我々JPNTestでは、あなたは一番優秀なRelativity RCA問題集を発見できます。我が社のサービスもいいです。購入した前、弊社はあなたが準備したいRCA試験問題集のサンプルを無料に提供します。購入した後、一年間の無料サービス更新を提供します。Relativity RCA問題集に合格しないなら、180日内で全額返金します。あるいは、他の科目の試験を変えていいです。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Analytics & Review Management | - Structured analytics - Review workflows |
| Topic 2: Data Management & Ingestion | - Data loading - File upload and import workflows |
| Topic 3: Productions & Outputs | - Productions setup - Export and reporting |
| Topic 4: Workspace Administration | - Permissions and security - Workspace configuration |
| Topic 5: Case Administration | - Case setup and management - User and group management |
高品質のRCA準備ガイドを購入できるだけでなく、当社から大きな勇気と信頼を得ることもできます。多くのオンライン教育プラットフォームのリソースは、購入後に使用するためにユーザー登録によって提供される必要がありますが、それは当社のウェブサイトでは簡単です。 RCAガイドトレントの無料デモを提供しています。登録せずにいつでもダウンロードできます。高速配信-支払い後、10分以内にRCA試験トレントを受信できるため、迅速かつ効率的に学習できます。 何を待っていますか？ RCA試験問題を購入してください。
質問 # 21
How is a Relativity Short Message Format RSMF file created?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is C. Files must be generated using the RSMF specifications before they are imported into Relativity. Relativity's official Short Message Format documentation explains that to use the Short Message Viewer, you first need to create an RSMF file, and the example/specification pages describe the required structure and header information that must be present before ingestion using Processing. Relativity also states that Processing is the recommended method of importing RSMF files into Relativity, which means the RSMF file already exists when Processing begins.
This rules out the other options. Relativity does not say that it automatically creates RSMF on-the-fly for all non-document data. It also does not describe a processing-profile feature that converts arbitrary XML from chat platforms into RSMF during import. Nor is there a document-list mass operation that converts conversations into RSMF. Instead, RSMF is a defined external format that must be constructed according to Relativity's published specifications, then imported and processed to preserve message metadata, attachments, and near-native review behavior. Therefore, the correct answer is C.
質問 # 22
Which of the following fields does a transcript's Word Index contain?
正解：D
解説：
The correct answer is C. Speaker . In Relativity transcript review, the Word Index is used to navigate the transcript content by words and speakers appearing in the testimony. The transcript review experience centers on transcript text structure, including speaker-based navigation, rather than fields like associated facts or exhibits, which belong to different transcript-management features. Relativity's transcript tooling distinguishes transcript content navigation from fact management and exhibit linking, so Speaker is the correct Word Index field from the choices given.
The other options correspond to different transcript-related concepts. Associated fact belongs to fact management workflows, Exhibit number relates to transcript exhibits, and Count is not the specific transcript Word Index field tested here. While the current public help snippets I found do not surface the exact Word Index field list in one compact line, the available transcript/user documentation supports the transcript- review distinction that makes Speaker the correct answer. This one is slightly less directly quoted than some of the others, but it remains the best verified answer from Relativity transcript behavior.
質問 # 23
You loaded a third-party production of native files, and the case team would like a field that provides the file size for each of the files received. What is the most efficient way to populate information for your native files?
正解：C
質問 # 24
You loaded a third-party production of native files, and the case team would like a field that provides the file size for each of the files received. What is the most efficient way to populate information for your native files?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is B. Run the Set native file size field script. In Relativity, the purpose of the Set native file size field script is to populate a decimal field with the size of each document's native file. This is the most efficient and direct administrative method when a workspace already contains produced native files and the case team wants a usable field showing file size. Relativity's documentation states that the script stores the native file size for each document in the workspace in a decimal field, making it specifically aligned to this requirement. It is intended for administrators who need to backfill or populate this metadata after files have already been loaded, rather than relying on manual calculations or unrelated operations.
The other options are not correct. A tally/sum/average mass operation works on values that already exist in fields; it does not inspect native files and write their file sizes into a document field. The Set extracted text size field script applies to extracted text size, not native file size, so it addresses a different metadata requirement. The statement that native file size is automatically populated for documents is also incorrect in this context, because Relativity provides a dedicated script precisely for populating that field when needed.
Therefore, from a Relativity Certified Administrator perspective under Data loading , the correct and most efficient administrative action is to run the Set native file size field script.
質問 # 25
In the Audit tab, which of these actions can you revert?
正解：C
解説：
The correct answer is A. Document - Update . Relativity's official Audit documentation states that system admins can revert coding decisions from the Audit list, and that this action applies to the latest Document Update , Mass Update , or Propagate action on the Document object. That makes Document - Update the correct revertable action among the choices provided.
The other options are not listed by Relativity as revertable audit actions in this context. A Field - Update concerns the field object itself rather than a document coding decision. Entity - Merge may create audit records, but Relativity does not list it as an action that can be reverted through the Audit revert feature.
Redaction - Update is also not one of the documented revertable audit actions under the Audit tab's revert capability. From an RCA perspective, this distinction matters because Audit revert is narrowly scoped to specific document-level update actions and certain supported field types. Therefore, the correct answer is Document - Update .
質問 # 26
......
近年、この行では、Relativity Certified Administratorの実際の試験で新しいポイントが絶えずテストされていることについて、いくつかの変更が行われています。 そのため、当社の専門家は新しいタイプの質問を強調し、練習資料に更新を追加し、発生した場合は密接にシフトを探します。 このJPNTest試験で起こった急速な変化については、Relativity専門家が修正し、現在見ているRCA試験シミュレーションが最新バージョンであることを保証します。 材料の傾向は必ずしも簡単に予測できるわけではありませんが、10年の経験から予測可能なパターンを持っているため、次のRCA準備材料Relativity Certified Administratorで発生する知識のポイントを正確に予測することがよくあります。
RCA日本語関連対策: https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/RCA-mondaishu