2026年ShikenPASSの最新Integration-Architect PDFダンプおよびIntegration-Architect試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1V0MPuczK_fG4wqgEuLK21dfzQYKRMtHK
IT業界の一员として、君はまだIT認証試験を悩んでいますか？認証試験はITの専門知識を主なテストとして別に初めてIT関連のSalesforce認証試験に参加する受験生にとってはとても難しいとみされます。良い対応性の訓練が必要で、ShikenPASS のIntegration-Architect問題集をお勧めます。
Salesforce Integration-ArchItect試験では、統合アーキテクチャ、データ統合、エンタープライズメッセージング、API統合、セキュリティなど、幅広いトピックをカバーしています。また、この試験では、ビジネス要件を満たし、ベストプラクティスを順守する複雑な統合ソリューションを設計および実装する能力もテストします。この認定により、Salesforceの統合に関する専門知識を実証し、高度に熟練した経験豊富な統合アーキテクトとして雇用市場で自分自身を区別できます。
>> Integration-Architect対応内容 <<
ShikenPASSはもっぱらSalesforceプロIntegration-Architect認証試験に関する知識を提供するのサイトで、ほかのサイト使った人はShikenPASSが最高の知識源サイトと比較しますた。ShikenPASSの商品はとても頼もしいIntegration-Architect試験の練習問題と解答は非常に正確でございます。
Salesforce Integration-ArchItect試験は、Salesforceとの複雑な統合をアーキテクトと実装するために必要なスキルと知識を検証するように設計されています。これは、Salesforceとの複雑な統合の設計と実装の経験がある専門家向けにSalesforceが提供する認定試験です。この試験では、Salesforceと他のシステムの間の安全、スケーラブル、効率的な統合を設計、開発、および実装する機能をテストします。
質問 # 22
Universal Containers (UC) is currently managing a custom monolithic web service that runs on an on-premise server. This monolithic web service is responsible for Point-to-Point (P2P) integrations between Salesforce and a legacy billing application, a cloud-based ERP, and a data lake. UC has found that the tight interdependencies are causing failures. What should an integration architect recommend to decouple the systems and improve performance?
正解：C
解説：
The primary architectural flaw in UC's current landscape is the reliance on a monolithic P2P integration layer. In such designs, any failure in one integration thread or a surge in volume for one system can monopolize resources (CPU, memory, threads), causing the entire service-and thus all other integrations-to fail. This lack of isolation leads to the "tight interdependencies" described.
To effectively decouple these systems, the architect should recommend a Microservices Architecture. By breaking the monolithic service into smaller, independent, and modular components, each integration (Billing, ERP, Data Lake) becomes its own isolated service. This approach provides several key architectural benefits:
* Isolation of Failure: If the connection to the legacy billing application fails or times out, it no longer impacts the ERP or Data Lake integrations.
* Independent Scalability: If the Data Lake integration requires high throughput, that specific microservice can be scaled horizontally without wasting resources on the others.
* Technology Agility: Each microservice can be updated or patched independently, allowing for faster maintenance cycles.
Furthermore, moving a "monolithic" service to the cloud (Option B) is simply a "lift and shift" that preserves the underlying fragility. While the Bulk API (Option A) is excellent for high-volume data loading, it does not solve the fundamental problem of system interdependency and orchestration failure. Transitioning to a modular, service-oriented design allows UC to implement modern integration patterns, such as asynchronous queuing between the microservices, which significantly improves the overall resilience and performance of the Salesforce-to-back-office landscape.
質問 # 23
A business requires automating the check and updating of the phone number type classification (mobile vs.
landline) for all incoming calls delivered to its phone sales agents. The following conditions exist:
* At peak, the call center can receive up to 100,000 calls per day.
* The phone number type classification is a service provided by an external service API.
* Business is flexible with timing and frequency to check and update the records (throughout the night or every 6-12 hours is sufficient).
A Remote-Call-In pattern and/or Batch Synchronization (Replication via ETL: System -> Salesforce) are determined to work with a middleware hosted on customer premise. In order to implement these patterns and mechanisms, which component should an integration architect recommend?
