AZ-802최신업데이트시험대비자료, AZ-802 100%시험패스자료

Microsoft인증 AZ-802시험을 패스하는 지름길은Itcertkr에서 연구제작한 Microsoft 인증AZ-802시험대비 덤프를 마련하여 충분한 시험준비를 하는것입니다. 덤프는 Microsoft 인증AZ-802시험의 모든 범위가 포함되어 있어 시험적중율이 높습니다. Microsoft 인증AZ-802시험패는 바로 눈앞에 있습니다. 링크를 클릭하시고Itcertkr의Microsoft 인증AZ-802시험대비 덤프를 장바구니에 담고 결제마친후 덤프를 받아 공부하는것입니다.

Microsoft AZ-802 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SectionWeightObjectives
Deploy and manage Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) in on-premises and cloud environments20%- Integrate AD DS with Azure AD and Azure Arc
- Manage FSMO roles and replication
- Implement and manage Group Policy Objects
- Install and configure domain controllers
Manage storage and file services15%- Configure file servers and shares
- Implement Storage Spaces and Storage Spaces Direct
- Configure data deduplication and replication
- Integrate on-premises storage with Azure Storage
Implement high availability and disaster recovery5%- Monitor and troubleshoot Windows Server environments
- Use Azure Site Recovery for hybrid workloads
- Configure failover clustering
- Perform server and workload migrations
- Implement backup and recovery solutions
Manage virtual machines and containers15%- Configure Azure Arc-enabled servers and VMs
- Deploy and manage containers and Kubernetes on Windows Server
- Deploy and manage Hyper-V virtual machines
Manage Windows Servers and workloads in a hybrid environment20%- Configure remote management and secure administration
- Manage updates and patches across hybrid servers
- Deploy servers using Windows Admin Center and Azure Arc
- Implement hybrid identity solutions
Implement and manage an on-premises and hybrid networking infrastructure15%- Secure network traffic in hybrid environments
- Configure IP addressing, DNS, and DHCP
- Implement hybrid network connectivity
- Configure software-defined networking
Secure Windows Server on-premises and hybrid infrastructures10%- Manage access control and permissions
- Configure Windows Defender and audit policies
- Implement security baselines and hardening

>> AZ-802최신 업데이트 시험대비자료 <<

AZ-802 100%시험패스 자료, AZ-802시험대비 덤프자료

만약 아직도Microsoft AZ-802시험패스를 위하여 고군분투하고 있다면 바로 우리 Itcertkr를 선택함으로 여러분의 고민을 날려버릴 수 잇습니다, 우리 Itcertkr에서는 최고의 최신의 덤프자료를 제공 합으로 여러분을 도와Microsoft AZ-802인증자격증을 쉽게 취득할 수 있게 해드립니다. 만약Microsoft AZ-802인증시험으로 한층 업그레이드된 자신을 만나고 싶다면 우리Itcertkr선택을 후회하지 않을 것입니다, 우리Itcertkr과의 만남으로 여러분은 한번에 아주 간편하게Microsoft AZ-802시험을 패스하실 수 있으며,Microsoft AZ-802자격증으로 완벽한 스펙을 쌓으실 수 있습니다,

최신 Microsoft Certified: Windows Server Hybrid Administrator Associate AZ-802 무료샘플문제 (Q213-Q218):

질문 # 213
You have a file server named Server1 that runs Windows Server and contains the volumes shown in the following table. On which volumes can you use BitLocker Drive Encryption (BitLocker), and on which volumes can you use disk quotas? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Volumes on Server1

정답:

설명:

Explanation:
BitLocker: C, D, and E. Disk quotas: C and D only.
Server1 has three volumes: C and D are formatted NTFS, and E is formatted ReFS. BitLocker Drive Encryption supports encrypting NTFS, FAT16/32, exFAT, and ReFS volumes, so it can be enabled on all three volumes regardless of whether they use NTFS or ReFS; there is no BitLocker restriction that excludes ReFS. Disk quotas, by contrast, are an NTFS-specific feature built into the NTFS file system driver to track and limit per-user storage consumption on a volume; ReFS does not implement the same per-user quota tracking mechanism that classic NTFS disk quotas rely on, so disk quotas cannot be configured on volume E.
Because C and D are both NTFS, disk quotas can be enabled on both of them. It is a common point of confusion to assume that any feature available on NTFS is automatically available on ReFS, or vice versa, since both are modern Microsoft-supported file systems, but they diverge specifically on this legacy per-user quota capability. Therefore, BitLocker applies to C, D, and E, while disk quotas apply only to C and D.


질문 # 214
You have an on-premises server named Server1 and Microsoft Sentinel instance.
You plan to collect windows Defender Firewall events from Sever1 and analyze the event data by using Microsoft Sentinel.
What should you install on Server1, and which information should you provide during the instance? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

정답:

설명:

Explanation:
Install: The Azure Monitor agent. Provide: The Azure Log Analytics workspace ID and the workspace key.
Collecting Windows Firewall events from an on-premises server into Microsoft Sentinel is done through the Windows Firewall Events via AMA data connector, which relies on the Azure Monitor agent together with an associated data collection rule to actually gather and forward the firewall event log entries; the Azure Log Analytics gateway is only a proxy relay used by the legacy Log Analytics agent, and the Microsoft Azure Recovery Services (MARS) agent is entirely unrelated to event forwarding, since it exists purely for Azure Backup scenarios. When enrolling a server that is neither Azure-hosted nor already Arc-onboarded, the Azure Monitor agent ' s setup process needs the destination Log Analytics workspace ' s ID and its workspace, or primary, key so the installer knows which specific workspace to report collected data to and can authenticate itself to that workspace, which is the same credential pairing Microsoft documents across both its Azure Monitor agent and legacy Microsoft Monitoring Agent onboarding flows for standalone, non-Azure servers.
A storage account name and access key, a subscription ID paired with the Sentinel workspace ' s name, or a set of Azure AD credentials play no role whatsoever in pointing an on-premises monitoring agent at a specific Log Analytics workspace during installation.


질문 # 215
DC1 fails.
You need to meet the technical requirements for the schema master.
Yourunntdsutil.exe.
Which five commands should you run in sequence? To answer, move the appropriate commands from the list of commands to the answer area and arrange them in the correct order?

정답:

설명:

Explanation:
1. roles 2. connections 3. connect to server dc2.adatum.com 4. quit 5. seize schema master Because DC1 has failed and cannot gracefully transfer the schema master role, DC2 must forcibly seize it using ntdsutil.exe. From the initial ntdsutil prompt, the first command is roles, which enters the Role Management submenu where FSMO role transfers and seizures are performed. From within that submenu, the command connections opens the Connections submenu, which is required before you can bind ntdsutil to a specific target domain controller. Inside the Connections submenu, connect to server dc2.adatum.com establishes the bind to DC2, the domain controller that will actually take over the schema master role. The quit command then exits the Connections submenu and returns to the Role Management submenu while keeping the established connection to DC2 active. Finally, seize schema master, executed from the Role Management submenu while bound to DC2, forces DC2 to take ownership of the schema master role even though DC1 (the previous holder) is offline and cannot be contacted to confirm the transfer. The unused command in the list, metadata cleanup, is a separate, later step used to remove the failed DC1 ' s leftover directory metadata once its roles have been reassigned; it is not part of seizing the schema master role itself, so it is correctly left out of this five-step sequence.
Topic 4, Case Study 4: Fabrikam, Inc.
This is a case study. Case studies are not timed separately. You can use as much exam time as you would like to complete each case. However, there may be additional case studies and sections on this exam. You must manage your time to ensure that you are able to complete all questions included on this exam in the time provided.
To answer the questions included in a case study, you will need to reference information that is provided in the case study. Case studies might contain exhibits and other resources that provide more information about the scenario that is described in the case study. Each question is independent of the other questions in this case study.
Overview: Fabrikam, Inc. is a manufacturing company that has a main office in Chicago and a branch office in Paris.
Existing Environment -- Identity Infrastructure: Fabrikam has an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest that syncs with a Microsoft Entra ID tenant. The AD DS forest contains two domains named corp.
fabrikam.com and europe.fabrikam.com.
Chicago Office On-Premises Servers: The office in Chicago contains on-premises servers that run Windows Server 2016 as shown in the following table.

