What's more, part of that VCE4Plus Data-Engineer-Associate dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1r6KW18iSatzzea2S_kwzQxwGzXtdVEuX
All of our users are free to choose our Data-Engineer-Associate guide materials on our website. In order to help users make better choices, we also think of a lot of ways. First of all, we have provided you with free trial versions of the Data-Engineer-Associate exam questions. And according to the three versions of the Data-Engineer-Associate Study Guide, we have three free demos. The content of the three free demos is the same, and the displays are different accordingly. You can try them as you like.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Store Management | 26% | - Understand data cataloging
|
| Topic 2: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Perform data ingestion
|
| Topic 3: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Manage and troubleshoot data processes
|
| Topic 4: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Manage data privacy and compliance
|
>> Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Test <<
The above formats of VCE4Plus are made to help customers prepare as per their unique styles and crack the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam certification on the very first attempt. Our AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) questions product is getting updated regularly as per the original AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) practice test’s content. So that customers can prepare according to the latest AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam content and pass it with ease.
NEW QUESTION # 86
A company stores a large dataset in an Amazon S3 bucket. A data engineer frequently runs complex queries on the dataset by using Amazon Athena. The data engineer needs to optimize query performance and optimize costs for queries that are run multiple times with the same parameters.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Amazon Athena charges per amount of data scanned by each query. When the same query with identical parameters is executed multiple times, re-scanning the data repeatedly increases both cost and execution time.
Athena provides query result reuse, which allows previously computed query results to be reused when an identical query is rerun within a configurable time window.
By enabling query result reuse at the Athena workgroup level, Athena automatically returns cached results instead of re-reading data from Amazon S3. This significantly improves query performance while reducing data scan costs. This feature is specifically designed for workloads where analysts frequently rerun complex queries with the same parameters, which directly matches the scenario.
Converting data to JSON would degrade performance because JSON is not a columnar format and increases scan size. Using Amazon EMR introduces unnecessary infrastructure management and cost for a query optimization problem that Athena already solves natively. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is intended for querying S3 data from within Redshift and does not address repeated-query optimization in Athena.
Therefore, configuring query result reuse in the Athena workgroup is the most cost-effective and operationally efficient solution.
NEW QUESTION # 87
A company has a data lake in Amazon 53. The company uses AWS Glue to catalog data and AWS Glue Studio to implement data extract, transform, and load (ETL) pipelines.
The company needs to ensure that data quality issues are checked every time the pipelines run. A data engineer must enhance the existing pipelines to evaluate data quality rules based on predefined thresholds.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST implementation effort?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Problem Analysis:
The company uses AWS Glue for ETL pipelines and must enforce data quality checks during pipeline execution.
The goal is to implement quality checks with minimal implementation effort.
Key Considerations:
AWS Glue provides an Evaluate Data Quality transform that allows for defining quality checks directly in the pipeline.
DQDL (Data Quality Definition Language) simplifies the process by allowing declarative rule definitions.
Solution Analysis:
Option A: SQL Transform
SQL queries can implement rules but require manual effort for each rule and do not integrate natively with Glue.
Option B: Evaluate Data Quality Transform + DQDL
AWS Glue's built-in Evaluate Data Quality transform is designed for this use case.
Allows defining thresholds and rules in DQDL with minimal coding effort.
Option C: Custom Transform with PyDeequ
PyDeequ is a powerful library but adds unnecessary complexity compared to Glue's native features.
Option D: Custom Transform with Great Expectations
Similar to PyDeequ, Great Expectations adds operational complexity and external dependencies.
Final Recommendation:
Use the Evaluate Data Quality transform with DQDL to implement data quality rules in AWS Glue pipelines.
Reference:
AWS Glue Data Quality
DQDL Syntax and Examples
AWS Glue Studio Documentation
NEW QUESTION # 88
A company stores employee data in Amazon Redshift A table named Employee uses columns named Region ID, Department ID, and Role ID as a compound sort key. Which queries will MOST increase the speed of a query by using a compound sort key of the table? (Select TWO.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
In Amazon Redshift, a compound sort key is designed to optimize the performance of queries that use filtering and join conditions on the columns in the sort key. A compound sort key orders the data based on the first column, followed by the second, and so on. In the scenario given, the compound sort key consists of Region ID, Department ID, and Role ID. Therefore, queries that filter on the leading columns of the sort key are more likely to benefit from this order.
* Option B: "Select * from Employee where Region ID='North America' and Department ID=20;" This query will perform well because it uses both the Region ID and Department ID, which are the first two columns of the compound sort key. The order of the columns in the WHERE clause matches the order in the sort key, thus allowing the query to scan fewer rows and improve performance.
