2026年CertShikenの最新Data-Engineer-Associate PDFダンプおよびData-Engineer-Associate試験エンジンの無料共有：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PcEntQvYyxL5ujaYL5BE33B7XH79PM7Y
CertShikenはAmazonのData-Engineer-Associate認定試験に対して問題集を提供しておるサイトで、現場のAmazonのData-Engineer-Associate試験問題と模擬試験問題集を含みます。ほかのホームページに弊社みたいな問題集を見れば、あとでみ続けて、弊社の商品を盗作することとよくわかります。CertShikenが提供した資料は最も全面的で、しかも更新の最も速いです。
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Apply programming concepts
|
| Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Automate data pipelines
|
| Data Store Management | 26% | - Design data models
|
| Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Ensure data encryption
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate対応内容 <<
Data-Engineer-Associate試験には多くの利点があり、Amazon購入する価値があります。購入前にData-Engineer-Associateガイドの質問デモをダウンロードして試用し、支払いが完了したらすぐに使用できます。支払いが完了したら、5〜10分以内に送信します。その後、あなたはそれを学び、実践することができます。AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01)試験に合格するための最新のData-Engineer-Associate試験問題があることを確認するために、Data-Engineer-Associateトレント質問を頻繁に更新します。 Data-Engineer-Associate試験に合格すると、大企業に入社して賃金を2倍にすることができます。
質問 # 142
A data engineer must ingest a source of structured data that is in .csv format into an Amazon S3 data lake. The
.csv files contain 15 columns. Data analysts need to run Amazon Athena queries on one or two columns of the dataset. The data analysts rarely query the entire file.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
正解：B
解説：
Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena supports various data formats, such as CSV,JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.
Therefore, creating an AWS Glue extract, transform, and load (ETL) job to read from the .csv structured data source and writing the data into the data lake in Apache Parquet format will meet the requirements most cost-effectively. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that provides a serverless data integration platform for data preparation, data cataloging, and data loading. AWS Glue ETL jobs allow you to transform and load data from various sources into various targets, using either a graphical interface (AWS Glue Studio) or a code-based interface (AWS Glue console or AWS Glue API). By using AWS Glue ETL jobs, you can easily convert the data from CSV to Parquet format, without having to write or manage any code. Parquet is a column-oriented format that allows Athena to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. This solution will also reduce the cost of Athena queries, as Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned from S3.
The other options are not as cost-effective as creating an AWS Glue ETL job to write the data into the data lake in Parquet format. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in .csv format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as .csv is a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Creating an AWS Glue ETL job to ingest the data into the data lake in JSON format will not improve the query performance or reduce the query cost, as JSON is also a row-oriented format that does not support columnar access or compression. Using an AWS Glue PySpark job to ingest the source data into the data lake in Apache Avro format will improve the query performance, as Avro is a column-oriented format that supports compression and encoding, but it will require more operational effort, as you will need to write and maintain PySpark code to convert the data from CSV to Avro format.
References:
Amazon Athena
Choosing the Right Data Format
AWS Glue
[AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide], Chapter 5: Data Analysis and Visualization, Section 5.1: Amazon Athena
質問 # 143
A data engineer has a one-time task to read data from objects that are in Apache Parquet format in an Amazon S3 bucket. The data engineer needs to query only one column of the data.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
正解：D
解説：
Option B is the best solution to meet the requirements with the least operational overhead because S3 Select is a feature that allows you to retrieve only a subset of data from an S3 object by using simple SQL expressions.
S3 Select works on objects stored in CSV, JSON, or Parquet format. By using S3 Select, you can avoid the need to download and process the entire S3 object, which reduces the amount of data transferred and the computation time. S3 Select is also easy to use and does not require any additional services or resources.
Option A is not a good solution because it involves writing custom code and configuring an AWS Lambda function to load data from the S3 bucket into a pandas dataframe and query the required column. This option adds complexity and latency to the data retrieval process and requires additional resources and configuration.
Moreover, AWS Lambda has limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which may affect the performance and reliability of the data retrieval process.
Option C is not a good solution because it involves creating and running an AWS Glue DataBrew project to consume the S3 objects and query the required column. AWS Glue DataBrew is a visual data preparation tool that allows you to clean, normalize, and transform data without writing code. However, in this scenario, the data is already in Parquet format, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics.
Therefore, there is no need to use AWS Glue DataBrew to prepare the data. Moreover, AWS Glue DataBrew adds extra time and cost to the data retrieval process and requires additional resources and configuration.
Option D is not a good solution because it involves running an AWS Glue crawler on the S3 objects and using a SQL SELECT statement in Amazon Athena to query the required column. An AWS Glue crawler is a service that can scan data sources and create metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. The Data Catalog is a central repository that stores information about the data sources, such as schema, format, and location. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in S3 using standard SQL. However, in this scenario, the schema and format of the data are already known and fixed, so there is no need to run a crawler to discover them. Moreover, running a crawler and using Amazon Athena adds extra time and cost to the data retrieval process and requires additional services and configuration.
:
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
S3 Select and Glacier Select - Amazon Simple Storage Service
AWS Lambda - FAQs
What Is AWS Glue DataBrew? - AWS Glue DataBrew
Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog - AWS Glue
What is Amazon Athena? - Amazon Athena
質問 # 144
A company is migrating its database servers from Amazon EC2 instances that run Microsoft SQL Server to Amazon RDS for Microsoft SQL Server DB instances. The company's analytics team must export large data elements every day until the migration is complete. The data elements are the result of SQL joins across multiple tables. The data must be in Apache Parquet format. The analytics team must store the data in Amazon S3.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST operationally efficient way?