正解：C
解説：
In this scenario, the architecture involves a Remote-Call-In pattern or Batch Synchronization, where an external system (the middleware or ETL tool) initiates communication with Salesforce to update records. For any external system to securely access Salesforce APIs and perform these updates, it must be authenticated and authorized.
The Connected App is the foundational framework that allows an external application to integrate with Salesforce using APIs and standard protocols, such as OAuth 2.0 and SAML. By configuring a Connected App, the architect can define which permissions (Scopes) the middleware has, such as the ability to access data via the REST or Bulk API. This is the correct choice because the middleware needs to "log in" to Salesforce to push the phone classification data back into the Account or Contact records.
Option B, an API Gateway, is typically used to manage and secure requests going out of an organization to external services, or to provide a facade for on-premise APIs; it does not handle the inbound authentication into Salesforce itself. Option C, Remote Site Settings, is a configuration used solely to permit Salesforce to make outbound calls to a specific external URL (for example, if Salesforce were calling the phone classification service directly via Apex).
Given that the business is flexible with timing (allowing for nightly or 12-hour syncs) and handles 100,000 calls, a Batch Synchronization pattern via an ETL tool is highly efficient. The ETL tool will authenticate against the Connected App using a secure OAuth flow (such as the JWT Bearer Flow for server-to-server integration), retrieve the new phone numbers, call the external classification API, and then bulk-update the Salesforce records. This setup ensures a secure, scalable, and manageable integration that respects Salesforce's security architecture while meeting the high-volume data requirements of the call center.
質問 # 24
An organization needs to integrate Salesforce with an external system and is considering authentication options. The organization already has implemented SAML, using athird-party Identity Provider for integrations between other systems.
Which use case can leverage the existing SAML integration to connect Salesforce with other internal systems?
正解：B
解説：
Explanation
The best use case for leveraging the existing SAML integration to connect Salesforce with other internal systems is to make Apex SOAP outbound integrations to external web services more secure. SAML can be used to authenticate the Salesforce org as the service provider and obtain a session ID from the external system as the identity provider. This session ID can then be used to make SOAP calls to the external web service without exposing any credentials in the Apex code. Option A is not correct because formula fields with HYPERLINK() do not support SAML authentication. Option C is not correct because Apex REST outbound integrations require OAuth or basic authentication, not SAML. Option D is not correct because API inbound integrations from an external Java client require OAuth or basic authentication, not SAML. References:
Named Credentials as Callout Endpoints
SAML SSO with Salesforce as the Service Provider
質問 # 25
Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) has an affiliate company that would like immediate notifications of changes to opportunities in the NTO Salesforce instance. The affiliate company has a CometD client available.
Which solution is recommended in order to meet the requirement?
正解：B
解説：
To provide "immediate notifications" to a client that already supports CometD, the architect must utilize Salesforce's Streaming API. PushTopic Events are the classic Streaming API implementation for broadcasting changes to specific records.
A PushTopic is a definition that includes a SOQL query and a set of trigger events (Create, Update, Delete).
When an Opportunity in NTO's instance is updated and matches the query, Salesforce automatically pushes a notification to the topic's channel. The affiliate's CometD client, having subscribed to this channel, receives the data payload instantly.12 Option A (Polling) is the architectural opposite of "immediate notifications". Polling is inefficient, consumes API limits, and int13roduces latency between the actual record change and the client's discovery of that change. Option C is incorrect as there is no "Accept CometD" setting in a Connected App; while a Connected App is used for OAuth authentication, the PushTopic is the mechanism that actually defines and delivers the stream. By using PushTopic, NTO provides a decoupled, event-driven architecture that fulfills the requirement for real-time visibility while minimizing the technical burden on the affiliate's infrastructure.
質問 # 26
An architect decided to use Platform Events for integrating Salesforce with an external system for a company.
Which three things should an architect consider when proposing this type of integration mechanism?
Choose 3 answers
正解：B、D、E
質問 # 27
......
Integration-Architect復習テキスト: https://www.shikenpass.com/Integration-Architect-shiken.html
ちなみに、ShikenPASS Integration-Architectの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1V0MPuczK_fG4wqgEuLK21dfzQYKRMtHK