* Option C: "Select * from Employee where Department ID=20 and Region ID='North America';" This query also benefits from the compound sort key because it includes both Region ID and Department ID, which are the first two columns in the sort key. Although the order in the WHERE clause does not match exactly, Amazon Redshift will still leverage the sort key to reduce the amount of data scanned, improving query speed.
* Options A, D, and E are less optimal because they do not utilize the sort key as effectively:
* Option A only filters by the Region ID, which may still use the sort key but does not take full advantage of the compound nature.
* Option D uses only Role ID, the last column in the compound sort key, which will not benefit much from sorting since it is the third key in the sort order.
* Option E filters on Region ID and Role ID but skips the Department ID column, making it less efficient for the compound sort key.
References:
* Amazon Redshift Documentation - Sorting Data
* AWS Certified Data Analytics Study Guide
* AWS Certification - Data Engineer Associate Exam Guide
NEW QUESTION # 89
A gaming company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to collect clickstream data. The company uses Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose delivery streams to store the data in JSON format in Amazon S3. Data scientists at the company use Amazon Athena to query the most recent data to obtain business insights.
The company wants to reduce Athena costs but does not want to recreate the data pipeline.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST management effort?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Step 1: Understanding the Problem
The company collects clickstream data via Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and stores it in JSON format in Amazon S3 using Kinesis Data Firehose. They use Amazon Athena to query the data, but they want to reduce Athena costs while maintaining the same data pipeline.
Since Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned during queries, reducing the data size (by converting JSON to a more efficient format like Apache Parquet) is a key solution to lowering costs.
Step 2: Why Option A is Correct
Option A provides a straightforward way to reduce costs with minimal management overhead:
Changing the Firehose output format to Parquet: Parquet is a columnar data format, which is more compact and efficient than JSON for Athena queries. It significantly reduces the amount of data scanned, which in turn reduces Athena query costs.
Custom S3 Object Prefix (YYYYMMDD): Adding a date-based prefix helps in partitioning the data, which further improves query efficiency in Athena by limiting the data scanned to only relevant partitions.
AWS Glue ETL Job for Existing Data: To handle existing data stored in JSON format, a one-time AWS Glue ETL job can combine small JSON files, convert them to Parquet, and apply the YYYYMMDD prefix. This ensures consistency in the S3 bucket structure and allows Athena to efficiently query historical data.
ALTER TABLE ADD PARTITION: This command updates Athena's table metadata to reflect the new partitions, ensuring that future queries target only the required data.
Step 3: Why Other Options Are Not Ideal
Option B (Apache Spark on EMR) introduces higher management effort by requiring the setup of Apache Spark jobs and an Amazon EMR cluster. While it achieves the goal of converting JSON to Parquet, it involves running and maintaining an EMR cluster, which adds operational complexity.
Option C (Kinesis and Apache Flink) is a more complex solution involving Apache Flink, which adds a real-time streaming layer to aggregate data. Although Flink is a powerful tool for stream processing, it adds unnecessary overhead in this scenario since the company already uses Kinesis Data Firehose for batch delivery to S3.
Option D (AWS Lambda with Firehose) suggests using AWS Lambda to convert records in real time. While Lambda can work in some cases, it's generally not the best tool for handling large-scale data transformations like JSON-to-Parquet conversion due to potential scaling and invocation limitations. Additionally, running parallel Glue jobs further complicates the setup.
Step 4: How Option A Minimizes Costs
By using Apache Parquet, Athena queries become more efficient, as Athena will scan significantly less data, directly reducing query costs.
Firehose natively supports Parquet as an output format, so enabling this conversion in Firehose requires minimal effort. Once set, new data will automatically be stored in Parquet format in S3, without requiring any custom coding or ongoing management.
The AWS Glue ETL job for historical data ensures that existing JSON files are also converted to Parquet format, ensuring consistency across the data stored in S3.
Conclusion:
Option A meets the requirement to reduce Athena costs without recreating the data pipeline, using Firehose's native support for Apache Parquet and a simple one-time AWS Glue ETL job for existing data. This approach involves minimal management effort compared to the other solutions.
NEW QUESTION # 90
A company receives a daily file that contains customer data in .xls format. The company stores the file in Amazon S3. The daily file is approximately 2 GB in size.
A data engineer concatenates the column in the file that contains customer first names and the column that contains customer last names. The data engineer needs to determine the number of distinct customers in the file.
Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational effort?
Answer: D
Explanation:
AWS Glue DataBrew is a visual data preparation tool that allows you to clean, normalize, and transform data without writing code. You can use DataBrew to create recipes that define the steps to apply to your data, such as filtering, renaming, splitting, or aggregating columns. You can also use DataBrew to run jobs that execute the recipes on your data sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, or Amazon Aurora. DataBrew integrates with AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository for your data assets1.
