BONUS!!! Itexamdump Mule-Arch-201 시험 문제집 전체 버전을 무료로 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Cy0yx4pn5xxM6AfQdm8N7-5LFf2Ix9tS
Salesforce인증 Mule-Arch-201시험준비중이신 분들은Salesforce인증 Mule-Arch-201시험통과가 많이 어렵다는것을 알고 있을것입니다. 학교공부하랴,회사다니랴 자격증공부까지 하려면 너무 많은 정력과 시간이 필요할것입니다. 그렇다고 자격증공부를 포기하면 자신의 위치를 찾기가 힘들것입니다. Itexamdump 덤프는 IT인증시험을 대비하여 제작된것이므로 시험적중율이 높아 다른 시험대비공부자료보다 많이 유용하기에 IT자격증을 취득하는데 좋은 동반자가 되어드릴수 있습니다. Itexamdump 덤프를 사용해보신 분들의 시험성적을 통계한 결과 시험통과율이 거의 100%에 가깝다는 놀라운 결과를 얻었습니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Establishing Organizational and Platform Foundations | 17% | - Platform Foundation Setup - IT Delivery & C4E Operating Model - Governance and Compliance Framework |
| Meeting API Quality Goals | 8% | - API Performance Optimization - Unit & Integration Testing - Resilience & Reliability Patterns |
| Designing and Sharing APIs | 11% | - Anypoint Exchange for Sharing Assets - API-Led Connectivity Approach - API Design Best Practices |
| Architecting and Deploying API Implementations | 11% | - Mule Runtime Architecture - High Availability (HA) Design - Disaster Recovery (DR) Strategies |
| Managing APIs | 12% | - API Versioning - API Lifecycle Management - API Security (Policies, SLAs) |
| Applying Integration Patterns | 11% | - Batch Processing - Integration Scenarios & Patterns - Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) |
| Monitoring and Analyzing Application Networks | 8% | - Analytics & Business Insights - Alerting & Auditing - Anypoint Monitoring Tools |
| Deploying API Implementations to CloudHub | 11% | - CloudHub 2.0 & Runtime Fabric - Deployment Strategies - CloudHub Architecture |
| Understanding the MuleSoft Platform & Application Networks | 11% | - Application Network Fundamentals - C4E (Center for Enablement) Definition - MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Core Concepts |
>> Mule-Arch-201퍼펙트 덤프 최신버전 <<
Itexamdump에서 출시한 Salesforce인증 Mule-Arch-201덤프는Salesforce인증 Mule-Arch-201시험에 대비하여 IT전문가들이 제작한 최신버전 공부자료로서 시험패스율이 100%입니다.Itexamdump는 고품질 Salesforce인증 Mule-Arch-201덤프를 가장 친근한 가격으로 미래의 IT전문가들께 제공해드립니다. Itexamdump의 소원대로 멋진 IT전문가도 거듭나세요.
질문 # 128
An organization uses various cloud-based SaaS systems and multiple on-premises systems. The on-premises systems are an important part of the organization's application network and can only be accessed from within the organization's intranet.
What is the best way to configure and use Anypoint Platform to support integrations with both the cloud-based SaaS systems and on-premises systems?
A) Use CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in an Anypoint VPC managed by Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane B) Use CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in the shared worker cloud managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane C) Use an on-premises installation of Mule runtimes that are completely isolated with NO external network access, managed by the Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane D) Use a combination of Cloud Hub-deployed and manually provisioned on-premises Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane
정답：A
설명：
Correct Answe r: Use a combination of CloudHub-deployed and manually provisioned on-premises Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Platform control plane.
*****************************************
Key details to be taken from the given scenario:
>> Organization uses BOTH cloud-based and on-premises systems
>> On-premises systems can only be accessed from within the organization's intranet Let us evaluate the given choices based on above key details:
>> CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes can ONLY be controlled using MuleSoft-hosted control plane. We CANNOT use Private Cloud Edition's control plane to control CloudHub Mule Runtimes. So, option suggesting this is INVALID
>> Using CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in the shared worker cloud managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform is completely IRRELEVANT to given scenario and silly choice. So, option suggesting this is INVALID
>> Using an on-premises installation of Mule runtimes that are completely isolated with NO external network access, managed by the Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane would work for On-premises integrations. However, with NO external access, integrations cannot be done to SaaS-based apps. Moreover CloudHub-hosted apps are best-fit for integrating with SaaS-based applications. So, option suggesting this is BEST WAY.
The best way to configure and use Anypoint Platform to support these mixed/hybrid integrations is to use a combination of CloudHub-deployed and manually provisioned on-premises Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Platform control plane.
질문 # 129
An organization has created an API-led architecture that uses various API layers to integrate mobile clients with a backend system. The backend system consists of a number of specialized components and can be accessed via a REST API. The process and experience APIs share the same bounded-context model that is different from the backend data model. What additional canonical models, bounded-context models, or anti-corruption layers are best added to this architecture to help process data consumed from the backend system?
정답：C
설명：
Correct Answe r: Create a bounded-context model for the system layer to closely match the backend data model, and add an anti-corruption layer to let the different bounded contexts cooperate across the system and process layers
*****************************************
>> Canonical models are not an option here as the organization has already put in efforts and created bounded-context models for Experience and Process APIs.
>> Anti-corruption layers for ALL APIs is unnecessary and invalid because it is mentioned that experience and process APIs share same bounded-context model. It is just the System layer APIs that need to choose their approach now.
>> So, having an anti-corruption layer just between the process and system layers will work well. Also to speed up the approach, system APIs can mimic the backend system data model.