正解：B
解説：
Option A is the most operationally efficient way to meet the requirements because it minimizes the number of steps and services involved in the data export process. AWS Glue is a fully managed service that can extract, transform, and load (ETL) data from various sources to various destinations, including Amazon S3. AWS Glue can also convert data to different formats, such as Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that is optimized for analytics. By creating a view in the SQL Server databases that contains the required data elements, the AWS Glue job can select the data directly from the view without having to perform any joins or transformations on the source data. The AWS Glue job can then transfer the data in Parquet format to an S3 bucket and run on a daily schedule.
Option B is not operationally efficient because it involves multiple steps and services to export the data. SQL Server Agent is a tool that can run scheduled tasks on SQL Server databases, such as executing SQL queries.
However, SQL Server Agent cannot directlyexport data to S3, so the query output must be saved as .csv objects on the EC2 instance. Then, an S3 event must be configured to trigger an AWS Lambda function that can transform the .csv objects to Parquet format and upload them to S3. This option adds complexity and latency to the data export process and requires additional resources and configuration.
Option C is not operationally efficient because it introduces an unnecessary step of running an AWS Glue crawler to read the view. An AWS Glue crawler is a service that can scan data sources and create metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. The Data Catalog is a central repository that stores information about the data sources, such as schema, format, and location. However, in this scenario, the schema and format of the data elements are already known and fixed, so there is no need to run a crawler to discover them. The AWS Glue job can directly select the data from the view without using the Data Catalog. Running a crawler adds extra time and cost to the data export process.
Option D is not operationally efficient because it requires custom code and configuration to query the databases and transform the data. An AWS Lambda function is a service that can run code in response to events or triggers, such as Amazon EventBridge. Amazon EventBridge is a service that can connect applications and services with event sources, such as schedules, and route them to targets, such as Lambda functions. However, in this scenario, using a Lambda function to query the databases and transform the data is not the best option because it requires writing and maintaining code that uses JDBC to connect to the SQL Server databases, retrieve the required data, convert the data to Parquet format, and transfer the data to S3.
This option also has limitations on the execution time, memory, and concurrency of the Lambda function, which may affect the performance and reliability of the data export process.
:
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
AWS Glue Documentation
Working with Views in AWS Glue
Converting to Columnar Formats
質問 # 145
A company needs to implement a data mesh architecture for trading, risk, and compliance teams. Each team has its own data but needs to share views. They have 1,000+ tables in 50 Glue databases. All teams use Athena and Redshift, and compliance requires full auditing and PII access control.
正解：A
解説：
A data mesh approach in AWS typically uses Lake Formation for domain-level access control and Athena for cross-domain querying through federated views. CloudTrail ensures auditing.
"For data mesh architectures, use AWS Lake Formation for fine-grained access control and Athena views for cross-domain analysis. Enable CloudTrail to audit access."
- Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf This ensures scalability, security, and compliance across domains.
質問 # 146
A company runs concurrent analytical queries on Amazon Redshift tables multiple times each day. The queries require consistent data views three times each day. The company runs extract, transform, and load (ETL) operations that update dimension tables while the queries run. The company has noticed that the queries cause table-level locks during the ETL operations. The company ' s current solution experiences query timeouts and deadlocks during peak processing hours, which affects analytical reporting and on-demand analysis.
Which solution will fix this issue?
正解：A
解説：
Option D is correct because the problem is lock contention between ETL writes and analytical reads on the same Redshift tables. AWS documents that table locks can block both reads and writes, and that Redshift data sharing lets you share live data across Redshift clusters and workgroups without manually moving or copying the data. Because the shared data is live, consumer users see the most up-to-date information as soon as it is updated. Separating ETL and analytics onto different Redshift clusters while using data sharing is therefore the cleanest way to isolate workloads and still provide consistent data views.
Option A reduces contention only by changing schedules and does not fully solve concurrent peak-hour conflicts. Option B is not correct because Redshift federated queries are read-only against external sources and do not provide a Redshift "read replica" design for this case. Option C does not address the locking problem on the dimension tables that ETL is updating. The official Redshift guidance and service capabilities point to workload isolation plus data sharing as the best fix. This also matches the exam guide's emphasis on choosing architectures that maintain performance and consistency without unnecessary copying.
質問 # 147
......
お客様が選択できるAmazon3つのバージョンのData-Engineer-Associate試験トレントを所有しています。 PDFバージョン、PCバージョン、およびAPPオンラインバージョンを締めくくります。 Data-Engineer-Associateクイズトレントの最も便利なバージョンを選択できます。 Data-Engineer-Associateテスト準備の3つのバージョンは、さまざまな長所を後押しし、最適な選択肢を見つけることができます。たとえば、PDFバージョンはダウンロードと印刷に便利であり、レビューと学習に簡単で便利です。紙に印刷することができ、メモをとるのに便利です。いつでもどこでもData-Engineer-Associateテスト準備を学び、繰り返し練習することができます。
Data-Engineer-Associate勉強資料: https://www.certshiken.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-shiken.html
P.S. CertShikenがGoogle Driveで共有している無料かつ新しいData-Engineer-Associateダンプ：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1PcEntQvYyxL5ujaYL5BE33B7XH79PM7Y