The solution that meets the requirement with the least operational effort is to use AWS Glue DataBrew to create a recipe that uses the COUNT_DISTINCT aggregate function to calculate the number of distinct customers. This solution has the following advantages:
It does not require you to write any code, as DataBrew provides a graphical user interface that lets you explore, transform, and visualize your data. You can use DataBrew to concatenate the columns that contain customer first names and last names, and then use the COUNT_DISTINCT aggregate function to count the number of unique values in the resulting column2.
It does not require you to provision, manage, or scale any servers, clusters, or notebooks, as DataBrew is a fully managed service that handles all the infrastructure for you. DataBrew can automatically scale up or down the compute resources based on the size and complexity of your data and recipes1.
It does not require you to create or update any AWS Glue Data Catalog entries, as DataBrew can automatically create and register the data sources and targets in the Data Catalog. DataBrew can also use the existing Data Catalog entries to access the data in S3 or other sources3.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests creating and running an Apache Spark job in an AWS Glue notebook. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to write code, as AWS Glue notebooks are interactive development environments that allow you to write, test, and debug Apache Spark code using Python or Scala. You need to use the Spark SQL or the Spark DataFrame API to read the S3 file and calculate the number of distinct customers.
It requires you to provision and manage a development endpoint, which is a serverless Apache Spark environment that you can connect to your notebook. You need to specify the type and number of workers for your development endpoint, and monitor its status and metrics.
It requires you to create or update the AWS Glue Data Catalog entries for the S3 file, either manually or using a crawler. You need to use the Data Catalog as a metadata store for your Spark job, and specify the database and table names in your code.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests creating an AWS Glue crawler to create an AWS Glue Data Catalog of the S3 file, and running SQL queries from Amazon Athena to calculate the number of distinct customers.
This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to create and run a crawler, which is a program that connects to your data store, progresses through a prioritized list of classifiers to determine the schema for your data, and then creates metadata tables in the Data Catalog. You need to specify the data store, the IAM role, the schedule, and the output database for your crawler.
It requires you to write SQL queries, as Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in S3 using standard SQL. You need to use Athena to concatenate the columns that contain customer first names and last names, and then use the COUNT(DISTINCT) aggregate function to count the number of unique values in the resulting column.
Option C is incorrect because it suggests creating and running an Apache Spark job in Amazon EMR Serverless to calculate the number of distinct customers. This solution has the following disadvantages:
It requires you to write code, as Amazon EMR Serverless is a service that allows you to run Apache Spark jobs on AWS without provisioning or managing any infrastructure. You need to use the Spark SQL or the Spark DataFrame API to read the S3 file and calculate the number of distinct customers.
It requires you to create and manage an Amazon EMR Serverless cluster, which is a fully managed and scalable Spark environment that runs on AWS Fargate. You need to specify the cluster name, the IAM role, the VPC, and the subnet for your cluster, and monitor its status and metrics.
It requires you to create or update the AWS Glue Data Catalog entries for the S3 file, either manually or using a crawler. You need to use the Data Catalog as a metadata store for your Spark job, and specify the database and table names in your code.
1: AWS Glue DataBrew - Features
2: Working with recipes - AWS Glue DataBrew
3: Working with data sources and data targets - AWS Glue DataBrew
[4]: AWS Glue notebooks - AWS Glue
[5]: Development endpoints - AWS Glue
[6]: Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog - AWS Glue
[7]: Crawlers - AWS Glue
[8]: Amazon Athena - Features
[9]: Amazon EMR Serverless - Features
[10]: Creating an Amazon EMR Serverless cluster - Amazon EMR
[11]: Using the AWS Glue Data Catalog with Amazon EMR Serverless - Amazon EMR
NEW QUESTION # 91
......
Before the clients buy our Data-Engineer-Associate guide prep they can have a free download and tryout. The client can visit the website pages of our product and understand our Data-Engineer-Associate study materials in detail. You can see the demo, the form of the software and part of our titles. To better understand our Data-Engineer-Associate Preparation questions, you can also look at the details and the guarantee. So it is convenient for you to have a good understanding of our product before you decide to buy our Data-Engineer-Associate training materials.
Data-Engineer-Associate Test Engine: https://www.vce4plus.com/Amazon/Data-Engineer-Associate-valid-vce-dumps.html
2026 Latest VCE4Plus Data-Engineer-Associate PDF Dumps and Data-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1r6KW18iSatzzea2S_kwzQxwGzXtdVEuX