BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PrepAwayTest RIBO-Level-1 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1srF3YvztQluoUkBW5Zyni3AzTfRX1JHh
The operating system of RIBO-Level-1 exam practice has won the appreciation of many users around the world. Within five to ten minutes after your payment is successful, our operating system will send a link to RIBO-Level-1 Training Materials to your email address. After our RIBO-Level-1 study guide update, our operating system will also send you a timely message to ensure that you will not miss a single message.
| Certification Vendor: | Insurance Institute of Canada |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | RIBO Level 1 Entry-Level Broker Exam |
| Exam Number: | RIBO-Level-1 |
| Passing Score: | 75% |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice |
| Exam Duration: | 180 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Price: | $300 |
| Related Certifications: | RIBO Level 3 - Principal Broker RIBO Level 2 - Acting Under Supervision |
| Sample Questions: | IIC RIBO-Level-1 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | In-person (administered by approved exam providers). Open-book format with access to PDF resources including Ontario Automobile Policy (OAP) #1, RIBO By-Laws, RIB Act, and Ontario Regulations during the exam. |
| Pre Condition: | Individuals wishing to obtain RIBO licensing in Ontario. Must register through approved exam providers. Candidates are eligible to write the exam twice per exam provider; after two failed attempts, subject to 8-month waiting period. |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.ribo.com/getting-a-license/individual-licenses/new-applicants/examinations/level-1-entry-level-broker-exam |
>> RIBO-Level-1 Exam Flashcards <<
PrepAwayTest, as a provider, specializing in providing all candidates with RIBO-Level-1 exam-related materials, focus on offering the most excellent dumps for the candidates. In contrast with other websites, PrepAwayTest is more trustworthy. Why? Because PrepAwayTest has many years of experience and our IIC experts have been devoted themselves to the study of IIC certification exam and summarize RIBO-Level-1 Exam rules. Thus, PrepAwayTest exam dumps have a high hit rate. Meanwhile, it guarantees the qualification rate in the exam. Therefore, PrepAwayTest got everyone's trust.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 85
What is the meaning of implied consent?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C because implied consent means permission is inferred from a person's conduct, behaviour, or the surrounding circumstances , rather than being stated clearly in words or writing. In privacy and regulatory compliance concepts relevant to brokers, this is different from express consent , where the individual explicitly agrees.
The uploaded PIPEDA material explains that organizations must consider the appropriate form of consent, either express or implied , and states that while consent should generally be express, it can be implied in strictly defined circumstances . It also says the choice between implied and express consent depends on factors such as the sensitivity of the information and the reasonable expectations of the individual . Where information is sensitive, outside reasonable expectations, or creates a meaningful risk of harm, express consent is generally required .
That is why A and D describe forms of explicit or declared permission, not implied consent. B is too vague and does not describe consent itself. From a RIBO perspective, brokers must understand that relying on implied consent has limits. For important changes, sensitive information, or uses outside the client's reasonable expectations, proper express client consent should be obtained and documented.
NEW QUESTION # 86
The "Pair and Set" clause in a Property insurance policy states which of the following?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The Pair and Set Clause is a standard provision in property insurance wordings designed to uphold the Principle of Indemnity. Indemnity ensures that an insured is returned to their pre-loss financial position, but not in a way that allows them to profit from the loss.
The clause explicitly addresses items that derive their value from being part of a matched pair (e.g., earrings) or a larger set (e.g., a set of silver cutlery). It states that the loss of one item in a pair or set does not constitute a "total loss" of the entire pair or set. Instead, the insurer will pay for a reasonable and fair proportion of the total value. For example, if one earring is lost from a $2,000 pair, the insurer will not automatically pay
$2,000; they will assess the value of the remaining earring and pay the difference.
The RIBO Level 1 Blueprint expects brokers to explain this clause during Claims Services to manage client expectations. Many clients mistakenly believe (Option C) that the loss of one part entitles them to the replacement of the whole. A broker's technical Insurance Product Knowledge allows them to clarify that the policy only covers the actual "economic loss" sustained. This prevents disputes and ensures the broker is providing Consulting and Advising that is consistent with the standard policy wordings found in the Habitational and Commercial forms. Understanding this clause is also vital for Risk Assessment, as a broker might recommend a "Valued Contract" or specific floaters for high-value items where the "Pair and Set" limitation might be undesirable for the client.
