BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Itcertkey Plat-Arch-204 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aXNQbXRmwPmESqghOsdv0jM0vsTtrByD
Itcertkey is a legal authorized company offering the best Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 test preparation materials. So for some candidates who are not confident for real tests or who have no enough to time to prepare I advise you that purchasing valid and Latest Plat-Arch-204 Test Preparation materials will make you half the efforts double the results. Our products help thousands of people pass exams and can help you half the work with double the results.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
>> Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Valid Dumps Ebook <<
You can directly refer our Plat-Arch-204 study materials to prepare the exam. Once the newest test syllabus is issued by the official, our experts will quickly make a detailed summary about all knowledge points of the real Plat-Arch-204 exam in the shortest time. All in all, our Plat-Arch-204 Exam Quiz will help you grasp all knowledge points. Not only our professional expert have simplified the content of the subject for you to understand fully, but also our Plat-Arch-204 practice guide will help you pass the exam smoothly.
NEW QUESTION # 97
Northern Trail Outfitters uses a custom Java application to display code coverage and test results for all enterprise applications. Which Salesforce API should an integration architect use to include Salesforce in this application?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The Tooling API is specifically designed for developer-centric tools that need fine-grained access to Salesforce metadata and runtime information. It exposes specialized objects like ApexCodeCoverage, ApexCodeCoverageAggregate, and ApexTestResult. These objects allow external applications to query the results of test runs and specific line-by-line coverage metrics. While the Metadata API (Option A) is used for deployments, it does not provide the same granular query access to test execution results. The Tooling API is the industry standard for integrating Salesforce into enterprise CI/CD pipelines and quality dashboards.
NEW QUESTION # 98
An integration architect has been tasked with integrating Salesforce with an on-premises system. Due to some established policies, this system must remain on-premises. What should the integration architect use to build a solution for this requirement?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When data must reside on-premises due to security or compliance policies, but needs to be visible and actionable in Salesforce, the architect should recommend Data Virtualization via Salesforce Connect.
Salesforce Connect allows Salesforce to treat external data as if it were stored natively in the org without ever moving the data into the Salesforce cloud.28 This is achieved by creating External Objects that map to the on-premises data structures. For this to work seamlessly, the on-premises system or a middleware layer must expose the data through a compatible protocol, most commonly the Open Data Protocol (OData).
Option C is incorrect because Salesforce Connect does not natively support ODBC directly; ODBC is a low-level driver protocol, whereas OData is a web-based RESTful protocol designed for cross-platform data exchange. Option B is irrelevant as the data is stated to be on-premises, not in Heroku. By using Salesforce Connect with OData, the architect satisfies the "stay on-premises" policy while providing Salesforce users with real-time, bidirectional access to the data, supporting features like Global Search and related lists without the overhead of data synchronization.
NEW QUESTION # 99
Northern Trail Outfitters uses Salesforce to track leads and opportunities, and to capture order details. However, Salesforce isn't the system that holds or processes orders. After the order details are captured in Salesforce, an order must be created in the Remote system, which manages the order's lifecycle. The integration architect for the project is recommending a remote system that will subscribe to the platform event defined in Salesforce. Which integration pattern should be used for this business use case?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In this scenario, Salesforce acts as the trigger for a business process that completes in an external system. The architect's recommendation for the remote system to subscribe to a platform event is the classic implementation of the Remote Process Invocation-Fire and Forget pattern.1 In a Fire and Forget pattern, Salesforce initiates a process by publishing a message (the event) to the event bus and then immediately continues its own2 processing without waiting for a functional response from the target system. The "Fire" part occurs when the order details are captured and the event is published; the "Forget" part refers to Salesforce handing off the responsibility of order creation to the remote system. This pattern is ideal for improving user experience and system performance, as it avoids blocking the user interface while waiting for potentially slow back-office systems to respond.
Option A (Request and Reply) is incorrect because that would require Salesforce to make a synchronous call and wait for the remote system to confirm the order was created before allowing the user to proceed. Option C (Remote Call-In) is the inverse of what is described; it would involve the remote system actively reaching into Salesforce to "pull" the data, whereas here Salesforce is "pushing" the notification via an event stream. By using Platform Events to facilitate this hand-off, Northern Trail Outfitters ensures a decoupled, scalable architecture where the remote system can process orders at its own pace while Salesforce remains responsive to sales users.
NEW QUESTION # 100
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to make synchronous callouts to "available-to-promise" services to query product availability and reserve inventory during the customer checkout process. What should an integration architect consider when building a scalable integration solution?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 101
A company accepts payment requests 24/7. Once the company accepts a payment request, its service level agreement (SLA) r5equires it to make sure each payment request is processed by its Payment System. The co6mpany tracks payment requests using a globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The company's simplified flow is as shown in the diagram.
The company encounters intermittent update errors when two or more processes try to update the same Payment Request record at the same time.
Which recommendation should an integration architect make to improve the company's SLA and update conflict handling?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To fulfill the SLA of ensuring every payment is processed while simultaneously resolving the issue of intermittent update errors, the architect must introduce an orchestration layer capable of managing state and concurrency. In a high-volume payment environment, "Fire and Forget" messages (as seen in the provided diagram) can lead to race conditions if multiple threads attempt to update a single record simultaneously-a common challenge when scaling payment systems.
The recommendation to have Middleware coordinate request delivery and payment processing (Option C) transforms the architecture into a managed queueing system. By coordinating delivery, the middleware can act as a traffic controller, ensuring that requests are delivered sequentially or that appropriate locks are respected before an update is attempted. This orchestration allows the system to meet its SLA by implementing a "guaranteed delivery" pattern, where the middleware tracks the status of each payment and only "forgets" the message once the Payment System confirms successful processing.
Furthermore, the architect should emphasize idempotency by leveraging the globally unique identifier created at the Data Entry Point. The Payment System should be designed to use this identifier to check if a specific transaction has already been processed before attempting an update. This prevents duplicate entries and conflicting updates, even if the middleware retries a message due to a network timeout. While retries (Options A and B) are part of a resilient system, they do not solve the root cause of record contention; only the coordination and sequencing provided by the middleware can ensure a stable, conflict-free integration flow.78
NEW QUESTION # 102
......
No matter what your current status is Plat-Arch-204 exam questions can save you the most time, and then pass the Plat-Arch-204 exam while still having your own life time. If you free dwonload the demo of our Plat-Arch-204 exam questions, I believe you will have a deeper understanding of our products, and we must also trust our Plat-Arch-204 learning quiz. Our products can provide you with the high efficiency and high quality you need. What are you waiting for? Quickly use our study Plat-Arch-204 materials!
Plat-Arch-204 Exam Tests: https://www.itcertkey.com/Plat-Arch-204_braindumps.html
What's more, part of that Itcertkey Plat-Arch-204 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aXNQbXRmwPmESqghOsdv0jM0vsTtrByD