SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam training allows you to pass exams in the shortest possible time. If you do not have enough time, our study material is really a good choice. In the process of your learning, our study materials can also improve your efficiency. If you don't have enough time to learn, SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization test guide will make the best use of your spare time, and the scattered time will add up. The service of SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test Guide is very prominent. It always considers the needs of customers in the development process. There are three versions of our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization learning question, PDF, PC and APP. Each version has its own advantages. You can choose according to your needs.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Configuration management for optimization - Report generation and interpretation - Nokia NetAct and performance tools - Automated optimization features |
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Handover optimization - Capacity optimization strategies - Load balancing techniques - Interference analysis and mitigation - Parameter tuning best practices - Coverage optimization methods |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards - KPI definition and measurement - Performance data collection and analysis - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Threshold configuration and alerting |
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN network architecture overview - SRAN solution components and functions - Single RAN integration principles - Radio access concepts and principles |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Common performance issues diagnosis - Root cause analysis methodologies - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Optimization case studies - Network failure identification and resolution |
>> High SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Quality <<
The actual MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) exam environment that the practice exam creates is beneficial to counter MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) exam anxiety. Tracking and reporting features of this SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice test enables you to assess and enhance your progress. The third format of Actual4Cert product is the desktop MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) practice exam software. It is an ideal format for those users who don't have access to the internet all the time. After installing the software on Windows computers, one will not require the internet. The desktop SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization practice test software specifies the web-based version.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Which of the following statements about CBRA , or contention-based random access , is correct?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In contention-based random access , the UE chooses a random access preamble by itself from a configured pool of available contention-based preambles. This is typically used when the UE does not yet have a dedicated connection or when the network has not assigned a dedicated preamble.
Because multiple UEs may choose the same preamble at the same time, preamble collision is possible . That is why CBRA requires a contention resolution step.
Option C describes contention-free random access , not CBRA. In contention-free random access, the network assigns a dedicated preamble to the UE, so collision risk is avoided and contention resolution is not required.
Option A is not the correct CBRA principle being tested. RACH false detection can be a receiver/design issue, but it does not define the CBRA procedure.
Option D describes a possible NSA signaling behavior around access failure handling, but it is not the core correct definition of CBRA.
Therefore, the correct CBRA statement is:
The UE autonomously selects a preamble from the configured range and starts the random access procedure.
NEW QUESTION # 26
Identify the missing network components X, Y, and Z in the architecture diagram.
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In the 5G Core , component X is connected to:
N2 from NG-RAN
N11 toward SMF
N15 toward PCF
N26 toward the EPC mobility entity
These are typical interfaces of the AMF , or Access and Mobility Management Function . Therefore, X = AMF .
In the EPC , component Z is connected to:
S1-MME from eNB
S11 toward the gateway
N26 toward the 5GC AMF
These are typical interfaces of the MME , or Mobility Management Entity . Therefore, Z = MME .
Component Y is outside the core user-plane path and represents the external service network connected through N6/SGi , commonly shown as IMS in voice-service architecture diagrams. Therefore, Y = IMS .
So the correct mapping is:
X: AMF, Y: IMS, Z: MME.
NEW QUESTION # 27
In a high-mobility network, the maximum cell size must be restricted to 33 km . Which PRACH format and restricted-set type should be used?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is Format 1 / Type B .
For PRACH planning, the selected preamble format must support the required cell radius. Format 0 is too short for a 33 km cell because it is typically suitable only up to around 14.5 km . Format 2 is also not suitable because its practical maximum cell radius is around 29.5 km , which is below the required 33 km . Therefore, a longer PRACH format is needed.
Because the scenario mentions high mobility , an unrestricted PRACH set is not preferred. High-mobility environments require a restricted set to handle Doppler effects and reduce ambiguity in PRACH preamble detection. Between the restricted-set options, Type B is the correct choice for this 33 km high-mobility case.
A matching Nokia-style question source also lists this exact scenario with Format 1 / Type B as option A.
NEW QUESTION # 28
Evaluate the impact of extended FR2 cell range on power consumption.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
In FR2/mmWave , uplink coverage is often the limiting factor because UE transmit power is much lower than gNodeB transmit power, and mmWave propagation suffers from high path loss and blockage. Ericsson's mmWave coverage discussion also notes that high-band coverage is limited by uplink signal quality and high- band propagation characteristics.
When the FR2 cell range is extended, UEs farther from the serving cell must transmit uplink signals over a more difficult radio path. This usually requires higher UE transmit power, more robust MCS, more repetitions or retransmissions, and potentially longer uplink activity. As a result, UE battery consumption can increase.
Therefore, extended FR2 range generally:
Increases power consumption because UEs need more energy to transmit uplink signals.
NEW QUESTION # 29
At which mark are all conditions fulfilled for energy saving , so the cell will be switched off? Refer to the image below.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B , which corresponds to mark C in the diagram.
In the diagram, the energy-saving process follows these stages:
Before mark B , the cell is entering the power-saving period, but the required load condition has not yet been satisfied for the required duration.
At mark B , the measured load has gone below the configured threshold, but the cell is not switched off immediately. The system must confirm that the load remains below the required threshold for the configured time.
At mark C , the load has stayed below the required threshold for the required duration, shown as 5 minutes in the diagram. At this point, all conditions are fulfilled, and the cell can be switched off. The diagram also shows the state becoming:
energySavingState = energySaving
Marks D and E are already inside or near the later part of the power-saving period. Mark E is associated with operator suspension/exit behavior, not the initial moment when all switch-off conditions are first fulfilled.
NEW QUESTION # 30
......
Our SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization study materials can have such a high pass rate, and it is the result of step by step that all members uphold the concept of customer first. If you use a trial version of SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization training prep, you can find that our study materials have such a high passing rate and so many users support it. After using the trial version, we believe that you will be willing to choose SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Questions.
Authorized SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Dumps: https://www.actual4cert.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-real-questions.html