NEW QUESTION # 87
Bob is operating a restaurant in downtown Toronto. He always keeps cleanliness of the restaurant and safety of his customers in mind. Angela, whose left leg was in a cast, visited the restaurant. She slipped and fell and injured herself. If Angela files a lawsuit against the restaurant, what type of liability is this?
Answer: D
Explanation:
This scenario focuses on Occupiers' Liability and the classification of business risks within the Risk Identification and Assessment competency. In the insurance industry, when a third party (like a customer) suffers bodily injury or property damage on a business's premises, the exposure is covered under a Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy.
Under the RIBO Level 1 Blueprint, a broker must distinguish between different "legal personas." Because Bob is operating a restaurant (a commercial venture), the liability arises from his role as a business owner
/occupier. Commercial General Liability (A) is designed specifically for this "Premises and Operations" risk.
It covers the legal costs to defend the business and the compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff if the business is found negligent.
Even though Bob prioritizes cleanliness, the court will determine if he met the Standard of Care required under theOccupiers' Liability Act. Factors such as the floor's condition and whether Angela's existing injury (the cast) made her more vulnerable will be scrutinized.
Option B is incorrect as no motor vehicle was involved. Option C (Contract) relates to breaches of specific agreements rather than unintentional torts (negligence). Option D (Personal Liability) is for private individuals in their non-business lives (e.g., at home); since this occurred at a place of business, personal liability does not apply.
The broker's role in Consulting and Advising is to ensure that commercial clients like Bob carry sufficient CGL limits. A single slip-and-fall lawsuit in a downtown Toronto location can easily reach hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees and settlements. This knowledge is essential for Relationship Management, as it allows the broker to explain how the CGL policy acts as a financial shield for the business's assets, ensuring Bob can continue operations despite the litigation.
NEW QUESTION # 88
Which of the following would be considered a Moral Hazard?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Client overstating value of stolen items because moral hazard relates to the character, honesty, or behaviour of the insured that increases the likelihood or severity of loss. In insurance, moral hazard is not about the physical condition of the property or the surrounding environment. Instead, it concerns attitudes or actions such as dishonesty, fraud, exaggeration of claims, intentional loss, or indifference to the insurer's interests.
A client who overstates the value of stolen items is creating a dishonest claims situation , which is a classic example of moral hazard. This kind of behaviour affects underwriting and claims handling because it suggests the insured may try to gain financially from the insurance contract beyond proper indemnification.
The other options are examples of physical hazard , not moral hazard. A. Poor wiring in a home is a physical condition that increases the chance of fire. C. Use of asbestos insulation is also a physical condition or construction feature that may affect risk. D. High traffic area prone to collisions is an external exposure hazard connected to location and frequency of accidents.
From a RIBO perspective, this question tests the broker's ability to distinguish between moral hazards and physical hazards . That distinction is important when assessing risk, identifying underwriting concerns, and recognizing possible fraud indicators.
NEW QUESTION # 89
Your insured is involved in an accident and the insured's automobile is heavily damaged. Repairs are estimated at $7,500. The insured calls to advise you that the insurer does not intend to have the vehicle repaired, but will make a cash settlement, as its actual cash value is shown in the "Red Book" as $5,000. What should you tell your insured?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is B . Under Ontario auto policy wording, the insurer is not required to pay repair costs that exceed the vehicle's actual cash value (ACV. . The OAP 1 states that the insurer will pay the lower of the cost to repair the damage or the automobile's actual cash value at the time of loss, less any deductible. It also says the insurer may choose to repair, replace, rebuild, or pay ACV , and if it pays ACV, it takes ownership of the salvage.
Since the repairs are estimated at $7,500 and the vehicle's ACV is $5,000 , the insurer is generally entitled to settle on an ACV basis rather than fund uneconomical repairs. That makes A incorrect. C and D are not appropriate broker guidance and do not reflect proper claims-handling practice or professional conduct.
The practical advice to the insured is that if they disagree with the insurer's valuation , they may pursue the policy's appraisal/arbitration dispute mechanism on value. In standard Ontario insurance practice, each side bears the cost of its own appraiser and shares the umpire cost if one is needed. For exam purposes, the closest and best answer provided is B : the insured can challenge the valuation through appraisal rather than demand the full repair amount.
NEW QUESTION # 90
......
Reliable RIBO-Level-1 Dumps Questions: https://www.prepawaytest.com/IIC/RIBO-Level-1-practice-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New RIBO-Level-1 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PrepAwayTest: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1srF3YvztQluoUkBW5Zyni3AzTfRX1JHh