Fast2testのMicrosoftのAZ-802試験のトレーニングキットはFast2testのIT技術専門家たちによって開発されたのです。そのデザインは当面の急速に変化するIT市場と密接な関係があります。Fast2testのトレーニングはあなたを助けて継続的に発展している技術を利用して、問題を解決する能力を高めると同時に仕事についての満足度を向上させることができます。Fast2testのMicrosoftのAZ-802の認証したカバー率は１００パーセントに達したのですから、弊社の問題と解答を利用する限り、あなたがきっと気楽に試験に合格することを保証します。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Compute, storage, and virtualization | - Storage and file services
|
| Networking and high availability | - High availability and disaster recovery
|
| Secure and manage Windows Server environments | - Security and compliance
|
| Hybrid infrastructure management | - Monitoring and update management
|
社会に入った後の私達は最もの責任があって、学習の時間は少なくなりました。IT領域により良く発展したいなら、Microsoft AZ-802のような試験認定資格を取得するのは重要なことです。周知のようにMicrosoft AZ-802のような試験認定資格を手に入れると、会社の規則に沿う奨励があります。それで、速く我々Fast2testのMicrosoft AZ-802試験問題集を入手しましょう。
質問 # 180
You need to meet the technical requirements for User1. The solution must use the principle of least privilege.
What should you do?
正解：C
解説：
The requirement is narrow: User1 must be able to manage the membership of all the groups located in Contoso\OU3, and nothing more. The Delegation of Control Wizard, run against OU3 specifically, lets an administrator grant User1 exactly the built-in task " Modify the membership of a group, " which grants write access to the member attribute on group objects contained in that OU only. This satisfies the requirement while granting no rights outside OU3, which is the definition of least privilege. Creating the same delegation at the domain root (contoso.com) would technically work but grants far broader scope than needed, since it would apply to every container in the domain, not just OU3, violating least privilege. Adding User1 to Account Operators grants domain-wide rights to create, delete, and modify most user, group, and computer accounts throughout the domain (with some protections for built-in admin accounts), which is excessive for a task limited to group membership in one OU. Server Operators is unrelated to Active Directory object management altogether; it governs local administrative rights on domain controllers themselves. Therefore, delegating control on OU3 is the correct, minimally scoped solution.
質問 # 181
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a failover cluster named Cluster1 that hosts an application named App1. The General tab in App1 Properties is shown in the General exhibit: Preferred Owners lists Server1 and Server2, both unchecked, with the Up/Down reordering controls disabled; Priority is Medium; the role is Running on Server2. The Failover tab in App1 Properties is shown in the Failover exhibit: Maximum failures in the specified period is 3, Period (hours) is 6, and Failback is currently set to " Allow failback " / " Immediately. " Server1 shuts down unexpectedly. You need to ensure that when you start Server1, App1 continues to run on Server2. Solution:
From the Failover settings, you select Prevent failback. Does this meet the goal?
App1 Properties - General tab
App1 Properties - Failover tab
正解：B
解説：
The Failover tab currently shows Failback configured to " Allow failback " / " Immediately, " meaning App1 will automatically move back to its most preferred owner (once one is configured) as soon as that node is available again -- which is the opposite of what the requirement calls for once Server1 restarts. Explicitly changing this setting to Prevent failback guarantees that once App1 has failed over to and is running on Server2, it will keep running there and will not automatically move back to Server1 merely because Server1 has restarted and rejoined the cluster. This is the documented, deterministic mechanism in Failover Cluster Manager for controlling failback behavior, and it works regardless of how -- or whether -- preferred owners are configured for the role on the General tab, since Prevent failback overrides any automatic return-to- preferred-owner behavior entirely. Because this setting directly and reliably achieves the stated goal of keeping App1 on Server2 after Server1 comes back online, this solution meets the goal.
質問 # 182
You have an on-premises Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain that syncs with a Microsoft Entra ID tenant. Group writeback is enabled in Microsoft Entra Connect. The AD DS domain contains a server named Server1. Server1 contains a shared folder named share1. You have an Azure Storage account named storage2 that uses Microsoft Entra ID-based access control. The storage2 account contains a share named share2. You need to create a security group that meets the following requirements: can contain users from the AD DS domain; can be used to authorize user access to share1 and share2. What should you do?
