BONUS!!! Download part of VCEPrep 156-590 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vYXlVw9poiObnhu5btVROqoPolYLpL7H
Our 156-590 study materials can improves your confidence for real 156-590 exam and will help you remember the exam questions and answers that you will take part in. You can choose the version which suits you mostly. Our 156-590 exam torrents simplify the important information and seize the focus to make you master the 156-590 Test Torrent in a short time. To gain a comprehensive understanding of our 156-590 study materials, you have to look at the introduction of our product firstly if you free download the demo of our 156-590 exam questions.
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Threat Prevention Architecture | - Check Point Threat Prevention framework overview - Security Gateway Threat Prevention blades |
| Topic 2: URL Filtering and Application Control | - Application Control enforcement and monitoring - URL filtering policy configuration |
| Topic 3: Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware | - Threat Emulation and Threat Extraction concepts - File inspection and malware detection |
| Topic 4: IPS and Anti-Bot Technologies | - Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) configuration and tuning - Anti-Bot detection and mitigation |
| Topic 5: Logs, Monitoring, and Troubleshooting | - SmartConsole logging and analysis - Troubleshooting Threat Prevention issues |
>> Exam 156-590 Revision Plan <<
VCEPrep almost aimed to meet the needs of all candidates who want to pass the 156-590 exam. If someone who donโt have enough time to prepare for their exam, our website provide they with test answers which only need 20-30 hours to grasp; If someone who worry about failed the 156-590 Exam, our website can guarantee that they can get full refund. In summary, the easiest way to prepare for 156-590 certification exam is to complete 156-590 study material.
NEW QUESTION # 52
Who owns and maintains the CVE program and database?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. MITRE Corporation . CVE, or Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures, is the standardized naming system used across security vendors, vulnerability databases, IPS signatures, advisories, scanners, and remediation programs. In a Check Point Threat Prevention context, CVE identifiers are important because IPS protections frequently map detections and exploit protections to known vulnerabilities.
This allows administrators to correlate a Check Point IPS protection with vendor advisories, exposure management, patching, and risk prioritization. The official CVE site describes CVE as an authoritative reference method for publicly known information-security vulnerabilities and exposures. MITRE documentation states that The MITRE Corporation maintains CVE and its public website , manages compatibility, and provides technical guidance to the CVE Editorial Board.
The distractors represent related but distinct roles. DHS/CISA has historically sponsored or funded the program, but sponsorship is not ownership and maintenance of the CVE list itself. NIST maintains the National Vulnerability Database, which enriches CVE data with scoring and analysis, but NVD is downstream from CVE identifiers. Check Point consumes CVE intelligence through IPS and ThreatCloud- driven protections; it does not own the CVE program. Reference topics: IPS vulnerability mapping, CVE- based protection metadata, threat intelligence normalization, vulnerability-to-protection correlation.
NEW QUESTION # 53
What deployment options for SmartEvent exist?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. 1. Integrated/Standalone and 2. Dedicated Server . SmartEvent is Check Point's event analysis, correlation, and reporting platform. Official Check Point Logging and Monitoring documentation explains that SmartEvent Server is integrated with the Security Management Server architecture and can communicate with Log Servers to read and analyze logs. It further states that administrators can enable SmartEvent on the Security Management Server or deploy it as a dedicated server . In Multi-Domain environments, Check Point requires SmartEvent on a dedicated server.
This maps directly to the course terminology: integrated or standalone deployment means SmartEvent runs on the existing management architecture, while a dedicated server deployment separates SmartEvent components onto another machine for scale, retention, performance, or Multi-Domain requirements. Option A uses generic distributed language but not the tested Check Point deployment wording. Option C confuses SmartEvent deployment with Threat Prevention enforcement states such as Prevent and Detect. Option D refers to clustering concepts and does not describe SmartEvent deployment models. In production design, dedicated SmartEvent is preferred when log volume is high, reporting is heavily used, or event correlation must not compete with management operations. Reference topics: Deploying SmartEvent, SmartEvent Server, Correlation Unit, Integrated/Standalone deployment, Dedicated SmartEvent Server.
NEW QUESTION # 54
What happens to traffic that matches the Access Control Policy but not the Threat Prevention Policy?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. The traffic is not dropped. It is simply not inspected by the Threat Prevention Engine . Access Control and Threat Prevention are separate enforcement stages. The Access Control policy first decides whether the connection is allowed, rejected, or dropped. If Access Control accepts the connection, Threat Prevention is then applied only if the connection matches a Threat Prevention rule and therefore receives a Threat Prevention profile. Check Point documentation describes Threat Prevention policy as the mechanism used to activate only the protections needed and prevent attacks that most threaten the network. It also explains that Threat Prevention policy layers calculate their action separately and that in a single layer, the first matched rule is enforced.
Therefore, if accepted traffic does not match the Threat Prevention rulebase, no Threat Prevention profile is selected for that connection. The traffic is not blocked merely because of the non-match; it passes according to the Access Control decision, but without Threat Prevention inspection. Option A is too aggressive and incorrect. Option B incorrectly assumes logging. Option C is directionally true but incomplete because the key point is that Threat Prevention inspection is not applied. Reference topics: Access Control before Threat Prevention, Threat Prevention Rule Base, profile selection, unmatched traffic, ordered layer evaluation.
NEW QUESTION # 55
What is true concerning the Threat Prevention Policy?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is D. The Threat Prevention Policy is only applied after traffic is accepted by Access Control Policy . Threat Prevention is a follow-up inspection framework for traffic that has already passed the access decision. The Access Control policy determines whether a connection is allowed, rejected, or dropped.
Only traffic that is allowed by Access Control can proceed into Threat Prevention evaluation for IPS, Anti- Bot, Anti-Virus, Threat Emulation, and related blades. Check Point's policy workflow separates Access Control and Threat Prevention, and the Threat Prevention guide describes the Threat Prevention rulebase as the policy used to activate needed protections and prevent attacks against accepted traffic flows.
Options B and C are incorrect because Threat Prevention does not resurrect or override a connection that Access Control has already dropped or rejected. The inspection chain is sequential from an enforcement perspective: blocked traffic does not continue to malware or IPS inspection as an accepted connection. Option A is also incorrect because a gateway is assigned policy through its policy package and Threat Prevention policy structure, not by stacking multiple independent Threat Prevention policies on the same target as competing enforcement policies. Reference topics: Threat Prevention Policy workflow, Access Control then Threat Prevention sequence, policy package enforcement, accepted-traffic inspection.
NEW QUESTION # 56
Task: Validate Anti-Virus updates are recent.
Answer:
Explanation:
See the Explanation.Explanation:
1- Use SmartConsole > Gateways > Threat Prevention > Updates.
2- Confirm update timestamp is recent.
3- SSH into Gateway and run cpstat anti-virus.
4- Run: cat $FWDIR/tmp/antivirus_status.xml to verify signature version.
5- Confirm no update errors in $FWDIR/log/antivirus_update.elg.
NEW QUESTION # 57
......
Another thing you will get from using the 156-590 Exam study material is free to support. If you encounter any problem while using the 156-590 material, you have nothing to worry about. The solution is closer to you than you can imagine, just contact the support team and continue enjoying your study with the Check Point Certified Threat Prevention Specialist (CTPS) preparation material.
156-590 Latest Exam: https://www.vceprep.com/156-590-latest-vce-prep.html
DOWNLOAD the newest VCEPrep 156-590 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vYXlVw9poiObnhu5btVROqoPolYLpL7H