Übrigens, Sie können die vollständige Version der PrüfungFrage Plat-Arch-202 Prüfungsfragen aus dem Cloud-Speicher herunterladen: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_RWGi-qpGwt9qH_MncMdyDmcB4o8dqcg
PrüfungFrage ist eine Website, die den IT-Kandidaten, die an der Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Zertifizierungsprüfung teilnehmen, Lernhilfe bieten, so dass sie das Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Zertifikat erhalten. Die Lernmaterialien von PrüfungFrage werden von den erfahrungsreichen Fachleuten nach ihren Erfahrungen und Kenntnissen bearbeitet. Die alle sind von guter Qualität und auch ganz schnell aktualisiert. Unsere Prüfungsfragen und Antworten sind den realen Prüfungsfragen und Antworten sehr ähnlich. Wenn Sie PrüfungFrage wählen, können Sie doch die schwierige Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Zertifizierungsprüfung, die für Ihre Karriere von großer Wichtigkeit ist, bestehen.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Operating | 8% | - Support and maintenance processes - Governance enforcement - Continuous improvement - Post-deployment monitoring |
| Releasing | 14% | - Release strategy design - Package types: managed, unmanaged, unlocked - Release communication and training - Release scheduling and coordination |
| Application Lifecycle Management | 17% | - Development methodologies evaluation - Development models: Change Set, Org Development, Package Development - Release management frameworks - Governance strategy design |
| System Design | 15% | - Single-org vs multi-org strategy evaluation - Deployment architecture design - Environment and sandbox strategy design - Agile tools and Salesforce DX usage |
| Testing | 10% | - Automated testing implementation - Performance and regression testing - Test coverage and execution strategy - Testing methodology selection |
| Deploying | 13% | - Deployment automation - Production deployment strategy - Deployment tools comparison: Change Sets, Metadata API, Salesforce CLI, Packages - Rollback and recovery planning |
| Building | 13% | - CI/CD pipeline design - Dependency management - Source control and version control implementation - Development best practices and standards |
| Planning | 10% | - Roles and responsibilities definition - Risk mitigation strategies - ALM maturity assessment - Organizational readiness analysis |
>> Plat-Arch-202 Prüfungsinformationen <<
Sich für IT-Branche interessierend Sie bereiten sich jetzt auf die wichtige Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Prüfung? Lassen wir PrüfungFrage Ihnen helfen! Was wir Ihnen garantieren ist, dass Sie nicht nur die Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Prüfung bestehen können, sondern auch Sie der leichte Vorbereitungsprozess und guter Kundendienst genießen.
56. Frage
Universal Containers (UC) had been using change sets for deploying all of the modifications to its Sales Cloud apps. After multiple business units joined the single Salesforce instance, there is a need to evaluate which development model is the most suitable for UC. The IT management has shown a particular interest in finding out more about the package development model.
As an architect, which two statements can be made to articulate the differences between the change set model and package development model?
Choose 2 answers
Antwort: A,C
57. Frage
Universal Containers has five development teams. The performance of the teams has been good, but the number of bugs has been increasing. After each sprint, they need more time to understand the code and make changes.
What are two ways to improve the performance? Choose 2 answers
Antwort: A,D
Begründung:
The correct selection is B, D. Consistent coding standards reduce the cognitive effort needed to understand code across multiple teams, while version control provides change history for root-cause analysis. Together they improve maintainability and defect traceability without creating a centralized review bottleneck. From a build perspective, the implementation should be source-driven, reviewable, automatable, and modular.
Engineering controls such as version control, package boundaries, static analysis, coding standards, and isolated development environments reduce defects early and make changes easier to understand, test, and promote. The alternatives do not create the same repeatable engineering control: they either postpone defect detection, couple teams unnecessarily, or bypass the package/source model that should govern the change. For this scenario, the decisive point is therefore the platform behavior represented by the selected options (B.
Define and follow code standards.; D. Version control system to identify who is generating the bugs.).
Applying that rule consistently keeps the implementation aligned with Salesforce-supported lifecycle practices and makes the resulting change easier to review, validate, and operate across environments.
Study Guide reference: Building - Salesforce DX; package development; coding standards; static analysis; source control; secure development.
