The Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect exam questions are very similar to actual Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Plat-Arch-204 Exam Questions. So it creates a real Plat-Arch-204 exam scenario for trustworthy users. As it is a Browser-Based Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Plat-Arch-204 practice exam so there is no need for any installation. The Web-Based Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect practice exam is supported by all major browsers like Chrome, IE, Firefox, Opera, and Safari. Furthermore, no special plugins are required to start your journey toward a bright career.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-select, Multiple-choice |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce System Architect Salesforce B2C Solution Architect |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online (proctored) or Onsite at a testing center |
| Pre Condition: | One year of Integration Architecture experience and three to four years of experience on Salesforce platform |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/integrationarchitect |
>> Valid Plat-Arch-204 Exam Discount <<
There are thousands of customers have passed their exam successfully and get the related certification. After that, all of their Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect exam torrents were purchase on our website. Our Plat-Arch-204 study tool boost three versions for you to choose and they include PDF version, PC version and APP online version. Each version is suitable for different situation and equipment and you can choose the most convenient method to learn our Plat-Arch-204 test torrent. For example, APP online version is printable and boosts instant access to download. You can study the Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect guide torrent at any time and any place. We provide 365-days free update and free demo available. The PC version of Plat-Arch-204 Study Tool can stimulate the real examβs scenarios, is stalled on the Windows operating system and runs on the Java environment. You can use it any time to test your own exam stimulation tests scores and whether you have mastered our Plat-Arch-204 test torrent or not.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 58
The director of customer service at Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to capture and trend specific business events that occur in Salesforce in real time. The metrics will be accessed in an ad-hoc manner using an external analytics system. The events include product exchanges, authorization clicks, subscription cancellations, and refund initiations via Cases. Which solution should meet these business requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
To meet a requirement for real-time event capture that supports an external analytics system, the arc14hitect must choose a pattern that is scalable, decoupled, and reliable. Platform Events are the modern standard for this use case.
By using a Case Trigger to publish a specific Platform Event, NTO creates a highly decoupled Publish/Subscribe architecture. The external analytics system (or a middleware layer feeding it) acts as a subscriber to the event channel. This is superior to standard callouts or outbound messaging for several reasons:
Durability: Platform Events offer a 72-hour retention window. If the analytics system is momentarily offline, it can use the Replay ID to retrieve missed events.
Atomic Transactions: Triggers can be configured to publish events only after the database transaction successfully commits ("Publish After Commit"), ensuring the analytics system doesn't receive data for transactions that were eventually rolled back.
Event Volume: Platform Events are designed to handle much higher volumes of real-time messages than standard synchronous callouts.
Option A (Apex Callouts) is a point-to-point, synchronous pattern that would block Case processing and risk hitting "Concurrent Long-Running Request" limits. Option B (Outbound Messaging) is reliable but is limited to a single object per message and uses a rigid SOAP format that is less flexible for ad-hoc external analytics than the modern JSON/CometD/gRPC structures used by the event bus. By implementing Option C, the architect ensures that every specific business milestone (refund, exchange, cancellation) is broadcasted immediately, providing the customer service director with the accurate, real-time visibility required for trending and metrics.
NEW QUESTION # 59
Northern Trail Outfitters is in the final stages of merging two Salesforce orgs, but needs to keep the retiring org available for a short period of time for lead management as it is connected to multiple public website forms. The sales department has requested that new leads are available in the new Salesforce instance within 30 minutes. Which approach requires the least amount of development effort?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In an org merger scenario, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must often design interim solutions that balance speed of delivery with minimal development overhead. The requirement here is for leads to be synced within a 30-minute window. This is a relatively low-latency requirement that does not strictly necessitate a real-time, event-driven architecture, which typically requires more complex infrastructure like Platform Events or middleware.
Option A, calling the Salesforce REST API to insert leads into the target system, represents the standard, most straightforward approach. Since both systems are Salesforce orgs, the retiring org can be configured to make an outbound REST call to the new org's standard Lead endpoint. This can be achieved with a small amount of Apex code (such as a trigger or an invocable method called by a Flow). This approach is considered the "least development effort" because it leverages the standard REST API, which is already enabled and authenticated via a Connected App in the target org. It requires no custom API development in the target system and uses standard JSON payloads.
Option B is incorrect because the Tooling API is intended for managing metadata, system settings, and developer tools, not for standard transactional data movement like Lead insertion. Option C, using the Composite REST API, is an optimization technique designed to group multiple requests into a single call to save on API limits. While efficient for high-volume scenarios, it introduces additional development complexity regarding payload construction and bulk error handling that exceeds the "least effort" requirement for a simple Lead sync. Therefore, a standard REST call is the most direct path to meeting the 30-minute SLA with minimal coding.
NEW QUESTION # 60
A company's cloud-based single page application consolidates data local to the application with data from on-premise and Third-party systems. The diagram below typifies the application's combined use of synchronous and asynchronous calls. The company wants to use the average response time of its application's user interface as a basis for certain alerts. For this purpose, the following occurs:
Log every call start and finish date and time to a central analytics data store.
Compute response time uniformly as the difference between the start and finish date and time (A to H in the diagram).
Which computation represents the end-to-end response time from the user's perspective?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 61
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to use Shield Platform Encryption to encrypt social security numbers in order to meet a business requirement. Which action should an integration architect take prior to the implementation of Shield Platform Encryption?
Answer: C
Explanation:
Implementing Shield Platform Encryption is a significant architectural change that requires careful planning before activation. The architect's first priority must be to Review Shield Platform Encryption configurations and understand the platform's functional limitations.
Encryption at rest affects how data interacts with other platform features. For example, encrypting a field can impact the ability to use that field in SOQL WHERE clauses, report filters, list views, or as a unique/external ID. Before encrypting Social Security Numbers, the architect must audit all existing integrations, Apex code, and reports that reference that field to ensure they will still function correctly.
Option A is incorrect because unnecessarily encrypting all data can negatively impact system performance and break standard functionality. Encryption should be applied selectively to sensitive fields based on a clear data classification policy. Option B is factually wrong; Shield is a data protection tool, not an authentication or authorization mechanism like OAuth or SSO. By reviewing the configurations first, the architect can identify potential "blockers"-such as a field being used in a formula or a criteria-based sharing rule-and address them before the encryption keys are generated and applied.
NEW QUESTION # 62
A security assessment noted vulnerabilities on unmanaged packages; notably, secrets like usernames, passwords, and OAuth tokens are stored in plain text. Which persistence mechanisms should an integration architect require to ensure that secrets are protected from deliberate or inadvertent exposure?
Answer: C
NEW QUESTION # 63
......
Plat-Arch-204 Latest Braindumps Questions: https://www.testkingpdf.com/Plat-Arch-204-testking-pdf-torrent.html