질문 # 130
A retail company is using an Order API to accept new orders. The Order API uses a JMS queue to submit orders to a backend order management service. The normal load for orders is being handled using two (2) CloudHub workers, each configured with 0.2 vCore. The CPU load of each CloudHub worker normally runs well below 70%. However, several times during the year the Order API gets four times (4x) the average number of orders. This causes the CloudHub worker CPU load to exceed 90% and the order submission time to exceed 30 seconds. The cause, however, is NOT the backend order management service, which still responds fast enough to meet the response SLA for the Order API. What is the MOST resource-efficient way to configure the Mule application's CloudHub deployment to help the company cope with this performance challenge?
정답：A
설명：
Correct Answe r: Use a horizontal CloudHub autoscaling policy that triggers on CPU utilization greater than 70%
*****************************************
The scenario in the question is very clearly stating that the usual traffic in the year is pretty well handled by the existing worker configuration with CPU running well below 70%. The problem occurs only "sometimes" occasionally when there is spike in the number of orders coming in.
So, based on above, We neither need to permanently increase the size of each worker nor need to permanently increase the number of workers. This is unnecessary as other than those "occasional" times the resources are idle and wasted.
We have two options left now. Either to use horizontal Cloudhub autoscaling policy to automatically increase the number of workers or to use vertical Cloudhub autoscaling policy to automatically increase the vCore size of each worker.
Here, we need to take two things into consideration:
1. CPU
2. Order Submission Rate to JMS Queue
>> From CPU perspective, both the options (horizontal and vertical scaling) solves the issue. Both helps to bring down the usage below 90%.
>> However, If we go with Vertical Scaling, then from Order Submission Rate perspective, as the application is still being load balanced with two workers only, there may not be much improvement in the incoming request processing rate and order submission rate to JMS queue. The throughput would be same as before. Only CPU utilization comes down.
>> But, if we go with Horizontal Scaling, it will spawn new workers and adds extra hand to increase the throughput as more workers are being load balanced now. This way we can address both CPU and Order Submission rate.
Hence, Horizontal CloudHub Autoscaling policy is the right and best answer.
질문 # 131
Which two statements are true about the technology architecture of an Anypoint Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)?
Choose 2 answers
정답：D,E
설명：
An Anypoint Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) provides a secure and private networking environment for MuleSoft applications, using specific architectural elements:
CIDR Blocks:
Anypoint VPCs utilize CIDR blocks to define IP ranges, allowing organizations to control and segment the VPC's IP address space.
Port 6091 for HTTP Requests:
By default, HTTP requests can be made to workers on port 6091 from the public internet, providing an accessible entry point unless additional restrictions are applied.
of Correct Answers (B, E):
CIDR blocks enable IP range management for VPCs, and port 6091 is the default public entry port, which is part of Anypoint VPC's default settings.
of Incorrect Options:
Option A (Ports 8081 and 8082) is incorrect; these are not default public ports for Anypoint VPC.
Option C (responsible for load balancing) is incorrect as load balancing requires a separate Dedicated Load Balancer (DLB).
Option D (round-robin load balancing) applies to DLBs, not directly to VPCs.
Reference
For more on VPC setup and networking, refer to MuleSoft documentation on VPC configurations and default port settings.
질문 # 132
A customer wants to host their MuleSoft applications in CloudHub 1.0, and these applications should be available at the domain https://api.acmecorp.com.
After creating a dedicated load balancer (DLB) called acme-dib-prod, which further action must the customer take to complete the configuration?
정답：B
설명：
When setting up a custom domain for MuleSoft applications hosted on CloudHub 1.0 using a Dedicated Load Balancer (DLB), follow these steps:
Set Up the TLS Certificate: Configure the DLB (acme-dib-prod) with a TLS certificate that covers the custom domain api.acmecorp.com. This certificate will allow HTTPS traffic to be securely directed through the DLB to your Mule applications.
DNS Configuration with CNAME:
Create a CNAME record that points api.acmecorp.com to the DLB hostname acme-dib-prod.lb.anypointdns.net.
The CNAME record enables the custom domain to resolve to the DLB provided by MuleSoft's Anypoint Platform. This CNAME mapping directs all traffic to the correct DLB for processing and load distribution.
Why Option B is Correct:
A CNAME record provides the necessary aliasing to acme-dib-prod.lb.anypointdns.net, which is the endpoint managed by Anypoint Platform for your DLB.
Option B also correctly identifies the need to configure the DLB with a TLS certificate specifically for api.acmecorp.com rather than for the DLB's internal hostname.
of Incorrect Options:
Options that suggest configuring the DLB with a TLS certificate for the DLB's internal hostname or using an A record are not suitable in this scenario. MuleSoft CloudHub 1.0 DLBs work with CNAME records to provide flexible and scalable domain management, and a direct IP (A record) is not supported for these load balancers.
Reference
For more information on configuring custom domains and DLBs on CloudHub 1.0, refer to the MuleSoft documentation on DLB setup and DNS configuration.
질문 # 133
......
요즘같이 시간인즉 금이라는 시대에 시간도 절약하고 빠른 시일 내에 학습할 수 있는 Itexamdump의 덤프를 추천합니다. 귀중한 시간절약은 물론이고 한번에Salesforce Mule-Arch-201인증시험을 패스함으로 여러분의 발전공간을 넓혀줍니다.
Mule-Arch-201시험대비 덤프 최신자료: https://www.itexamdump.com/Mule-Arch-201.html
참고: Itexamdump에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료, 최신 Mule-Arch-201 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Cy0yx4pn5xxM6AfQdm8N7-5LFf2Ix9tS