BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Pass4suresVCE SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DglXH7pDtfSNOKeqy_BfczH0DTCQmqKs
The catch is that passing the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam is not as easy as it seems to be. It requires sheer determination, a thorough understanding of each topic, and critical thinking when posed with tricky problems. That is the reason why Pass4suresVCE have come up with a solution by providing the most updated prep material created under the supervision of 90,0000 experienced Nokia professionals. This SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Dumps is made to polish your abilities, help you understand every topic, and pass you Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization exam on your first attempt.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| SRAN Architecture and Fundamentals | 15-20% | - SRAN network architecture overview - Single RAN integration principles - Radio access concepts and principles - SRAN solution components and functions |
| Radio Network Optimization Techniques | 25-30% | - Parameter tuning best practices - Interference analysis and mitigation - Handover optimization - Load balancing techniques - Coverage optimization methods - Capacity optimization strategies |
| Radio Network Performance Monitoring | 20-25% | - Real-time network monitoring techniques - Threshold configuration and alerting - KPI definition and measurement - Performance data collection and analysis - Performance monitoring tools and dashboards |
| SRAN Optimization Tools and Reports | 10-15% | - Configuration management for optimization - Report generation and interpretation - Nokia NetAct and performance tools - Automated optimization features |
| Performance Troubleshooting | 20-25% | - Root cause analysis methodologies - Optimization case studies - Troubleshooting tools utilization - Common performance issues diagnosis - Network failure identification and resolution |
>> Pass SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Test <<
All these three MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) exam dumps formats contain the real and MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) certification exam trainers. So rest assured that you will get top-notch and easy-to-use Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Practice Questions. The SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization PDF dumps file is the PDF version of real MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) exam questions that work with all devices and operating systems.
NEW QUESTION # 23
When selecting an LTE anchor layer for EN-DC , why is it important to check 3GPP band combinations ?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
In 5G NSA EN-DC , the UE connects to LTE as the Master Cell Group , or anchor, and NR as the Secondary Cell Group . Not every LTE band can be paired with every NR band. The supported LTE-NR combinations are defined by 3GPP band-combination rules and must also be supported by the UE chipset and device capability.
For example, an operator may have LTE Band 3, Band 7, or Band 20 and NR n78, but only certain LTE-NR combinations may be valid for EN-DC. If the selected LTE anchor band is not supported in combination with the NR band, the UE will not be able to establish EN-DC even if LTE and NR coverage both exist.
Option C is not correct because dual-uplink support depends on UE capability and specific band-combination support; it cannot be guaranteed for all UE models. Option A and D are unrelated to the main purpose of checking 3GPP band combinations.
So the correct reason is:
To ensure that LTE and NR bands are compatible and allowed as EN-DC pairs.
NEW QUESTION # 24
Evaluate the impact of using MantaRay SON's centralized PCI optimization module compared to distributed SON implementations.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C .
A centralized SON approach has broader network-level visibility than a purely distributed implementation.
For PCI optimization , this is important because PCI conflicts, PCI confusion, and neighbor-related PCI issues are not always local to one cell. They may involve several neighboring cells, multiple layers, and sometimes multiple vendors.
Nokia positions MantaRay SON as a centralized, AI-powered network optimization and automation platform for improving RAN quality, efficiency, and customer experience. Nokia also describes MantaRay SON as supporting multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality in the MantaRay SMO framework.
So compared with distributed SON, centralized PCI optimization can better analyze wider-area PCI relationships and resolve PCI problems across multi-vendor or multi-layer networks.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
Centralized PCI optimization can identify and resolve PCI issues across multi-vendor networks.
NEW QUESTION # 25
Which of the following best describes one of the primary purposes of the Coverage and Quality use case?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
The Coverage and Quality use case is used in network planning and optimization to identify RF problem areas. These may include:
Low RSRP or weak coverage areas
Poor SINR or low radio quality areas
High interference zones
Overshooting cells
Coverage holes
Areas where users experience poor throughput or poor accessibility
This type of use case helps NPO engineers prioritize optimization actions such as antenna tilt changes, azimuth changes, parameter tuning, neighbor optimization, power adjustment, or site expansion.
The other options are not the primary purpose:
VPN tunnel configuration is a connectivity/security task.
LCBIN-to-CSV conversion is a data processing task.
Replacing the Kronos parser is a tool-chain or troubleshooting function, not the main purpose of coverage and quality analysis.
So the best answer is:
To identify problem areas such as low coverage or high interference.
NEW QUESTION # 26
Which statement is not true about MantaRay SON ?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is B .
The statement "Energy savings management is not covered" is not true . Nokia describes MantaRay SON as supporting radio network performance, quality, and energy efficiency optimization. Nokia also references AI-powered energy savings management and RAN energy efficiency use cases under its SON/MantaRay automation portfolio.
The other statements are aligned with Nokia SON/MantaRay positioning. Nokia describes MantaRay SON as an automation layer within the MantaRay SMO framework, with support for multi-supplier/non-real-time RIC functionality and an application ecosystem. Nokia also has historical EdenNet SON material, including EdenNet SON Energy Saving Management.
Therefore, the statement that is not true is:
Energy savings management is not covered.
NEW QUESTION # 27
In a high-mobility network, the maximum cell size must be restricted to 33 km . Which PRACH format and restricted-set type should be used?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is Format 1 / Type B .
For PRACH planning, the selected preamble format must support the required cell radius. Format 0 is too short for a 33 km cell because it is typically suitable only up to around 14.5 km . Format 2 is also not suitable because its practical maximum cell radius is around 29.5 km , which is below the required 33 km . Therefore, a longer PRACH format is needed.
Because the scenario mentions high mobility , an unrestricted PRACH set is not preferred. High-mobility environments require a restricted set to handle Doppler effects and reduce ambiguity in PRACH preamble detection. Between the restricted-set options, Type B is the correct choice for this 33 km high-mobility case.
A matching Nokia-style question source also lists this exact scenario with Format 1 / Type B as option A.
NEW QUESTION # 28
......
For the recognition of skills and knowledge, more career opportunities, professional development, and higher salary potential, the Nokia SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization certification exam is the proven way to achieve these tasks quickly. Overall, we can say that with the MN: NCSS NPS - SRAN Radio Network Performance Optimization Certification Exam | GS40-NPS-SRPER-E-S03-2510 (SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization) exam you can gain a competitive edge in your job search and advance your career in the tech industry.
New SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization Exam Questions: https://www.pass4suresvce.com/SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization-pass4sure-vce-dumps.html
DOWNLOAD the newest Pass4suresVCE SRAN-Radio-Network-Performance-Optimization PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DglXH7pDtfSNOKeqy_BfczH0DTCQmqKs