Chicago office on-premises servers
All the servers in the Chicago office are in the corp.fabrikam.com domain.
All the virtual machines in the Chicago office are hosted on HV1 and HV2. HV1 and HV2 are nodes in a failover cluster named Cluster1.
WEB1 and WEB2 run an Internet Information Services (IIS) website. Internet users connect to the website by using a URL of https://www.fabrikam.com.
All the users in the Chicago office run an application that connects to a UNC path of \\Fileserver1\Data.
Paris On-Premises Servers: The office in Paris contains a physical server named dc2.europe.fabrikam.com that runs Windows Server 2016 and is a domain controller for the europe.fabrikam.com domain.
Network Infrastructure: The networks in both the Chicago and Paris offices have local internet connections.
The Chicago and Paris offices are connected by using VPN connections. The client computers in the Chicago office get IP addresses from DHCP1.
Security Risks: Fabrikam identifies the following security risks:
-- Some accounts connect to AD DS resources by using insecure protocols such as NTLMv1, SMB1, and unsigned LDAP.
-- Servers have Windows Defender Firewall enabled. Server administrators sometimes modify firewall rules and allow risky connections.
Requirements -- Security Requirements: Fabrikam identifies the following security requirements:
-- Prevent server administrators from configuring Windows Defender Firewall rules.
-- Encrypt all the data disks on the servers by using BitLocker Drive Encryption (BitLocker).
-- Ensure that only authorized applications can be installed or run on the servers in the forest.
-- Implement Microsoft Sentinel as a reporting solution to identify all connections to the domain controllers that use insecure protocols.
On-Premises Migration Plan: Fabrikam plans to migrate all the existing servers and identifies the following migration requirements:
-- Move the APP1 and APP2 virtual machines in the Chicago office to a new Hyper-V failover cluster named Cluster2 that will run Windows Server 2022. Cluster2 will contain two new nodes named HV3 and HV4. All virtual machine files will be stored on a Cluster Shared Volume (CSV).
-- Migrate Archive1 to a new failover cluster named Cluster3 that will run Windows Server 2022. Cluster3 will contain two physical nodes named Node1 and Node2. The file shares on Cluster3 will be a failover cluster role in active-passive mode.
-- Migrate all users, groups, and client computers from europe.fabrikam.com to corp.fabrikam.com. User accounts will retain their existing password.
-- Migrate the data share from Fileserver1 to a new server named Fileserver2 that will run Windows Server
2022. After the migration, the data share must be accessible by using the existing UNC path.
Azure Migration Plan: Fabrikam plans to migrate some resources to Azure and identifies the following migration requirements:
-- Create an Azure subscription named Sub1 and an Azure virtual network named Vnet1. Use ExpressRoute to connect the Paris and Chicago offices to Vnet1.
-- License all servers for Microsoft Defender for Servers.
-- Migrate APP3 and APP4 to Azure.
-- Migrate the www.fabrikam.com website to an Azure App Service web app named WebApp1, then decommission WEB1 and WEB2.
DHCP Migration Plan: Fabrikam plans to replace DHCP1 with a new server named DHCP2 and identifies the following migration requirements:
-- Ensure that DHCP2 provides the same IP addresses that are currently available from DHCP1.
-- Prevent DHCP1 from servicing clients once services are enabled on DHCP2.
-- Ensure that the existing leases and reservations are migrated.


