P.S. Free & New 312-39 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PassTestking: https://drive.google.com/open?id=11rC1o7TujdtkZkrK_GSr5ZG5iFsJxgtx
PassTestking is a legal authorized company offering the best EC-COUNCIL 312-39 test preparation materials. So for some candidates who are not confident for real tests or who have no enough to time to prepare I advise you that purchasing valid and Latest 312-39 Test Preparation materials will make you half the efforts double the results. Our products help thousands of people pass exams and can help you half the work with double the results.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Enhanced Incident Detection with Threat Intelligence | 20% | - Threat Hunting
|
| Topic 2: Incident Response and Forensics | 20% | - Digital Forensics Basics
|
| Topic 3: SOC Infrastructure and Threat Intelligence | 15% | - Threat Intelligence
|
| Topic 4: Data Analysis and SIEM | 25% | - SIEM Operations
|
| Topic 5: SOC Process and Workflow | 20% | - Incident Detection and Analysis
|
We stress the primacy of customers’ interests, and make all the preoccupation based on your needs on the 312-39 study materials. We assume all the responsibilities that our 312-39 practice braindumps may bring. They are a bunch of courteous staff waiting for offering help 24/7. You can definitely contact them when getting any questions related with our 312-39 Preparation quiz. And you will be satified by their professional guidance.
NEW QUESTION # 103
Daniel is a member of an IRT, which was started recently in a company named Mesh Tech. He wanted to find the purpose and scope of the planned incident response capabilities.
What is he looking for?
Answer: B
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 104
Identify the event severity level in Windows logs for the events that are not necessarily significant, but may indicate a possible future problem.
Answer: A
Explanation:
In the context of Windows logs, the event severity level that indicates events that are not necessarily significant but may point to a possible future problem is classified as a "Warning." This level is used to log events that are not immediately harmful, such as an impending disk space shortage or other conditions that could potentially cause problems if not addressed.
References: The EC-Council's Certified SOC Analyst (CSA) program covers the fundamentals of SOC operations, including log management and correlation, which would encompass understanding the severity levels of events in Windows logs1. Additionally, the discussion on the ExamTopics website corroborates that the answer to this question is "Warning"2. Further general information on Windows event logging can be found in resources like Sumo Logic's guide to Windows Event Logging3 and other incident response guides that discuss the importance of monitoring event severity levels within a SOC4.
NEW QUESTION # 105
Which of the following Windows features is used to enable Security Auditing in Windows?
Answer: A
Explanation:
To enable Security Auditing in Windows, the Local Group Policy Editor is used. This feature allows administrators to configure security policies and audit settings on a local computer. Here's how you can enableSecurity Auditing using the Local Group Policy Editor:
* Press Win + R, type gpedit.msc, and press Enter to open the Local Group Policy Editor.
* Navigate to Computer Configuration -> Windows Settings -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -
> Audit Policy.
* Here, you will find a list of audit policies that you can configure for both success and failure events.
* By enabling these policies, you can specify which security-related events you want to audit, such as account logon events, object access, policy change, privilege use, and more.
References: The process described above is aligned with the best practices and guidelines provided by Microsoft and other authoritative sources on Windows security auditing, such as:
Microsoft's official documentation on Security Auditing1.
Guides on how to enable Security Auditing in Active Directory environments2.
Articles detailing the essentials of Windows event log security auditing3. These references are part of the learning resources for the EC-Council SOC Analyst course and provide comprehensive information on the subject.
Reference: https://resources.infosecinstitute.com/topic/how-to-audit-windows-10-application-logs/
NEW QUESTION # 106
An attacker attempts to gain unauthorized access to a secure network by repeatedly guessing login credentials.
The SIEM is configured to generate an alert after detecting 10 consecutive failed login attempts within a short timeframe. However, the attacker successfully logs in on the 9th attempt, just before the threshold is reached, bypassing the alert mechanism. The security team only becomes aware of the incident after detecting suspicious activity post-login, highlighting a gap in the SIEM's detection rules. What type of alert classification does this represent?
Answer: B
Explanation:
A false negative occurs when malicious activity happens but the detection logic fails to alert. In this case, an attacker successfully authenticates after multiple failed attempts, yet the SIEM rule does not trigger because the threshold (10 failed attempts) was not met. The incident is real, but the system missed it-this is the definition of a false negative. From a SOC engineering perspective, this highlights a common tuning pitfall:
rigid thresholds can be evaded by attackers who adjust timing or stop just short of the trigger condition. To reduce false negatives, SOC teams often implement layered detections: alert on "many failed attempts" (lower thresholds), alert on "failed attempts followed by a success," incorporate user risk context (unusual source IP
/geo), and add account lockout or MFA policies to reduce attack success. A false positive would mean an alert triggered for benign activity, which did not occur here. True positives/true negatives require the SIEM to correctly alert or correctly stay silent, respectively. Since the SIEM stayed silent during an actual compromise, the classification is false negative.
NEW QUESTION # 107
What is the correct sequence of SOC Workflow?
Answer: B
Explanation:
* Collect: The first step involves collecting data from various sources. This data could be logs, alerts, or other relevant information.
* Ingest: The collected data is then ingested into the SOC's systems for processing. This typically involves parsing and normalizing the data to make it usable for analysis.
* Validate: Once ingested, the data must be validated to ensure its integrity and relevance. This step helps in filtering out false positives and focusing on genuine security events.
* Report: After validation, the relevant findings are compiled into reports. These reports may be used internally within the SOC or shared with other stakeholders.
* Respond: Based on the reports, the SOC team responds to the identified incidents. This response could involve mitigating threats, patching vulnerabilities, or other remediation actions.
* Document: Finally, all actions and findings are thoroughly documented. This documentation is crucial for audit trails, compliance, and improving future SOC operations.
References: The sequence provided is aligned with the SOC operations as described in EC-Council's Certified SOC Analyst (CSA) training and certification program, which covers the fundamentals of SOC operations, including the workflow of SOC analysts123.
NEW QUESTION # 108
......
PassTestking 312-39 exam certification training materials is not only the foundation for you to success, but also can help you play a more effective role in the IT industry. With efforts for years, the passing rate of PassTestking 312-39 Certification Exam has reached as high as 100%. If you failed 312-39 exam with our 312-39 exam dumps, we will give a full refund unconditionally
Learning 312-39 Materials: https://www.passtestking.com/EC-COUNCIL/312-39-practice-exam-dumps.html
BONUS!!! Download part of PassTestking 312-39 dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=11rC1o7TujdtkZkrK_GSr5ZG5iFsJxgtx