58. Frage
Universal Containers is having trouble aligning releases between major, minor, and Salesforce seasonal releases.
What should an architect recommend?
Antwort: C
59. Frage
Universal Containers (UC) is planning to move to Salesforce Sales Cloud and retire its homegrown on- premise system. As part of the project, UC will need to migrate 5 million Accounts, 10 million Contacts, and
5 million Leads to Salesforce.
Which three areas should be tested as part of data migration? Choose 3 answers
Antwort: C,D,E
Begründung:
The correct selection is C, D, E. Migration testing must confirm transformed values, record ownership, and referential integrity. Account and Lead ownership affects access and reporting, source-to-target transformations must reconcile correctly, and Contacts must remain associated with the proper Accounts after identifier remapping. From a testing perspective, the goal is deterministic evidence that the solution behaves correctly under the conditions that matter. Tests should isolate external dependencies, use controlled data, exercise positive and negative paths, and reproduce realistic volume or user behavior where required without making production the first place defects are discovered. The rejected choices either test the wrong layer, introduce live-system dependencies, or detect problems too late to provide the deterministic early feedback expected from a mature test strategy. For this scenario, the decisive point is therefore the platform behavior represented by the selected options (C. Account and Lead ownership; D. Data transformation against source system; E. Contact association with contact account). Applying that rule consistently keeps the implementation aligned with Salesforce-supported lifecycle practices and makes the resulting change easier to review, validate, and operate across environments.
Study Guide reference: Testing - Apex testing; test-data isolation; mocks; regression testing; performance
/load testing; sandbox test strategy.
60. Frage
Universal Containers uses multiple Salesforce orgs for its different lines of business (LOBS). In a recent analysis, the architect found that UC could have a more complete view of its customers by gathering customer data from different orgs.
What two options can an architect recommend to accomplish the customer 360-degree view? Choose 2 answers
Antwort: A,C
Begründung:
The correct selection is C, D. A multi-org Customer 360 strategy should avoid uncontrolled point-to-point connectivity. A reusable package can standardize common customer-view functionality across orgs, while a hub-and-spoke pattern centralizes authoritative customer data and lets business-unit orgs integrate to that master. From a system-design perspective, the decision should minimize unnecessary coupling while preserving clear ownership, scalability, governance, and extensibility. Salesforce architecture is strongest when boundaries reflect real business and technical responsibilities instead of using organizational convenience as the primary design driver. The rejected designs either centralize too much, fragment without justification, or use a mechanism that does not create the required architectural contract between systems or teams. For this scenario, the decisive point is therefore the platform behavior represented by the selected options (C. Implement a Single Package multi-org strategy by developing and deploying to all orgs a managed package which reads and consolidates customer 360-degree view from the different orgs.; D.
Implement a Hub-and-Spoke multi-org strategy by consolidating customer data in a single org, which will be the master of customer data, and using integration strategies to let the LOBS orgs read and write from it.).
Applying that rule consistently keeps the implementation aligned with Salesforce-supported lifecycle practices and makes the resulting change easier to review, validate, and operate across environments.
Study Guide reference: System Design - org strategy; modular architecture; integration topology; data ownership; enterprise governance; scalability.
61. Frage
......
Wir PrüfungFrage sind der zuverlässige Rückhalt für jede, die auf die Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Prüfung vorbereiten. Alle, was Sie bei der Vorbereitung der Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Prüfung brauchen, können wir Ihnen bieten.Nachdem Sie gekauft haben, werden wir Ihnen weiter hingebend helfen, die Salesforce Plat-Arch-202 Prüfung zu bestehen. Einjährige Aktualisierung der Software und 100% Rückerstattung Garantie, sind unser herzlicher Kundendienst.
Plat-Arch-202 Zertifizierungsantworten: https://www.pruefungfrage.de/Plat-Arch-202-dumps-deutsch.html
Übrigens, Sie können die vollständige Version der PrüfungFrage Plat-Arch-202 Prüfungsfragen aus dem Cloud-Speicher herunterladen: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_RWGi-qpGwt9qH_MncMdyDmcB4o8dqcg