질문 # 216
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have an on-premises server named Server1 that runs Windows Server. You have a Microsoft Sentinel instance. You add the Windows Firewall data connector in Microsoft Sentinel. You need to ensure that Microsoft Sentinel can collect Windows Firewall logs from Server1. Solution: You install the Azure Connected Machine agent on Server1. Does this meet the goal?

정답:B

설명:
For any non-Azure machine, whether on-premises or hosted in another cloud, to be used as a source for an Azure Monitor Agent-based Microsoft Sentinel data connector such as the Windows Firewall connector, the machine must first be onboarded to Azure Arc as a connected machine. Installing the Azure Connected Machine agent on Server1 is precisely the action that performs this onboarding: it registers Server1 as an Azure Arc-enabled server, giving it an Azure resource identity that can then have extensions such as the Azure Monitor Agent deployed to it and associated with a data collection rule. This Azure Arc onboarding is the documented prerequisite step described in Microsoft ' s guidance for connecting Windows-based, non- Azure servers to Sentinel ' s AMA-based data connectors, and once Server1 is Arc-enabled, the Azure Monitor Agent extension and a data collection rule targeting the Windows Firewall log source can be deployed to it to complete the log collection pipeline. Because installing the Azure Connected Machine agent is exactly the required first step for enabling this scenario, this solution meets the goal.


질문 # 217
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. You are planning the deployment of DNS to a new network. You have three internal DNS servers as shown in the following exhibit (Server1/Montreal/10.
0.1.10/contoso.local, Server2/Toronto/10.0.2.10/east.contoso.local, Server3/Seattle/10.0.3.10/west.contoso.
local). The contoso.local zone contains zone delegations for east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local. All the DNS servers use root hints. You need to ensure that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces and internet hosts. Solution: On Server2, you create a conditional forwarder for west.
contoso.local. On Server3, you create a conditional forwarder for east.contoso.local. Does this meet the goal?

Server1 (Montreal, 10.0.1.10, contoso.local) / Server2 (Toronto, 10.0.2.10, east.contoso.local) / Server3 (Seattle, 10.0.3.10, west.contoso.local); contoso.local delegates east.contoso.local and west.contoso.local.

정답:B

설명:
This solution lets Server2 reach the sibling zone west.contoso.local (by forwarding to Server3) and lets Server3 reach the sibling zone east.contoso.local (by forwarding to Server2), but it never gives either server a way to resolve the parent zone, contoso.local, which is hosted only on Server1. Neither Server2 nor Server3 is configured with any forwarder, conditional or otherwise, that targets contoso.local or points at Server1 at all, so any query for a name that lives directly in the parent zone (as opposed to one of the two delegated child zones) has no resolution path from either server. Root hints, which both servers already use, only provide internet resolution and have no knowledge of the internal, non-public contoso.local namespace. Because the stated goal explicitly requires that all the DNS servers can resolve the names of all the internal namespaces - which includes the parent zone contoso.local, not just the two child zones - and this solution leaves that zone completely unreachable from Server2 and Server3, the solution does not meet the goal. A complete solution would need to additionally forward to Server1 for the contoso.local namespace itself.


질문 # 218
......

고객님의 시간을 조금이라도 절약해드리고 공을 적게 들여도 자격증 취득이 쉬워지도록 Itcertkr의 IT전문가들은 최신 실러버스에 따라 몇년간의 노하우와 경험을 충분히 활용하여Microsoft AZ-802시험대비자료를 연구제작하였습니다. Microsoft AZ-802 덤프를 공부하여 시험에서 떨어지는 경우 덤프비용환불 혹은 다른 과목으로 교환하는중 한가지 서비스를 제공해드립니다.

AZ-802 100%시험패스 자료: https://www.itcertkr.com/AZ-802_exam.html