 'maintain passage for emergency vehicles'). Also, a second major outcome of this value analysis was to change the design to an aesthetic, curved bridge because it was in a prominent location. The redesign of the bridge cost some money but this was more than made up by the cost of the bridge construction. Thus, the value analysis paid for itself about 10 times over in the reduced construction cost, and the bridge was significantly more aesthetic.
5. Development
Once the value improvement options have been whittled down to the ones that make sense, the value engineering team develop the options to the point of passing them back to the original project team. They must be clearly written and explained so that the project owner and stakeholders can understand how it benefits the project and act on it. Any potential negative factors are identified. Potential costs and cost savings are itemized.
6. Presentation
This last phase represents the presentation of the alternatives to the stakeholders. Often value engineering represents a change in the normal practices that people are used to, an "out of the box thinking." Thus the best salesperson on the team is often the best one to do the presentation.
Some typical products of a value engineering analysis are a briefing document, risk analy-sis, present worth analysis, advantages vs. disadvantages, etc.
Reference:
LO 3, AC 3.4
NEW QUESTION # 41
Which of the following can cause overhead variance? Select TWO that apply:
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
Overhead variances arise when the actual overhead costs incurred differ from the expected amounts.
Managers want to understand the reasons for these differences, and so should consider computing one or more of the overhead variances described below. Each of these variances applies to a different aspect of overhead expenditures. It is not necessary to calculate these variances when a manager cannot influence their outcome.
Fixed Overhead Spending Variance
The fixed overhead spending variance is the difference between the actual fixed overhead expense incurred and the budgeted fixed overhead expense. An unfavorable variance means that actual fixed overhead expenses were greater than anticipated. The formula for this variance is:
Actual fixed overhead - Budgeted fixed overhead = Fixed overhead spending variance The amount of expense related to fixed overhead should (as the name implies) be relatively fixed, and so the fixed overhead spending variance should not theoretically vary much from the budget.
Fixed Overhead Volume Variance
The fixed overhead volume variance is the difference between the amount of fixed overhead actually applied to produced goods based on production volume, and the amount that was budgeted to be applied to produced goods. For example, a company budgets for the allocation of $25,000 of fixed overhead costs to produced goods at the rate of $50 per unit produced, with the expectation that 500 units will be produced. However, the actual number of units produced is 600, so a total of $30,000 of fixed overhead costs are allocated. This creates a fixed overhead volume variance of $5,000.
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance
The variable overhead efficiency variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted hours worked, which are then applied to the standard variable overhead rate per hour. The formula is:
Standard overhead rate x (Actual hours - Standard hours)
= Variable overhead efficiency variance
A favorable variance means that the actual hours worked were less than the budgeted hours, resulting in the application of the standard overhead rate across fewer hours, resulting in less expense being incurred.
However, a favorable variance does not necessarily mean that a company has incurred less actual overhead, it simply means that there was an improvement in the allocation base what was used to apply overhead.
Variable Overhead Spending Variance
The variable overhead spending variance is the difference between the actual and budgeted rates of spending on variable overhead. The variance is used to focus attention on those overhead costs that vary from expectations. The formula is:
Actual hours worked x (Actual overhead rate - standard overhead rate)
= Variable overhead spending variance
A favorable variance means that the actual variable overhead expenses incurred per labor hour were less than expected.
In the study guide, CIPS splits overhead variance into volume and expenditure variance. They can be understood as variable and fixed overhead variance respectively.
Reference:
- CIPS study guide page 59
- What are overhead variances? - AccountingTools
LO 1, AC 1.4
NEW QUESTION # 42
Which of the following is the purpose of benchmarking?
Answer: A
Explanation:
According to US Department of the Navy, Benchmarking is a strategic and analytic process of continuously measuring an organisation's products, services, and practices against a recognised leader in the studied area.
Successful benchmarking will help you:
- Find who does the process best and close the gap
- Recognise the leading organisations in a process or activity
- Create performance standards derived from an analysis of the best in business
- Ensure that comparisons are relevant
- Measure your performance, your processes, and your strategies against best in business
- Measure business processes
- Assess performance over time
- Accelerate continuous process improvement (CPI)
- Establish more credible goals for CPI
- Establish actionable objectives
- Discover and clarify new goals
- Establish customer expectations of business standards set by the best suppliers in industry
- Help your organisation achieve breakthrough improvements
- Create a sense of urgency for change
- Increase customer satisfaction
- Become direction setting
- Provide a positive, proactive structured process
Benchmarking does not:
- Copy the other's processes
- Steal other business confidentiality
- Stop. Benchmarking is a continuous process.
Reference:
- CIPS study guide page 49-51
- The Department of the Navy Benchmarking Handbook
LO 1, AC 1.3
NEW QUESTION # 43
Why should procurement professionals develop business case before seeking approval to purchase capital equipment?
Answer: A
Explanation:
A business case is developed during the early stages of a project and outlines the why, what, how, and who necessary to decide if it is worthwhile continuing a project. One of the first things you need to know when starting a new project are the benefits of the proposed business change and how to communicate those benefits to the business.
Preparing the business case involves an assessment of:
- Business problem or opportunity
- Benefits
- Risk
- Costs including investment appraisal
- Technical solutions
- Timescale
- Impact on operations
- Organizational capability to deliver the project outcomes
These project issues are an important part of the business case. They express the problems with the current situation and demonstrate the benefits of the new business vision. Making business case with multiple options and choices also prompts the procurement and senior management to consider alternatives. As a result, the organisation may opt out the best option.
The business case brings together the benefits, disadvantages, costs, and risks of the current situa-tion and future vision so that executive management can decide if the project should go ahead.
NEW QUESTION # 44
......
We recommend you use CIPS L4M2 practice material to prepare for your L4M2 certification exam. ITExamSimulator provides the most accurate and real CIPS L4M2 Exam Questions. These CIPS L4M2 practice test questions will assist you in better preparing for the final CIPS L4M2 exam.
L4M2 Accurate Prep Material: https://www.itexamsimulator.com/L4M2-brain-dumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 CIPS L4M2 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ITExamSimulator: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pGNvOMYJiPcyMyQG3fCtWlkgrMb8Tl2i