正解：C
解説：
Azure Files ' Microsoft Entra ID Kerberos authentication for a storage account share currently requires that the security group placed on the share ' s access control list be a Microsoft Entra security group with assigned membership; groups with dynamic membership rules are not supported for this purpose, and a Microsoft 365 group is a different kind of object that is likewise not a supported security principal for this access-control scenario. Creating the group in the Microsoft Entra tenant as a standard security group with assigned membership therefore satisfies the share2 requirement directly. Because Group writeback is already enabled in Microsoft Entra Connect, a cloud-created Microsoft Entra security group (with assigned, not dynamic, membership - writeback also does not support dynamic groups) is written back down into the on-premises AD DS domain as a corresponding group object, which is what allows it to be used in an NTFS or share permission entry on share1 and to contain (or be evaluated against) users whose accounts live in the on- premises AD DS domain. Creating the group directly in the on-premises AD DS domain (option A) would satisfy share1 but would not automatically exist as a Microsoft Entra security group usable for storage2 ' s Entra-ID-based access control unless synced up, which is not how writeback operates (writeback is one- directional, cloud to on-premises). Creating the group in the Entra tenant with assigned membership is therefore the single action that satisfies both requirements.
質問 # 183
Your network contains an on-premises Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest named contoso.
com. The forest contains three domain controllers that have the DNS Server role installed and host an Active Directory-integrated zone for contoso.com. The DNS servers use existing forwarders for internet name resolution. You have a partner company that owns a DNS namespace named fabrikam.com and provides DNS servers at IP addresses 172.16.10.10 and 172.16.10.11 over a Site-to-Site (S2S) VPN. You need to configure the DNS servers in the contoso.com forest. The solution must meet the following requirements: - Send queries for fabrikam.com to the partner company ' s DNS servers. - Continue to use the existing forwarders for other external namespaces. - Apply the configuration to all the current and future DNS servers on the domain controllers in contoso.com. What should you do?
正解：B
解説：
A conditional forwarder routes queries for one specific namespace, here fabrikam.com, to designated DNS servers, leaving the server ' s regular forwarders configuration untouched for every other external name, so it satisfies both the namespace-specific redirection requirement and the requirement to keep using the existing forwarders for all other external lookups; a plain (unconditional) forwarders change would instead redirect every external query, breaking general internet resolution. The requirement to apply the configuration to all current and future DNS servers on the domain controllers in contoso.com is the deciding factor between the two kinds of conditional forwarders: an Active Directory-integrated conditional forwarder is stored in and replicated through an AD DS application directory partition, so creating it once causes it to automatically propagate to every DNS server hosted on a domain controller in the forest today and to any new DNS server promoted later, with no additional configuration step required. A locally stored conditional forwarder exists only in that one server ' s own configuration and must be manually recreated on every other DNS server, and again on any future DNS server, failing the ' future DNS servers ' requirement. Root hints only govern the fallback used when no forwarder answers, are not scoped to a specific namespace, and would not deterministically send fabrikam.com queries to the partner ' s servers over the S2S VPN.
質問 # 184
Your network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain. The domain contains a server named DHCP1 that runs Windows Server and has the DHCP Server role installed. DHCP1 has a static IPv4 address of 10.10.10.5/24.
DHCP1 is authorized in AD DS and contains an active scope for the 10.10.20.0/24 subnet.
Client computers on the 10.10.20.0/24 subnet receive APIPA addresses. You verify that the DHCP Server service is running and that the scope has available IP addresses.
You need to ensure that the computers on 10.10.20.0/24 can obtain IPv4 address leases from DHCP1.
What should you do?
正解：B
解説：
DHCP clients initially transmit DHCPDISCOVER messages as broadcasts. Because DHCP1 is on 10.10.10.0
/24 while the affected clients are on 10.10.20.0/24, those broadcasts do not normally cross the router separating the subnets. A DHCP relay agent receives the local broadcast and forwards the request to DHCP1 as routable traffic, while supplying information that enables DHCP1 to select the correct 10.10.20.0/24 scope.
The server is already authorized, the DHCP service is running, and the scope is active with free addresses, so neither reauthorization nor scope modification addresses the actual problem. An exclusion would reduce the available address pool rather than restore connectivity. Microsoft documents DHCP relay specifically for forwarding DHCP messages between clients and DHCP servers located on different subnets. Microsoft Learn
質問 # 185
......
Fast2testのMicrosoftのAZ-802試験問題資料は質が良くて値段が安い製品です。我々は低い価格と高品質の模擬問題で受験生の皆様に捧げています。我々は心からあなたが首尾よく試験に合格することを願っています。あなたに便利なオンラインサービスを提供して、Microsoft AZ-802試験問題についての全ての質問を解決して差し上げます。
AZ-802日本語練習問題: https://jp.fast2test.com/AZ-802-premium-file.html