Versa Networks VNX301 exam materials are successful with high efficiency and high quality to navigate you throughout the process. If you pay attention to using our VNX301 practice engine, thing will be solved easily. We have favorable quality reputation in the mind of exam candidates these years by trying to provide high quality Versa Certified SD-WAN Specialist (VNX300) VNX301 Study Guide with the lowest prices while the highest quality.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
>> 100% Versa Networks VNX301 Exam Coverage <<
For candidates who want to buy VNX301 exam materials online, they may have the concern of the privacy. We respect personal information of you. If you buy VNX301 test materials from us, your personal information such as your email address and name will be protected well. Once the order finishes, your personal information will be concealed. Moreover, VNX301 Exam Dumps cover most of knowledge points for the exam, and it will be enough for you to pass the exam just one time. In order to strengthen your confidence for VNX301 exam braindumps, we are pass guarantee and money back guarantee.
NEW QUESTION # 33
You configured Direct Internet Access on your Versa branches using the workflow template. Which statement is true in this scenario?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is C . In Versa Secure SD-WAN, Direct Internet Access, or DIA, provides local internet breakout from the branch rather than backhauling internet-bound traffic through a hub. Versa design documentation explains that the DIA architecture creates an internal connection between the tenant VRF and the WAN transport VR and uses CGNAT to translate internet-bound LAN traffic to the public IP address associated with the WAN transport interface. It specifically states that the main DIA components include the CGNAT function for translating internet-bound traffic and that DIA is configured using Director Workflows when configuring tunnels.
When the workflow template is used and the DIA option is selected for the internet breakout tunnel, Director automatically builds the required DIA infrastructure, including the NAPT/CGNAT configuration associated with the internet-facing transport network. This is why manual creation of the CGNAT pool and rule is not required in the workflow-based method. Option A describes a manual configuration approach, not the workflow-generated behavior. Option B is incorrect because NAT must be associated with the internet-facing breakout path, not simply the LAN interface. Option D is incorrect because DIA normally requires address translation for LAN users accessing the public internet.
NEW QUESTION # 34
Examine the exhibit below.
An SD-WAN administrator has configured Direct Internet Access (DIA) for INET and INET-2 and wants to use SaaS Application Monitoring and SD-WAN policies to steer certain applications to the best Internet path on a certain VOS device.
Which two statements are true regarding the configuration shown in the exhibit? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
The correct answers are B and D . In the exhibit, the Next-Hop Selection Method is configured as Load Balance , and both INET and INET-2 have the same next-hop priority value of 1 . Versa SD-WAN guidance states that load balancing between WAN paths is achieved by configuring at least two circuits with equal priority. Therefore, when both INET and INET-2 satisfy the SLA requirements, sessions can be load-balanced across those two internet circuits.
Option D is also correct because the exhibit shows SLA Violation Action: Forward . This means that if no next hop is SLA-compliant, the VOS device is still allowed to forward traffic instead of dropping it. This behavior is consistent with Versa SD-WAN traffic-steering concepts, where forwarding profiles define circuit or path priorities, connection methods, load-balancing behavior, and SLA handling for traffic that matches an SD-WAN policy.
Option A is incorrect because the exhibit does not use the Automatic next-hop selection method. Versa' s performance-based SaaS optimization uses monitoring metrics to select the best path when configured for automatic/performance-based selection, but this exhibit shows Load Balance instead. Option C is not the best answer because LTE has lower priority 2 and would be considered only after the higher- priority INET and INET-2 paths are unavailable or unusable, not merely when one INET circuit fails.
NEW QUESTION # 35
A branch has correct underlay speed and no asymmetric SD-WAN paths, but users still report packet loss during large transfers. You suspect QoS shaping is dropping traffic. Which command is most appropriate to verify interface-level CoS drops?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is A . Versa throughput troubleshooting documentation includes a specific section titled Check that Packets Are not Dropped by CoS . It states that if a CoS shaper or rate limiter is configured on the VOS device, it may drop packets when traffic exceeds the configured shaping rate. To check whether CoS is dropping packets, Versa recommends commands including show class-of-services interfaces brief and show class-of-services interfaces detail interface-name.
The detailed interface output displays traffic statistics such as TX packets, TX packets dropped, TX bytes, TX bytes dropped, and per-traffic-class drops. This is exactly the evidence needed to confirm whether shaping or QoS enforcement is causing the observed loss.
show alarms last-n 10 may reveal major events but will not provide per-interface CoS drop counters.
show system uptime only indicates how long the system has been running. show cgnat tenants is relevant for NAT state and tenant CGNAT resources, not QoS drops.
NEW QUESTION # 36
A branch device is powered on with factory-default staging configuration. The device establishes an IKE session to the staging server and receives an IP address, but it does not proceed to establish an IKE session with the Versa Controller. Which staging phase is failing?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B . In Versa SD-WAN onboarding, the branch progresses through three staging phases.
In Stage 1 , the branch uses its factory-default configuration to start an IKE session with the staging server.
After the IKE session comes up, the staging server assigns an IP address to the branch and notifies the branch of the Versa Director IP address. Versa Director is also notified that the branch has come up.
In Stage 2 , Versa Director pushes the stage-two configuration to the branch through the staging server. This stage changes the IPsec profile so that the Controller IP address becomes the remote IP. The branch reboots and then attempts to establish the IKE session with the Controller. If the device successfully completed Stage
1 but never forms the Controller IKE session, the failure point is Stage 2.
Stage 3 is later, when the device receives stage-three configuration, becomes operational, and creates Controller IPsec plus branch-to-branch VXLAN/ESP sessions. Therefore, the described issue is a Stage
2 staging failure.
NEW QUESTION # 37
Examine the CLI output in the exhibit.
You are reviewing the OSPF adjacency on a VOS CPE, and the output is shown in the exhibit. In this scenario, what is the probable cause of the OSPF adjacency issue?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B . The exhibit shows the OSPF neighbor in the exst state, which means Exchange Start . Versa documentation lists the OSPF neighbor state codes and identifies exst as "exchange start," followed by exchange, loading, and full. In normal OSPF adjacency formation, neighbors progress through initialization and two-way communication before they negotiate database exchange. If the neighbor becomes stuck in ExStart or Exchange, a common and highly probable cause is an MTU mismatch between the two OSPF peers. During database description packet negotiation, the peers must agree on parameters that allow LSDB exchange; an MTU mismatch can prevent the adjacency from advancing to Full.
Option A is less likely because an area mismatch usually prevents the neighbor relationship from forming correctly rather than leaving it stuck in ExStart. Option C is also incorrect because the neighbor has already progressed beyond early states, which indicates that bidirectional communication has occurred. Option D is not the best answer because dropping OSPF multicast 224.0.0.5 would typically prevent discovery or keep the adjacency in an earlier state, not specifically in ExStart.
Therefore, the probable cause is an interface MTU mismatch.
NEW QUESTION # 38
......
As is known to us, there are best sale and after-sale service of the VNX301 certification training materials all over the world in our company. Our company has employed many excellent experts and professors in the field in the past years, in order to design the best and most suitable VNX301 Latest Questions for all customers. More importantly, it is evident to all that the VNX301 training materials from our company have a high quality, and we can make sure the quality of our products will be higher than other study materials in the market.
Latest VNX301 Exam Fee: https://www.testsimulate.com/VNX301-study-materials.html